Does cabergoline administration affect endometrial VEGFR-2 expression in a rat model of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome?
article
OA: diamond
CC0
AI-generated summary
Cabergoline administration in an OHSS rat model did not significantly alter endometrial VEGFR-2 expression, potentially impacting implantation and IVF success.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of cabergoline on endometrial vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) immunoexpression in an ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rat model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-one immature female Wistar rats were assigned into three groups: group 1, the control group; group 2, stimulated with gonadotropins to mimic OHSS; and group 3, in which an OHSS protocol was induced and thereafter treated with cabergoline (100 μg/kg/day). Body weight, ovarian volume, corpora lutea numbers, and endometrial VEGFR-2 expression were compared between the groups. RESULTS: = 0.465). CONCLUSION: While successful implantation requires a vascularized receptive endometrium, impaired expression of VEGFR-2 and disrupted endometrial angiogenesis due to cabergoline administration may be associated with IVF failure in fresh OHSS cycles. The insignificant decrease in endometrial VEGFR-2 expression observed in this research needs to be investigated by further studies involving additional techniques such as immunoblotting and/or RT-PCR analyses.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
References (27)
- The effects of ergot and non-ergot-derived dopamine agonists in an experimental mouse model of endometriosis via openalex
- doi:10.1093/jb/mvs136 via openalex
- doi:10.1210/en.2004-0765 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008605.pub3 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60401-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1186/2045-824x-6-16 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00404-020-05855-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008605.pub4 via openalex
- doi:10.3109/09513590.2016.1152575 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/dem315 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/j.0001-6349.2005.00586.x via openalex
- doi:10.12891/ceog3264.2017 via openalex
- doi:10.1530/rep.0.1250337 via openalex
- doi:10.3109/00016341003592537 via openalex
- doi:10.1095/biolreprod48.1.165 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/01443615.2018.1563774 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.04.004 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/14647270601111239 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.11.005 via openalex
- W3163289166 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00211.x via openalex
- doi:10.1210/en.2002-220204 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.08.048 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(94)93001-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1210/en.2006-0657 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s10815-010-9387-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1240 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-10T11:01:05.103053+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK