General practitioners’ and women’s experiences of perimenopause consultations: A qualitative evidence synthesis protocol

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

Background Perimenopause precedes menopause and can cause a myriad of symptoms for women. General practitioners (GPs) are frequently the first contact for perimenopausal women with symptoms. However, women express feeling dissatisfied with the consultations they have with their GPs for perimenopausal symptoms. Moreover, diagnostic difficulties can make these consultations challenging for GPs. Despite these challenges, research to date has focused on menopause, not the transition to menopause. To date, no evidence synthesis has examined how women experience perimenopause consultations, nor how GPs experience providing care to these women. Objective To systematically search, collate, and appraise the qualitative literature to understand general practitioners' and women's experiences of perimenopause consultations and examine how treatment decisions are made during consultations. Methods A meta-ethnography will be conducted following Sattar et al. (2021) guidelines for conducting a meta-ethnography as developed by Noblit and Hare (1988). Seven databases will be systematically searched. To be included, studies must report on the experiences of either general practitioners and/or perimenopausal women and published since 2014 to capture the most up-to-date evidence. Quality assessment will be conducted using CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme) tools. A GRADE-CERqual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) will be conducted to assess the confidence of the findings. PROSPERO registration number CRD42024520537. Discussion Findings will provide new and useful insight into how GPs and women experience consultations for perimenopause and how decisions are made during these consultations.
Full text 147,901 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
General practitioners’ and... | HRB Open Research dataLayer = dataLayer || []; // Standard GTM initialization - Google Consent Mode handles consent automatically (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start': new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0], j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src= 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl+ '>m_auth=hzk0Vc3qFsQYhCrIoHz68A>m_preview=env-1>m_cookies_win=x';f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f); })(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-MWFK8L5J'); ;window.NREUM||(NREUM={});NREUM.init={distributed_tracing:{enabled:true},privacy:{cookies_enabled:true},ajax:{deny_list:["bam.nr-data.net"]}}; ;NREUM.loader_config={accountID:"438030",trustKey:"438030",agentID:"772317073",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073"} ;NREUM.info={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073",sa:1} ;/*! For license information please see nr-loader-spa-1.236.0.min.js.LICENSE.txt */ (()=>{"use strict";var e,t,r={5763:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P_:()=>l,Mt:()=>g,C5:()=>s,DL:()=>v,OP:()=>T,lF:()=>D,Yu:()=>y,Dg:()=>h,CX:()=>c,GE:()=>b,sU:()=>_});var n=r(8632),i=r(9567);const o={beacon:n.ce.beacon,errorBeacon:n.ce.errorBeacon,licenseKey:void 0,applicationID:void 0,sa:void 0,queueTime:void 0,applicationTime:void 0,ttGuid:void 0,user:void 0,account:void 0,product:void 0,extra:void 0,jsAttributes:{},userAttributes:void 0,atts:void 0,transactionName:void 0,tNamePlain:void 0},a={};function s(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");if(!a[e])throw new Error("Info for ".concat(e," was never set"));return a[e]}function c(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");a[e]=(0,i.D)(t,o),(0,n.Qy)(e,a[e],"info")}var u=r(7056);const d=()=>{const e={blockSelector:"[data-nr-block]",maskInputOptions:{password:!0}};return{allow_bfcache:!0,privacy:{cookies_enabled:!0},ajax:{deny_list:void 0,enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},distributed_tracing:{enabled:void 0,exclude_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_tracecontext_headers:void 0,allowed_origins:void 0},session:{domain:void 0,expiresMs:u.oD,inactiveMs:u.Hb},ssl:void 0,obfuscate:void 0,jserrors:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},metrics:{enabled:!0},page_action:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30},page_view_event:{enabled:!0},page_view_timing:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30,long_task:!1},session_trace:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},harvest:{tooManyRequestsDelay:60},session_replay:{enabled:!1,harvestTimeSeconds:60,sampleRate:.1,errorSampleRate:.1,maskTextSelector:"*",maskAllInputs:!0,get blockClass(){return"nr-block"},get ignoreClass(){return"nr-ignore"},get maskTextClass(){return"nr-mask"},get blockSelector(){return e.blockSelector},set blockSelector(t){e.blockSelector+=",".concat(t)},get maskInputOptions(){return e.maskInputOptions},set maskInputOptions(t){e.maskInputOptions={...t,password:!0}}},spa:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10}}},f={};function l(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");if(!f[e])throw new Error("Configuration for ".concat(e," was never set"));return f[e]}function h(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");f[e]=(0,i.D)(t,d()),(0,n.Qy)(e,f[e],"config")}function g(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");var r=l(e);if(r){for(var n=t.split("."),i=0;i {r.d(t,{D:()=>i});var n=r(50);function i(e,t){try{if(!e||"object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires an object as input");if(!t||"object"!=typeof t)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires a model to set its initial properties");const r=Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(t),Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)),o=0===Object.keys(r).length?e:r;for(let a in o)if(void 0!==e[a])try{"object"==typeof e[a]&&"object"==typeof t[a]?r[a]=i(e[a],t[a]):r[a]=e[a]}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occurred while setting a property of a Configurable",e)}return r}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting a Configurable",e)}}},6818:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Re:()=>i,gF:()=>o,q4:()=>n});const n="1.236.0",i="PROD",o="CDN"},385:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{FN:()=>a,IF:()=>u,Nk:()=>f,Tt:()=>s,_A:()=>o,il:()=>n,pL:()=>c,v6:()=>i,w1:()=>d});const n="undefined"!=typeof window&&!!window.document,i="undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator),o=n?window:"undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis),a=""+o?.location,s=/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(navigator.userAgent),c=s&&"undefined"==typeof SharedWorker,u=(()=>{const e=navigator.userAgent.match(/Firefox[/\s](\d+\.\d+)/);return Array.isArray(e)&&e.length>=2?+e[1]:0})(),d=Boolean(n&&window.document.documentMode),f=!!navigator.sendBeacon},1117:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{w:()=>o});var n=r(50);const i={agentIdentifier:"",ee:void 0};class o{constructor(e){try{if("object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("shared context requires an object as input");this.sharedContext={},Object.assign(this.sharedContext,i),Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,r]=e;Object.keys(i).includes(t)&&(this.sharedContext[t]=r)}))}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting SharedContext",e)}}}},8e3:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{L:()=>d,R:()=>c});var n=r(2177),i=r(1284),o=r(4322),a=r(3325);const s={};function c(e,t){const r={staged:!1,priority:a.p[t]||0};u(e),s[e].get(t)||s[e].set(t,r)}function u(e){e&&(s[e]||(s[e]=new Map))}function d(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:"",t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:"feature";if(u(e),!e||!s[e].get(t))return a(t);s[e].get(t).staged=!0;const r=[...s[e]];function a(t){const r=e?n.ee.get(e):n.ee,a=o.X.handlers;if(r.backlog&&a){var s=r.backlog[t],c=a[t];if(c){for(var u=0;s&&u {let[t,r]=e;return r.staged}))&&(r.sort(((e,t)=>e[1].priority-t[1].priority)),r.forEach((e=>{let[t]=e;a(t)})))}function f(e,t){var r=e[1];(0,i.D)(t[r],(function(t,r){var n=e[0];if(r[0]===n){var i=r[1],o=e[3],a=e[2];i.apply(o,a)}}))}},2177:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{c:()=>f,ee:()=>u});var n=r(8632),i=r(2210),o=r(1284),a=r(5763),s="nr@context";let c=(0,n.fP)();var u;function d(){}function f(e){return(0,i.X)(e,s,l)}function l(){return new d}function h(){u.aborted=!0,u.backlog={}}c.ee?u=c.ee:(u=function e(t,r){var n={},c={},f={},g=!1;try{g=16===r.length&&(0,a.OP)(r).isolatedBacklog}catch(e){}var p={on:b,addEventListener:b,removeEventListener:y,emit:v,get:x,listeners:w,context:m,buffer:A,abort:h,aborted:!1,isBuffering:E,debugId:r,backlog:g?{}:t&&"object"==typeof t.backlog?t.backlog:{}};return p;function m(e){return e&&e instanceof d?e:e?(0,i.X)(e,s,l):l()}function v(e,r,n,i,o){if(!1!==o&&(o=!0),!u.aborted||i){t&&o&&t.emit(e,r,n);for(var a=m(n),s=w(e),d=s.length,f=0;fn,p:()=>i});var n=r(2177).ee.get("handle");function i(e,t,r,i,o){o?(o.buffer([e],i),o.emit(e,t,r)):(n.buffer([e],i),n.emit(e,t,r))}},4322:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>o});var n=r(5546);o.on=a;var i=o.handlers={};function o(e,t,r,o){a(o||n.E,i,e,t,r)}function a(e,t,r,i,o){o||(o="feature"),e||(e=n.E);var a=t[o]=t[o]||{};(a[r]=a[r]||[]).push([e,i])}},3239:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{bP:()=>s,iz:()=>c,m$:()=>a});var n=r(385);let i=!1,o=!1;try{const e={get passive(){return i=!0,!1},get signal(){return o=!0,!1}};n._A.addEventListener("test",null,e),n._A.removeEventListener("test",null,e)}catch(e){}function a(e,t){return i||o?{capture:!!e,passive:i,signal:t}:!!e}function s(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;window.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}function c(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;document.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}},4402:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Ht:()=>u,M:()=>c,Rl:()=>a,ky:()=>s});var n=r(385);const i="xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx";function o(e,t){return e?15&e[t]:16*Math.random()|0}function a(){const e=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let t,r=0;return e&&e.getRandomValues&&(t=e.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31))),i.split("").map((e=>"x"===e?o(t,++r).toString(16):"y"===e?(3&o()|8).toString(16):e)).join("")}function s(e){const t=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let r,i=0;t&&t.getRandomValues&&(r=t.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31)));const a=[];for(var s=0;s {r.d(t,{Bq:()=>n,Hb:()=>o,oD:()=>i});const n="NRBA",i=144e5,o=18e5},7894:(e,t,r)=>{function n(){return Math.round(performance.now())}r.d(t,{z:()=>n})},7243:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{e:()=>o});var n=r(385),i={};function o(e){if(e in i)return i[e];if(0===(e||"").indexOf("data:"))return{protocol:"data"};let t;var r=n._A?.location,o={};if(n.il)t=document.createElement("a"),t.href=e;else try{t=new URL(e,r.href)}catch(e){return o}o.port=t.port;var a=t.href.split("://");!o.port&&a[1]&&(o.port=a[1].split("/")[0].split("@").pop().split(":")[1]),o.port&&"0"!==o.port||(o.port="https"===a[0]?"443":"80"),o.hostname=t.hostname||r.hostname,o.pathname=t.pathname,o.protocol=a[0],"/"!==o.pathname.charAt(0)&&(o.pathname="/"+o.pathname);var s=!t.protocol||":"===t.protocol||t.protocol===r.protocol,c=t.hostname===r.hostname&&t.port===r.port;return o.sameOrigin=s&&(!t.hostname||c),"/"===o.pathname&&(i[e]=o),o}},50:(e,t,r)=>{function n(e,t){"function"==typeof console.warn&&(console.warn("New Relic: ".concat(e)),t&&console.warn(t))}r.d(t,{Z:()=>n})},2587:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>c,T:()=>u});var n=r(2177),i=r(5546),o=r(8e3),a=r(3325);const s={stn:[a.D.sessionTrace],err:[a.D.jserrors,a.D.metrics],ins:[a.D.pageAction],spa:[a.D.spa],sr:[a.D.sessionReplay,a.D.sessionTrace]};function c(e,t){const r=n.ee.get(t);e&&"object"==typeof e&&(Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,n]=e;void 0===u[t]&&(s[t]?s[t].forEach((e=>{n?(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,e,r):(0,i.p)("block-"+t,[],void 0,e,r),(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+t,[Boolean(n)],void 0,e,r)})):n&&(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,void 0,r),u[t]=Boolean(n))})),Object.keys(s).forEach((e=>{void 0===u[e]&&(s[e]?.forEach((t=>(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+e,[!1],void 0,t,r))),u[e]=!1)})),(0,o.L)(t,a.D.pageViewEvent))}const u={}},2210:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>i});var n=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty;function i(e,t,r){if(n.call(e,t))return e[t];var i=r();if(Object.defineProperty&&Object.keys)try{return Object.defineProperty(e,t,{value:i,writable:!0,enumerable:!1}),i}catch(e){}return e[t]=i,i}},1284:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n});const n=(e,t)=>Object.entries(e||{}).map((e=>{let[r,n]=e;return t(r,n)}))},4351:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P:()=>o});var n=r(2177);const i=()=>{const e=new WeakSet;return(t,r)=>{if("object"==typeof r&&null!==r){if(e.has(r))return;e.add(r)}return r}};function o(e){try{return JSON.stringify(e,i())}catch(e){try{n.ee.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}}},3960:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{K:()=>a,b:()=>o});var n=r(3239);function i(){return"undefined"==typeof document||"complete"===document.readyState}function o(e,t){if(i())return e();(0,n.bP)("load",e,t)}function a(e){if(i())return e();(0,n.iz)("DOMContentLoaded",e)}},8632:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{EZ:()=>u,Qy:()=>c,ce:()=>o,fP:()=>a,gG:()=>d,mF:()=>s});var n=r(7894),i=r(385);const o={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net"};function a(){return i._A.NREUM||(i._A.NREUM={}),void 0===i._A.newrelic&&(i._A.newrelic=i._A.NREUM),i._A.NREUM}function s(){let e=a();return e.o||(e.o={ST:i._A.setTimeout,SI:i._A.setImmediate,CT:i._A.clearTimeout,XHR:i._A.XMLHttpRequest,REQ:i._A.Request,EV:i._A.Event,PR:i._A.Promise,MO:i._A.MutationObserver,FETCH:i._A.fetch}),e}function c(e,t,r){let i=a();const o=i.initializedAgents||{},s=o[e]||{};return Object.keys(s).length||(s.initializedAt={ms:(0,n.z)(),date:new Date}),i.initializedAgents={...o,[e]:{...s,[r]:t}},i}function u(e,t){a()[e]=t}function d(){return function(){let e=a();const t=e.info||{};e.info={beacon:o.beacon,errorBeacon:o.errorBeacon,...t}}(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.init||{};e.init={...t}}(),s(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.loader_config||{};e.loader_config={...t}}(),a()}},7956:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>i});var n=r(3239);function i(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1],r=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,i=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;return void(0,n.iz)("visibilitychange",(function(){if(t)return void("hidden"==document.visibilityState&&e());e(document.visibilityState)}),r,i)}},1214:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{em:()=>v,u5:()=>N,QU:()=>S,_L:()=>I,Gm:()=>L,Lg:()=>M,gy:()=>U,BV:()=>Q,Kf:()=>ee});var n=r(2177);const i="nr@original";var o=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,a=!1;function s(e,t){return e||(e=n.ee),r.inPlace=function(e,t,n,i,o){n||(n="");var a,s,c,u="-"===n.charAt(0);for(c=0;c 2?n-2:0),o=2;o {r(A[T],e,w),r(E[T],e,w)})),r(l._A,"fetch",y),t.on(y+"end",(function(e,r){var n=this;if(r){var i=r.headers.get("content-length");null!==i&&(n.rxSize=i),t.emit(y+"done",[null,r],n)}else t.emit(y+"done",[e],n)})),t}const O={},j=["pushState","replaceState"];function S(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("history")}(e);return!l.il||O[t.debugId]++||(O[t.debugId]=1,s(t).inPlace(window.history,j,"-")),t}var P=r(3239);const C={},R=["appendChild","insertBefore","replaceChild"];function I(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("jsonp")}(e);if(!l.il||C[t.debugId])return t;C[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=/[?&](?:callback|cb)=([^&#]+)/,o=/(.*)\.([^.]+)/,a=/^(\w+)(\.|$)(.*)$/;function c(e,t){var r=e.match(a),n=r[1],i=r[3];return i?c(i,t[n]):t[n]}return r.inPlace(Node.prototype,R,"dom-"),t.on("dom-start",(function(e){!function(e){if(!e||"string"!=typeof e.nodeName||"script"!==e.nodeName.toLowerCase())return;if("function"!=typeof e.addEventListener)return;var n=(a=e.src,s=a.match(i),s?s[1]:null);var a,s;if(!n)return;var u=function(e){var t=e.match(o);if(t&&t.length>=3)return{key:t[2],parent:c(t[1],window)};return{key:e,parent:window}}(n);if("function"!=typeof u.parent[u.key])return;var d={};function f(){t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}function l(){t.emit("jsonp-error",[],d),t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}r.inPlace(u.parent,[u.key],"cb-",d),e.addEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.addEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1)),t.emit("new-jsonp",[e.src],d)}(e[0])})),t}var k=r(5763);const H={};function L(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("mutation")}(e);if(!l.il||H[t.debugId])return t;H[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=k.Yu.MO;return i&&(window.MutationObserver=function(e){return this instanceof i?new i(r(e,"fn-")):i.apply(this,arguments)},MutationObserver.prototype=i.prototype),t}const z={};function M(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("promise")}(e);if(z[t.debugId])return t;z[t.debugId]=!0;var r=n.c,o=s(t),a=k.Yu.PR;return a&&function(){function e(r){var n=t.context(),i=o(r,"executor-",n,null,!1);const s=Reflect.construct(a,[i],e);return t.context(s).getCtx=function(){return n},s}l._A.Promise=e,Object.defineProperty(e,"name",{value:"Promise"}),e.toString=function(){return a.toString()},Object.setPrototypeOf(e,a),["all","race"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){let i=!1;[...e||[]].forEach((e=>{this.resolve(e).then(a("all"===r),a(!1))}));const o=n.apply(this,arguments);return o;function a(e){return function(){t.emit("propagate",[null,!i],o,!1,!1),i=i||!e}}}})),["resolve","reject"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){const r=n.apply(this,arguments);return e!==r&&t.emit("propagate",[e,!0],r,!1,!1),r}})),e.prototype=a.prototype;const n=a.prototype.then;a.prototype.then=function(){var e=this,i=r(e);i.promise=e;for(var a=arguments.length,s=new Array(a),c=0;c e())),t};function m(e,t){i.inPlace(t,["onreadystatechange"],"fn-",E)}function b(){var e=this,t=r.context(e);e.readyState>3&&!t.resolved&&(t.resolved=!0,r.emit("xhr-resolved",[],e)),i.inPlace(e,f,"fn-",E)}if(function(e,t){for(var r in e)t[r]=e[r]}(o,p),p.prototype=o.prototype,i.inPlace(p.prototype,J,"-xhr-",E),r.on("send-xhr-start",(function(e,t){m(e,t),function(e){h.push(e),a&&(y?y.then(A):u?u(A):(w=-w,x.data=w))}(t)})),r.on("open-xhr-start",m),a){var y=c&&c.resolve();if(!u&&!c){var w=1,x=document.createTextNode(w);new a(A).observe(x,{characterData:!0})}}else t.on("fn-end",(function(e){e[0]&&e[0].type===d||A()}));function A(){for(var e=0;e {r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.ajax},6660:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{A:()=>i,t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.jserrors,i="nr@seenError"},3081:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{gF:()=>o,mY:()=>i,t9:()=>n,vz:()=>s,xS:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.metrics,i="sm",o="cm",a="storeSupportabilityMetrics",s="storeEventMetrics"},4649:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageAction},7633:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Dz:()=>i,OJ:()=>a,qw:()=>o,t9:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewEvent,i="firstbyte",o="domcontent",a="windowload"},9251:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewTiming},3614:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BST_RESOURCE:()=>i,END:()=>s,FEATURE_NAME:()=>n,FN_END:()=>u,FN_START:()=>c,PUSH_STATE:()=>d,RESOURCE:()=>o,START:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.sessionTrace,i="bstResource",o="resource",a="-start",s="-end",c="fn"+a,u="fn"+s,d="pushState"},7836:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BODY:()=>A,CB_END:()=>E,CB_START:()=>u,END:()=>x,FEATURE_NAME:()=>i,FETCH:()=>_,FETCH_BODY:()=>v,FETCH_DONE:()=>m,FETCH_START:()=>p,FN_END:()=>c,FN_START:()=>s,INTERACTION:()=>l,INTERACTION_API:()=>d,INTERACTION_EVENTS:()=>o,JSONP_END:()=>b,JSONP_NODE:()=>g,JS_TIME:()=>T,MAX_TIMER_BUDGET:()=>a,REMAINING:()=>f,SPA_NODE:()=>h,START:()=>w,originalSetTimeout:()=>y});var n=r(5763);const i=r(3325).D.spa,o=["click","submit","keypress","keydown","keyup","change"],a=999,s="fn-start",c="fn-end",u="cb-start",d="api-ixn-",f="remaining",l="interaction",h="spaNode",g="jsonpNode",p="fetch-start",m="fetch-done",v="fetch-body-",b="jsonp-end",y=n.Yu.ST,w="-start",x="-end",A="-body",E="cb"+x,T="jsTime",_="fetch"},5938:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{W:()=>o});var n=r(5763),i=r(2177);class o{constructor(e,t,r){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.aggregator=t,this.ee=i.ee.get(e,(0,n.OP)(this.agentIdentifier).isolatedBacklog),this.featureName=r,this.blocked=!1}}},9144:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{j:()=>m});var n=r(3325),i=r(5763),o=r(5546),a=r(2177),s=r(7894),c=r(8e3),u=r(3960),d=r(385),f=r(50),l=r(3081),h=r(8632);function g(){const e=(0,h.gG)();["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease","addPageAction","setCurrentRouteName","setPageViewName","setCustomAttribute","interaction","noticeError","setUserId"].forEach((t=>{e[t]=function(){for(var r=arguments.length,n=new Array(r),i=0;i 1?r-1:0),i=1;i {e.exposed&&e.api[t]&&o.push(e.api[t](...n))})),o.length>1?o:o[0]}(t,...n)}}))}var p=r(2587);function m(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:{},m=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,v=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0,{init:b,info:y,loader_config:w,runtime:x={loaderType:m},exposed:A=!0}=t;const E=(0,h.gG)();y||(b=E.init,y=E.info,w=E.loader_config),(0,i.Dg)(e,b||{}),(0,i.GE)(e,w||{}),(0,i.sU)(e,x),y.jsAttributes??={},d.v6&&(y.jsAttributes.isWorker=!0),(0,i.CX)(e,y),g();const T=function(e,t){t||(0,c.R)(e,"api");const h={};var g=a.ee.get(e),p=g.get("tracer"),m="api-",v=m+"ixn-";function b(t,r,n,o){const a=(0,i.C5)(e);return null===r?delete a.jsAttributes[t]:(0,i.CX)(e,{...a,jsAttributes:{...a.jsAttributes,[t]:r}}),x(m,n,!0,o||null===r?"session":void 0)(t,r)}function y(){}["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease"].forEach((e=>h[e]=x(m,e,!0,"api"))),h.addPageAction=x(m,"addPageAction",!0,n.D.pageAction),h.setCurrentRouteName=x(m,"routeName",!0,n.D.spa),h.setPageViewName=function(t,r){if("string"==typeof t)return"/"!==t.charAt(0)&&(t="/"+t),(0,i.OP)(e).customTransaction=(r||"http://custom.transaction")+t,x(m,"setPageViewName",!0)()},h.setCustomAttribute=function(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2];if("string"==typeof e){if(["string","number"].includes(typeof t)||null===t)return b(e,t,"setCustomAttribute",r);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nNon-null value must be a string or number type, but a type of was provided."))}else(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nName must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.setUserId=function(e){if("string"==typeof e||null===e)return b("enduser.id",e,"setUserId",!0);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setUserId.\nNon-null value must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.interaction=function(){return(new y).get()};var w=y.prototype={createTracer:function(e,t){var r={},i=this,a="function"==typeof t;return(0,o.p)(v+"tracer",[(0,s.z)(),e,r],i,n.D.spa,g),function(){if(p.emit((a?"":"no-")+"fn-start",[(0,s.z)(),i,a],r),a)try{return t.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw p.emit("fn-err",[arguments,this,"string"==typeof e?new Error(e):e],r),e}finally{p.emit("fn-end",[(0,s.z)()],r)}}}};function x(e,t,r,i){return function(){return(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/"+t+"/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),i&&(0,o.p)(e+t,[(0,s.z)(),...arguments],r?null:this,i,g),r?void 0:this}}function A(){r.e(439).then(r.bind(r,7438)).then((t=>{let{setAPI:r}=t;r(e),(0,c.L)(e,"api")})).catch((()=>(0,f.Z)("Downloading runtime APIs failed...")))}return["actionText","setName","setAttribute","save","ignore","onEnd","getContext","end","get"].forEach((e=>{w[e]=x(v,e,void 0,n.D.spa)})),h.noticeError=function(e,t){"string"==typeof e&&(e=new Error(e)),(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/noticeError/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),(0,o.p)("err",[e,(0,s.z)(),!1,t],void 0,n.D.jserrors,g)},d.il?(0,u.b)((()=>A()),!0):A(),h}(e,v);return(0,h.Qy)(e,T,"api"),(0,h.Qy)(e,A,"exposed"),(0,h.EZ)("activatedFeatures",p.T),T}},3325:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n,p:()=>i});const n={ajax:"ajax",jserrors:"jserrors",metrics:"metrics",pageAction:"page_action",pageViewEvent:"page_view_event",pageViewTiming:"page_view_timing",sessionReplay:"session_replay",sessionTrace:"session_trace",spa:"spa"},i={[n.pageViewEvent]:1,[n.pageViewTiming]:2,[n.metrics]:3,[n.jserrors]:4,[n.ajax]:5,[n.sessionTrace]:6,[n.pageAction]:7,[n.spa]:8,[n.sessionReplay]:9}}},n={};function i(e){var t=n[e];if(void 0!==t)return t.exports;var o=n[e]={exports:{}};return r[e](o,o.exports,i),o.exports}i.m=r,i.d=(e,t)=>{for(var r in t)i.o(t,r)&&!i.o(e,r)&&Object.defineProperty(e,r,{enumerable:!0,get:t[r]})},i.f={},i.e=e=>Promise.all(Object.keys(i.f).reduce(((t,r)=>(i.f[r](e,t),t)),[])),i.u=e=>(({78:"page_action-aggregate",147:"metrics-aggregate",242:"session-manager",317:"jserrors-aggregate",348:"page_view_timing-aggregate",412:"lazy-feature-loader",439:"async-api",538:"recorder",590:"session_replay-aggregate",675:"compressor",733:"session_trace-aggregate",786:"page_view_event-aggregate",873:"spa-aggregate",898:"ajax-aggregate"}[e]||e)+"."+{78:"ac76d497",147:"3dc53903",148:"1a20d5fe",242:"2a64278a",317:"49e41428",348:"bd6de33a",412:"2f55ce66",439:"30bd804e",538:"1b18459f",590:"cf0efb30",675:"ae9f91a8",733:"83105561",786:"06482edd",860:"03a8b7a5",873:"e6b09d52",898:"998ef92b"}[e]+"-1.236.0.min.js"),i.o=(e,t)=>Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,t),e={},t="NRBA:",i.l=(r,n,o,a)=>{if(e[r])e[r].push(n);else{var s,c;if(void 0!==o)for(var u=document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=0;d {s.onerror=s.onload=null,clearTimeout(h);var i=e[r];if(delete e[r],s.parentNode&&s.parentNode.removeChild(s),i&&i.forEach((e=>e(n))),t)return t(n)},h=setTimeout(l.bind(null,void 0,{type:"timeout",target:s}),12e4);s.onerror=l.bind(null,s.onerror),s.onload=l.bind(null,s.onload),c&&document.head.appendChild(s)}},i.r=e=>{"undefined"!=typeof Symbol&&Symbol.toStringTag&&Object.defineProperty(e,Symbol.toStringTag,{value:"Module"}),Object.defineProperty(e,"__esModule",{value:!0})},i.j=364,i.p="https://js-agent.newrelic.com/",(()=>{var e={364:0,953:0};i.f.j=(t,r)=>{var n=i.o(e,t)?e[t]:void 0;if(0!==n)if(n)r.push(n[2]);else{var o=new Promise(((r,i)=>n=e[t]=[r,i]));r.push(n[2]=o);var a=i.p+i.u(t),s=new Error;i.l(a,(r=>{if(i.o(e,t)&&(0!==(n=e[t])&&(e[t]=void 0),n)){var o=r&&("load"===r.type?"missing":r.type),a=r&&r.target&&r.target.src;s.message="Loading chunk "+t+" failed.\n("+o+": "+a+")",s.name="ChunkLoadError",s.type=o,s.request=a,n[1](s)}}),"chunk-"+t,t)}};var t=(t,r)=>{var n,o,[a,s,c]=r,u=0;if(a.some((t=>0!==e[t]))){for(n in s)i.o(s,n)&&(i.m[n]=s[n]);if(c)c(i)}for(t&&t(r);u {i.r(o);var e=i(3325),t=i(5763);const r=Object.values(e.D);function n(e){const n={};return r.forEach((r=>{n[r]=function(e,r){return!1!==(0,t.Mt)(r,"".concat(e,".enabled"))}(r,e)})),n}var a=i(9144);var s=i(5546),c=i(385),u=i(8e3),d=i(5938),f=i(3960),l=i(50);class h extends d.W{constructor(e,t,r){let n=!(arguments.length>3&&void 0!==arguments[3])||arguments[3];super(e,t,r),this.auto=n,this.abortHandler,this.featAggregate,this.onAggregateImported,n&&(0,u.R)(e,r)}importAggregator(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:{};if(this.featAggregate||!this.auto)return;const r=c.il&&!0===(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"privacy.cookies_enabled");let n;this.onAggregateImported=new Promise((e=>{n=e}));const o=async()=>{let t;try{if(r){const{setupAgentSession:e}=await Promise.all([i.e(860),i.e(242)]).then(i.bind(i,3228));t=e(this.agentIdentifier)}}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("A problem occurred when starting up session manager. This page will not start or extend any session.",e)}try{if(!this.shouldImportAgg(this.featureName,t))return void(0,u.L)(this.agentIdentifier,this.featureName);const{lazyFeatureLoader:r}=await i.e(412).then(i.bind(i,8582)),{Aggregate:o}=await r(this.featureName,"aggregate");this.featAggregate=new o(this.agentIdentifier,this.aggregator,e),n(!0)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Downloading and initializing ".concat(this.featureName," failed..."),e),this.abortHandler?.(),n(!1)}};c.il?(0,f.b)((()=>o()),!0):o()}shouldImportAgg(r,n){return r!==e.D.sessionReplay||!1!==(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"session_trace.enabled")&&(!!n?.isNew||!!n?.state.sessionReplay)}}var g=i(7633),p=i(7894);class m extends h{static featureName=g.t9;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];if(super(r,n,g.t9,i),("undefined"==typeof PerformanceNavigationTiming||c.Tt)&&"undefined"!=typeof PerformanceTiming){const n=(0,t.OP)(r);n[g.Dz]=Math.max(Date.now()-n.offset,0),(0,f.K)((()=>n[g.qw]=Math.max((0,p.z)()-n[g.Dz],0))),(0,f.b)((()=>{const t=(0,p.z)();n[g.OJ]=Math.max(t-n[g.Dz],0),(0,s.p)("timing",["load",t],void 0,e.D.pageViewTiming,this.ee)}))}this.importAggregator()}}var v=i(1117),b=i(1284);class y extends v.w{constructor(e){super(e),this.aggregatedData={}}store(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,r,i);return o.metrics=function(e,t){t||(t={count:0});return t.count+=1,(0,b.D)(e,(function(e,r){t[e]=w(r,t[e])})),t}(n,o.metrics),o}merge(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,n,i);if(o.metrics){var a=o.metrics;a.count+=r.count,(0,b.D)(r,(function(e,t){if("count"!==e){var n=a[e],i=r[e];i&&!i.c?a[e]=w(i.t,n):a[e]=function(e,t){if(!t)return e;t.c||(t=x(t.t));return t.min=Math.min(e.min,t.min),t.max=Math.max(e.max,t.max),t.t+=e.t,t.sos+=e.sos,t.c+=e.c,t}(i,a[e])}}))}else o.metrics=r}storeMetric(e,t,r,n){var i=this.getBucket(e,t,r);return i.stats=w(n,i.stats),i}getBucket(e,t,r,n){this.aggregatedData[e]||(this.aggregatedData[e]={});var i=this.aggregatedData[e][t];return i||(i=this.aggregatedData[e][t]={params:r||{}},n&&(i.custom=n)),i}get(e,t){return t?this.aggregatedData[e]&&this.aggregatedData[e][t]:this.aggregatedData[e]}take(e){for(var t={},r="",n=!1,i=0;i t.max&&(t.max=e),e 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,r,j.t,n),c.il&&((0,t.OP)(e).initHidden=Boolean("hidden"===document.visibilityState),(0,N.N)((()=>(0,s.p)("docHidden",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee)),!0),(0,O.bP)("pagehide",(()=>(0,s.p)("winPagehide",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee))),this.importAggregator())}}var P=i(3081);class C extends h{static featureName=P.t9;constructor(e,t){let r=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,P.t9,r),this.importAggregator()}}var R,I=i(2210),k=i(1214),H=i(2177),L={};try{R=localStorage.getItem("__nr_flags").split(","),console&&"function"==typeof console.log&&(L.console=!0,-1!==R.indexOf("dev")&&(L.dev=!0),-1!==R.indexOf("nr_dev")&&(L.nrDev=!0))}catch(e){}function z(e){try{L.console&&z(e)}catch(e){}}L.nrDev&&H.ee.on("internal-error",(function(e){z(e.stack)})),L.dev&&H.ee.on("fn-err",(function(e,t,r){z(r.stack)})),L.dev&&(z("NR AGENT IN DEVELOPMENT MODE"),z("flags: "+(0,b.D)(L,(function(e,t){return e})).join(", ")));var M=i(6660);class B extends h{static featureName=M.t;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,M.t,i),this.skipNext=0;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}const o=this;o.ee.on("fn-start",(function(e,t,r){o.abortHandler&&(o.skipNext+=1)})),o.ee.on("fn-err",(function(t,r,n){o.abortHandler&&!n[M.A]&&((0,I.X)(n,M.A,(function(){return!0})),this.thrown=!0,(0,s.p)("err",[n,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee))})),o.ee.on("fn-end",(function(){o.abortHandler&&!this.thrown&&o.skipNext>0&&(o.skipNext-=1)})),o.ee.on("internal-error",(function(t){(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee)})),this.origOnerror=c._A.onerror,c._A.onerror=this.onerrorHandler.bind(this),c._A.addEventListener("unhandledrejection",(t=>{const r=function(e){let t="Unhandled Promise Rejection: ";if(e instanceof Error)try{return e.message=t+e.message,e}catch(t){return e}if(void 0===e)return new Error(t);try{return new Error(t+(0,D.P)(e))}catch(e){return new Error(t)}}(t.reason);(0,s.p)("err",[r,(0,p.z)(),!1,{unhandledPromiseRejection:1}],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}),(0,O.m$)(!1,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),(0,k.gy)(this.ee),(0,k.BV)(this.ee),(0,k.em)(this.ee),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}onerrorHandler(t,r,n,i,o){"function"==typeof this.origOnerror&&this.origOnerror(...arguments);try{this.skipNext?this.skipNext-=1:(0,s.p)("err",[o||new F(t,r,n),(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(t){try{(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(e){}}return!1}}function F(e,t,r){this.message=e||"Uncaught error with no additional information",this.sourceURL=t,this.line=r}let U=1;const q="nr@id";function G(e){const t=typeof e;return!e||"object"!==t&&"function"!==t?-1:e===c._A?0:(0,I.X)(e,q,(function(){return U++}))}function V(e){if("string"==typeof e&&e.length)return e.length;if("object"==typeof e){if("undefined"!=typeof ArrayBuffer&&e instanceof ArrayBuffer&&e.byteLength)return e.byteLength;if("undefined"!=typeof Blob&&e instanceof Blob&&e.size)return e.size;if(!("undefined"!=typeof FormData&&e instanceof FormData))try{return(0,D.P)(e).length}catch(e){return}}}var X=i(7243);class W{constructor(e){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.generateTracePayload=this.generateTracePayload.bind(this),this.shouldGenerateTrace=this.shouldGenerateTrace.bind(this)}generateTracePayload(e){if(!this.shouldGenerateTrace(e))return null;var r=(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier);if(!r)return null;var n=(r.accountID||"").toString()||null,i=(r.agentID||"").toString()||null,o=(r.trustKey||"").toString()||null;if(!n||!i)return null;var a=(0,_.M)(),s=(0,_.Ht)(),c=Date.now(),u={spanId:a,traceId:s,timestamp:c};return(e.sameOrigin||this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useTraceContextHeadersForCors())&&(u.traceContextParentHeader=this.generateTraceContextParentHeader(a,s),u.traceContextStateHeader=this.generateTraceContextStateHeader(a,c,n,i,o)),(e.sameOrigin&&!this.excludeNewrelicHeader()||!e.sameOrigin&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useNewrelicHeaderForCors())&&(u.newrelicHeader=this.generateTraceHeader(a,s,c,n,i,o)),u}generateTraceContextParentHeader(e,t){return"00-"+t+"-"+e+"-01"}generateTraceContextStateHeader(e,t,r,n,i){return i+"@nr=0-1-"+r+"-"+n+"-"+e+"----"+t}generateTraceHeader(e,t,r,n,i,o){if(!("function"==typeof c._A?.btoa))return null;var a={v:[0,1],d:{ty:"Browser",ac:n,ap:i,id:e,tr:t,ti:r}};return o&&n!==o&&(a.d.tk=o),btoa((0,D.P)(a))}shouldGenerateTrace(e){return this.isDtEnabled()&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)}isAllowedOrigin(e){var r=!1,n={};if((0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"distributed_tracing")&&(n=(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier).distributed_tracing),e.sameOrigin)r=!0;else if(n.allowed_origins instanceof Array)for(var i=0;i 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,Z.t,i),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(this.dt=new W(r),this.handler=(e,t,r,n)=>(0,s.p)(e,t,r,n,this.ee),(0,k.u5)(this.ee),(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),function(r,n,i,o){function a(e){var t=this;t.totalCbs=0,t.called=0,t.cbTime=0,t.end=E,t.ended=!1,t.xhrGuids={},t.lastSize=null,t.loadCaptureCalled=!1,t.params=this.params||{},t.metrics=this.metrics||{},e.addEventListener("load",(function(r){_(t,e)}),(0,O.m$)(!1)),c.IF||e.addEventListener("progress",(function(e){t.lastSize=e.loaded}),(0,O.m$)(!1))}function s(e){this.params={method:e[0]},T(this,e[1]),this.metrics={}}function u(e,n){var i=(0,t.DL)(r);i.xpid&&this.sameOrigin&&n.setRequestHeader("X-NewRelic-ID",i.xpid);var a=o.generateTracePayload(this.parsedOrigin);if(a){var s=!1;a.newrelicHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("newrelic",a.newrelicHeader),s=!0),a.traceContextParentHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("traceparent",a.traceContextParentHeader),a.traceContextStateHeader&&n.setRequestHeader("tracestate",a.traceContextStateHeader),s=!0),s&&(this.dt=a)}}function d(e,t){var r=this.metrics,i=e[0],o=this;if(r&&i){var a=V(i);a&&(r.txSize=a)}this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.listener=function(e){try{"abort"!==e.type||o.loadCaptureCalled||(o.params.aborted=!0),("load"!==e.type||o.called===o.totalCbs&&(o.onloadCalled||"function"!=typeof t.onload)&&"function"==typeof o.end)&&o.end(t)}catch(e){try{n.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}};for(var s=0;s 1?e[1]=i:e.push(i)}else e[0]&&e[0].headers&&s(e[0].headers,n)&&(this.dt=n);function s(e,t){var r=!1;return t.newrelicHeader&&(e.set("newrelic",t.newrelicHeader),r=!0),t.traceContextParentHeader&&(e.set("traceparent",t.traceContextParentHeader),t.traceContextStateHeader&&e.set("tracestate",t.traceContextStateHeader),r=!0),r}}function x(e,t){this.params={},this.metrics={},this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.dt=t,e.length>=1&&(this.target=e[0]),e.length>=2&&(this.opts=e[1]);var r,n=this.opts||{},i=this.target;"string"==typeof i?r=i:"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof Y?r=i.url:c._A?.URL&&"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof URL&&(r=i.href),T(this,r);var o=(""+(i&&i instanceof Y&&i.method||n.method||"GET")).toUpperCase();this.params.method=o,this.txSize=V(n.body)||0}function A(t,r){var n;this.endTime=(0,p.z)(),this.params||(this.params={}),this.params.status=r?r.status:0,"string"==typeof this.rxSize&&this.rxSize.length>0&&(n=+this.rxSize);var o={txSize:this.txSize,rxSize:n,duration:(0,p.z)()-this.startTime};i("xhr",[this.params,o,this.startTime,this.endTime,"fetch"],this,e.D.ajax)}function E(t){var r=this.params,n=this.metrics;if(!this.ended){this.ended=!0;for(var o=0;o 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,we.t,r),this.importAggregator()}}new class{constructor(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:(0,_.ky)(16);c._A?(this.agentIdentifier=t,this.sharedAggregator=new y({agentIdentifier:this.agentIdentifier}),this.features={},this.desiredFeatures=new Set(e.features||[]),this.desiredFeatures.add(m),Object.assign(this,(0,a.j)(this.agentIdentifier,e,e.loaderType||"agent")),this.start()):(0,l.Z)("Failed to initial the agent. Could not determine the runtime environment.")}get config(){return{info:(0,t.C5)(this.agentIdentifier),init:(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier),loader_config:(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier),runtime:(0,t.OP)(this.agentIdentifier)}}start(){const t="features";try{const r=n(this.agentIdentifier),i=[...this.desiredFeatures];i.sort(((t,r)=>e.p[t.featureName]-e.p[r.featureName])),i.forEach((t=>{if(r[t.featureName]||t.featureName===e.D.pageViewEvent){const n=function(t){switch(t){case e.D.ajax:return[e.D.jserrors];case e.D.sessionTrace:return[e.D.ajax,e.D.pageViewEvent];case e.D.sessionReplay:return[e.D.sessionTrace];case e.D.pageViewTiming:return[e.D.pageViewEvent];default:return[]}}(t.featureName);n.every((e=>r[e]))||(0,l.Z)("".concat(t.featureName," is enabled but one or more dependent features has been disabled (").concat((0,D.P)(n),"). This may cause unintended consequences or missing data...")),this.features[t.featureName]=new t(this.agentIdentifier,this.sharedAggregator)}})),(0,T.Qy)(this.agentIdentifier,this.features,t)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Failed to initialize all enabled instrument classes (agent aborted) -",e);for(const e in this.features)this.features[e].abortHandler?.();const r=(0,T.fP)();return delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.api,delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.[t],delete this.sharedAggregator,r.ee?.abort(),delete r.ee?.get(this.agentIdentifier),!1}}}({features:[J,m,S,class extends h{static featureName=oe;constructor(t,r){if(super(t,r,oe,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;const n=this.ee;let i;(0,k.QU)(n),this.eventsEE=(0,k.em)(n),this.eventsEE.on(se,(function(e,t){this.bstStart=(0,p.z)()})),this.eventsEE.on(ae,(function(t,r){(0,s.p)("bst",[t[0],r,this.bstStart,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),n.on(ce+ne,(function(e){this.time=(0,p.z)(),this.startPath=location.pathname+location.hash})),n.on(ce+ie,(function(t){(0,s.p)("bstHist",[location.pathname+location.hash,this.startPath,this.time],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)}));try{i=new PerformanceObserver((t=>{const r=t.getEntries();(0,s.p)(te,[r],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),i.observe({type:re,buffered:!0})}catch(e){}this.importAggregator({resourceObserver:i})}},C,xe,B,class extends h{static featureName=de;constructor(e,r){if(super(e,r,de,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;if(!(0,t.OP)(e).xhrWrappable)return;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}let n,i=0;const o=this.ee.get("tracer"),a=(0,k._L)(this.ee),s=(0,k.Lg)(this.ee),u=(0,k.BV)(this.ee),d=(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),f=this.ee.get("events"),l=(0,k.u5)(this.ee),h=(0,k.QU)(this.ee),g=(0,k.Gm)(this.ee);function m(e,t){h.emit("newURL",[""+window.location,t])}function v(){i++,n=window.location.hash,this[ve]=(0,p.z)()}function b(){i--,window.location.hash!==n&&m(0,!0);var e=(0,p.z)();this[pe]=~~this[pe]+e-this[ve],this[ye]=e}function y(e,t){e.on(t,(function(){this[t]=(0,p.z)()}))}this.ee.on(ve,v),s.on(be,v),a.on(be,v),this.ee.on(ye,b),s.on(ge,b),a.on(ge,b),this.ee.buffer([ve,ye,"xhr-resolved"],this.featureName),f.buffer([ve],this.featureName),u.buffer(["setTimeout"+le,"clearTimeout"+fe,ve],this.featureName),d.buffer([ve,"new-xhr","send-xhr"+fe],this.featureName),l.buffer([me+fe,me+"-done",me+he+fe,me+he+le],this.featureName),h.buffer(["newURL"],this.featureName),g.buffer([ve],this.featureName),s.buffer(["propagate",be,ge,"executor-err","resolve"+fe],this.featureName),o.buffer([ve,"no-"+ve],this.featureName),a.buffer(["new-jsonp","cb-start","jsonp-error","jsonp-end"],this.featureName),y(l,me+fe),y(l,me+"-done"),y(a,"new-jsonp"),y(a,"jsonp-end"),y(a,"cb-start"),h.on("pushState-end",m),h.on("replaceState-end",m),window.addEventListener("hashchange",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("load",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("popstate",(function(){m(0,i>1)}),(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}}],loaderType:"spa"})})(),window.NRBA=o})(); const cookieDomain = window.location.hostname; const tld = buildTLD(); function buildTLD() { const domainParts = cookieDomain.split('.'); while (domainParts.length > 2) { domainParts.shift(); } return domainParts.join('.'); } function deleteCookie(cookieName) { if (!cookieName) { return; } const cookiePath = (cookieName.startsWith('retraction_warning_') || cookieName.startsWith('version_warning_')) ? '/articles/' + cookieName : '/'; // Yes, these three slightly different ways to try and remove cookies are necessary document.cookie = cookieName + '=; path=' + cookiePath + '; domain=' + cookieDomain + '; expires=Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:01 GMT;'; document.cookie = cookieName + '=; path=' + cookiePath + '; domain=.' + tld + '; expires=Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:01 GMT;'; document.cookie = cookieName + '=; path=' + cookiePath + '; expires=Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:01 GMT;'; } function deleteGroupCookies(group) { if (!group) { return; } const domainData = OneTrust.GetDomainData(), cookies = domainData.Groups.filter(cookieGroup => cookieGroup.OptanonGroupId === group)[0].Cookies; cookies.forEach(cookie => deleteCookie(cookie.Name)); } function OptanonWrapper() { const cookieConsentGroups = []; for (group of OneTrust.GetDomainData().Groups) { cookieConsentGroups.push(group.OptanonGroupId); } OneTrust.OnConsentChanged(function(e) { const cookieConsentActiveGroups = OnetrustActiveGroups.split(',').filter(activeGroup => activeGroup); cookieConsentGroups.forEach(group => { if (!cookieConsentActiveGroups.includes(group)) { deleteGroupCookies(group); }; }); }); } window.jQuery || document.write(' ') CKEDITOR_BASEPATH='https://hrbopenresearch.org/js/vendor/ckeditor/' window.reactTheme = 'HRB'; window.MathJax = { CommonHTML: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, 'HTML-CSS': { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, SVG: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, AuthorInit: function() { MathJax.Hub.Register.MessageHook('End Process', function () { let timeout = false; // holder for timeout id const delay = 250; // delay after event is "complete" to run callback const reflowMath = function() { const dispFormulas = document.querySelectorAll('.disp-formula.panel'); if (!dispFormulas) { return; } for (const dispFormula of dispFormulas) { const child = dispFormula.querySelector('.MathJax_Preview').nextSibling.firstChild; const isMultiline = MathJax.Hub.getAllJax(dispFormula)[0].root.isMultiline; if (dispFormula.offsetWidth < child.offsetWidth || isMultiline) { MathJax.Hub.Queue(['Rerender', MathJax.Hub, dispFormula]); } } }; window.addEventListener('resize', function() { clearTimeout(timeout); // clear the timeout timeout = setTimeout(reflowMath, delay); // start timing for event "completion" }); }); }, }; if (window.location.hash == '#_=_'){ window.location = window.location.href.split('#')[0] } !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function() {n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)} ;if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n; n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script','https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '1641728616063202'); fbq('track', "PixelInitialized", {}); Skip to content HRB Open Research file_upload Submit your research search clear search menu close clear Search Browse Gateways & Collections How to Publish Submit your Research My Submissions Article Guidelines Article Guidelines (New Versions) Data Guidelines Prepublication Checks Production Process Article Processing Charges Finding Article Reviewers About How it Works For Reviewers National Steering Group Policies Glossary FAQs Contact Blog My Account Submissions Content and Tracking Alerts My Details Sign In file_upload Submit your research { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-39" }, "headline": "General practitioners’ and women’s experiences of perimenopause consultations: A qualitative...", "datePublished": "2024-06-24T18:07:37", "dateModified": "2024-06-24T18:07:37", "author": [ { "@type": "Person", "name": "Laura-Jane McCarthy" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Aoife O'Mahony" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Aisling Jennings" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Sheena M. McHugh" } ], "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "HRB Open Research", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://hrbopenresearch.org/img/AMP/HRB_image.png", "height": 566, "width": 60 } }, "image": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://hrbopenresearch.org/img/AMP/HRB_image.png", "height": 1200, "width": 127 }, "description": " Background Perimenopause precedes menopause and can cause a myriad of symptoms for women. General practitioners (GPs) are frequently the first contact for perimenopausal women with symptoms. However, women express feeling dissatisfied with the consultations they have with their GPs for perimenopausal symptoms. Moreover, diagnostic difficulties can make these consultations challenging for GPs. Despite these challenges, research to date has focused on menopause, not the transition to menopause. To date, no evidence synthesis has examined how women experience perimenopause consultations, nor how GPs experience providing care to these women. Objective To systematically search, collate, and appraise the qualitative literature to understand general practitioners' and women's experiences of perimenopause consultations and examine how treatment decisions are made during consultations. Methods A meta-ethnography will be conducted following Sattar et al. (2021) guidelines for conducting a meta-ethnography as developed by Noblit and Hare (1988). Seven databases will be systematically searched. To be included, studies must report on the experiences of either general practitioners and/or perimenopausal women and published since 2014 to capture the most up-to-date evidence. Quality assessment will be conducted using CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme) tools. A GRADE-CERqual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) will be conducted to assess the confidence of the findings. PROSPERO registration number CRD42024520537. Discussion Findings will provide new and useful insight into how GPs and women experience consultations for perimenopause and how decisions are made during these consultations. " } { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "1", "item": { "@id": "https://hrbopenresearch.org/", "name": "Home" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "2", "item": { "@id": "https://hrbopenresearch.org/browse/articles", "name": "Browse" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "3", "item": { "@id": "https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-39/v1", "name": "General practitioners’ and women’s experiences of perimenopause consultations:..." } } ] } Home Browse General practitioners’ and women’s experiences of perimenopause consultations:... ALL Metrics - Views Downloads Get PDF Get XML Cite How to cite this article McCarthy LJ, O'Mahony A, Jennings A and McHugh SM. General practitioners’ and women’s experiences of perimenopause consultations: A qualitative evidence synthesis protocol [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . HRB Open Res 2024, 7 :39 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13908.1 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. Close Copy Citation Details Export Export Citation Sciwheel EndNote Ref. Manager Bibtex ProCite Sente EXPORT Select a format first Track Share ▬ ✚ Study Protocol General practitioners’ and women’s experiences of perimenopause consultations: A qualitative evidence synthesis protocol [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] Laura-Jane McCarthy https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4539-0555 1 , Aoife O'Mahony 1 , Aisling Jennings https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9246-3955 2 , Sheena M. McHugh https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6595-0491 1 Laura-Jane McCarthy https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4539-0555 1 , Aoife O'Mahony 1 , Aisling Jennings https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9246-3955 2 , Sheena M. McHugh https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6595-0491 1 PUBLISHED 24 Jun 2024 Author details Author details 1 School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, T12 XF62, Ireland 2 Department of General Practice, University College Cork, Cork, T12 XF62, Ireland Laura-Jane McCarthy Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Software, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Aoife O'Mahony Roles: Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Aisling Jennings Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Sheena M. McHugh Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing OPEN PEER REVIEW DETAILS REVIEWER STATUS Abstract Background Perimenopause precedes menopause and can cause a myriad of symptoms for women. General practitioners (GPs) are frequently the first contact for perimenopausal women with symptoms. However, women express feeling dissatisfied with the consultations they have with their GPs for perimenopausal symptoms. Moreover, diagnostic difficulties can make these consultations challenging for GPs. Despite these challenges, research to date has focused on menopause, not the transition to menopause. To date, no evidence synthesis has examined how women experience perimenopause consultations, nor how GPs experience providing care to these women. Objective To systematically search, collate, and appraise the qualitative literature to understand general practitioners' and women's experiences of perimenopause consultations and examine how treatment decisions are made during consultations. Methods A meta-ethnography will be conducted following Sattar et al. (2021) guidelines for conducting a meta-ethnography as developed by Noblit and Hare (1988). Seven databases will be systematically searched. To be included, studies must report on the experiences of either general practitioners and/or perimenopausal women and published since 2014 to capture the most up-to-date evidence. Quality assessment will be conducted using CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme) tools. A GRADE-CERqual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) will be conducted to assess the confidence of the findings. PROSPERO registration number CRD42024520537. Discussion Findings will provide new and useful insight into how GPs and women experience consultations for perimenopause and how decisions are made during these consultations. READ ALL READ LESS Keywords Qualitative Evidence Synthesis, perimenopause, women, general practice, general practitioners, meta-ethnography Corresponding Author(s) Laura-Jane McCarthy ( [email protected] ) Close Corresponding author: Laura-Jane McCarthy Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information: Health Research Board-RL-2020-004 The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Copyright: © 2024 McCarthy LJ et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. How to cite: McCarthy LJ, O'Mahony A, Jennings A and McHugh SM. General practitioners’ and women’s experiences of perimenopause consultations: A qualitative evidence synthesis protocol [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . HRB Open Res 2024, 7 :39 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13908.1 ) First published: 24 Jun 2024, 7 :39 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13908.1 ) Latest published: 24 Jun 2024, 7 :39 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13908.1 ) Introduction Menopause refers to the absence of a menstrual period for 12 consecutive months 1 as a result of the loss of ovarian follicular activity 2 . The transition to menopause is often gradual and may be first recognized by irregularities and/or changes to the menstrual cycle as a result of greater fluctuations of sex hormones compared to premenopausal menstrual cycles 3 . When such changes are observed a woman is said to be perimenopausal. The terms “perimenopause” and “menopausal transition” are often used interchangeably 4 . Perimenopause precedes menopause and is the time that spans from a woman’s mature reproductive state to 12 months after her last menstrual period 5 , 6 . The majority of women experience menopause between 45 and 55 years of age 6 with the median onset of perimenopause at 47 years 7 . The median length of time a woman may be perimenopausal is four years or more 7 . There are a myriad of menopausal symptoms reported by women during perimenopause 8 . An estimated 20% of women who transition to menopause do so with no significant symptoms 9 or without the need for medical attention 10 . However, this is not always the case, and many women experience symptoms that affect their quality of life. The 2023 state-of-the-art review by Duralde et al. 11 estimates that 60–86% of perimenopausal and menopausal women seek medical attention for their symptoms. Some of the most reported symptoms include but are not limited to altered mood, and sleep disturbances 12 . Approximately 80% of perimenopausal women experience vasomotor symptoms which often increase in frequency in the later perimenopausal stage 13 . Vasomotor symptoms such as hot flushes and/or night sweats are considered significant indications for menopause hormone therapy (MHT) in women without contraindications 14 . Research conducted in the UK in 2022 evaluated perimenopausal women’s attitudes and knowledge of menopause and found some women felt bewildered that they had reached midlife with a significant lack of awareness or knowledge of perimenopause likening it to a “hidden phenomenon” 8 (p16) . Furthermore some women, on seeking advice for symptoms have expressed that their healthcare provider has dismissed or invalidated their concerns 8 , 15 . Perimenopause consultations can be complex and challenging interactions for general practitioners 16 for numerous reasons. As mentioned, perimenopause can be associated with varied physical and psychosocial symptoms, that can be difficult to assess and address during short healthcare appointments. This may be especially true during appointments where there is a need to prioritize other health issues or rule out serious pathologies 16 as not all symptomology experienced by women at this stage of life are attributable to perimenopause 17 . Diagnosing menopause is generally considered a straightforward diagnosis, in women aged 45 years and over who have not had a menstrual period for more than 12 months 14 . However, diagnosing perimenopause is less straightforward, as some women may continue to have normal menstrual cycles, even up to the final menstrual period 18 . Generally perimenopause is clinically diagnosed based on irregularities in the menstrual cycle and/or the presence of menopausal symptoms 4 , 19 . The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has published guidelines 4 on menopause management and diagnosis to guide healthcare providers by providing evidence-based information on the diagnosis and management of menopause and perimenopause. Perimenopause and menopause have garnered much media attention in recent years, peaking in 2021–2022 20 , 21 with work-related and healthcare-related policy responses in various countries, including the United Kingdom and Ireland 22 , 23 . It has been said that increased media attention has empowered women to discuss their experiences more openly and seek medical help, increasing requests for prescriptions for hormone replacement therapy from GPs 24 . There has been concern expressed by some GPs in the UK, that recent media attention has not only resulted in a significant increase in women seeking HRT but also younger women requesting blood tests 25 that may not be clinically useful 18 . To date, evidence syntheses generally collate evidence that reports perimenopause as part of menopause and not as a standalone unique experience 26 , 27 . For example, Ayers et al. ’s systematic review 28 examined the relationship between attitudes towards menopause and symptom experience and found that the perimenopausal stage is the most difficult stage for women, attributable in part to the bodily changes experienced during this stage. To date, no evidence synthesis has examined how women experience perimenopause consultations, nor how GPs experience delivering this care. Synthesizing experiences from multiple perspectives will provide a more holistic understanding of perimenopause consultations which is important to ascertain what works well in practice and areas that may need improvement. Therefore, the objective of this qualitative evidence synthesis is to synthesize primary research on how general practitioners and women experience perimenopause consultations and to construct a new line of argument based on the literature. This qualitative evidence synthesis intends to understand how general practitioners experience treating and managing women during consultations for perimenopausal symptoms. It also intends to understand how women experience receiving this care. The review questions are: i. What are general practitioners' and women’s experiences and perceptions of perimenopause consultations? ii. How are decisions regarding treatment made during perimenopause consultations from the perspective of both general practitioners and women? Methods This protocol describes a systematic review of qualitative research on GP’s and women’s experiences of perimenopause consultations in general practice. The systematic review has been prospectively registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42024520537 . This systematic review protocol adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) reporting guidelines 29 , 30 . For this systematic review the meta-ethnographic approach of Noblit and Hare 31 as described by Sattar 32 and colleagues will be employed. Meta-ethnography is well-established and is a commonly adopted approach in conducting qualitative evidence syntheses as it allows for holistic interpretations, by comparing and understanding the interconnection between studies 31 , 33 . Meta-ethnography is a highly interpretive inductive approach, that advances understanding of a topic by synthesizing existing qualitative studies to gain a deeper understanding or inform broader concepts 31 . Meta-ethnography consists of seven stages or phases and includes: (1) Getting started, (2) Deciding what is relevant, (3) Reading the studies, (4) Determining how the studies are related, (5) Translating the studies into one another, (6) Synthesizing the translations and (7) Expressing the synthesis. Each step is distinct from the other but often overlaps. Sattar and colleagues’ 32 approach to meta-ethnography will guide this meta-ethnography. It has been selected as it provides greater clarity on stages 4–6 of the meta-ethnographic process, which are often reported as the more difficult stages of conducting a meta-ethnography due to lack of guidance 32 . This meta-ethnography will be reported in accordance to the eMERGE guidelines 33 . The eMERGE 33 reporting guidelines provide structure and guidance for researchers conducting and reporting a meta-ethnography 32 . High-quality meta-ethnographies have the potential to inform clinical guidelines and policy 33 , as such this review will be guided and reported according to the eMERGE reporting guidelines to ensure transparency, trustworthiness, and completeness of this review. Phase 1: Getting started This stage of meta-ethnography involves identifying an area of interest and providing a rationale for conducting the study. To the best of our knowledge, through preliminary searching, no meta-ethnography has synthesized general practitioners' and women’s lived experiences of perimenopausal consultations in general practice. A meta-ethnography was chosen as the most suitable approach to enable the development of a conceptual understanding of the experiences of perimenopausal consultations as experienced by both GPs and women in the context of general practice. Given the surge of attention given to menopause and perimenopause in the media 20 , 21 , 34 as well as primary qualitative research 25 , 35 – 37 conducting this qualitative evidence synthesis is timely. As recommended 32 , 38 a research team with suitable expertise and skills has been established to conduct this meta-ethnography. Phase 2: Deciding what is relevant Once the topic of interest has been established, the next four steps as described by Sattar et al. 32 will be completed: Phase 2a. Defining the focus of the synthesis Finding the balance between having a qualitative evidence synthesis with a broad scope, yet a focus that provides an appropriate but manageable number of studies can be a challenge in the meta-ethnographic approach 32 . It is suggested that if there is little literature published on the chosen topic, a wider search of the literature should be conducted 39 . Given the paucity of research on the phenomenon of perimenopause in isolation from menopause, it has been decided that the search strategy should be wider than perimenopause alone, so as not to miss research that reports perimenopause as a theme of menopause. Moreover, with such varied definitions of perimenopause and pre-menopause in the literature as highlighted by Ambikairajah et al. (2022) 40 it has been decided that the best approach to disentangle studies that report perimenopause as a concept of menopause is to search for perimenopause more broadly. Phase 2b: Locating relevant studies Currently, there is little consensus on how studies should be included in meta-ethnographic synthesis, nor is there agreement regarding the necessity of exhaustive literature searching 39 . As there is little qualitative research that explores perimenopause consultations from the perspective of GPs and women our search will be expansive yet systematic. We will conduct an extensive search strategy of seven databases: Medline (via PubMed), Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, CINAHL, Embase (Elsevier), PsycINFO and Academic Search Complete. A comprehensive search strategy was developed guided by the Sample, Phenomenon of interest, Design, Evaluation, Research type (SPIDER) tool 41 . A search strategy was first formulated in Medline (via PubMed) and consists of three major concepts: general practice, perimenopause and qualitative research. Search terms include a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), specific database headings, keywords, and synonymous with the following: “perimenopause” “general practice” and “qualitative research”. Boolean operators (OR, AND) were used to widen and narrow searches where appropriate. Proximity searches of keywords were also included. An academic support librarian from University College Cork was consulted and offered guidance on search strategy development. Searches in subsequent databases will be amended as appropriate depending on database specifications. The reference list of identified studies will also be searched. The search strategy as conducted in Medline (via PubMed) is presented in Table 1 below. Given the extensive search of seven databases, grey literature sources will not be searched. Grey literature searching can be a time-consuming process with “minimally productive follow-up of the unpublished literature” 42 (p.83) . Table 1. Search strategy conducted in Medline (via PubMed). #1 "General Practice"[MeSH Terms] OR "General Practitioners"[MeSH Terms] OR "decision making, shared"[MeSH Terms] #2 "General Practice"[Title/Abstract] OR "primary health care"[Title/Abstract] OR "general practitioner*"[Title/Abstract] OR "general physician"[Title/Abstract] OR "family physician*"[Title/Abstract] OR "family medicine"[Title/Abstract] OR "family practice"[Title/ Abstract] OR "primary care physician*"[Title/Abstract] OR "shared decision-making" OR "shared decision making" OR "shared decision"[All Fields] OR "shared decisions"[All Fields] OR "shared medical decision"[All Fields] OR "shared medical decisions"[All Fields] OR "shared treatment*"[All Fields] OR "shared clinical decision"[All Fields] OR "shared clinical decisions"[All Fields] OR "informed decision"[All Fields] OR "informed choice"[All Fields] OR "decision making"[All Fields] OR "decision support"[All Fields] OR "decision behavior"[All Fields] OR "choice behavior"[All Fields] OR "choice behaviour"[All Fields] OR "decision behaviour"[All Fields] OR "patient participation"[All Fields] OR "patient involvement"[All Fields] OR "participatory decision*"[All Fields] OR "collaborative decision*"[All Fields] #3 #1 OR #2 #4 "Perimenopause"[MeSH Terms] OR "Menopause"[MeSH Terms] OR "Premenopause"[MeSH Terms] OR "Estrogen Replacement Therapy"[MeSH Terms] OR "Hormone Replacement Therapy"[MeSH Terms] #5 "peri-menopause"[All Fields] OR "peri-menopause"[All Fields] OR "perimenopause"[All Fields] OR "perimenopausal symptoms"[All Fields] OR "perimenopausal complaint*"[All Fields] OR "perimenopause*"[All Fields] OR "menopause"[All Fields] OR "climacteric"[All Fields] OR "menopause transition"[All Fields] OR "menopausal transition"[All Fields] OR "HRT"[All Fields] OR "hormonal replacement"[All Fields] OR "menopause hormone therapy"[All Fields] OR "menopause transition"[All Fields] OR "menopausal transition"[All Fields] #6 "hormone replacement therapy decision"[Title/Abstract:~20] OR "menopause hormone replacement therapy decision"[Title/ Abstract:~20] OR "symptoms perimenopause"[Title/Abstract:~20] OR "perimenopausal symptoms"[Title/Abstract:~20] OR "perimenopausal women"[Title/Abstract:~20] OR “perimenopause women” [Title/Abstract:~20] #7 #4 OR #5 OR #6 #8 #3 AND #7 #9 "Qualitative Research"[MeSH Terms] #10 "qualitative research"[All Fields] OR "mixed-methods"[All Fields] OR "mixed-methods"[All Fields] OR "questionnaire*"[All Fields] OR "focus group*"[All Fields] OR "focus group interview*"[All Fields] OR "focus group discussion*"[All Fields] OR "discourse analysis"[All Fields] OR "content analysis"[All Fields] OR "purposive sampling"[All Fields] OR "phenomenolog*"[All Fields] OR "ethnograph*"[All Fields] OR "grounded theory"[All Fields] OR "hermeneutics"[All Fields] OR "heuristic*"[All Fields] OR "narrative analysis"[All Fields] OR "thematic analysis"[All Fields] OR "themes"[All Fields] OR "thematic"[All Fields] OR "life-world"[All Fields] OR "life-world"[All Fields] OR "live experience"[All Fields] OR "case stud*"[All Fields] OR "case series"[All Fields] OR "case report*" #11 #9 OR #10 #12 #8 AND #11 Phase 2c: Decisions to include studies The SPIDER framework 41 will inform inclusion and exclusion criteria for screening and selection of studies. Table 2 outlines each aspect of the SPIDER tool and the corresponding inclusion and exclusion criteria. Table 2. SPIDER table of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion Exclusion S ample ◦ General practitioners (or equivalents, must be physicians) ◦ Perimenopausal women with experience of seeking care in general practice (or equivalent) ◦ Healthcare providers that are not physicians ◦ Physicians in secondary care ◦ Post-menopausal women, women with early menopause, iatrogenic menopause P henomenon of I nterest ◦ Perimenopause consultations ◦ Consultations for wider women’s health issues that report experiences of perimenopause ◦ Perimenopause consultations in settings other than general practice ◦ Consultations iatrogenic menopause or early menopause ◦ Consultations for menopause only (not perimenopause) D esign ◦ Qualitative or mixed methods studies reporting the lived experience of perimenopause or of providing care to women with perimenopausal symptoms ◦ Primary studies reporting qualitative methods of data collection and analysis ◦ Studies that report quantitative methods only ◦ Mixed methods where it is not possible to extract qualitative data E valuation ◦ Experiences of perimenopause consultations in general practice ◦ Studies that evaluate experiences of perimenopause quantitatively only ◦ Studies that do not report qualitative method of analysis R esearch type ◦ English full text available ◦ Peer-reviewed literature ◦ Non-English language ◦ Grey literature, non-peer-reviewed literature, opinion pieces, editorials, protocols, reviews, theses Sample: Studies must include either general practitioners or equivalents (including family physicians, and primary care physicians) and/or women with lived experience of attending general practice (or equivalent, family practice) for management of symptoms during perimenopause. Studies conducted in secondary care settings will be excluded. Phenomenon of Interest: Studies that explore GPs’ and women’s lived experience of perimenopause consultations will be included. Studies that investigate consultations for other clinical conditions, menopause for example, will be included if data regarding perimenopausal symptom management can be isolated and extracted. Studies that report on wider women’s health issues that report perimenopause as a theme will be included. Studies that investigate clinical management of post-menopausal symptoms only will not be included in the review, as the phenomenon of interest is perimenopause. Studies that investigate the management of iatrogenic menopause will not be included. The experiences of perimenopause consultations as experienced by women and GPs could include experiences of the treatment and management of symptoms including menopause hormone therapy or non-hormonal alternative medications, confidence in managing perimenopause, feelings of satisfaction or dissatisfaction, and how decisions regarding the management of symptoms are made. Design and Research Type: All primary qualitative and mixed methods studies that meet the eligibility criteria ( Table 2 ) will be included. Qualitative or mixed-methods studies must report primary qualitative data with recognised methods of qualitative analysis (thematic synthesis, grounded theory etc.) to be included. Studies that provide free text responses to questionnaires that have been analyzed qualitatively will be included. Studies that employ quantitative methods only will be excluded. Mixed methods studies without any recognised qualitative components will be excluded. The year of publication will be restricted to studies published after 2014 to include the most up-to-date literature and to capture studies published after the publication of NICE Guidelines: Diagnosis and Management of the Menopause (NG23) 4 in 2015 for healthcare professionals who care for menopausal and perimenopausal women. Due to time constraints and availability of translation services studies must be published in the English language. Studies must be peer-reviewed to be included. Following the completion of searching all seven databases, identified articles will be imported into the bibliographic software EndNote - Clarivate TM and duplicates removed. Articles will then be exported to Rayyan – Intelligent Systematic Review - Rayyan a systematic review software tool. Further deduplication will be carried out before the screening of articles. Title/abstract screening and full-text screening will be conducted by two reviewers (LJM and AOM) independently. Where consensus cannot be reached through discussion a third review author will be consulted (AJ). A PRISMA 43 flow diagram will be provided to illustrate the screening and inclusion process and will outline reasons for exclusion at the full-text screening stage. Phase 2d: Quality appraisal Quality assessment will be conducted using CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme) 44 tools for qualitative studies. Qualitative data from mixed methods studies will also be assessed using this tool. The CASP tool for qualitative studies is used widely in qualitative evidence synthesis and consists of ten questions that consider the methodological aspects of a qualitative research study 45 . No studies will be excluded based upon quality appraisal as studies with a lower quality appraisal rating can still make a valuable contribution to qualitative evidence synthesis 32 . Quality appraisal will be assessed by the main review author and a random sample of 20% will be checked by a second review author. Studies with lower-quality assessment scores will be included but will be highlighted in methodological limitations. Furthermore, a quality appraisal is a required step that must be completed before applying the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CERQual) tool 32 . Phase 3: Reading the studies Included studies will be read in-depth, with repeated reading. First order constructs (participants’ quotations) and second order constructs (authors’ themes) presented in the results or the discussion of included primary studies will be considered the raw data for this meta-ethnography 46 . PDFs of included studies will be uploaded at this stage to NVivo - Lumivero 14 to facilitate coding of conceptual findings as they appear in the studies. Contextual data will be extracted in a data extraction form in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and will include author, year of publication, country of origin, study aims and objectives, study design, study setting, sample, characteristics of participants, data collection methodology, coding approaches, analysis, themes, and subthemes. Phase 4: Determining how the studies are related During this stage studies will be “put together” 31 (p.28) through constant comparison a commonly used method in qualitative research 47 . The relationships between studies and key concepts of included studies will be explored. A list of themes will be created to allow for comparison and identify reoccurring commonalities and concepts between studies. Concepts should not just describe the data but should explain it. A concept is a ‘meaningful idea that develops by comparing particular instances’ 46 (p. 7) Phase 5: Translating the studies into one another Concepts from each paper will be compared to identify the presence of similarities, or the absence of similarities. In doing so, it will be possible to identify differences or commonalities between concepts and will enable us to further organize them into conceptual groupings, thus creating third order constructs. Codes that have been created will be sorted into categories based on common concepts and labeled using appropriate terms that capture the key concepts that contain and express relationships that exist between and within categories. Reference to study characteristics (completed during stage 3: reading the studies) is important at this stage to give context to comparisons and to the papers themselves 32 . Phase 6: Synthesising the translations: as described by Sattar et al. 32 this phase will be divided into the following stages (a) Reciprocal and refutational synthesis Third order constructs, i.e. the review authors’ interpretation of first and second order concepts will be established. At this stage studies are no longer viewed as individual studies but as a whole, in an attempt to develop a conceptual framework that may explain the phenomenon of interest 48 . This stage involves ascertaining if studies are similar to allow for reciprocal translation synthesis or refutational synthesis whereby studies refute each other. (b) A line of argument synthesis The themes that are common across the studies will be summarized and juxtaposed to interpret a line of argument synthesis. This process will enable ‘making a whole into something more than the parts alone imply’ 31 (p.28) As this QES aims to synthesize the experiences of general practitioners and women, two separate syntheses will be conducted. This phase will be conducted by the main study author (LJM) and findings will be merged to create the final line of argument. Findings will be presented to the wider research team and reviewed. Phase 7: Expressing the synthesis To ensure transparency and robustness in conducting this meta-ethnography the eMERGe 33 reporting guidelines will be adhered to, and a record will be provided. Findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and will also be presented at academic conferences. Confidence A GRADE-CERQual assessment will be conducted to assess the confidence of our review findings based on methodological limitations, data adequacy, coherence and relevance 49 . The iSoQ :: Grade-CERQual , a free online tool will be used to assist conducting and applying the GRADE-CERQual approach to findings of this qualitative evidence synthesis. The iSoQ tool 50 will be used to present a summary of qualitative findings table. Applying the GRADE-CERQual approach to findings that emerge from a meta-ethnography is considered a challenging process and is not well described in the literature 51 , nonetheless, it is also considered an important step. Reflexivity statement It is important to acknowledge the review authors' expertise and background, to be transparent in how these may influence findings, thus increasing rigor 52 . LJM is a full-time PhD candidate, with a background in general nursing with a strong interest in women’s health and health equity. As the main review author, LJM will keep a journal throughout all stages of the review process, to keep note of decisions made and why decisions were made. Discussions with the wider review team will also be documented throughout. AOM is a postdoctoral researcher with a background in psychology and a strong interest in evidence synthesis and research integrity. She has not previously worked on research regarding women’s health. AJ is an academic GP. Within her clinical practice, AJ has an interest in female health. SMH is a health services researcher with a background in health psychology and interest in implementation science. SMH has carried out research on the management of chronic conditions in general practice however she has not previously conducted research on women’s health topics. Discussion Strengths and limitations To the best of our knowledge, this review will be the first qualitative evidence synthesis to present the experiences of both women who have attended general practice for the treatment of perimenopausal symptoms and the GPs managing them. Moreover, there is no QES that gathers the evidence on experiences of GP delivering perimenopausal care. Given the dearth of research published specific to perimenopause in the context of general practice, results from this QES will add to the empirical literature and generate evidence for GPs, women, and researchers. The findings of this QES will provide a greater understanding of how GPs and women experience perimenopause consultations, aspects of these consultations that work well, and areas that may need improvement. It is important to acknowledge that meta-ethnography does have limitations. It should be acknowledged that findings from this meta-ethnography will offer just one interpretation and given the subjective nature of this methodology, the representativeness of findings may also be affected 32 . Nonetheless, despite its challenges, meta-ethnography is invaluable in providing evidence to support practice and policy 33 . Data availability No data are associated with this article Extended data Open science framework: General practitioners’ and women’s experiences of perimenopause consultations: A qualitative evidence synthesis protocol, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AWCF2 30 Faculty Opinions recommended References 1. Rozenberg S, Panay N, Gambacciani M, et al. : Breaking down barriers for prescribing and using hormone therapy for the treatment of menopausal symptoms: an experts’ perspective. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2023; 16 (6): 507–17. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 2. Shifren JL, Gass MLS, NAMS Recommendations for Clinical Care of Midlife Women Working Group: The North American Menopause Society recommendations for clinical care of midlife women. Menopause. 2014; 21 (10): 1038–62. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 3. Monteleone P, Mascagni G, Giannini A, et al. : Symptoms of menopause - global prevalence, physiology and implications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018; 14 (4): 199–215. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 4. Recommendations: Menopause: diagnosis and management. Guidance | NICE, NICE; 2015; [cited 2024 Feb 2]. Reference Source 5. Dutton PJ, Rymer JM: Physiology of the menstrual cycle and changes in the perimenopause. In: Kovacs G, Panay N, Briggs P, editors. Managing the Menopause: 21st Century Solutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015; 1–10, [cited 2024 Feb 2]. Publisher Full Text 6. World Health Organization: Menopause. [cited 2024 Feb 2]. Reference Source 7. Delamater L, Santoro N: Management of the perimenopause. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 61 (3): 419–32. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 8. Harper JC, Phillips S, Biswakarma R, et al. : An online survey of perimenopausal women to determine their attitudes and knowledge of the menopause. Womens Health (Lond). 2022; 18 : 17455057221106890. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 9. Briggs P, Kovacs G: Clinical features of the menopause transition. In: Kovacs G, Panay N, Briggs P, editors. Managing the Menopause: 21st Century Solutions . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015; 29–35. Publisher Full Text 10. Hickey M, LaCroix AZ, Doust J, et al. : An empowerment model for managing menopause. Lancet. 2024; 403 (10430): 947–57. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 11. Duralde ER, Sobel TH, Manson JE: Management of perimenopausal and menopausal symptoms. BMJ. 2023; 382 : e072612. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 12. Huang DR, Goodship A, Webber I, et al. : Experience and severity of menopause symptoms and effects on health-seeking behaviours: a cross-sectional online survey of community dwelling adults in the United Kingdom. BMC Womens Health. 2023; 23 (1): 373. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 13. Avis NE, Crawford SL, Green R: Vasomotor Symptoms across the menopause transition. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2018; 45 (4): 629–40. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 14. Davis SR, Taylor S, Hemachandra C, et al. : The 2023 practitioner's toolkit for managing menopause. Climacteric. 2023; 26 (6): 517–536. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 15. Woods NF, Mitchell ES, Coslov N, et al. : Transitioning to the menopausal transition: a scoping review of research on the Late Reproductive Stage in reproductive aging. Menopause. 2021; 28 (4): 447–66. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 16. Richardson MK, Coslov N, Woods NF: Seeking health care for perimenopausal symptoms: observations from the Women Living Better survey. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2023; 32 (4): 434–44. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 17. Berecki-Gisolf J, Begum N, Dobson AJ: Symptoms reported by women in midlife: menopausal transition or aging? Menopause. 2009; 16 (5): 1021–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 18. Voedisch AJ, Dunsmoor-Su R, Kasirsky J: Menopause: a global perspective and clinical guide for practice. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 64 (3): 528–54. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 19. Hartley C, McCarthy C, Herlihy N: Irish College of General Practitioners Quick Reference Guide (ICGP QRG) diagnosis & management of menopause in general practice. Dubln: ICGP, 2022. Reference Source 20. Orgad S, Rottenberg C: The menopause moment: The rising visibility of ‘the change’ in UK news coverage. Eur J Cult Stud. 2023; 136754942311595. Publisher Full Text 21. The ‘Davina’ effect, menopause and general practice responses to celebrity stories – BJGP Life. 2022; [cited 2023 Nov 15]. Reference Source 22. Menopause and the workplace: how to enable fulfilling working lives: government response. GOV.UK, [cited 2024 Feb 27]. Reference Source 23. Civil service menopause in the workplace policy framework. 2023; [cited 2024 Feb 27]. Reference Source 24. Kennedy B, Lundy D, Rachel M, et al. : Novel method of breaking down barriers in the provision of menopause care in Ireland. Post Reprod Health. 2023; 29 (3): 143–7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 25. Barber K, Charles A: Barriers to accessing effective treatment and support for menopausal symptoms: a qualitative study capturing the behaviours, beliefs and experiences of key stakeholders. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023; 17 : 2971–80. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 26. Hoga L, Rodolpho J, Gonçalves B, et al. : Women’s experience of menopause: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015; 13 (8): 250–337. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 27. O’Reilly K, McDermid F, McInnes S, et al. : An exploration of women’s knowledge and experience of perimenopause and menopause: an integrative literature review. J Clin Nurs. 2023; 32 (15–16): 4528–40. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 28. Ayers B, Forshaw M, Hunter MS: The impact of attitudes towards the menopause on women’s symptom experience: a systematic review. Maturitas. 2010; 65 (1): 28–36. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 29. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. : Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015; 4 (1): 1. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 30. McCarthy LJ: PRISMA P checklist. General practitioners’ and women’s experiences of perimenopause consultations: a qualitative evidence synthesis protocol. 2024; [cited 2024 May 17]. https://osf.io/awcf2/ 31. Noblit GW, DwightHare R: Meta-ethnography. SAGE Publications, Inc, 1988; [cited 2024 Feb 22]. Publisher Full Text 32. Sattar R, Lawton R, Panagioti M, et al. : Meta-ethnography in healthcare research: a guide to using a meta-ethnographic approach for literature synthesis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021; 21 (1): 50. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 33. France EF, Cunningham M, Ring N, et al. : Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019; 19 (1): 25. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 34. Davina McCall: sex, myths and the menopause. [cited 2024 Mar 31]. Reference Source 35. Refaei M, Mardanpour S, Masoumi SZ, et al. : Women’s experiences in the transition to menopause: a qualitative research. BMC Womens Health. 2022; 22 (1): 53. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 36. Herbert D, Bell RJ, Young K, et al. : Australian women’s understanding of menopause and its consequences: a qualitative study. Climacteric. 2020; 23 (6): 622–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 37. Stanzel KA, Hammarberg K, Fisher J: Primary healthcare providers’ attitudes and beliefs about the menopause-related care needs of women who have migrated from low- and middle-income countries to Australia. Aust J Prim Health. 2019; 26 (1): 88–94. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 38. Campbell R, Pound P, Morgan M, et al. : Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research. Health Technol Assess. 2011; 15 (43): 1–164. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 39. Toye F, Barker KL: A meta-ethnography to understand the experience of living with urinary incontinence: ‘is it just part and parcel of life?’ BMC Urol. 2020; 20 (1): 1. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 40. Ambikairajah A, Walsh E, Cherbuin N: A review of menopause nomenclature. Reprod Health. 2022; 19 (1): 29. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 41. Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A: Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012; 22 (10): 1435–43. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 42. Booth A: Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological review. Syst Rev. 2016; 5 : 74. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 43. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. : The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Med. 2021; 18 (3): e1003583. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 44. CASP Checklists - Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP - Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. [cited 2024 Feb 26]. Reference Source 45. Long HA, French DP, Brooks JM: Optimising the value of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis. Research Methods in Medicine & Health Sciences. 2020; 1 (1): 31–42. Publisher Full Text 46. Toye F, Seers K, Allcock N, et al. : Meta-ethnography 25 years on: challenges and insights for synthesising a large number of qualitative studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014; 14 (1): 80. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 47. Glaser BG, Strauss AL, Strutzel E: The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Nurs Res. 1968; 17 (4): 364. Reference Source 48. Toye F, Seers K, Allcock N, et al. : ‘Trying to pin down jelly’ - exploring intuitive processes in quality assessment for meta-ethnography. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13 (1): 46. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 49. Lewin S, Booth A, Glenton C, et al. : Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series. Implement Sci. 2018; 13 (Suppl 1): 2. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 50. GRADE-CERQual interactive summary of qualitative findings (iSoQ) [Computer program], Version 1.0. Norwegian Institute of Public Health. iSoQ, 2022; [cited 2024 Apr 26]. Reference Source 51. Wainwright M, Zahroh RI, Tunçalp Ö, et al. : The use of GRADE-CERQual in qualitative evidence synthesis: an evaluation of fidelity and reporting. Health Res Policy Syst. 2023; 21 (1): 77. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 52. Barrett A, Kajamaa A, Johnston J: How to … be reflexive when conducting qualitative research. Clin Teach. 2020; 17 (1): 9–12. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 24 Jun 2024 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment Author details Author details 1 School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, T12 XF62, Ireland 2 Department of General Practice, University College Cork, Cork, T12 XF62, Ireland Laura-Jane McCarthy Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Software, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Aoife O'Mahony Roles: Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Aisling Jennings Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Sheena M. McHugh Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Competing interests No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information Health Research Board-RL-2020-004 The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Article Versions (1) version 1 Published: 24 Jun 2024, 7:39 https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13908.1 Copyright © 2024 McCarthy LJ et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Download Export To Sciwheel Bibtex EndNote ProCite Ref. Manager (RIS) Sente metrics VIEWS $counts.viewCount downloads Citations open_in_new 0 open_in_new 0 open_in_new SEE MORE DETAILS CITE how to cite this article McCarthy LJ, O'Mahony A, Jennings A and McHugh SM. General practitioners’ and women’s experiences of perimenopause consultations: A qualitative evidence synthesis protocol [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . HRB Open Res 2024, 7 :39 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13908.1 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS track receive updates on this article Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article. TRACK THIS ARTICLE Share Open Peer Review Current Reviewer Status: ? Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 24 Jun 2024 Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Rana MM and Javed S. Reviewer Report For: General practitioners’ and women’s experiences of perimenopause consultations: A qualitative evidence synthesis protocol [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . HRB Open Res 2024, 7 :39 ( https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.15254.r40987 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-39/v1#referee-response-40987 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 28 Nov 2024 Muhammad Mohsin Rana , Medicine, Niazi Medical and Dental College Sargodha, Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan Sana Javed , Medicine, Nazar Health Care, Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.15254.r40987 The term perimenopause covers the symptoms before, during and after the menopause, starting from the time when cycles start getting abnormal through the one year after complete stopping to the period long after cessation, the hot flushes, sweating, fluctuating blood ... Continue reading READ ALL The term perimenopause covers the symptoms before, during and after the menopause, starting from the time when cycles start getting abnormal through the one year after complete stopping to the period long after cessation, the hot flushes, sweating, fluctuating blood pressure and mood swings may come much later. management options include non hormonal therapies and SSRIs antidepressants. The methodology section is very good. I would love to see the complete paper. This article has identified a very important but still neglected issue. Identifying Perimenopasal symptoms becomes very important for those females who had hysterectomy for any other reason and had almost forgotten the menstrual cycle. for them it becomes less likely to relate these symptoms with menopause. As general practitioners are the first contact professional persons, you have very rightly focused on them for the identification of the problem and at the same time suggesting solutions. I would suggest adding a few comments about associated wide swings in Blood Pressure associated with vasomotor symptoms which may lead to unnecessary work up and prescription of antihypertensive drugs. Associated anxiety, depression and mood swings can seriously impair quality of life in these females, this needs to be part of every assessment of menopause, few comments may be added on it. Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described? Yes Is the study design appropriate for the research question? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others? Yes Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? Yes Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Public Health and Patient Education, Toxicology and Emergency Medicine, Respiratory and Pulmonary Care We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Rana MM and Javed S. Reviewer Report For: General practitioners’ and women’s experiences of perimenopause consultations: A qualitative evidence synthesis protocol [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . HRB Open Res 2024, 7 :39 ( https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.15254.r40987 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-39/v1#referee-response-40987 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Hayfield N. Reviewer Report For: General practitioners’ and women’s experiences of perimenopause consultations: A qualitative evidence synthesis protocol [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . HRB Open Res 2024, 7 :39 ( https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.15254.r41188 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-39/v1#referee-response-41188 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 20 Sep 2024 Nikki Hayfield , University of the West of England, Bristol, England, UK Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.15254.r41188 Thank you for the opportunity to review this paper reporting the protocol on GP and women’s experiences of peri/menopause consultations. There are some areas where the authors could make some further clarifications or where I had thought ... Continue reading READ ALL Thank you for the opportunity to review this paper reporting the protocol on GP and women’s experiences of peri/menopause consultations. There are some areas where the authors could make some further clarifications or where I had thought that the authors might like to consider as they develop their review. It would be useful to capture in the abstract some nuance that you touch upon in the paper itself around how menopause and peri/menopause may be used interchangeably. In the abstract the statement you make is that: ‘research to date has focused on menopause, not the transition to menopause’ – but precisely because the terms have been used interchangeably this is slightly misleading (e.g., menopause has been taken as a catch all term for perimenopause and menopause, hence some of the existing menopause research will include aspects of transition to menopause). However, perimenopause may not be as easy to separate out from menopause to the extent that it can be understood as an entirely ‘unique experience’ especially given the uptake in HRT and as women near the end of peri/menopause. From my position as a social psychologist, aspects of the paper felt focused perhaps a little too heavily on the medical aspects of perimenopause. There are not only vasomotor ‘symptoms’ during this time but also a myriad of potential psychological impacts which are often considered as important a part of experiences during this time- and may also be explicitly relevant when women are consulting their GPs (e.g., anxiety, depression, brain fog) both in terms of them being problematic symptoms and in how they feel about the consultation when experiencing these types of issues.. I have most commonly seen menopause hormone therapy referred to as hormone replacement therapy (HRT) – although I have heard of critiques of the term HRT and a turn to abbreviating this to hormone therapy. I wonder why the authors used the term MHT? Consultations may be complex and challenging for GPs, as you note, and so too can they be for women. It is the case that many women report having little knowledge of peri/menopause, but it may also be that women are becoming more aware through a recent increase in mainstream media and the cultural interest in peri/menopause. It is also likely that many women have to educate themselves in order to be taken seriously or heard by their GP and healthcare professionals. Further, they may well be having to persist to be taken by GPs and may be turning to private consultations as a last resort to be heard and supported. Finally, not all women will necessarily be seeking HRT (although some will be) but rather be seeking validation, advice, or alternative ways of managing peri/menopause. It’s a particularly important point that not all symptoms during peri/menopause or attributed to peri/menopause are necessarily attributable – thank you for highlighting this. There is increasingly a sense that may not yet be evidenced in published data that peri/menopausal experiences may start from a younger age than in the past or than is currently acknowledged. This might be a consideration alongside the current NICE guidelines age criteria and women under that age being required to have blood tests – that as you note, may not be clinically useful. It may also be a part of the reason that women are dissatisfied with their care, particularly those under 45. In community spaces there is speculation that the results of tests are unreliable and women noting that they would prefer tor their doctors to consider other measures (e.g., the menopause checklist) even in those under 45. While both GPs and women are present during peri/menopause consultations, their experiences are quite different. I would have liked to see a stronger rationale for examining these together rather than as two separate reviews. My expertise does not lie in conducting qualitative evidence synthesis. However, the protocol seems clear and comprehensive and draws on recognised methods and tools. I could not see the term doctor included in the search terms and this would seem a sensible addition. Has a scoping exercise been completed to ensure there are sufficient studies to synthesise within these topic areas? I wondered whether you will include all those assigned female at birth (e.g., any studies with trans men and non-binary people). It would be helpful to be clear on this from the outset.. Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described? Yes Is the study design appropriate for the research question? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others? Partly Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? Not applicable Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Peri/menopause; Qualitative research methods I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Hayfield N. Reviewer Report For: General practitioners’ and women’s experiences of perimenopause consultations: A qualitative evidence synthesis protocol [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . HRB Open Res 2024, 7 :39 ( https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.15254.r41188 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-39/v1#referee-response-41188 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Willman A. Reviewer Report For: General practitioners’ and women’s experiences of perimenopause consultations: A qualitative evidence synthesis protocol [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . HRB Open Res 2024, 7 :39 ( https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.15254.r41184 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-39/v1#referee-response-41184 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 22 Jul 2024 Antony Willman , University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, UK Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.15254.r41184 Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described? Yes Is the study design appropriate for the research question? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others? Yes Are the ... Continue reading READ ALL Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described? Yes Is the study design appropriate for the research question? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others? Yes Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? N/A I cannot really add anything more to my comments below which I drafted while reading and re-reading. The only thing I can pick up is the decision to include mixed method papers (albeit with a qualitative analysis). I would totally agree with this strategy, it’s just justifying it in light of the decision to use the framework by Sattar et al. It’s a small point but might be worth expanding on. I think this proposal is otherwise excellent and definitely needed, given the lack of evidence in this area. 1.( McCarthy et al.,2024)(Ref-1) Please view the additional review comments in the file found here Page.3: I would agree. It’s a completely different heterogenous presentation. page.3: In my experience, especially with psychological symptoms, it can be difficult to know the aetiology but I share this with the patient. A very well informed patient told me after we agreed trial of HRT over her anti-depressant which wasn’t helping, she had never had depression before so was surprised to be started on fluoxetine when she did wonder about the PMP. The GP at the time didn’t ask about this or consider HRT as a treatment. For some other women however, the PMP may trigger a flare of a pre-existing affective disorder. Management may then be slightly different. So much has changed since 2010. GPs are much better informed and possibly more willing to try HRT for cognitive decline or impairment although the evidence isn’t great. See: (Spector A et al.,. 2024 ) (Ref-2) page.4: I found quite a lot of survey data of which little was published. For example, this: (Newson et al., 2019)(Ref-3) There was clearly more to it than what appeared in print so it might be worthwhile approaching the authors directly who I think will be responsive to your request. I agree with the grey literature search otherwise. page.5: Searching might want to be expanded to include common presentations of the perimenopause which aren’t always recognized. Psychological symptoms, such as anxiety and insomnia, and other physical symptoms such as dermatological complaints. Also searching for tools which aid in both the diagnosis of the PMP (Greene, Balance app), and of other related condition such as PMP depression and the use of the MENO-D scale. Might want to include the use of antidepressants as often these are prescribed when the PMP isn’t recognized. page.5: Sattar et al. state that meta-ethnography should only include qual studies, not mixed method. I think MM studies should be included, as some of the examples I found included thematic analysis of survey free text data as well as further interviews +/- focus groups. For example: (Harper JC et al.,2018)(Ref-4) It might be worthwhile including the reasoning for this. page.6: Important to recognize the impact of the WHI and Million Women Study on HRT prescribing. GPs may still have had residual skepticism in 2014 despite NICE guidelines. The availability of TD estrogen and micronized progesterone has probably been a factor increasing HRT use alongside better informed patients. page.7: I would agree page.7: This is important. I think managing the PMP is a great example of shared decision making and using ICE to achieve this. The PMP is a lot more widely known about but not all symptoms are due to this. There may be a risk we are over diagnosing it, and potentially missing other conditions. Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described? Yes Is the study design appropriate for the research question? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others? Yes Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? Not applicable References 1. McCarthy L, O'Mahony A, Jennings A, McHugh S: General practitioners’ and women’s experiences of perimenopause consultations: A qualitative evidence synthesis protocol. HRB Open Research . 2024; 7 . Publisher Full Text 2. Spector A, Li Z, He L, Badawy Y, et al.: The effectiveness of psychosocial interventions on non-physiological symptoms of menopause: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord . 2024; 352 : 460-472 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 3. Newson L, Connolly A: Survey demonstrates suboptimal menopause care in UK despite NICE guidelines. Maturitas . 2019; 124 . Publisher Full Text 4. Harper JC, Phillips S, Biswakarma R, Yasmin E, et al.: An online survey of perimenopausal women to determine their attitudes and knowledge of the menopause. Womens Health (Lond) . 2022; 18 : 17455057221106890 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Primary care, women’s health, medical education. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Willman A. Reviewer Report For: General practitioners’ and women’s experiences of perimenopause consultations: A qualitative evidence synthesis protocol [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . HRB Open Res 2024, 7 :39 ( https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.15254.r41184 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-39/v1#referee-response-41184 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 24 Jun 2024 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment keyboard_arrow_left keyboard_arrow_right Open Peer Review Reviewer Status info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Reviewer Reports Invited Reviewers 1 2 3 Version 1 24 Jun 24 read read read Antony Willman , University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Nikki Hayfield , University of the West of England, Bristol, UK Muhammad Mohsin Rana , Niazi Medical and Dental College Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan Sana Javed , Nazar Health Care, Sargodha, Pakistan Comments on this article All Comments (0) Add a comment Sign up for content alerts Sign Up You are now signed up to receive this alert keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2024 Rana M et al. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 28 Nov 2024 | for Version 1 Muhammad Mohsin Rana , Medicine, Niazi Medical and Dental College Sargodha, Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan Sana Javed , Medicine, Nazar Health Care, Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan 0 Views copyright © 2024 Rana M et al. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions The term perimenopause covers the symptoms before, during and after the menopause, starting from the time when cycles start getting abnormal through the one year after complete stopping to the period long after cessation, the hot flushes, sweating, fluctuating blood pressure and mood swings may come much later. management options include non hormonal therapies and SSRIs antidepressants. The methodology section is very good. I would love to see the complete paper. This article has identified a very important but still neglected issue. Identifying Perimenopasal symptoms becomes very important for those females who had hysterectomy for any other reason and had almost forgotten the menstrual cycle. for them it becomes less likely to relate these symptoms with menopause. As general practitioners are the first contact professional persons, you have very rightly focused on them for the identification of the problem and at the same time suggesting solutions. I would suggest adding a few comments about associated wide swings in Blood Pressure associated with vasomotor symptoms which may lead to unnecessary work up and prescription of antihypertensive drugs. Associated anxiety, depression and mood swings can seriously impair quality of life in these females, this needs to be part of every assessment of menopause, few comments may be added on it. Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described? Yes Is the study design appropriate for the research question? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others? Yes Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? Yes Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Public Health and Patient Education, Toxicology and Emergency Medicine, Respiratory and Pulmonary Care We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Rana MM and Javed S. Peer Review Report For: General practitioners’ and women’s experiences of perimenopause consultations: A qualitative evidence synthesis protocol [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . HRB Open Res 2024, 7 :39 ( https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.15254.r40987) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-39/v1#referee-response-40987 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2024 Hayfield N. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 20 Sep 2024 | for Version 1 Nikki Hayfield , University of the West of England, Bristol, England, UK 0 Views copyright © 2024 Hayfield N. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Thank you for the opportunity to review this paper reporting the protocol on GP and women’s experiences of peri/menopause consultations. There are some areas where the authors could make some further clarifications or where I had thought that the authors might like to consider as they develop their review. It would be useful to capture in the abstract some nuance that you touch upon in the paper itself around how menopause and peri/menopause may be used interchangeably. In the abstract the statement you make is that: ‘research to date has focused on menopause, not the transition to menopause’ – but precisely because the terms have been used interchangeably this is slightly misleading (e.g., menopause has been taken as a catch all term for perimenopause and menopause, hence some of the existing menopause research will include aspects of transition to menopause). However, perimenopause may not be as easy to separate out from menopause to the extent that it can be understood as an entirely ‘unique experience’ especially given the uptake in HRT and as women near the end of peri/menopause. From my position as a social psychologist, aspects of the paper felt focused perhaps a little too heavily on the medical aspects of perimenopause. There are not only vasomotor ‘symptoms’ during this time but also a myriad of potential psychological impacts which are often considered as important a part of experiences during this time- and may also be explicitly relevant when women are consulting their GPs (e.g., anxiety, depression, brain fog) both in terms of them being problematic symptoms and in how they feel about the consultation when experiencing these types of issues.. I have most commonly seen menopause hormone therapy referred to as hormone replacement therapy (HRT) – although I have heard of critiques of the term HRT and a turn to abbreviating this to hormone therapy. I wonder why the authors used the term MHT? Consultations may be complex and challenging for GPs, as you note, and so too can they be for women. It is the case that many women report having little knowledge of peri/menopause, but it may also be that women are becoming more aware through a recent increase in mainstream media and the cultural interest in peri/menopause. It is also likely that many women have to educate themselves in order to be taken seriously or heard by their GP and healthcare professionals. Further, they may well be having to persist to be taken by GPs and may be turning to private consultations as a last resort to be heard and supported. Finally, not all women will necessarily be seeking HRT (although some will be) but rather be seeking validation, advice, or alternative ways of managing peri/menopause. It’s a particularly important point that not all symptoms during peri/menopause or attributed to peri/menopause are necessarily attributable – thank you for highlighting this. There is increasingly a sense that may not yet be evidenced in published data that peri/menopausal experiences may start from a younger age than in the past or than is currently acknowledged. This might be a consideration alongside the current NICE guidelines age criteria and women under that age being required to have blood tests – that as you note, may not be clinically useful. It may also be a part of the reason that women are dissatisfied with their care, particularly those under 45. In community spaces there is speculation that the results of tests are unreliable and women noting that they would prefer tor their doctors to consider other measures (e.g., the menopause checklist) even in those under 45. While both GPs and women are present during peri/menopause consultations, their experiences are quite different. I would have liked to see a stronger rationale for examining these together rather than as two separate reviews. My expertise does not lie in conducting qualitative evidence synthesis. However, the protocol seems clear and comprehensive and draws on recognised methods and tools. I could not see the term doctor included in the search terms and this would seem a sensible addition. Has a scoping exercise been completed to ensure there are sufficient studies to synthesise within these topic areas? I wondered whether you will include all those assigned female at birth (e.g., any studies with trans men and non-binary people). It would be helpful to be clear on this from the outset.. Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described? Yes Is the study design appropriate for the research question? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others? Partly Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? Not applicable Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Peri/menopause; Qualitative research methods I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Hayfield N. Peer Review Report For: General practitioners’ and women’s experiences of perimenopause consultations: A qualitative evidence synthesis protocol [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . HRB Open Res 2024, 7 :39 ( https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.15254.r41188) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-39/v1#referee-response-41188 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2024 Willman A. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 22 Jul 2024 | for Version 1 Antony Willman , University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, UK 0 Views copyright © 2024 Willman A. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described? Yes Is the study design appropriate for the research question? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others? Yes Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? N/A I cannot really add anything more to my comments below which I drafted while reading and re-reading. The only thing I can pick up is the decision to include mixed method papers (albeit with a qualitative analysis). I would totally agree with this strategy, it’s just justifying it in light of the decision to use the framework by Sattar et al. It’s a small point but might be worth expanding on. I think this proposal is otherwise excellent and definitely needed, given the lack of evidence in this area. 1.( McCarthy et al.,2024)(Ref-1) Please view the additional review comments in the file found here Page.3: I would agree. It’s a completely different heterogenous presentation. page.3: In my experience, especially with psychological symptoms, it can be difficult to know the aetiology but I share this with the patient. A very well informed patient told me after we agreed trial of HRT over her anti-depressant which wasn’t helping, she had never had depression before so was surprised to be started on fluoxetine when she did wonder about the PMP. The GP at the time didn’t ask about this or consider HRT as a treatment. For some other women however, the PMP may trigger a flare of a pre-existing affective disorder. Management may then be slightly different. So much has changed since 2010. GPs are much better informed and possibly more willing to try HRT for cognitive decline or impairment although the evidence isn’t great. See: (Spector A et al.,. 2024 ) (Ref-2) page.4: I found quite a lot of survey data of which little was published. For example, this: (Newson et al., 2019)(Ref-3) There was clearly more to it than what appeared in print so it might be worthwhile approaching the authors directly who I think will be responsive to your request. I agree with the grey literature search otherwise. page.5: Searching might want to be expanded to include common presentations of the perimenopause which aren’t always recognized. Psychological symptoms, such as anxiety and insomnia, and other physical symptoms such as dermatological complaints. Also searching for tools which aid in both the diagnosis of the PMP (Greene, Balance app), and of other related condition such as PMP depression and the use of the MENO-D scale. Might want to include the use of antidepressants as often these are prescribed when the PMP isn’t recognized. page.5: Sattar et al. state that meta-ethnography should only include qual studies, not mixed method. I think MM studies should be included, as some of the examples I found included thematic analysis of survey free text data as well as further interviews +/- focus groups. For example: (Harper JC et al.,2018)(Ref-4) It might be worthwhile including the reasoning for this. page.6: Important to recognize the impact of the WHI and Million Women Study on HRT prescribing. GPs may still have had residual skepticism in 2014 despite NICE guidelines. The availability of TD estrogen and micronized progesterone has probably been a factor increasing HRT use alongside better informed patients. page.7: I would agree page.7: This is important. I think managing the PMP is a great example of shared decision making and using ICE to achieve this. The PMP is a lot more widely known about but not all symptoms are due to this. There may be a risk we are over diagnosing it, and potentially missing other conditions. Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described? Yes Is the study design appropriate for the research question? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others? Yes Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? Not applicable References 1. McCarthy L, O'Mahony A, Jennings A, McHugh S: General practitioners’ and women’s experiences of perimenopause consultations: A qualitative evidence synthesis protocol. HRB Open Research . 2024; 7 . Publisher Full Text 2. Spector A, Li Z, He L, Badawy Y, et al.: The effectiveness of psychosocial interventions on non-physiological symptoms of menopause: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord . 2024; 352 : 460-472 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 3. Newson L, Connolly A: Survey demonstrates suboptimal menopause care in UK despite NICE guidelines. Maturitas . 2019; 124 . Publisher Full Text 4. Harper JC, Phillips S, Biswakarma R, Yasmin E, et al.: An online survey of perimenopausal women to determine their attitudes and knowledge of the menopause. Womens Health (Lond) . 2022; 18 : 17455057221106890 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Primary care, women’s health, medical education. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Willman A. Peer Review Report For: General practitioners’ and women’s experiences of perimenopause consultations: A qualitative evidence synthesis protocol [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] . HRB Open Res 2024, 7 :39 ( https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.15254.r41184) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-39/v1#referee-response-41184 Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Adjust parameters to alter display View on desktop for interactive features Includes Interactive Elements View on desktop for interactive features Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Stay Updated Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles Register with HRB Open Research Already registered? Sign in Not now, thanks close PLEASE NOTE If you are an AUTHOR of this article, please check that you signed in with the account associated with this article otherwise we cannot automatically identify your role as an author and your comment will be labelled as a “User Comment”. If you are a REVIEWER of this article, please check that you have signed in with the account associated with this article and then go to your account to submit your report, please do not post your review here. If you do not have access to your original account, please contact us . All commenters must hold a formal affiliation as per our Policies . The information that you give us will be displayed next to your comment. User comments must be in English, comprehensible and relevant to the article under discussion. We reserve the right to remove any comments that we consider to be inappropriate, offensive or otherwise in breach of the User Comment Terms and Conditions . Commenters must not use a comment for personal attacks. When criticisms of the article are based on unpublished data, the data should be made available. I accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions Please confirm that you accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions. Affiliation ✕ refresh Please enter your institution. Note: To add your institution or organisation, start typing the name and then select the correct name from the list. Where applicable, the name will appear in both the original language and in English. Do not paste in the name. If the name does not appear in the drop-down list, we will display the information you have entered. ✕ refresh Country/Region * USA UK Canada China France Germany Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Federated States of Micronesia Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo (Serbia and Montenegro) Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Minor Outlying Islands of the United States Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island North Korea North Macedonia Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Is South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The Gambia The Netherlands Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu UK USA Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Wallis and Futuna West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Please select your country/region. You must enter a comment. Competing Interests Please disclose any competing interests that might be construed to influence your judgment of the article's or peer review report's validity or importance. Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Please state your competing interests The comment has been saved. An error has occurred. Please try again. Cancel Post var lTitle = "General practitioners\’ and women\’s...".replace("'", ''); var linkedInUrl = "http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?url=https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-39/v1" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle) + "&summary=" + encodeURIComponent('Read the article by '); var deliciousUrl = "https://del.icio.us/post?url=https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-39/v1&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); var redditUrl = "http://reddit.com/submit?url=https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-39/v1" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); linkedInUrl += encodeURIComponent('McCarthy LJ et al.'); var offsetTop = /chrome/i.test( navigator.userAgent ) ? 4 : -10; var addthis_config = { ui_offset_top: offsetTop, services_compact : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_expanded : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_custom : [ { name: "LinkedIn", url: linkedInUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_linkedin.svg" }, { name: "Mendeley", url: "http://www.mendeley.com/import/?url=https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-39/v1/mendeley", icon:"/img/icon/at_mendeley.svg" }, { name: "Reddit", url: redditUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_reddit.svg" }, ] }; var addthis_share = { url: "https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-39", templates : { twitter : "General practitioners\’ and women\’s experiences of perimenopause.... McCarthy LJ et al., published by " + "@HRBOpenRes" + ", https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-39/v1" } }; if (typeof(addthis) != "undefined"){ addthis.addEventListener('addthis.ready', checkCount); addthis.addEventListener('addthis.menu.share', checkCount); } $(".f1r-shares-twitter").attr("href", "https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=" + addthis_share.templates.twitter); $(".f1r-shares-facebook").attr("href", "https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=" + addthis_share.url); $(".f1r-shares-linkedin").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[0].url); $(".f1r-shares-reddit").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[2].url); $(".f1r-shares-mendelay").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[1].url); function checkCount(){ setTimeout(function(){ $(".addthis_button_expanded").each(function(){ var count = $(this).text(); if (count !== "" && count != "0") $(this).removeClass("is-hidden"); else $(this).addClass("is-hidden"); }); }, 1000); } close How to cite this report {{reportCitation}} Cancel Copy Citation Details $(function(){R.ui.buttonDropdowns('.dropdown-for-downloads');}); $(function(){R.ui.toolbarDropdowns('.toolbar-dropdown-for-downloads');}); $.get("/articles/acj/13908/15254") new F1000.Clipboard(); new F1000.ThesaurusTermsDisplay("articles", "article", "15254"); $(document).ready(function() { $( "#frame1" ).on('load', function() { var mydiv = $(this).contents().find("div"); var h = mydiv.height(); console.log(h) }); var tooltipLivingFigure = jQuery(".interactive-living-figure-label .icon-more-info"), titleLivingFigure = tooltipLivingFigure.attr("title"); tooltipLivingFigure.simpletip({ fixed: true, position: ["-115", "30"], baseClass: 'small-tooltip', content:titleLivingFigure + " " }); tooltipLivingFigure.removeAttr("title"); $("body").on("click", ".cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); var ref = $(this).attr("data-ref"); $(this).closest(".living-figure-list-container").find("#" + ref).fadeIn(200); }); $("body").on("click", ".close-cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).closest(".popup-window-wrapper").fadeOut(200); }); $(document).on("mouseup", function(e) { var metricsContainer = $(".article-metrics-popover-wrapper"); if (!metricsContainer.is(e.target) && metricsContainer.has(e.target).length === 0) { $(".article-metrics-close-button").click(); } }); var articleId = $('#articleId').val(); if($("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics) { $("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics(articleId, { articleMetricsView: true }); } }); var figshareWidget = $(".new_figshare_widget"); if (figshareWidget.length > 0) { window.figshare.load("f1000", function(Widget) { // Select a tag/tags defined in your page. In this tag we will place the widget. _.map(figshareWidget, function(el){ var widget = new Widget({ articleId: $(el).attr("figshare_articleId") //height:300 // this is the height of the viewer part. [Default: 550] }); widget.initialize(); // initialize the widget widget.mount(el); // mount it in a tag that's on your page // this will save the widget on the global scope for later use from // your JS scripts. This line is optional. //window.widget = widget; }); }); } close Error Close Add Reset F1000.MICROSERVICES.AFFILIATION = ''; $(document).ready(function () { $('.js-affiliations-form').each((index, form) => { new AffiliationForm({ formId: form.id, institutionErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-institution', departmentErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-department', placeSelector: '.js-add-comment-place', stateSelector: '.js-add-comment-state', zipCodeSelector: '.js-add-comment-zipcode', countrySelector: '.js-add-comment-country', countryErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-country', }); }); }); $(document).ready(function () { var reportIds = { "40992": 0, "41184": 30, "41185": 0, "41186": 0, "41187": 0, "41188": 19, "41189": 0, "40983": 0, "40984": 0, "40985": 0, "40986": 0, "40987": 13, "40988": 0, "41180": 0, "40989": 0, "41181": 0, "40990": 0, "41182": 0, "40991": 0, "41183": 0, }; $(".referee-response-container,.js-referee-report").each(function(index, el) { var reportId = $(el).attr("data-reportid"), reportCount = reportIds[reportId] || 0; $(el).find(".comments-count-container,.js-referee-report-views").html(reportCount); }); var uuidInput = $("#article_uuid"), oldUUId = uuidInput.val(), newUUId = "f079f40c-33c6-43f8-b312-4a4ee9274602"; uuidInput.val(newUUId); $("a[href*='article_uuid=']").each(function(index, el) { var newHref = $(el).attr("href").replace(oldUUId, newUUId); $(el).attr("href", newHref); }); }); Are you a HRB-funded researcher? Submission to HRB Open Research is open to all HRB grantholders or people working on a HRB-funded/co-funded grant on or since 1 January 2017. Sign up for information about developments, publishing and publications from HRB Open Research. First Name * You must provide your first name Last Name * You must provide your last name Email * You must provide a valid email address Institution You must provide an institution. Submit Thank you! We'll keep you updated on any major new updates to HRB Open Research HRB Open Research Browse How to Publish About Contact RSS Cookie Notice Privacy Notice Legal Submit Your Research © F1000 Research Limited and its licensors ISSN 2515-4826 | Legal background var F1000platform = new F1000.Platform({ name: "hrb", displayName: "HRB Open Research", hostName: "hrbopenresearch.org", id: "5", editorialEmail: "[email protected]", infoEmail: "[email protected]" }); Sign In Remember me Forgotten your password? Sign In Cancel Email or password not correct. Please try again Please wait... $(function(){ // Note: All the setup needs to run against a name attribute and *not* the id due the clonish // nature of facebox... $("a[id=googleSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("GOOGLE"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=facebookSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("FACEBOOK"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=orcidSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("ORCID"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); }); If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password. The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000. Email address not valid, please try again You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here . You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here . Code not correct, please try again Reset password Cancel Email us for further assistance. Server error, please try again. If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password. If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance. Please wait... Register $(document).ready(function () { signIn.createSignInAsRow($("#sign-in-form-gfb-popup")); $(".target-field").each(function () { var uris = $(this).val().split("/"); if (uris.pop() === "login") { $(this).val(uris.toString().replace(",","/")); } }); }); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a03653906b364193',t:'MTc4MDA2NjM4Mw=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0