p27 Kip1 and cytoplasmic pSer10p27 are promising biomarkers for predicting prognosis and chemotherapy response in ovarian cancer
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
Purpose: The biological function of p27 Kip1 largely depends on its subcellular localization and phosphorylation status. Different subcellular localization and phosphorylation status of p27 Kip1 may represent distinct clinical values, which are not entirely clear in ovarian cancer. This study aimed to elucidate different subcellular localizations of p27 Kip1 and pSer10p27 in predicting prognosis and chemotherapy response in ovarian cancer. Methods: Meta-analyses were executed to evaluate the association of p27 Kip1 and phosphorylated p27 Kip1 with the prognosis of ovarian cancer patients. The expression levels and patterns of p27 Kip1 and pSer10p27 were evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The correlations between different p27 Kip1 states and clinicopathological features as well as prognosis were analyzed. p27 Kip1 and pSer10p27 expression level in cisplatin-sensitive and cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cell lines were detected using WB. KEGG analysis and WB were performed to evaluate the involved pathways of p27 Kip1 . Results: Meta-analyses showed that p27 Kip1 was associated with significantly better overall survival (OS) in ovarian cancer (HR = 2.14; 95% CI [1.71 - 2.68]) and pSer10p27 was associated with significantly poor OS in mixed solid tumors (HR = 2.56; 95% CI [1.76 - 3.73]) In our cohort of ovarian cancer patients, low total p27 Kip1 remained independent risk factors for OS (HR = 2.097; 95% CI [1.121 - 3.922], P = 0.021) and PFS (HR = 2.483; 95% CI [1.364 - 4.518], P = 0.003), while low cytoplasmic pSer10p27 had independent protective effects in terms of OS (HR = 0.472; 95% CI [0.248 - 0.898], P = 0.022) and PFS (HR = 0.488; 95% CI [0.261 - 0.910], P = 0.024). Patients with low total p27 Kip1 /pSer10p27 and low nuclear p27 Kip1 had worse chemotherapy response while patients with low cytoplasmic pSer10p27 expression had better chemotherapy response. The protein levels of p27 Kip1 and pSer10p27 were significantly reduced in cisplatin resistant cell lines SKOV3-cDDP and A2780-cDDP and the level of p27 Kip1 /pSer10p27 was subjective to Akt activation. Conclusion: The present study demonstrates that p27 Kip1 and cytoplasmic pSer10p27 are promising biomarkers for predicting prognosis and chemotherapy response in ovarian cancer.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (2)
References (47)
- Biomarkers and algorithms for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: CA125, HE4, RMI and ROMA, a review via crossref
- p27<sup>Kip1</sup>, an Intrinsically Unstructured Protein with Scaffold Properties. via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2021.01.010 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/path.5167 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2015.09.009 via crossref
- doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-12-0095 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/1878-0261.12624 via crossref
- doi:10.1182/blood.v95.2.619 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nrc2347 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1151871 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fonc.2015.00025 via crossref
- doi:10.1074/jbc.m203668200 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2012.08.006 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/ctm2.848 via crossref
- doi:10.1074/jbc.m001144200 via crossref
- doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-0170 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/advs.202204599 via crossref
- doi:10.4161/cc.8.21.9789 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/s12935-021-02273-4 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.stem.2012.09.014 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/s11658-022-00362-4 via crossref
- doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-15-3189 via crossref
- doi:10.7150/thno.36838 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nm761 via crossref
- doi:10.5372/1905-7415.0506.103 via crossref
- doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-0634 via crossref
- doi:10.3892/ol.2020.12073 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/cncr.32500 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.015 via crossref
- doi:10.1101/gad.8.1.9 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nm0297-222 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00432-005-0057-5 via crossref
- doi:10.1172/jci60376 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/onc.2011.9 via crossref
- doi:10.3892/ijo.18.5.953 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nm759 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/emm.2000.14 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2022.11.007 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/cas.13599 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/21691401.2019.1699811 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1745-6215-8-16 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90573-8 via crossref
- doi:10.7150/thno.48101 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00432-023-04917-6 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.07.008 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1817415116 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00026-6 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-09-11T06:32:26.773452+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0