Combined expression of FOXO and Tribbles proteins predicts survival of glioma patients

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14

A combined signature of high FOXO1 and TRIB1/2/3, with low FOXO3/4 mRNA levels, predicts poorer survival across glioma patient cohorts, especially in grade 4 gliomas.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14 · read from full text

This study analyzed RNA-seq and microarray expression data from multiple glioma cohorts (TCGA, CGGA, REMBRANDT, and Gravendeel; total n=2,543) to test whether mRNA levels of FOXO family members (FOXO1/3/4/6) combined with Tribbles pseudokinases (TRIB1/2/3) predict patient survival. Across all cohorts, high FOXO1 with low FOXO3/4 mRNA, together with elevated TRIB1/2/3 expression, defined a transcriptional signature associated with significantly worse survival, including a median survival difference of 4.5 months in grade 4 tumors. Grade 4 gliomas showed enrichment of this expression pattern, and the authors highlight multi-cohort validation as a robustness strength, while the main limitation stated is the prognostic (biomarker) focus without functional confirmation in the paper text provided. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background Gliomas, particularly high-grade variants such as glioblastoma, remain therapeutically challenging with poor survival outcomes. Current biomarkers inadequately stratify patients for therapy selection, monitoring, and early detection of progression. The FOXO transcription factors and Tribbles pseudokinases, key regulators of the PI3K/AKT pathway, have been implicated in cancer progression but their prognostic value in gliomas is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether transcriptional profiles of FOXO and Tribbles family members predict survival in glioma patients better than established biomarkers. Methods Using RNA-seq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, n = 705) and Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA, n = 1018), along with microarray datasets (REMBRANDT, n = 552; Gravendeel, n = 268), we analyzed mRNA levels of FOXO1/3/4/6 and TRIB1/2/3 . Survival analysis was performed via Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and concordance indices. Gene expression differences across tumor grades and molecular subgroups were assessed using Student’s t-test. Results High FOXO1 and low FOXO3/4 mRNA levels, combined with elevated TRIB1/2/3 expression, formed a signature significantly associated with worse survival across all cohorts. This signature stratifies grade 4 gliomas, with a median survival difference of 4.5 months. Grade 4 tumors exhibited elevated FOXO1 and TRIB1/2/3 but reduced FOXO3/4 levels compared to lower-grade gliomas. Conclusions The FOXO/Tribbles transcriptional signature robustly predicts survival in glioma patients. These findings highlight its potential as a biomarker for patient stratification and a therapeutic target for high-grade gliomas. Key Points FOXO/Tribbles mRNA signature predicts glioma survival status. Our analysis identifies a distinct transcriptional signature – characterized by high FOXO1 and TRIB1/2/3 levels along with low FOXO3 and FOXO4 – that consistently predicts poor prognosis across glioma cohorts. This FOXO/Tribbles signature demonstrates great prognostic power, particularly in grade 4 gliomas, providing an improved tool for risk stratification and clinical decision-making. High FOXO1 and Tribbles levels mark aggressive glioblastoma tumors. We show that elevated expression of FOXO1 and Tribbles pseudokinases is enriched in glioblastoma (GB) and grade 4 astrocytomas. These tumors, known for their aggressiveness and therapy resistance, are consistently associated with this unfavorable mRNA profile. This suggests a functional role for FOXO1 and Tribbles in glioma progression and highlights them as promising biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Multi-cohort validation (TCGA, CGGA) confirms prognostic robustness. The predictive FOXO/Tribbles expression pattern was validated across four large and independent datasets (TCGA, CGGA, REMBRANDT, and Gravendeel), demonstrating consistency despite differences in platform and population. This multi-cohort validation reinforces the robustness and generalizability of this transcriptional signature for predicting survival outcomes in glioma patients. Importance of the Study Glioblastoma and high-grade gliomas have dismal prognoses, yet current biomarkers fail to adequately guide therapy. This study identifies a novel transcriptional signature – combining FOXO transcription factors and Tribbles pseudokinases – that robustly predicts survival in glioma patients stratifying aggressive tumors. Using multi-cohort validation (TCGA, CGGA, REMBRANDT), we demonstrate that elevated FOXO1 and Tribbles ( TRIB1/2/3 ) levels, coupled with reduced FOXO3/4 , correlate with poor outcomes in grade 4 gliomas. This signature is enriched in glioblastomas, highlighting its link to therapy resistance. Unlike prior studies focusing on individual proteins, our integrated analysis reveals their collective prognostic power, offering a pathway-specific biomarker for patient stratification. These findings provide a translational framework for targeting FOXO/Tribbles in precision oncology, addressing an urgent need for improved therapeutic strategies in neuro-oncology.
Full text 4,534 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Gliomas, particularly high-grade variants such as glioblastoma, remain therapeutically challenging with poor survival outcomes. Current biomarkers inadequately stratify patients for therapy selection, monitoring, and early detection of progression. The FOXO transcription factors and Tribbles pseudokinases, key regulators of the PI3K/AKT pathway, have been implicated in cancer progression but their prognostic value in gliomas is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether transcriptional profiles of FOXO and Tribbles family members predict survival in glioma patients better than established biomarkers.

Methods

Using RNA-seq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, n = 705) and Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA, n = 1018), along with microarray datasets (REMBRANDT, n = 552; Gravendeel, n = 268), we analyzed mRNA levels of FOXO1/3/4/6 and TRIB1/2/3. Survival analysis was performed via Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and concordance indices. Gene expression differences across tumor grades and molecular subgroups were assessed using Student’s t-test.

Results

High FOXO1 and low FOXO3/4 mRNA levels, combined with elevated TRIB1/2/3 expression, formed a signature significantly associated with worse survival across all cohorts. This signature stratifies grade 4 gliomas, with a median survival difference of 4.5 months. Grade 4 tumors exhibited elevated FOXO1 and TRIB1/2/3 but reduced FOXO3/4 levels compared to lower-grade gliomas.

Conclusions

The FOXO/Tribbles transcriptional signature robustly predicts survival in glioma patients. These findings highlight its potential as a biomarker for patient stratification and a therapeutic target for high-grade gliomas. Key Points FOXO/Tribbles mRNA signature predicts glioma survival status. Our analysis identifies a distinct transcriptional signature – characterized by high FOXO1 and TRIB1/2/3 levels along with low FOXO3 and FOXO4 – that consistently predicts poor prognosis across glioma cohorts. This FOXO/Tribbles signature demonstrates great prognostic power, particularly in grade 4 gliomas, providing an improved tool for risk stratification and clinical decision-making. High FOXO1 and Tribbles levels mark aggressive glioblastoma tumors. We show that elevated expression of FOXO1 and Tribbles pseudokinases is enriched in glioblastoma (GB) and grade 4 astrocytomas. These tumors, known for their aggressiveness and therapy resistance, are consistently associated with this unfavorable mRNA profile. This suggests a functional role for FOXO1 and Tribbles in glioma progression and highlights them as promising biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Multi-cohort validation (TCGA, CGGA) confirms prognostic robustness. The predictive FOXO/Tribbles expression pattern was validated across four large and independent datasets (TCGA, CGGA, REMBRANDT, and Gravendeel), demonstrating consistency despite differences in platform and population. This multi-cohort validation reinforces the robustness and generalizability of this transcriptional signature for predicting survival outcomes in glioma patients. Importance of the Study Glioblastoma and high-grade gliomas have dismal prognoses, yet current biomarkers fail to adequately guide therapy. This study identifies a novel transcriptional signature – combining FOXO transcription factors and Tribbles pseudokinases – that robustly predicts survival in glioma patients stratifying aggressive tumors. Using multi-cohort validation (TCGA, CGGA, REMBRANDT), we demonstrate that elevated FOXO1 and Tribbles (TRIB1/2/3) levels, coupled with reduced FOXO3/4, correlate with poor outcomes in grade 4 gliomas. This signature is enriched in glioblastomas, highlighting its link to therapy resistance. Unlike prior studies focusing on individual proteins, our integrated analysis reveals their collective prognostic power, offering a pathway-specific biomarker for patient stratification. These findings provide a translational framework for targeting FOXO/Tribbles in precision oncology, addressing an urgent need for improved therapeutic strategies in neuro-oncology. Competing Interest Statement W.L. is cofounder of Refoxy Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Cologne, Germany and required by his institution to state so in his publications. Ana Teresa Maia, co-founder and CEO of expressTEC, Lda, declares no conflict of interest related to this study. The other authors declare no conflict of interest. Footnotes We have incorporated new results and new authors in the revised version of the manuscript

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-07-15T06:44:59.916582+00:00