Benchmarking of Human Read Removal Strategies for Viral and Microbial Metagenomics

preprint OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Human reads are a key contaminant in microbial metagenomics and enrichment-based studies, requiring removal for computational efficiency, biological analysis, and privacy protection. Various in silico methods exist, but their effectiveness depends on the parameters and reference genomes used. Here, we assess different methods, including the impact of the updated T2T-CHM13 human genome versus GRCh38. Using a synthetic dataset of viral and human reads, we evaluated performance metrics for multiple approaches. We found that the usage of high-sensitivity configuration of Bowtie2 with the T2T-CHM13 reference assembly significantly improves human read removal with minimal loss of specificity, albeit at higher computational cost compared to other methods investigated. Applying this approach to a publicly available microbiome dataset, we effectively removed sex-determining SNPs with little impact on microbial assembly. Our results suggest that our high-sensitivity Bowtie2 approach with the T2T-CHM13 is the best method tested to minimise identifiability risks from residual human reads.
Full text 1,180 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Human reads are a key contaminant in microbial metagenomics and enrichment-based studies, requiring removal for computational efficiency, biological analysis, and privacy protection. Various in silico methods exist, but their effectiveness depends on the parameters and reference genomes used. Here, we assess different methods, including the impact of the updated T2T-CHM13 human genome versus GRCh38. Using a synthetic dataset of viral and human reads, we evaluated performance metrics for multiple approaches. We found that the usage of high-sensitivity configuration of Bowtie2 with the T2T-CHM13 reference assembly significantly improves human read removal with minimal loss of specificity, albeit at higher computational cost compared to other methods investigated. Applying this approach to a publicly available microbiome dataset, we effectively removed sex-determining SNPs with little impact on microbial assembly. Our results suggest that our high-sensitivity Bowtie2 approach with the T2T-CHM13 is the best method tested to minimise identifiability risks from residual human reads. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T02:00:01.467718+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0