Full text
76,208 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
The bidirectional neuroimmune dialogue in inter-organs | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 7 October 2025 V1 Latest version Share on The bidirectional neuroimmune dialogue in inter-organs Authors : Wenqian Huang , Xiangyang Wang , and Yingjiao Cao 0009-0004-9367-9792 [email protected] Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.175983149.90056770/v1 180 views 153 downloads Contents Abstract Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract The long-established perception envisioning the brain as an immune-privileged organ has undergone a paradigm shift in recent decades. Emerging research reveals that the nervous and immune systems engage in bidirectional crosstalk through anatomically specialized niches and closely entwined molecular axes to maintain tissue homeostasis, modulate immune responses and ensure properly neural function. Unfortunately, the bidirectional neuroimmune dialogue can also malfunction under some circumstances, leading to a spectrum of diseases including neuroinflammatory disorders, metabolic disorders and cancer. Here we summarize recent advances revealing the neuroimmune interaction under physiologic and pathologic processes, focusing on neuronal regulation of immune responses in barrier tissues and the reciprocal influence of immune cells on neural development and brain function. The bidirectional neuroimmune dialogue in inter-organs Wenqian Huang 1 , Xiangyang Wang 2,3 *, Yingjiao Cao 1,3 * 1 Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. 2 Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Immune Regulation and Immunotherapy, School of Laboratory Medicine and Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. 3 Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital Ganzhou Hospital,Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China. *Correspondence: [email protected] (YC) Abstract The long-established perception envisioning the brain as an immune-privileged organ has undergone a paradigm shift in recent decades. Emerging research reveals that the nervous and immune systems engage in bidirectional crosstalk through anatomically specialized niches and closely entwined molecular axes to maintain tissue homeostasis, modulate immune responses and ensure properly neural function. Unfortunately, the bidirectional neuroimmune dialogue can also malfunction under some circumstances, leading to a spectrum of diseases including neuroinflammatory disorders, metabolic disorders and cancer. Here we summarize recent advances revealing the neuroimmune interaction under physiologic and pathologic processes, focusing on neuronal regulation of immune responses in barrier tissues and the reciprocal influence of immune cells on neural development and brain function. Immune and nervous system are intricately intertwined Brain has long been considered as an immune-privileged organ since the purported absence of lymphatic vessel and the limited rejection of xenobiotic tissue by the brain (1). However, experimental and clinical evidence has posed a challenge to the long-established paradigm (2,3). Immune cells reside in the specialized niches of central nervous system (CNS) and contribute to the circuit refinement and neuronal function (4,5). Meanwhile, peripheral nervous system (PNS) also innervates spleen, lymph node and even tumors to modulate immune responses (6–8). Beyond anatomical connection, those two systems also have considerable overlaps and well-organized crosstalk, cooperating to support development and maintain homeostasis of an organism. Neurotransmitters, neuropeptides and neural hormones participate in immune regulation, while many signaling molecules and pathways characterized in the immune system are increasingly recognized as critical for normal brain function (9,10). Collectively, these findings reveal that the immune and nervous system are not only anatomically interlinked but also functionally integrated, highlighting the urgency to unravel the molecular underpinnings of such sophisticated neuroimmune dialogue. Recent technological innovations such as chemogenetics, optogenetics and spatially resolved single-cell technologies are enabling a deeper interrogation of molecular and cellular basis of the neuroimmune interactions. Owing to the ever-increasing advancement and the great abundance of paper on the subject, this review is not exhaustive but instead highlights pivotal discoveries that redefine our understanding of neuroimmune crosstalk. Here we detail the recent advances in neural regulation of immune cells in the context of homeostasis, host-defense, hypersensitivity and cancer, emphasizing context-dependent mechanisms of neuroimmune dialogue in inter-organs. We also examine how innate and adaptive immune cells influence neural development, plasticity and function, highlighting conserved pathways and their translational implications. Elucidating the spatiotemporal dynamics of these interactions represents a vibrant frontier and will accelerate the development of effective therapies for diseases such as metabolic disorders, cancer and neurological disorders . Elaborate regulation of immune responses by neurons The nervous system is comprised of the CNS (brain and spinal cord) and the PNS (sensory and autonomic components), the latter can be subdivided into somatic and visceral arms (Fig. 1A). The cell bodies of the sensory neurons reside within trigeminal ganglia (TG) in the cranium and dorsal root ganglia (DRG) near the spinal cord, conveying information about pain, temperature and touch to CNS (Fig. 1B) (11). The autonomic nervous system can be further classified into parasympathetic, sympathetic and enteric nervous system (ENS) (Fig. 1C). The parasympathetic neurons are hardwired into the visceral organ through the vagal nerve, modulating heart, lung and intestine via the transmitter acetylcholine (Ach) (12). Sympathetic neurons mediate ”fight-or-flight” responses through catecholamines such as epinephrine, norepinephrine (NE) and dopamine (13). ENS is located within the myenteric and submucosal plexus of the intestine, senses local stimuli and regulates motility and secretion (14). Upon activation, sensory neurons conduct signals orthodromically to the CNS, generating sensations such as pain or itch. Concurrently, the conducted action potentials transmit antidromically toward the PNS and cause the rapid release of neurotransmitters such as Ach, catecholamine and glutamine, and neuropeptides such as neuromedin U (NMU), calcitonin gene relating peptide (CGRP) and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP), to modulate immune responses via the cascades of subsequent signal pathways (15). As the neuronal sensing and response occur on a timescale of milliseconds and span the entire body, this neuronal control of immune system enables an accelerated reaction rate and extended physiological reach, highlighting the evolutionary significance of such a regulation system. In this part, we highlight key discoveries in neural-immune regulation across homeostasis, host-defense, hypersensitivity and cancer. Future exploration will continue to yield important insights into how the nervous system shape immunity in a context-dependent way. Homeostasis PNS innervates peripheral organs and tissues to modulate immune responses, supporting homeostasis, tissue repair and metabolic regulation. The intestine, as a major immune site, is densely innervated by neurons and serves as a hub for neuroimmune communication. For instance, the circadian neuropeptide VIP is released by enteric neurons upon food intake to regulate group 3 innate lymphoid cell (ILC3) response while promoting lipid uptake (Fig. 2A) (16,17). This feeding-regulated circuit illustrates how organisms coordinate nutrient assimilation with barrier immunity. Notably, the VIP could also potentiates the IL-5 secretion by group 2 innate lymphoid cell (ILC2), linking neural circadian rhythms to eosinophil homeostasis (Fig. 2A) (18,19). As suprachiasmatic nuclei in the hypothalamus integrates external light cues, the neural circuits may regulate the ILC response to avoid excess activation during homeostasis while assuring adequate immune response against ingested pathogens, although more specific mechanisms remains to be elucidated (20). Beyond ILCs, a reciprocal loop exists between muscularis macrophages (MMs) and enteric neurons. MMs produce BMP2 to trigger neuronal release of colony stimulatory factor 1 (CSF1) essential for MM development requisite for MMs development (Fig. 2A) (21). Recently, MMs were shown to refine ENS synapses, which in turn sustain neuro-supportive phenotype of MMs through transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling (22). This self-sustaining neuroimmune unit emerges as a bona fide therapeutic target for gut motility disorders. Gut-innervated sensory neurons further amplify this neuroimmune dialog. Nav1.8 + nerves could elicit mucus secretion by goblet cells via CGRP-Ramp1 axis, orchestrating intestine microbiota homeostasis and mucosal barrier protection (Fig. 2A) (23). Similarly, TRPV1⁺ neurons release SP, promoting goblet cell proliferation in a microbiota-dependent manner, indicating a sophisticated functional link between nociceptors, immune cells and intestine microbiota (Fig. 2A) (24). Gut-innervated sympathetic neurons secret NE to promote ILC2 migration to pancreas, ILC2-derived IL-5/IL-13 subsequently stimulate pancreatic α-cell glucagon secretion to modulate glucose homeostasis (Fig. 2B) (25). In adipose tissue, sympathetic neuron-released NE trigger the release of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) by mesenchymal cell, which boosts ILC2s-mediated energy expenditure, suggesting therapeutic potential of targeting neuroimmune axis in treating obesity and metabolic disorders (Fig. 2B) (26). In the skin, Nav1.8 + nociceptors suppress phagocyte infiltration via CGRP-RAMP1 signaling while polarizing macrophages towards M2 phenotype (Fig. 2C) (27). Notably, TRPA1 activation in nociceptors induces IL-23 production from dermal dendritic cells (dDCs), driving γδ T cell-mediated IL-17/IL-22 production to accelerate tissue regeneration (Fig. 2C) (28). Similarly, GINIP + mechanoreceptors secrete TAFA4 to promote IL-10 + macrophage survival critical for tissue repair. In parallel, Langerhans cells also regulate MrgprD⁺ neurons to suppress mast cell MrgprB2 expression, curbing mast cell hyperreactivity and maintaining cutaneous immune homeostasis (Fig. 2C) (29). Collectively, these findings demonstrate how neuroimmune interactions dynamically coordinate metabolic and reparative processes across tissues and harnessing neuronal responses via methods like chemogenetics and optogenetics could offer a promising strategy for treating inflammatory and metabolic diseases. Host-defense The nervous system detects microbial pathogens at barrier sites and orchestrates anti-microbial responses via neuroimmune crosstalk, exerting systemic effects on host defense. During viral infection, prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂) activates splenic nociceptors to release CGRP, which enhances B cell germinal center response via RAMP1 and strengthens anti-influenza immunity (6). GCRP also promotes Th1 cells differentiation via RAMP3, amplifying anti-viral CD8 + T cell and Th1 cell response (30). In contrast, glossopharyngeal GABRA1 + neurons activated by PGE2 during influenza infection exacerbate sickness behaviors (Fig. 3B) (31). The discrepancy indicates the context-dependent duality of neuroimmune interplay, which may be attributed to neuron subtypes and signaling hubs engaged. The interaction between bacteria and host immunity could bring about a wide spectrum of consequences spanning from mutualistic symbiosis to pathogenic aggression. Notably, bacteria-derived signals also hijack neural circuits to modulate social behaviors and sculpt the host immune landscape via neuroimmune crosstalk (32,33). In the skin, Staphylococcus aureus ( S. aureus ) serine V8 protease activates the pruriceptors via protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) to drive itch, while NFP and α-HL trigger pain via formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) and ADAM10, respectively (34,35). Once activated, nociceptors concurrently release CGRP to suppress the neutrophils infiltration and TNF-α production by macrophages (Fig. 3A) (35). Similarly, Streptococcus pyogenes ( S. pyogenes ) secret streptolyisn S to cause pain and the release of CGRP, impairing neutrophils recruitment and phagocytosis (Fig. 3A) (36). Conversely, in fungal infection, TRPV1 + neuron-derived CGRP enhances defense against cutaneous Candida albicans ( C. albicans ) by driving IL-23 production from CD301 + dDCs, priming IL-17 responses of γδ T cell. (Fig. 3A) (37). Activation of TRPV1 + neurons via optogenetics is sufficient to confer anticipatory protection against C. albicans via a nerve reflex arc (38). This context-specific duality of CGRP signaling illustrates how neuroimmune mechanisms are finely tuned to local microenvironmental cues. The lung and respiratory tract-innervated neurons are closely related with coughing, bronchoconstriction and host-defense against pathogens. For instance, mycobacterium tuberculosis ( Mtb ) produces sulfolipid 1 (SL-1) which activates TRPV1 + neurons to trigger cough, facilitating pathogen transmission (Fig. 3B) (39). During lethal S. aureus pneumonia, TRPV1 + nociceptors secret CGRP to suppress the neutrophil and γδT cell responses, dampening host immunity (Fig. 3B) (40). In parallel, cytosolic CGRP in macrophages could dismantle the NLRP3-NEK7 complex, thereby disrupting the activation of NLRP3 inflammation and dampening the host immunity against Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) infection (Fig. 3B) (41). Together, those researches highlight the active participation of neuron in host-defense immunity and unravel a novel therapeutic target in treating bacterial pneumonia. The intestine is densely innervated by intrinsic and extrinsic neurons which orchestrate motility, secretion and pathogen defense through neuroimmune interactions. For instance, the ENS-derived IL-18 elicits the production of antimicrobial protein (AMP) from goblet cells (Fig. 3C) (42). Nociceptors also protect against Salmonella by releasing CGRP, which downregulates the microfold cells (M cells) density to limit bacterial entry and maintains the colonization of segmented filamentous bacteria (SFB) to block Salmonella invasion (Fig. 3C) (43). Additionally, commensal microbes activate Nav1.8⁺ neurons to release CGRP, stimulating rapid goblet cell mucus secretion (23). During Salmonella infection, sympathetic neurons release NE to polarize MMs toward M2 phenotype via beta-2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR) (Fig. 3C) (44). CGRP further modulates anti-helminth immunity by enhancing ILC2 proliferation and IL-13 production (45). Notably, a subset of ILC2s express Calca (encoding CGRP), indicating a negative feedback loop during type 2 responses (Fig. 3C) (45). Further complexity arises as enteric neurons sense ILC2-derived IL-13 via IL-13R, reciprocally dampening anti-helminth immunity via CGRP signaling, suggesting a bidirectional neuroimmune checkpoint (46). Similarly, sympathetic neurons also inhibit ILC2 response and helminth clearance through β2AR (Fig. 3C) (47). Conversely, cholinergic neuron-derived neuropeptide NMU potently activates ILC2s and recruits eosinophils to accelerate helminth expulsion (Fig. 3C) (48–50). A recent study has illustrated that NMU can also activate eosinophils to drive the rapid differentiation of goblet cells (Fig. 3C) (51). These findings underscore the highly complexity of neuroimmune interplay during parasite infection and future studies dissecting how neurons decode parasite-derived cues and coordinate different signals to modulate immunity remains an emerging field. Hypersensitivity and cancer The PNS dynamically regulates inflammation through context-specific neuroimmune interactions. For instance, nociceptor neurons boost type 17 immunity as optogenetic activation of TRPV1 + or Nav1.8 + nociceptors induces robust type 17 inflammation (Fig. 4A) (52,53). In contrast, CGRP generally suppresses type 2 responses by acting on ILC2s, mast cells and CD4⁺ T cells. In the lung, CGRP suppresses the type 2 inflammation via CALCRL/RAMP1 expressed on ILC2s, inhibiting IL-13 production and eosinophils recruitment (Fig. 4A) (45,54). Similarly, in the intestine, ChAT⁺ enteric neuron-derived CGRP constrains ILC2 activity and reduces mast cell numbers (55). Paradoxically, pulmonary neuroendocrine cell-derived CGRP exacerbates type 2 asthma, revealing a source-specific duality in CGRP function (Fig. 4A) (56,57). These divergent effects underscore the necessity to delineate how neural microenvironments encode bidirectional immune regulation and evolving whether such contradictions arise from ILC2 heterogeneity or tissue-specific neuroimmune hubs remains a key frontier. Cholinergic neurons amplify type 2 immunity via the NMU/NMUR1 axis, driving ILC2 proliferation and cytokine production in the gut and lung—a mechanism evolutionarily conserved and non-redundant from adaptive immunity (Fig. 4B) (50,58). NMU further activates NMR1 + eosinophils to promote goblet cell differentiation, reinforcing intestinal barrier integrity (Fig. 4B) (59). In parallel, SP is another neuropeptide that also strongly boosts type 2 immunity. In house dust mice (HDM)-induced skin inflammation, TRPV1 + neurons detect cysteine protease and release SP, which induces mast cell degranulation via MRGPRB2 and recruits CD301b⁺ dendritic cells to lymph nodes via MRGPRA1, initiating Th2 responses (Fig. 4C) (60,61). Paradoxically, SP exhibits anti-inflammatory effects in the gut, highlighting tissue-specific neuroimmune duality and offering novel insights into the exploration of neuromodulation-based therapies for inflammatory disorders (Fig. 4C) (62). The circadian synchronizer VIP is another neuropeptide that activates ILC2s and Th2 cells via VIP receptor type 2 (VPAC2), linking type 2 immunity to circadian rhythm and metabolic cues (Fig. 4D) (18,19,63). Noteworthy, IL-5 from ILC2s stimulates Nav1.8 + neurons to secret VIP, creating a positive feedback loop that promotes exacerbates allergic airway inflammation (Fig. 4D) (63). These findings underscore neurons as context-dependent rheostats of immunity, highlighting the potential of targeting specific neuropeptide pathways for immunomodulatory therapy. Neurotransmitters also fine-tune inflammatory responses through context-dependent mechanisms. Adrenergic neurons colocalizing with ILC2s in gut and lung suppress type 2 inflammation via NE-β2AR axis (Fig. 4C) (47,64). Paradoxically, brainstem Dbh + neurons activated by mast cell-derived IL-4 release NE to induce ganglionic parasympathetic neurons to release Ach, which amplifies allergen hypersensitivity (Fig. 4C) (65). These opposing roles of NE underscore the complexity of neuroimmune circuits and highlight the need to delineate how neural and immune components cooperate to balance host defense and pathological inflammation. Dopamine is another member of catecholamines that regulates the inflammation and exhibits age- and receptor-specific duality. In pediatric asthma, sympathetic neurons-derived dopamine promotes the differentiation of Th2 cells and the establishment of Th2 resident memory cells through dopamine receptor 4 (DRD4) (Fig. 6) (66,67). As the sympathetic neurons in the lung undergoes a dopaminergic-to-adrenergic shift during neonatal development, the dopamine-DRD4 signaling might represents the mechanisms underlining the susceptibility of young children to asthma (66). However, our work has demonstrated that dopamine suppresses ILC2-driven allergic lung inflammation via metabolic restriction, which is depending on dopamine receptor 1 (DRD1). Moreover, local administration of dopamine significantly alleviated multiple allergens induced airway inflammations in adults, which highlight that dopamine-DRD1 signals could be harnessed to potentiate immunotherapy for allergic lung inflammations (Fig. 4C) (68). These findings indicate that sympathetic signals may encompass dual mechanisms to activate or repress type 2 inflammation in a context-, age- or disease-dependent manner and more specific mechanisms involved warrants further investigation. Noteworthily, dopamine-DRD1 inhibits the NLRP3 inflammasome activation in macrophages, thereby suppressing multiple systemic inflammation (69). These findings reveal sympathetic pleiotropy in the context of inflammation, positioning adrenergic and dopaminergic pathways as tunable targets for treating relevant diseases. Beyond neuropeptides and neurotransmitters, neuronal hormones such like prostaglandin D2 and neuropeptide Y also participate in the neuroimmune interplay and fine-tune the inflammatory response, working together to synchronize the inflammatory response with physiological function, ultimately supporting the necessary homeostasis of an organism (70,71). Parallel to roles during inflammation, the nervous system is emerging as a crucial regulator of cancer, influencing tumor initiation, progression and metastasis. In turn, tumor cells also hijack and remodel neural circuits to facilitate their growth and dissemination (72). Nerves branches to tumor microenvironment, engaging directly with cancer cells via neuro-cancer synapses or paracrine signaling (72–75). In addition, indirect crosstalk also occurs as circulating and paracrine signals from neurons profoundly affect immune cells trafficking and function. Elucidating the intricate dialogue among nervous system, immune system and cancer represents an emerging frontier with therapeutic implications. In the brain, gliomas synaptically and electrically integrate into neural circuits which cause current amplitude in tumor cells via AMPA receptor or gap junction to promote glioma proliferation (Fig. 5A) (73–76). In parallel, neuronal activity-dependent release of paracrine signals such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), neuroligin-3 and insulin-like growth factor 1 could also accelerate glioma growth (Fig. 5A) (74,77,78). In turn, gliomas remodel synaptic plasticity and neuronal activity through signals like thrombospondin-1, establishing a feedforward loop of tumor progression (Fig. 5A). Beyond CNS, recent studies have come to appreciate the pivotal role of peripheral innervation in the progression of multiple cancers types including head and neck, gastrointestinal, melanoma, breast and pancreatic cancers (72,79–82). PNS-cancer cell crosstalk occurs in a manner which closely mimics the principles under brain tumors, with PNS neurons innervating various cancers and establishing a neuron-cancer-microenvironment interactome. In head and neck cancer, tumor cells reprogram sensory neurons toward an adrenergic phenotype to support tumor progression (79). Gastric tumor cells also secret nerve growth factor (NGF) to induce nociceptive nerve expansion and CGRP release, which drive tumor progression via CGRP-RAMP1 pathways (Fig. 5B) (80). Likewise, melanoma cells secret secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) and elicit neurite outgrowth of nociceptors, which attenuate the cytotoxicity of CD8 + T cell via CGRP-RAMP1 axis (Fig. 5C) (72). In metastatic breast tumors, endothelium-derived Slit Homolog 2 (SLIT2) actively promote tumor sensory innervation, which release SP to cause cancer cell death, driving cancer invasion and metastasis (Fig. 5D) (81). Technological advances such as Trace-n-Seq now enable molecular profiling of tumor-innervating neurons at single-cell resolution, surpassing conventional scRNA-seq and may advance the drug target identification of neuro-stimulated carcinoma (82). Continued development of tools for deeper interrogation, quantification and imaging of tumor-infiltrated neuronal activity will also help to clarify the neuronal inputs affecting cancer biology. Immune cells modulate the neural system The long-held dogma envisioning the brain as an immune-privileged organ has undergone a paradigm shift. Emerging studies reveal that the brain is in proximate anatomically and physiologically communication with immune cells for proper development, normal function and homeostatic maintenance. Immune cells reside in specialized immunological niches in the brain (parenchyma, meninges, choroid plexus and the perivascular spaces) and regulate CNS function by direct interaction, cytokine signaling and cerebrospinal fluid flow (CSF) dynamics (83,84). Furthermore, the demonstration of the CNS lymphatic drainage and the skull microscopic channels linking bone marrow to CSF, establishes novel pathways for systemic neuroimmune communication (85,86). Tightly regulated neuroimmune interplay in the CNS is pivotal for the proper development and function of the brain, the perturbation of which underpins multiple neurological disorders (87–90). In this part, we’ll elaborate the recent advances in how innate and adaptive immune regulate neural system, while future exploration on the topic will offer novel perspective to design new therapeutic strategies for brain diseases. Innate immune cells The cross-talk between brain and innate immune cells is implicated in sculpting neural circuits, supporting neurodevelopment and maintaining functional brain homeostasis (87,91–94). A hallmark of developing CNS is overproduction followed by selective pruning, an activity-dependent program in which substantial inactive neurons, synapses and myelin are eliminated. Among innate immune cells, microglia—the primary resident macrophages of the CNS, have been the most extensively studied. Derived from the yolk sac, microglia exhibit peak diversity during embryogenesis and become relatively homogeneous in adulthood (92,95). Through developmentally regulated phagocytosis and trophic signaling, they contribute to essential processes such as neurogenesis, synaptic refinement and myelin elimination (96–98). During development, microglia eliminate surplus neurons through phagocytosis or via cytotoxicity mediated by reactive oxygen species and nerve growth factor (96,99). They further contribute to neural circuit refinement by spatially regulating synaptogenesis and synaptic pruning (97,100,101). To ensure the proper synaptic pruning without erroneous elimination, microglia exhibit spatiotemporal heterogeneity and integrate diverse cerebral signals from neurons and other cells (102–104). For instance, GABA released by inhibitory neurons triggers a pruning transcriptional program in GABAb-receptive microglia, leading to selective sculpting of inhibitory but not excitatory synapses (Fig. 6) (101). Similarly, astrocyte-derived IL-33 engages microglial ST2 to enhance phagocytosis, a mechanism temporally modulated to align with neurodevelopmental transitions (Fig. 6) (105,106). Non-phagocytic synaptic refinement occurs through interaction of Fn14 expressed on neurons and TWEAK released by microglia in a sensory experience-dependent manner (Fig. 6) (107). Conversely, immune checkpoint signals such as TGF-α and CD47 prevent excessive or inappropriate pruning, thereby synchronizing microglial activity with developmental requirements (108,109). Microglia also remove supernumerary myelin sheaths via activity-dependent microglia–oligodendrocyte crosstalk (98). Together, these mechanisms underscore the role of microglia in selectively eliminating less active components of the developing CNS—a process analogous to lymphocyte selection. In the adult brain, microglia serve as a dynamic sentinels, patrolling parenchyma with highly motile protrusions and switching to fighting state once encountered with threats (110). They could accommodate their morphology and function to the changing microenvironment, the dysregulation of which is tightly associated with neurodegeneral diseases and brain ageing (111–114). For instance, microglia clear myelin debris and promote oligodendrocyte progenitor maturation to facilitate remyelination after injury (115,116). They also regulate oligodendrocyte lipid metabolism via TGFβ/TGFβR axis to maintain myelin integrity (Fig. 6) (91). Beyond myelin health, microglia also modulate cognition function, brain activity and memory process (106,117–120). For instance, microglia are recruited by neuronal ATP, which they convert to adenosine to suppress hyperactivity (Fig. 6) (118). In parallel, microglia could also release Prostaglandin E2 to reduce striatal neuronal excitability, representing a complementary mechanism to inhibitory neurons for preventing pathological overactivation (119). Furthermore, experience-dependent neuronal IL-33 recruits microglia for extracellular matrix remodeling and memory consolidation, while C1q-dependent pruning dissociates engram cells and impairs remote memory (Fig. 6) (106,120). Taken together, one can envisage that the dysregulation of microglia-brain crosstalk could bring catastrophic repercussion to the CNS which underpins multiple neurological disorders and age-related cognitive decline (111–114). Natural killer (NK) cells and neutrophils also differentially modulate neuroimmune crosstalk under physiological and pathological contexts (121–125). In steady state, meningeal NK cells secret INF-γ which drives the expression of TRAIL in astrocytes to eliminate T cell, limiting neuroinflammation (123). Conversely, in the aged brain, NK cells activated by IL-27 eliminate senescent neuroblasts, impairing neurogenesis and cognitive function (122). These findings highlight the spatial and functional heterogeneity of NK cells and reflect the dynamism of brain-immune crosstalk. In comparison, neutrophils are primarily implicated in neurodegenerative pathology (121,124,125). In Alzheimer’s diseases, Aβ deposits-activated LFA-1 integrin facilitates the neutrophils adhesion to vascular endothelium and migration into brain parenchyma (124). Infiltrated neutrophils release neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and IL-17, which exacerbate blood-brain barrier disruption and neuronal injury, accelerating disease progression and cognitive decline (121,124). Furthermore, neutrophil adhesion in cerebral capillaries stalls cortical perfusion, compounding hypoperfusion and neurodegeneration (125). Innate-like lymphoid cells including γδ T cells and B1 cells, infiltrate the neonatal meninges and engage with neurons, glia, and oligodendrocyte precursor cells to modulate memory and behavior (94,126). Notably, a recent landmark study revealed that meningeal ILC2s enhance inhibitory synapse formation via IL-13 during early development, identifying a previously unrecognized therapeutic target for neurodevelopmental disorders (87). Together, these studies illustrate a spatiotemporally organized logic of neuroimmune regulation, wherein innate immune cells act as both guardians and disruptors of CNS integrity. Adaptive immune cells Unlike innate immune cells, adaptive immune cells populate the meninges later in postnatal development and maintain their number through self-renewal or recruitment of circulating lymphocytes (127). Adaptive lymphoid cells such as T cells and B cells are found to reside in the brain and modulate synaptic pruning, myelination and neuronal activity. For instance, CD4 + T cells are implicated in contextual fear memory by regulating the synaptic function of GABAergic neurons via IL-4 (128). Of note, the adaptive and innate immune compartments in the CNS are not isolated but intricately intertwined, adding another layer of complexity to the dynamic neuroimmune dialogue. In mice, brain residential CD4 + T cells are requisite for the maturation of microglia during fetal-to-adult transition which is requisite for synapses refinement (129). To date, regulatory T cells (Tregs) are one of the most extensively studied CD4 + T cells involved in the interaction with microglia, acting as important cerebro-protective immunomodulators under multiple pathological conditions (130). For instance, Tregs are recruited by chemokines CCL1 and CCL20 to the brain and secret amphiregulin to suppress neurotoxic astrogliosis (131). Meanwhile, CD4 + T cells also contribute to neurological diseases such like Lewy body dementia and maternal immune activation (MIA)-induced behavioral abnormalities in offspring (132–134). Compared to CD4 + T cells, CD8 + T cell in the CNS are often associated with neuropathology in conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease (135). During recovery from neurotropic flavivirus infection, IFN-γ produced by CD8 + T cells promotes microglia-mediated synaptic pruning and cognitive deficits (136). This CD8 + T cell-derived IFN-γ can also trigger neuronal CCL2 release, exacerbating microglia-driven synapse loss and neuronal injury in neuroinflammation (104). Furthermore, IFN-γ from CD8 + T cells contributes to the loss of OPCs and oligodendrocytes during inflammatory demyelination (137). Concurrently, early-developing B cells originating from skull hematopoietic stem cells reside in the meninges and undergo negative selection, the disruption of which is tightly associated with pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (138). Besides the circulation-independent route, gut-derived IgA + plasma cells home to the meninges under homeostatic conditions, positioning near dural venous sinuses and defending CNS at this vulnerable barrier surface (139). In multiple sclerosis, CNS-infiltrating and meningeal B cells could secret IL-23, expanding the Th17 cell population and thereby promoting autoimmune inflammation (140). Taken together, it’s abundantly clear that the CNS has established immunological pathways to ensure the well-organized mobilization and function of immune cells in response to immunological cues in the brain. The neural control of immunity could in turn affect the appropriate development and proper function of the brain, the dysregulation of which is thereby considered as an escalating factor in neurological diseases and ageing. Conclusion The long-established assumption considering the brain as an immune-privileged organ has undergone a paradigm shift as contemporary research reveals extensive bidirectional communication between the nervous and immune systems. In this review, we have presented the recent advances unmasking the well-characterized mechanisms by which the nervous and immune system regulate and shape each other. Modulating organogenesis and plasticity during development and homeostasis, neural system plays a pivotal role in regulating immune system during homeostasis, host-defense, inflammation and cancer. Multifarious immune cells express receptors for various neurotransmitters, neuropeptides and neuronal hormones. Upon stimulation by endogenous and exogenous cues, the nervous system could directly regulate immune responses by releasing diverse signaling molecules. The widely-distributed neural system could transmit the signal on a timescale of milliseconds, enabling an extended physiological reach and accelerated reaction speed of immune system. Given that neural system actively regulates the immune responses in multiple organs and tissues, harnessing neuronal responses via methods like chemogenetics and optogenetics could offer therapeutic effects with enhanced curative efficiency. Meanwhile, innate and adaptive immune cells could exert profound influence on brain throughout the lifetime from embryogenesis to ageing, contributing to the proper development and functional maintenance of the brain. Immune cells reside in the specialized niches including brain parenchyma, meninges, choroid plexus and the perivascular spaces, modulating processes like synaptic pruning, myelination and neuronal survival. Disturbance of the delicate neuroimmune balance is implicated in multiple neurological disorders like Alzheimer’s diseases, Parkinson’s diseases and multiple sclerosis. The future work exploring the brain immunity in the homeostatic and pathological context will continue to extend our knowledge in this field and reveal therapeutic strategies for treating various neurological disorder. Furthermore, these two systems also share substantial properties including sensing, reacting and memory. Multifarious signaling molecules and pathways are conserved among immune cells and brain-resident cells, exerting distinctive functions. Future work rooting out more shared signaling molecules and pathways and probing into the mechanistic similarities and differences of neuronal and immune responses like memory will continue to yield important insights, offering a wide range of novel opportunities for the design of therapeutic approaches and drug-delivery strategies. Author Contributions WH conceptualized the review topic, designed the framework, performed the literature review, wrote the original draft and designed figures. YC and XW contributed to critical revisions and offered valuable guidance. All authors approved the final version. Acknowledgements We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all those who contributed to this work but do not meet the criteria for authorship. Specifically, we thank Yuhao Zheng, Lisi Zhu for their valuable assistance in language editing. We also appreciate the insightful comments and suggestions from Jingxuan Shao, Jiawei Song and Wenle Zhou which helped improve the quality of this manuscript. Finally, we extend our thanks to the reviewers and editors for their constructive feedback. Funding This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 82271866, 82471853 and 8240062935), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (no. 2024B1515020039). Data Availability No data were generated or analyzed during the current study. Competing Interests The authors declare no competing financial interests. Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable. Consent for publication Not applicable. References 1. Medawar PB. Immunity to homologous grafted skin; the fate of skin homografts transplanted to the brain, to subcutaneous tissue, and to the anterior chamber of the eye. Br J Exp Pathol 1948; 29 :58–69.2. Buffington SA, Di Prisco GV, Auchtung TA, Ajami NJ, Petrosino JF, Costa-Mattioli M. Microbial Reconstitution Reverses Maternal Diet-Induced Social and Synaptic Deficits in Offspring. Cell 2016; 165 :1762–1775.3. Hayes LN, An K, Carloni E, Li F, Vincent E, Trippaers C et al. Prenatal immune stress blunts microglia reactivity, impairing neurocircuitry. Nature 2022; 610 :327–334.4. Sankowski R, Süß P, Benkendorff A, Böttcher C, Fernandez-Zapata C, Chhatbar C et al. Multiomic spatial landscape of innate immune cells at human central nervous system borders. Nat Med 2024; 30 :186–198.5. Chen X, Firulyova M, Manis M, Herz J, Smirnov I, Aladyeva E et al. Microglia-mediated T cell infiltration drives neurodegeneration in tauopathy. Nature 2023; 615 :668–677.6. Wu M, Song G, Li J, Song Z, Zhao B, Liang L et al. Innervation of nociceptor neurons in the spleen promotes germinal center responses and humoral immunity. Cell 2024; 187 :2935-2951.e19.7. Huang S, Ziegler CGK, Austin J, Mannoun N, Vukovic M, Ordovas-Montanes J et al. Lymph nodes are innervated by a unique population of sensory neurons with immunomodulatory potential. Cell 2021; 184 :441-459.e25.8. Balood M, Ahmadi M, Eichwald T, Ahmadi A, Majdoubi A, Roversi K et al. Nociceptor neurons affect cancer immunosurveillance. Nature 2022; 611 :405–412.9. Lee B, Kwon J-T, Jeong Y, Caris H, Oh D, Feng M et al. Inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines bidirectionally modulate amygdala circuits regulating anxiety. Cell 2025; 188 :2190-2202.e15.10. Zipp F, Bittner S, Schafer DP. Cytokines as emerging regulators of central nervous system synapses. Immunity 2023; 56 :914–925.11. Turecek J, Lehnert BP, Ginty DD. The encoding of touch by somatotopically aligned dorsal column subdivisions. Nature 2022; 612 :310–315.12. Veerakumar A, Yung AR, Liu Y, Krasnow MA. Molecularly defined circuits for cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary control. Nature 2022; 606 :739–746.13. Scott-Solomon E, Boehm E, Kuruvilla R. The sympathetic nervous system in development and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 2021; 22 :685–702.14. Xie Z, Rose L, Feng J, Zhao Y, Lu Y, Kane H et al. Enteric neuronal Piezo1 maintains mechanical and immunological homeostasis by sensing force. Cell 2025; 188 :2417-2432.e19.15. Deng L, Gillis JE, Chiu IM, Kaplan DH. Sensory neurons: An integrated component of innate immunity. Immunity 2024; 57 :815–831.16. Seillet C, Luong K, Tellier J, Jacquelot N, Shen RD, Hickey P et al. The neuropeptide VIP confers anticipatory mucosal immunity by regulating ILC3 activity. Nat Immunol 2020; 21 :168–177.17. Talbot J, Hahn P, Kroehling L, Nguyen H, Li D, Littman DR. Feeding-dependent VIP neuron–ILC3 circuit regulates the intestinal barrier. Nature 2020; 579 :575–580.18. Nussbaum JC, Van Dyken SJ, von Moltke J, Cheng LE, Mohapatra A, Molofsky AB et al. Type 2 innate lymphoid cells control eosinophil homeostasis. Nature 2013; 502 :245–248.19. Pascal M, Kazakov A, Chevalier G, Dubrule L, Deyrat J, Dupin A et al. The neuropeptide VIP potentiates intestinal innate type 2 and type 3 immunity in response to feeding. Mucosal Immunology 2022; 15 :629–641.20. Godinho-Silva C, Domingues RG, Rendas M, Raposo B, Ribeiro H, da Silva JA et al. Light-entrained and brain-tuned circadian circuits regulate ILC3s and gut homeostasis. Nature 2019; 574 :254–258.21. Muller PA, Koscsó B, Rajani GM, Stevanovic K, Berres M-L, Hashimoto D et al. Crosstalk between Muscularis Macrophages and Enteric Neurons Regulates Gastrointestinal Motility. Cell 2014; 158 :300–313.22. Viola MF, Chavero-Pieres M, Modave E, Delfini M, Stakenborg N, Estévez MC et al. Dedicated macrophages organize and maintain the enteric nervous system. Nature 2023; 618 :818–826.23. Yang D, Jacobson A, Meerschaert KA, Sifakis JJ, Wu M, Chen X et al. Nociceptor neurons direct goblet cells via a CGRP-RAMP1 axis to drive mucus production and gut barrier protection. Cell 2022; 185 :4190-4205.e25.24. Zhang W, Lyu M, Bessman NJ, Xie Z, Arifuzzaman M, Yano H et al. Gut-innervating nociceptors regulate the intestinal microbiota to promote tissue protection. Cell 2022; 185 :4170-4189.e20.25. Šestan M, Raposo B, Rendas M, Brea D, Pirzgalska R, Rasteiro A et al. Neuronal-ILC2 interactions regulate pancreatic glucagon and glucose homeostasis. Science 2025; 387 :eadi3624.26. Cardoso F, Klein Wolterink RGJ, Godinho-Silva C, Domingues RG, Ribeiro H, da Silva JA et al. Neuro-mesenchymal units control ILC2 and obesity via a brain–adipose circuit. Nature 2021; 597 :410–414.27. Lu Y-Z, Nayer B, Singh SK, Alshoubaki YK, Yuan E, Park AJ et al. CGRP sensory neurons promote tissue healing via neutrophils and macrophages. Nature 2024; 628 :604–611.28. Wei JJ, Kim HS, Spencer CA, Brennan-Crispi D, Zheng Y, Johnson NM et al. Activation of TRPA1 nociceptor promotes systemic adult mammalian skin regeneration. Science Immunology 2020; 5 :eaba5683.29. Zhang S, Edwards TN, Chaudhri VK, Wu J, Cohen JA, Hirai T et al. Nonpeptidergic neurons suppress mast cells via glutamate to maintain skin homeostasis. Cell 2021; 184 :2151-2166.e16.30. Hou Y, Sun L, LaFleur MW, Huang L, Lambden C, Thakore PI et al. Neuropeptide signalling orchestrates T cell differentiation. Nature 2024; 635 :444–452.31. Bin N-R, Prescott SL, Horio N, Wang Y, Chiu IM, Liberles SD. An airway-to-brain sensory pathway mediates influenza-induced sickness. Nature 2023; 615 :660–667.32. Gabanyi I, Lepousez G, Wheeler R, Vieites-Prado A, Nissant A, Chevalier G et al. Bacterial sensing via neuronal Nod2 regulates appetite and body temperature. Science 2022; 376 :eabj3986.33. Wu T, Ge M, Wu M, Duan F, Liang J, Chen M et al. Pathogenic bacteria modulate pheromone response to promote mating. Nature 2023; 613 :324–331.34. Deng L, Costa F, Blake KJ, Choi S, Chandrabalan A, Yousuf MS et al. S. aureus drives itch and scratch-induced skin damage through a V8 protease-PAR1 axis. Cell 2023; 186 :5375-5393.e25.35. Chiu IM, Heesters BA, Ghasemlou N, Von Hehn CA, Zhao F, Tran J et al. Bacteria activate sensory neurons that modulate pain and inflammation. Nature 2013; 501 :52–57.36. Pinho-Ribeiro FA, Baddal B, Haarsma R, O’Seaghdha M, Yang NJ, Blake KJ et al. Blocking Neuronal Signaling to Immune Cells Treats Streptococcal Invasive Infection. Cell 2018; 173 :1083-1097.e22.37. Kashem SW, Riedl MS, Yao C, Honda CN, Vulchanova L, Kaplan DH. Nociceptive Sensory Fibers Drive Interleukin-23 Production from CD301b+ Dermal Dendritic Cells and Drive Protective Cutaneous Immunity (vol 43, pg 515, 2015). Immunity 2015; 43 :830–830.38. Cohen JA, Edwards TN, Liu AW, Hirai T, Jones MR, Wu J et al. Cutaneous TRPV1+ Neurons Trigger Protective Innate Type 17 Anticipatory Immunity. Cell 2019; 178 :919-932.e14.39. Ruhl CR, Pasko BL, Khan HS, Kindt LM, Stamm CE, Franco LH et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Sulfolipid-1 Activates Nociceptive Neurons and Induces Cough. Cell 2020; 181 :293-305.e11.40. Baral P, Umans BD, Li L, Wallrapp A, Bist M, Kirschbaum T et al. Nociceptor sensory neurons suppress neutrophil and γδ T cell responses in bacterial lung infections and lethal pneumonia. Nat Med 2018; 24 :417–426.41. Zhu F, Yu D, Qin X, Qian Y, Ma J, Li W et al. The neuropeptide CGRP enters the macrophage cytosol to suppress the NLRP3 inflammasome during pulmonary infection. Cell Mol Immunol 2023; 20 :264–276.42. Jarret A, Jackson R, Duizer C, Healy ME, Zhao J, Rone JM et al. Enteric Nervous System-Derived IL-18 Orchestrates Mucosal Barrier Immunity. Cell 2020; 180 :50-+.43. Lai NY, Musser MA, Pinho-Ribeiro FA, Baral P, Jacobson A, Ma P et al. Gut-Innervating Nociceptor Neurons Regulate Peyer’s Patch Microfold Cells and SFB Levels to Mediate Salmonella Host Defense. Cell 2020; 180 :33-49.e22.44. Gabanyi I, Muller PA, Feighery L, Oliveira TY, Costa-Pinto FA, Mucida D. Neuro-immune Interactions Drive Tissue Programming in Intestinal Macrophages. Cell 2016; 164 :378–391.45. Nagashima H, Mahlakõiv T, Shih H-Y, Davis FP, Meylan F, Huang Y et al. Neuropeptide CGRP Limits Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cell Responses and Constrains Type 2 Inflammation. Immunity 2019; 51 :682-695.e6.46. Wang Y, Zhang X, Liu S, Gu Z, Sun Z, Zang Y et al. Bi-directional communication between intrinsic enteric neurons and ILC2s inhibits host defense against helminth infection. Immunity 2025; 0 . doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2025.01.00447. Moriyama S, Brestoff JR, Flamar A-L, Moeller JB, Klose CSN, Rankin LC et al. β2-adrenergic receptor–mediated negative regulation of group 2 innate lymphoid cell responses. Science 2018; 359 :1056–1061.48. Klose C, Mahlakõiv T, Moeller J, Rankin L, Flamar A-L, Kabata H et al. The neuropeptide neuromedin U stimulates innate lymphoid cells and type 2 inflammation. Nature 2017; 549 :282–286.49. Cardoso V, Chesne J, Ribeiro H, Garcia-Cassani B, Carvalho T, Bouchery T et al. Neuronal regulation of type 2 innate lymphoid cells via neuromedin U. Nature 2017; 549 :277–281.50. Tsou AM, Yano H, Parkhurst CN, Mahlakõiv T, Chu C, Zhang W et al. Neuropeptide regulation of non-redundant ILC2 responses at barrier surfaces. Nature 2022; 611 :787–793.51. Li Y, Liu S, Zhou K, Wang Y, Chen Y, Hu W et al. Neuromedin U programs eosinophils to promote mucosal immunity of the small intestine. Science 2023; 381 :1189–1196.52. Cohen JA, Edwards TN, Liu AW, Hirai T, Jones MR, Wu J et al. Cutaneous TRPV1+ Neurons Trigger Protective Innate Type 17 Anticipatory Immunity. Cell 2019; 178 :919-932.e14.53. Riol-Blanco L, Ordovas-Montanes J, Perro M, Naval E, Thiriot A, Alvarez D et al. Nociceptive sensory neurons drive interleukin-23-mediated psoriasiform skin inflammation. Nature 2014; 510 :157–161.54. Wallrapp A, Burkett PR, Riesenfeld SJ, Kim S-J, Christian E, Abdulnour R-EE et al. Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Negatively Regulates Alarmin-Driven Type 2 Innate Lymphoid Cell Responses. Immunity 2019; 51 :709-723.e6.55. Xu H, Ding J, Porter CBM, Wallrapp A, Tabaka M, Ma S et al. Transcriptional Atlas of Intestinal Immune Cells Reveals that Neuropeptide α-CGRP Modulates Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cell Responses. Immunity 2019; 51 :696-708.e9.56. Tamari M, Del Bel KL, Ver Heul AM, Zamidar L, Orimo K, Hoshi M et al. Sensory neurons promote immune homeostasis in the lung. Cell 2024; 187 :44-61.e17.57. Sui P, Wiesner DL, Xu J, Zhang Y, Lee J, Van Dyken S et al. Pulmonary neuroendocrine cells amplify allergic asthma responses. Science 2018; 360 :eaan8546.58. Ju X, Nagashima A, Dvorkin-Gheva A, Wattie J, Howie K, Whetstone C et al. Neuromedin-U Mediates Rapid Activation of Airway Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells in Mild Asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2024; 210 :755–765.59. Li Y, Liu S, Zhou K, Wang Y, Chen Y, Hu W et al. Neuromedin U programs eosinophils to promote mucosal immunity of the small intestine. Science 2023; 381 :1189–1196.60. Serhan N, Basso L, Sibilano R, Petitfils C, Meixiong J, Bonnart C et al. House dust mites activate nociceptor–mast cell clusters to drive type 2 skin inflammation. Nat Immunol 2019; 20 :1435–1443.61. Perner C, Flayer CH, Zhu X, Aderhold PA, Dewan ZNA, Voisin T et al. Substance P Release by Sensory Neurons Triggers Dendritic Cell Migration and Initiates the Type-2 Immune Response to Allergens. Immunity 2020; 53 :1063-1077.e7.62. Zhang W, Lyu M, Bessman NJ, Xie Z, Arifuzzaman M, Yano H et al. Gut-innervating nociceptors regulate the intestinal microbiota to promote tissue protection. Cell 2022; 185 :4170-4189.e20.63. Talbot S, Abdulnour R-EE, Burkett PR, Lee S, Cronin SJF, Pascal MA et al. Silencing Nociceptor Neurons Reduces Allergic Airway Inflammation. Neuron 2015; 87 :341–354.64. Ahn S, Maarsingh H, Walker JKL, Liu S, Hegde A, Sumajit HC et al. Allosteric modulator potentiates β 2 AR agonist–promoted bronchoprotection in asthma models. J Clin Invest 2023; 133 . doi:10.1172/JCI16733765. Su Y, Xu J, Zhu Z, Chin J, Xu L, Yu H et al. Brainstem Dbh+ neurons control allergen-induced airway hyperreactivity. Nature 2024; 631 :601–609.66. Wang W, Cohen JA, Wallrapp A, Trieu KG, Barrios J, Shao F et al. Age-Related Dopaminergic Innervation Augments T Helper 2-Type Allergic Inflammation in the Postnatal Lung. Immunity 2019; 51 :1102-1118.e7.67. Wang W, Garcia C, Shao F, Cohen JA, Bai Y, Fine A et al. Lung dopaminergic nerves facilitate the establishment of TH2 resident memory cells in early life. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2023; 152 :386–399.68. Cao Y, Li Y, Wang X, Liu S, Zhang Y, Liu G et al. Dopamine inhibits group 2 innate lymphoid cell-driven allergic lung inflammation by dampening mitochondrial activity. Immunity 2023; 56 :320-335.e9.69. Yan Y, Jiang W, Liu L, Wang X, Ding C, Tian Z et al. Dopamine Controls Systemic Inflammation through Inhibition of NLRP3 Inflammasome. Cell 2015; 160 :62–73.70. Sang D, Lin K, Yang Y, Ran G, Li B, Chen C et al. Prolonged sleep deprivation induces a cytokine-storm-like syndrome in mammals. Cell 2023; 186 :5500-5516.e21.71. Yu J, Xiao K, Chen X, Deng L, Zhang L, Li Y et al. Neuron-derived neuropeptide Y fine-tunes the splenic immune responses. Neuron 2022; 110 :1327-1339.e6.72. Balood M, Ahmadi M, Eichwald T, Ahmadi A, Majdoubi A, Roversi K et al. Nociceptor neurons affect cancer immunosurveillance. Nature 2022; 611 :405–412.73. Venkataramani V, Tanev DI, Strahle C, Studier-Fischer A, Fankhauser L, Kessler T et al. Glutamatergic synaptic input to glioma cells drives brain tumour progression. Nature 2019; 573 :532–538.74. Taylor KR, Barron T, Hui A, Spitzer A, Yalçin B, Ivec AE et al. Glioma synapses recruit mechanisms of adaptive plasticity. Nature 2023; 623 :366–374.75. Barron T, Yalçın B, Su M, Byun YG, Gavish A, Shamardani K et al. GABAergic neuron-to-glioma synapses in diffuse midline gliomas. Nature 2025; 639 :1060–1068.76. Venkatesh HS, Morishita W, Geraghty AC, Silverbush D, Gillespie SM, Arzt M et al. Electrical and synaptic integration of glioma into neural circuits. Nature 2019; 573 :539–545.77. Venkatesh HS, Tam LT, Woo PJ, Lennon J, Nagaraja S, Gillespie SM et al. Targeting neuronal activity-regulated neuroligin-3 dependency in high-grade glioma. Nature 2017; 549 :533–537.78. Chen P, Wang W, Liu R, Lyu J, Zhang L, Li B et al. Olfactory sensory experience regulates gliomagenesis via neuronal IGF1. Nature 2022; 606 :550–556.79. Amit M, Takahashi H, Dragomir MP, Lindemann A, Gleber-Netto FO, Pickering CR et al. Loss of p53 drives neuron reprogramming in head and neck cancer. Nature 2020; 578 :449–454.80. Zhi X, Wu F, Qian J, Ochiai Y, Lian G, Malagola E et al. Nociceptive neurons promote gastric tumour progression via a CGRP-RAMP1 axis. Nature 2025; 640 :802–810.81. Padmanaban V, Keller I, Seltzer ES, Ostendorf BN, Kerner Z, Tavazoie SF. Neuronal substance P drives metastasis through an extracellular RNA–TLR7 axis. Nature 2024; 633 :207–215.82. Thiel V, Renders S, Panten J, Dross N, Bauer K, Azorin D et al. Characterization of single neurons reprogrammed by pancreatic cancer. Nature 2025; 640 :1042–1051.83. Rustenhoven J, Drieu A, Mamuladze T, de Lima KA, Dykstra T, Wall M et al. Functional characterization of the dural sinuses as a neuroimmune interface. Cell 2021; 184 :1000-1016.e27.84. Castellani G, Croese T, Peralta Ramos JM, Schwartz M. Transforming the understanding of brain immunity. Science 2023; 380 :eabo7649.85. Louveau A, Smirnov I, Keyes TJ, Eccles JD, Rouhani SJ, Peske JD et al. Structural and functional features of central nervous system lymphatic vessels. Nature 2015; 523 :337–341.86. Cugurra A, Mamuladze T, Rustenhoven J, Dykstra T, Beroshvili G, Greenberg ZJ et al. Skull and vertebral bone marrow are myeloid cell reservoirs for the meninges and CNS parenchyma. Science 2021; 373 :eabf7844.87. Barron JJ, Mroz NM, Taloma SE, Dahlgren MW, Ortiz-Carpena JF, Keefe MG et al. Group 2 innate lymphoid cells promote inhibitory synapse development and social behavior. Science 2024; 386 :eadi1025.88. Roy ER, Chiu G, Li S, Propson NE, Kanchi R, Wang B et al. Concerted type I interferon signaling in microglia and neural cells promotes memory impairment associated with amyloid β plaques. Immunity 2022; 55 :879-894.e6.89. Chung EN, Lee J, Polonio CM, Choi J, Akl CF, Kilian M et al. Psychedelic control of neuroimmune interactions governing fear. Nature 2025; 641 :1276–1286.90. Chen X, Firulyova M, Manis M, Herz J, Smirnov I, Aladyeva E et al. Microglia-mediated T cell infiltration drives neurodegeneration in tauopathy. Nature 2023; 615 :668–677.91. McNamara NB, Munro DAD, Bestard-Cuche N, Uyeda A, Bogie JFJ, Hoffmann A et al. Microglia regulate central nervous system myelin growth and integrity. Nature 2023; 613 :120–129.92. Masuda T, Amann L, Monaco G, Sankowski R, Staszewski O, Krueger M et al. Specification of CNS macrophage subsets occurs postnatally in defined niches. Nature 2022; 604 :740–748.93. Sankowski R, Süß P, Benkendorff A, Böttcher C, Fernandez-Zapata C, Chhatbar C et al. Multiomic spatial landscape of innate immune cells at human central nervous system borders. Nat Med 2024; 30 :186–198.94. Alves de Lima K, Rustenhoven J, Da Mesquita S, Wall M, Salvador AF, Smirnov I et al. Meningeal γδ T cells regulate anxiety-like behavior via IL-17a signaling in neurons. Nat Immunol 2020; 21 :1421–1429.95. Ginhoux F, Greter M, Leboeuf M, Nandi S, See P, Gokhan S et al. Fate Mapping Analysis Reveals That Adult Microglia Derive from Primitive Macrophages. Science 2010; 330 :841–845.96. Escoubas CC, Dorman LC, Nguyen PT, Lagares-Linares C, Nakajo H, Anderson SR et al. Type-I-interferon-responsive microglia shape cortical development and behavior. Cell 2024; 187 :1936-1954.e24.97. Vainchtein ID, Chin G, Cho FS, Kelley KW, Miller JG, Chien EC et al. Astrocyte-derived interleukin-33 promotes microglial synapse engulfment and neural circuit development. Science 2018; 359 :1269–1273.98. Hughes AN, Appel B. Microglia phagocytose myelin sheaths to modify developmental myelination. Nat Neurosci 2020; 23 :1055–1066.99. Frade JM, Barde Y-A. Microglia-Derived Nerve Growth Factor Causes Cell Death in the Developing Retina. Neuron 1998; 20 :35–41.100. Paolicelli RC, Bolasco G, Pagani F, Maggi L, Scianni M, Panzanelli P et al. Synaptic Pruning by Microglia Is Necessary for Normal Brain Development. Science 2011; 333 :1456–1458.101. Favuzzi E, Huang S, Saldi GA, Binan L, Ibrahim LA, Fernández-Otero M et al. GABA-receptive microglia selectively sculpt developing inhibitory circuits. Cell 2021; 184 :4048-4063.e32.102. Matcovitch-Natan O, Winter DR, Giladi A, Aguilar SV, Spinrad A, Sarrazin S et al. Microglia development follows a stepwise program to regulate brain homeostasis. Science 2016; 353 :aad8670.103. Stratoulias V, Ruiz R, Kanatani S, Osman AM, Keane L, Armengol JA et al. ARG1-expressing microglia show a distinct molecular signature and modulate postnatal development and function of the mouse brain. Nat Neurosci 2023; 26 :1008–1020.104. Di Liberto G, Pantelyushin S, Kreutzfeldt M, Page N, Musardo S, Coras R et al. Neurons under T Cell Attack Coordinate Phagocyte-Mediated Synaptic Stripping. Cell 2018; 175 :458-471.e19.105. He D, Xu H, Zhang H, Tang R, Lan Y, Xing R et al. Disruption of the IL-33-ST2-AKT signaling axis impairs neurodevelopment by inhibiting microglial metabolic adaptation and phagocytic function. Immunity 2022; 55 :159-173.e9.106. Nguyen PT, Dorman LC, Pan S, Vainchtein ID, Han RT, Nakao-Inoue H et al. Microglial Remodeling of the Extracellular Matrix Promotes Synapse Plasticity. Cell 2020; 182 :388-403.e15.107. Cheadle L, Rivera SA, Phelps JS, Ennis KA, Stevens B, Burkly LC et al. Sensory Experience Engages Microglia to Shape Neural Connectivity through a Non-Phagocytic Mechanism. Neuron 2020; 108 :451-468.e9.108. Lehrman EK, Wilton DK, Litvina EY, Welsh CA, Chang ST, Frouin A et al. CD47 Protects Synapses from Excess Microglia-Mediated Pruning during Development. Neuron 2018; 100 :120-134.e6.109. Deczkowska A, Amit I, Schwartz M. Microglial immune checkpoint mechanisms. Nat Neurosci 2018; 21 :779–786.110. Nimmerjahn A, Kirchhoff F, Helmchen F. Resting Microglial Cells Are Highly Dynamic Surveillants of Brain Parenchyma in Vivo. Science 2005; 308 :1314–1318.111. Werneburg S, Jung J, Kunjamma RB, Ha S-K, Luciano NJ, Willis CM et al. Targeted Complement Inhibition at Synapses Prevents Microglial Synaptic Engulfment and Synapse Loss in Demyelinating Disease. Immunity 2020; 52 :167-182.e7.112. Holden SS, Grandi FC, Aboubakr O, Higashikubo B, Cho FS, Chang AH et al. Complement factor C1q mediates sleep spindle loss and epileptic spikes after mild brain injury. Science 2021; 373 :eabj2685.113. Pluvinage JV, Haney MS, Smith BAH, Sun J, Iram T, Bonanno L et al. CD22 blockade restores homeostatic microglial phagocytosis in ageing brains. Nature 2019; 568 :187–192.114. Gulen MF, Samson N, Keller A, Schwabenland M, Liu C, Glück S et al. cGAS–STING drives ageing-related inflammation and neurodegeneration. Nature 2023; 620 :374–380.115. Berghoff SA, Spieth L, Sun T, Hosang L, Schlaphoff L, Depp C et al. Microglia facilitate repair of demyelinated lesions via post-squalene sterol synthesis. Nat Neurosci 2021; 24 :47–60.116. Li W, Zhu H, Zou X, Ye H, Zhong J, Xiang S et al. A brain-to-lung signal from GABAergic neurons to ADRB2+ interstitial macrophages promotes pulmonary inflammatory responses. Immunity 2025; 0 . doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2025.05.005117. Filipello F, Morini R, Corradini I, Zerbi V, Canzi A, Michalski B et al. The Microglial Innate Immune Receptor TREM2 Is Required for Synapse Elimination and Normal Brain Connectivity. Immunity 2018; 48 :979-991.e8.118. Badimon A, Strasburger HJ, Ayata P, Chen X, Nair A, Ikegami A et al. Negative feedback control of neuronal activity by microglia. Nature 2020; 586 :417–423.119. Klawonn AM, Fritz M, Castany S, Pignatelli M, Canal C, Similä F et al. Microglial activation elicits a negative affective state through prostaglandin-mediated modulation of striatal neurons. Immunity 2021; 54 :225-234.e6.120. Wang C, Yue H, Hu Z, Shen Y, Ma J, Li J et al. Microglia mediate forgetting via complement-dependent synaptic elimination. Science 2020; 367 :688–694.121. Rosenzweig N, Kleemann KL, Rust T, Carpenter M, Grucci M, Aronchik M et al. Sex-dependent APOE4 neutrophil–microglia interactions drive cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Med 2024; 30 :2990–3003.122. Jin W-N, Shi K, He W, Sun J-H, Van Kaer L, Shi F-D et al. Neuroblast senescence in the aged brain augments natural killer cell cytotoxicity leading to impaired neurogenesis and cognition. Nat Neurosci 2021; 24 :61–73.123. Sanmarco LM, Wheeler MA, Gutiérrez-Vázquez C, Polonio CM, Linnerbauer M, Pinho-Ribeiro FA et al. Gut-licensed IFNγ+ NK cells drive LAMP1+TRAIL+ anti-inflammatory astrocytes. Nature 2021; 590 :473–479.124. Zenaro E, Pietronigro E, Bianca VD, Piacentino G, Marongiu L, Budui S et al. Neutrophils promote Alzheimer’s disease–like pathology and cognitive decline via LFA-1 integrin. Nat Med 2015; 21 :880–886.125. Cruz Hernández JC, Bracko O, Kersbergen CJ, Muse V, Haft-Javaherian M, Berg M et al. Neutrophil adhesion in brain capillaries reduces cortical blood flow and impairs memory function in Alzheimer’s disease mouse models. Nat Neurosci 2019; 22 :413–420.126. Tanabe S, Yamashita T. B-1a lymphocytes promote oligodendrogenesis during brain development. Nat Neurosci 2018; 21 :506–516.127. Korin B, Ben-Shaanan TL, Schiller M, Dubovik T, Azulay-Debby H, Boshnak NT et al. High-dimensional, single-cell characterization of the brain’s immune compartment. Nat Neurosci 2017; 20 :1300-+.128. Herz J, Fu Z, Kim K, Dykstra T, Wall M. GABAergic neuronal IL-4R mediates T cell effect on memory. Neuron 2021; 109 :3609-3618.e9.129. Pasciuto E, Burton OT, Roca CP, Lagou V, Rajan WD, Theys T et al. Microglia Require CD4 T Cells to Complete the Fetal-to-Adult Transition. Cell 2020; 182 :625-640.e24.130. Liesz A, Suri-Payer E, Veltkamp C, Doerr H, Sommer C, Rivest S et al. Regulatory T cells are key cerebroprotective immunomodulators in acute experimental stroke. Nat Med 2009; 15 :192–199.131. Shi L, Sun Z, Su W, Xu F, Xie D, Zhang Q et al. Treg cell-derived osteopontin promotes microglia-mediated white matter repair after ischemic stroke. Immunity 2021; 54 :1527-1542.e8.132. Shin Yim Y, Park A, Berrios J, Lafourcade M, Pascual LM, Soares N et al. Reversing behavioural abnormalities in mice exposed to maternal inflammation. Nature 2017; 549 :482–487.133. Gate D, Tapp E, Leventhal O, Shahid M, Nonninger TJ, Yang AC et al. CD4+ T cells contribute to neurodegeneration in Lewy body dementia. Science 2021; 374 :868–874.134. Kim S, Kim H, Yim YS, Ha S, Atarashi K, Tan TG et al. Maternal gut bacteria promote neurodevelopmental abnormalities in mouse offspring. Nature 2017; 549 :528–532.135. Gate D, Saligrama N, Leventhal O, Yang AC, Unger MS, Middeldorp J et al. Clonally expanded CD8 T cells patrol the cerebrospinal fluid in Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 2020; 577 :399–404.136. Garber C, Soung A, Vollmer LL, Kanmogne M, Last A, Brown J et al. T cells promote microglia-mediated synaptic elimination and cognitive dysfunction during recovery from neuropathogenic flaviviruses. Nat Neurosci 2019; 22 :1276–1288.137. Kaya T, Mattugini N, Liu L, Ji H, Cantuti-Castelvetri L, Wu J et al. CD8+ T cells induce interferon-responsive oligodendrocytes and microglia in white matter aging. Nat Neurosci 2022; 25 :1446–1457.138. Wang Y, Chen D, Xu D, Huang C, Xing R, He D et al. Early developing B cells undergo negative selection by central nervous system-specific antigens in the meninges. Immunity 2021; 54 :2784-2794.e6.139. Fitzpatrick Z, Frazer G, Ferro A, Clare S, Bouladoux N, Ferdinand J et al. Gut-educated IgA plasma cells defend the meningeal venous sinuses. Nature 2020; 587 :472–476.140. Fazazi MR, Doss PMIA, Pereira R, Fudge N, Regmi A, Joly-Beauparlant C et al. Myelin-reactive B cells exacerbate CD4+ T cell-driven CNS autoimmunity in an IL-23-dependent manner. Nat Commun 2024; 15 :5404. Figure legend. Fig. 1. Peripheral nervous system innervates multiple organs and tissues. Nervous system is comprised of central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS). CNS includes brain and spinal cord while PNS is divided into sensory and autonomic arms. The sensory nervous system is subdivided into somatic (innervates skin and soft tissues) and visceral arms (innervates visceral organs) while autonomic nervous system is further divided into sympathetic, parasympathetic and enteric nervous system. (B) The cell body of sensory neuron reside within ganglia and their nerve terminals innervate barrier tissues. (C) Parasympathetic, sympathetic nervous system and the enteric nervous system (ENS) work antagonistically to regulate body response. Fig. 2. Neuro-immune crosstalk in tissues under steady state. Enteric nervous system (ENS)-derived vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) regulates ILC3 responses and food uptake via VPAC2 and promotes IL-5 release from ILC2s to maintain eosinophil homeostasis. Muscularis macrophages (MMs) secrete bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) to activate enteric neurons, which feedback colony stimulatory factor 1 (CSF1) to sustain MMs development. TGF-β released by enteric neurons maintains neurosupportive phenotype of MMs which are refine ENS in early life. Calcitonin gene relating peptide (CGRP) and stance P (SP) released by Nav 1.8 + neuron induce the mucus secretion of goblet cells, while Ach from cholinergic neurons maintains epithelial barrier integrity. (B) Gut sympathetic neuron-derived norepinephrine (NE) promotes ILC2 migration to the pancreas, where IL-5/IL-13 stimulate glucagon secretion from pancreatic α-cell. In adipose tissue, sympathetic neuorn-derived NE promote release of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) by mesenchymal cell to boost ILC2s-mediated energy expenditure. (C) In the skin, CGRP induces macrophage M2 polarization, reduces neutrophil infiltration, and activates dermal dendritic cells (dDCs) to release IL-23 critical for γδ T cell-mediated IL-17/IL-22 production. GINIP + neurons-released TAFA4 also induces macrophage M2 polarization requisite for tissue repair while Langerhans cell-dependent Mrgprd + neurons suppress Mrgbr2 expression of mast cell via glutamate signaling. Fig. 3. Tissue-specific neuroimmune axes in host-defense against microbes across skin, lung, and gut. In the skin, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) serine V8 protease activate the pruriceptors via protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) to elicit itch, while the its NFP and α-HL induce pain via formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) and ADAM10, respectively. Nociceptors-derived CGRP then suppresses neutrophils infiltration and TNF-α production by macrophages. Streptococcus pyogenes (S. pyogenes) secret streptolyisn S to activate TRPV1 + neurons, releasing CGRP to inhibit neutrophil recruitment and phagocytosis. In contract, during cutaneous candida albicans (C. albicans) infection, TRPV1 + neurons-derived CGRP drives the IL-23 production by CD301 + dDCs, enabling γδ T cell-mediated antifungal immunity. (B) In the lung, mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) produces sulfolipid 1 (SL-1) and activate TRPV1 + neurons to trigger cough. During S. aureus and K. pneumoniae infection, TRPV1 + nociceptors can secret CGRP to suppress host immunity. (C) In the gut, the ENS-derived IL-18 critically induces antimicrobial protein (AMP) synthesis in goblet cells to defend against Salmonella infection. In parallel, commensal-activated Nav1.8 + neurons enhance mucus secretion via CGRP-RAMP1 signaling, while nociceptor-derived CGRP concurrently reduces microfold cells (M cells) density and sustains segmented filamentous bacteria (SFB) colonization to fortify barrier immunity. Gut extrinsic sympathetic neurons-derived NE polarizes muscularis macrophages (MMs) toward M2-like tissue-protective phenotype via beta-2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR). For ILC2 regulation, enteric neurons sense ILC2-derived IL-13 through IL-13R, forming a CGRP-mediated negative feedback loop that constrains anti-helminth immunity, while sympathetic β2AR signaling further suppresses ILC2 activity. Conversely, cholinergic neuron-derived neuropeptide neuromedin U (NMU) potently activates ILC2s and recruits eosinophils, driving goblet cell differentiation and accelerating helminth expulsion. Fig. 4. Neuropeptide-mediated bidirectional control of inflammation. sensory neurons-derived CGRP exacerbates type 17 immunity while inhibiting type 2 responses. Paradoxically, CGRP secreted by pulmonary neuroendocrine cells (PNEC) amplifies type 2 inflammation. Neuromedin U (NMU) promotes type 2 inflammation via neuromedin U receptor 1 (NMR1) on type 2 innate lymphoid cell (ILC2s) and eosinophils. (C) Stance P (SP) drives cutaneous type 2 responses via mast cells, CD301b + dendritic cells (DCs) and ILC2s while preserving gut microbiome homeostasis. And Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) promotes type 2 inflammation via VIP receptor type 2 (VPAC2) expressed on Th2 and ILC2s. (C) Norepinephrine (NE) suppresses ILC2-driven type 2 inflammation via β2AR but paradoxically amplifies hypersensitivity via NE-Ach circuits. Dopamine promotes Th2 responses via DRD4 whereas suppressing ILC2 and macrophages responses via DRD1. Fig. 5. Neuronal control of tumor progression in glioma, gastric, melanoma and breast cancer. In glioma, neuron-derived glutamine elicits glioma cell depolarization and promote tumor growth via α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA) and NMDA N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor. Neuronal BDNF acts on TrkB receptor to promote the transportation of AMPA receptor and regulate the neuron-cancer cell synaptic plasticity. Neurons also release neuroligin-3 and insulin growth factor 1 (IGF1) to promote tumor progression and metastasis. In turn, cancer cell remodels the synaptic plasticity through thrombosponsin-1 to facilitate its progression. B. In gastric cancer, cancer cell secret nerve growth factor (NGF) to act on TrkA receptor and induce the release of CGRP by nociceptor, which promote tumor progression via RAMP1. C. Melanoma cell-derived secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) elicits elicit neurite outgrowth of nociceptors, which attenuate the cytotoxicity of CD8 + T cell via CGRP-RAMP1 axis. D. In breast cancer, endothelium-derived Slit Homolog 2 (SLIT2) promote tumor sensory innervation, which release SP to cause TACR1 high cancer cell death, driving cancer invasion and metastasis via ssRNA/TLR7 signaling. Fig. 6. Dialogue between microglia, neurons, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes contributes to synapse refinement, synaptic plasticity, neuronal activity and myelin health. Inhibitory neurons-derived GABA induce inhibitory synapse pruning by GABAb-receptive microglia, while astrocyte-derived IL-33 could bind to ST2 expressed on microglia to fuel phagocytosis function. Non-phagocytic synaptic refinement occurs through interaction of Fn14 expressed on thalamic relay neurons and TWEAK released by microglia. Microglia orchestrate myelin health by regulating the lipid metabolism of oligodendrocyte via TGFβ/TGFβR axis, preventing hypermyelination or demyelination of the already existed myelin. ATP released by activated neurons recruits microglia to catalyze ATP to adenosine, thereby suppressing hyperactivity. In addition, neuronal IL-33 expressed in an experience-dependent manner recruits microglia for extracellular matrix remodeling, enhancing synaptic plasticity and memory consolidation. Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 07 October 2025 Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Keywords allergy treament basic immunology clinical immunology mucosal immunity Authors Affiliations Wenqian Huang Sun Yat-sen University Zhongshan School of Medicine View all articles by this author Xiangyang Wang Southern Medical University School of Laboratory Medicine and Biotechnology View all articles by this author Yingjiao Cao 0009-0004-9367-9792 [email protected] Sun Yat-sen University Zhongshan School of Medicine View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 180 views 153 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Wenqian Huang, Xiangyang Wang, Yingjiao Cao. The bidirectional neuroimmune dialogue in inter-organs. Authorea . 07 October 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.175983149.90056770/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.175983149.90056770/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9ffe9e130bb1aa64',t:'MTc3OTQ4MjIzMg=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.