FF3F: Feature-Fused 3 Frame Hybrid NeuralNetwork Framework for 3D Tracking ofFast-Moving Small Objects

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14

The FF3F neural network framework fuses temporal features from three LiDAR frames to accurately and efficiently track fast-moving small objects, outperforming other methods in recall at high speeds.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14 · read from full text

The preprint studies LiDAR-based 3D detection and tracking of fast-moving small objects, where conventional contour/segmentation methods fail under scarce target features, using solid-state LiDAR data. It proposes FF3F, a feature-fused three-frame hybrid neural-network framework that combines lightweight low-level neural modules and conditional convolution layers to fuse pixel drifts, centroid displacements, and velocity estimates in a confidence-aware temporal pipeline across three consecutive frames. Compared with an end-to-end three-frame neural model (EE3F) and a traditional feature-based optical flow method (FBOF), FF3F achieved higher average recall (0.89 vs 0.78 and 0.59) for targets moving 9–12 m/s and spanning ~128 pixels, with latency reported as 27.31–92.35 ms; the main limitation is that results are evaluated under specific sensor/target motion conditions and against predefined comparison methods. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Detecting and tracking fast-moving small objects with LiDAR remains a challenge. Conventional computer vision approaches rely heavily on contour segmentation, which degrades sharply when the accessible features of the targets are limited. To address this limitation, we propose the Feature-Fused ThreeFrame (FF3F) detection algorithm, which integrates lightweight low-level neural networks and conditional convolution layers to achieve a balance between accuracy and efficiency. FF3F fuses pixel drifts, centroid displacements, and velocity estimates within a confidence-aware framework, enabling robust motion estimation even under scarce signal or noisy environments. The “three-frame” design refers to integrating temporal features across three consecutive frames, thereby strengthening recognition consistency. The approach is tested and compared against an end-to-end three-frame neural network-based detection (EE3F) model and a traditional feature-based optical flow (FBOF) algorithm. This study uses solid-state LiDAR sensors. Performance was evaluated by Precision, Recall, F1(the harmonic mean of its precision and recall rate), and IoU (Intersection over Union). When target objects are moving at 9–12 m/s and covering approximately 128 pixels, the FF3F model achieved an average recall of 0.89, outperforming other frameworks (EE3F: 0.78, FBOF: 0.59). FF3F had a latency between 27.31ms and 92.35 ms. In comparison, EE3F exhibited higher latency (59.42 ms –171.64 ms), while FBOF was faster (17.13 ms – 55.43 ms) but substantially less accurate. These results confirm that FF3F effectively balances accuracy and computational efficiency under visibility constraints.
Full text 10,848 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
FF3F: Feature-Fused 3 Frame Hybrid NeuralNetwork Framework for 3D Tracking ofFast-Moving Small Objects | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article FF3F: Feature-Fused 3 Frame Hybrid NeuralNetwork Framework for 3D Tracking ofFast-Moving Small Objects Yanghe Yan, Paul I. Ro, Kiron Ang This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7943189/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Detecting and tracking fast-moving small objects with LiDAR remains a challenge. Conventional computer vision approaches rely heavily on contour segmentation, which degrades sharply when the accessible features of the targets are limited. To address this limitation, we propose the Feature-Fused ThreeFrame (FF3F) detection algorithm, which integrates lightweight low-level neural networks and conditional convolution layers to achieve a balance between accuracy and efficiency. FF3F fuses pixel drifts, centroid displacements, and velocity estimates within a confidence-aware framework, enabling robust motion estimation even under scarce signal or noisy environments. The “three-frame” design refers to integrating temporal features across three consecutive frames, thereby strengthening recognition consistency. The approach is tested and compared against an end-to-end three-frame neural network-based detection (EE3F) model and a traditional feature-based optical flow (FBOF) algorithm. This study uses solid-state LiDAR sensors. Performance was evaluated by Precision, Recall, F1(the harmonic mean of its precision and recall rate), and IoU (Intersection over Union). When target objects are moving at 9–12 m/s and covering approximately 128 pixels, the FF3F model achieved an average recall of 0.89, outperforming other frameworks (EE3F: 0.78, FBOF: 0.59). FF3F had a latency between 27.31ms and 92.35 ms. In comparison, EE3F exhibited higher latency (59.42 ms –171.64 ms), while FBOF was faster (17.13 ms – 55.43 ms) but substantially less accurate. These results confirm that FF3F effectively balances accuracy and computational efficiency under visibility constraints. LiDAR 3D object tracking feature-fused NN safety Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7943189","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":535622804,"identity":"f673287d-0328-453a-954d-909783135f0b","order_by":0,"name":"Yanghe Yan","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Baylor University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yanghe","middleName":"","lastName":"Yan","suffix":""},{"id":535622805,"identity":"a3aebd80-528c-48fc-8e44-37c6146cb8fe","order_by":1,"name":"Paul I. Ro","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Baylor University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Paul","middleName":"I.","lastName":"Ro","suffix":""},{"id":535622806,"identity":"de9a4a0a-04e9-4ad3-8a1f-3d7a1ff02755","order_by":2,"name":"Kiron Ang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Baylor University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kiron","middleName":"","lastName":"Ang","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-10-26 09:54:05","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7943189/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7943189/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":101570512,"identity":"160993e3-55d7-4d3b-9a33-5ad3fd534ef6","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-31 15:24:54","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":935523,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"FF3FFeatureFused3Framefortracking.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7943189/v1_covered_1bc58824-a5ef-40ba-8848-b3d6c4b1b9ea.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"FF3F: Feature-Fused 3 Frame Hybrid NeuralNetwork Framework for 3D Tracking ofFast-Moving Small Objects","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"LiDAR, 3D object tracking, feature-fused NN, safety","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7943189/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7943189/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"Detecting and tracking fast-moving small objects with LiDAR remains a challenge. Conventional computer vision approaches rely heavily on contour segmentation, which degrades sharply when the accessible features of the targets are limited. To address this limitation, we propose the Feature-Fused ThreeFrame (FF3F) detection algorithm, which integrates lightweight low-level neural networks and conditional convolution layers to achieve a balance between accuracy and efficiency. FF3F fuses pixel drifts, centroid displacements, and velocity estimates within a confidence-aware framework, enabling robust motion estimation even under scarce signal or noisy environments. The “three-frame” design refers to integrating temporal features across three consecutive frames, thereby strengthening recognition consistency. The approach is tested and compared against an end-to-end three-frame neural network-based detection (EE3F) model and a traditional feature-based optical flow (FBOF) algorithm. This study uses solid-state LiDAR sensors. Performance was evaluated by Precision, Recall, F1(the harmonic mean of its precision and recall rate), and IoU (Intersection over Union). When target objects are moving at 9–12 m/s and covering approximately 128 pixels, the FF3F model achieved an average recall of 0.89, outperforming other frameworks (EE3F: 0.78, FBOF: 0.59). FF3F had a latency between 27.31ms and 92.35 ms. In comparison, EE3F exhibited higher latency (59.42 ms –171.64 ms), while FBOF was faster (17.13 ms – 55.43 ms) but substantially less accurate. These results confirm that FF3F effectively balances accuracy and computational efficiency under visibility constraints.","manuscriptTitle":"FF3F: Feature-Fused 3 Frame Hybrid NeuralNetwork Framework for 3D Tracking ofFast-Moving Small Objects","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-01-28 18:22:47","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7943189/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"5e0308c5-06e2-4891-bdbe-2ff16af8a807","owner":[],"postedDate":"January 28th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-01-31T15:24:38+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-01-28 18:22:47","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7943189","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7943189","identity":"rs-7943189","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0