Improving Growth Predictions in Aquaculture through an Improved Bioenergetics Model Incorporating Feed Composition and Nutrient Digestibility for Largemouth Bass ( Micropterus salmoides )

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text

This paper developed and tested a refined bioenergetics model for predicting largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) growth by explicitly incorporating feed composition and nutrient-specific digestibility coefficients (ADCs) to estimate macronutrient-resolved digestible energy, rather than relying only on gross energy intake. Using a compiled dataset of 235 fish (165 calibration, 70 independent validation) and an additional field experimental dataset, the authors first optimized a gross-energy-based model (improving R2 from 0.62 to 0.96) before showing that the refined model achieved better performance on the compiled data (R2 = 0.97; RMSE = 19.86 g; MAE = 10.31 g) and high accuracy in the field experiment (R2 = 0.98 and 0.97), while the optimized GE-based model performed poorly there. A stated limitation is that the work is framed around model-based prediction using available datasets rather than direct biological mechanisms beyond the energy-partitioning structure of the model. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Bioenergetics models serve as mechanistic tools to predict growth by linking energy intake, metabolic expenditure, and nutrient partitioning. However, traditional models rely primarily on gross energy (GE) intake, thereby oversimplifying the effects of feed composition and nutrient availability on fish growth. This work therefore proposed a refined bioenergetics model incorporating nutrient-specific digestibility coefficients (ADCs) and feed composition and tested using a compiled dataset (n=235; 165 for calibration and 70 for independent validation) and a field experimental dataset of largemouth bass ( Micropterus salmoides ). We first optimized parameters of a gross energy intake–based bioenergetics model, increasing R 2 from 0.62 to 0.96 and thereby providing a calibrated foundation for subsequent refined model. The refined model demonstrated superior predictive performance on the compiled dataset (R 2 = 0.97) with RMSE = 19.86 g and MAE = 10.31 g), representing reductions of 4.13% in RMSE and 19.98% in MAE and a 1.03% increase in R 2 compared with the optimized GE-based model. In the field experiment, the refined model achieved high predictive accuracy (R 2 = 0.98 and 0.97), whereas the optimized GE-based model showed poor performance (R 2 = 0.33 and 0.06 respectively). This study is, to our knowledge, the first bioenergetics framework for largemouth bass that decomposes feed composition and nutrient-specific ADCs to compute macronutrient-resolved digestible energy, enabling formulation-aware growth prediction and nutrient-oriented optimization.
Full text 1,655 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Abstract Bioenergetics models serve as mechanistic tools to predict growth by linking energy intake, metabolic expenditure, and nutrient partitioning. However, traditional models rely primarily on gross energy (GE) intake, thereby oversimplifying the effects of feed composition and nutrient availability on fish growth. This work therefore proposed a refined bioenergetics model incorporating nutrient-specific digestibility coefficients (ADCs) and feed composition and tested using a compiled dataset (n=235; 165 for calibration and 70 for independent validation) and a field experimental dataset of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). We first optimized parameters of a gross energy intake–based bioenergetics model, increasing R2 from 0.62 to 0.96 and thereby providing a calibrated foundation for subsequent refined model. The refined model demonstrated superior predictive performance on the compiled dataset (R2 = 0.97) with RMSE = 19.86 g and MAE = 10.31 g), representing reductions of 4.13% in RMSE and 19.98% in MAE and a 1.03% increase in R2 compared with the optimized GE-based model. In the field experiment, the refined model achieved high predictive accuracy (R2 = 0.98 and 0.97), whereas the optimized GE-based model showed poor performance (R2 = 0.33 and 0.06 respectively). This study is, to our knowledge, the first bioenergetics framework for largemouth bass that decomposes feed composition and nutrient-specific ADCs to compute macronutrient-resolved digestible energy, enabling formulation-aware growth prediction and nutrient-oriented optimization. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0