A NKp80-based identification strategy reveals that CD56negNK cells are not completely dysfunctional in health and disease

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT Natural killer (NK) cells are usually identified by the absence of other lineage markers, due to the lack of a cell surface specific marker. CD56 neg NK cells, classically identified as CD56 neg CD16 + are known to be expanded in some pathological conditions. However, studies on CD56 neg NK cells had revealed different results regarding the phenotype and functionality of these cells. This could be due to, among others, the unstable expression of CD16, which hinders CD56 neg NK cells identification. Hence, we aim to determine an alternative surface marker to CD16 to better identify CD56 neg NK cells. Using multiparametric flow cytometry, we have found that NKp80 is a good alternative to CD16 not only in healthy donors but also in HIV-1 infected subjects and multiple myeloma patients. Furthermore, we found differences between the functionality of CD56 neg NKp80 + and CD56 neg CD16 + NK cells both in healthy donors and patients, suggesting that the effector functions of CD56 neg NK cells are not as diminished as previously thought. We proposed NKp80 as a noteworthy marker to identify and accurately re-characterize human CD56 neg NK cells.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0