Use of an Expedited Review Tool to Screen for Prior Diagnostic Error in Emergency Department Patients.

OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-06

An expedited semi-automated review tool significantly reduced screening time for diagnostic errors in emergency department patients with prior healthcare visits, identifying a notable rate of missed or delayed diagnoses.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectiveMissed diagnoses are an important area of care quality resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Determination of rates and causes has been limited by difficulties in screening, including the effort of manual chart review. We developed and tested a semi- automated review tool to expedite screening for diagnostic errors in an electronic health record (EHR).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients seen in the emergency department (ED) of a teaching hospital over 31 days, using an automated screen to identify those with a prior in-system visit during the 14 days preceding their ED visit. We collected prior and subsequent notes from the institution's EHR for these cases, then populated a specially designed relational database enabling rapid comparison of prior visit records to the sentinel ED visit. Each case was assessed for potential missed or delayed diagnosis, and rated by likelihood as "definite, probable, possible, unlikely or none."ResultsA total of 5 066 patient encounters were screened by a clinician using the tool, of which 1 498 (30%) had a clinical encounter within the preceding 14 days. Of these, 37 encounters (2.6% of those reviewed) were "definite" or "probable" missed diagnoses. The rapid review tool took a mean of 1.9 minutes per case for primary review, compared with 11.2 minutes per case for reviews without the automated tool.ConclusionsDiagnostic errors were present in a significant number of cases presenting to the ED after recent healthcare visits. An innovative review tool enabled a substantially increased efficiency in screening for diagnostic errors.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-06T09:34:12.023084+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-11T06:32:28.951138+00:00