The Triphasic Model of Love: A Developmental Architecture of Attraction, Immersion, and Union
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
⚙
AI-generated summary
by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14
ⓘ
This paper proposes the Triphasic Model of Love, describing a developmental progression through Attraction, Immersion, and Union phases, each characterized by distinct cognitive and motivational changes leading to stabilized attachment.
⚙
AI-generated deep summary
by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14
· read from full text
ⓘ
The provided text for this “Triphasic Model of Love” paper is largely bibliographic and licensing information and does not include the study’s methods, results, or any substantive description of findings. As written, there is no information about a population, experimental or analytical approach, or any key conclusion to summarize. No explicit limitations are stated in the excerpt because the research content is not present. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Abstract
Love is one of the most extensively studied yet theoretically fragmented constructs in the behavioral sciences. Existing frameworks have clarified its components, motivational systems, attachment dynamics, and experiential qualities; however, the temporal architecture through which love reorganizes attention, valuation, and identity across development remains comparatively underarticulated. This manuscript proposes the Triphasic Model of Love (TML), conceptualizing love as a sequential yet continuous progression through three structurally distinct phases: Attraction, Immersion, and Union. Attraction represents evaluative motivational activation under rational regulatory dominance. Immersion marks a qualitative reorganization characterized by attentional narrowing, reduced evaluative inhibition, valuation amplification, and accelerated identity integration. Union consolidates these processes into stabilized reciprocal attachment embedded within relational structure. Unlike component-based or categorical models, TML delineates a developmental architecture in which passion, commitment, and attachment emerge as phase-dependent structural transformations rather than static dimensions. The model is situated in relation to major theoretical frameworks, including Sternberg’s triangular theory, attachment theory, Fisher’s neurobiological model, self-expansion theory, the Investment Model, Hatfield’s passionate–companionate distinction, Baumeister and Bratslavsky’s temporal model of passion, and the experiential construct of Flow. To address methodological challenges, the manuscript proposes operational markers distinguishing phases based on regulatory dominance, attentional exclusivity, and identity integration, and articulates falsifiable predictions regarding nonlinear attentional trajectories, phase-sensitive modulation of cognitive regulation, accelerated identity restructuring during immersion, and stabilization dynamics in union. By integrating theoretical synthesis with operational criteria and empirical implications, the Triphasic Model provides a temporally grounded framework for understanding how love develops, transforms the self, and stabilizes into attachment.
Full text
621 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version
{{ publication.field_name }}
{{ publication.subfield_name }}
Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information.
Listen on
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
⚙
Ask this paper
AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text
· source: oa-doi-fallback
ⓘ
Citation neighborhood
(no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet.
This is a recent paper (2026) — citers
typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference
graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0