A selection-based framework for evaluating transgenerational phenotypic plasticity under environmental change

preprint OA: closed

Abstract

Rapid environmental change has intensified interest in inter- and transgenerational phenotypic plasticity (TGP) as a potential mechanism by which populations may buffer the fitness consequences of climate change. Parental environments frequently induce shifts in offspring phenotypes, and such responses are often implicitly assumed to enhance offspring fitness and thus population persistence. However, evidence for phenotypic change alone is insufficient to demonstrate adaptive value, particularly when fitness is inferred from performance proxies rather than survival or reproduction. Here, we argue that a more agnostic null hypothesis is required when evaluating the fitness consequences of TGP: that intergenerational phenotypic shifts may be neutral, maladaptive, or context-dependent, rather than inherently beneficial. We propose selection analysis as a general, quantitative framework for assessing whether phenotypic variation associated with parental environments align with fitness variation in offspring. This approach does not seek to identify the mechanistic basis of TGP, nor to disentangle plasticity from genetic or epigenetic causation, but instead provides a diagnostic test of whether observed phenotypic shifts are associated with positive, negative, or absent selection. Using worked examples across taxa and environmental contexts, we demonstrate that TGP frequently does not align with selection, despite pronounced changes in offspring phenotype. These findings highlight the risk of over-interpreting intergenerational phenotypic responses as evidence of resilience to environmental change. Integrating selection analysis into studies of TGP provides a tractable and comparable framework for evaluating whether intergenerational responses enhance, constrain, or have no effect on population persistence under environmental change.
Full text 2,794 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Rapid environmental change has intensified interest in inter- and transgenerational phenotypic plasticity (TGP) as a potential mechanism by which populations may buffer the fitness consequences of climate change. Parental environments frequently induce shifts in offspring phenotypes, and such responses are often implicitly assumed to enhance offspring fitness and thus population persistence. However, evidence for phenotypic change alone is insufficient to demonstrate adaptive value, particularly when fitness is inferred from performance proxies rather than survival or reproduction. Here, we argue that a more agnostic null hypothesis is required when evaluating the fitness consequences of TGP: that intergenerational phenotypic shifts may be neutral, maladaptive, or context-dependent, rather than inherently beneficial. We propose selection analysis as a general, quantitative framework for assessing whether phenotypic variation associated with parental environments align with fitness variation in offspring. This approach does not seek to identify the mechanistic basis of TGP, nor to disentangle plasticity from genetic or epigenetic causation, but instead provides a diagnostic test of whether observed phenotypic shifts are associated with positive, negative, or absent selection. Using worked examples across taxa and environmental contexts, we demonstrate that TGP frequently does not align with selection, despite pronounced changes in offspring phenotype. These findings highlight the risk of over-interpreting intergenerational phenotypic responses as evidence of resilience to environmental change. Integrating selection analysis into studies of TGP provides a tractable and comparable framework for evaluating whether intergenerational responses enhance, constrain, or have no effect on population persistence under environmental change. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2R675 Life Sciences adaptive plasticity, fitness, intergenerational phenotypic plasticity, natural selection, offspring, parental effects, phenotypic plasticity, survival, reproduction Published: 2026-04-04 13:37 Last Updated: 2026-04-04 13:37 Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: The data and code supporting the results used for Case studies 1-3 are archived in the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/R7Q35). Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-07-12T06:46:07.823367+00:00