Spider webs as reservoirs of culturable fungal diversity: evidence from orb-weaving Cyclosa mulmeinensis spider in Thai rice agroecosystems

2026 · doi:10.3897/arphapreprints.e187289
preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Spider webs are increasingly recognized as passive environmental collectors; however, fungi remain among the least explored biological components associated with spider silk, particularly when examined using culture-based and taxonomically resolved approaches. In this study, we investigated the culturable fungal diversity associated with two-dimensional, debris-decorated orb webs—both with and without egg sacs—constructed by the orb-weaving spider Cyclosa mulmeinensis in rice agroecosystems in Thailand. Using a standardized field-to-laboratory isolation workflow combined with genus-appropriate multilocus phylogenetic analyses, decorated orb webs were sampled from three provinces, and fungi were isolated via dilution plating on potato dextrose agar supplemented with chloramphenicol. A total of 112 fungal isolates were recovered, grouped into 45 colony morphotypes and resolved into 23 taxa across six genera: Alternaria , Aspergillus , Cladosporium , Fusarium , Penicillium , and Talaromyces . Taxonomic placement was inferred primarily from multilocus phylogenetic analyses, with morphological characteristics used as supporting evidence. Several isolates formed well-supported lineages within Cladosporium and Talaromyces that could not be assigned to any described species, indicating the presence of potentially undescribed taxa. Fungal richness and taxonomic composition varied among sampling locations, and exploratory comparisons suggested that debris-decorated webs bearing egg sacs harbored a higher culturable fungal diversity than debris-decorated webs without egg sacs. Collectively, these findings highlight spider webs as a low-impact, non-destructive substrate for accessing viable fungal biodiversity in rice agroecosystems, facilitating repeatable culture-based recovery of taxonomically informative—and potentially novel—fungal lineages for biodiversity assessment and environmental monitoring.
Full text 2,297 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Preprint ARPHA Preprints https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e187289 (03 Feb 2026) https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e187289 (03 Feb 2026) Published in: Biodiversity Data Journal https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.14.e187035 Other versions: - Preprint InfoPreprint Info - CiteCite - MetricsMetrics - CommentComment - RelatedRelated - CitedCited ARPHA Preprints doi: 10.3897/arphapreprints.e187289 First posted 03 Feb 2026 Authors Thanakron Into - Corresponding author Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand Booppa Petcharad - Corresponding author Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathum Thani, Thailand Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathum Thani, Thailand National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathum Thani, Thailand National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathum Thani, Thailand National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathum Thani, Thailand Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results. Supporting agencies Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI) and Thammasat University (TU) This is an open access preprint distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0