Leveraging long-term ecological research initiatives into the One Health synthesis

1. There is still little emphasis within One Health on building linkages between human health, changes in biodiversity, and ecosystem perturbation. 2. We use the Great Plains, a system of substantial One Health concern, to illustrate a persistent data challenge through the lens of small mammals, parasitic vectors of disease, and long-term ecosystem change. 3. With progressive ecological change of grasslands through woody encroachment, we see that shifting plant communities cause a turnover in dominant rodent species, changes in the evolutionary complexity of host-vector relationships, a reduction in host species richness and an increase in carrying capacity of both hosts and vectors. 4. Knowledge of these progressive and accelerating dynamics are evident through novel data syntheses and collectively indicate heightened risk of emerging zoonotic disease throughout the region. 5. We call for One Health research that promotes novel digitized data linkages between specimen time-series held in biorepositories, long-term ecological research initiatives, and surveillance of pathogens. 1. Introduction Although not yet a household phrase, the concept of One Health is now widely recognized by health professionals as a holistic consideration of functional linkages between human health, animal health and environmental health (Destoumieux-Garzón et al., 2018). Zoonotic diseases starting with pathogen spillover from wildlife have a long history of affecting humanity, through severely virulent outbreaks, periodic pandemics, and chronic widespread infection, including ebola, bubonic plague, influenza, and malaria, to name a few (Piret & Boivin, 2021). The One Health synthesis was initially developed within the purview of biomedical science and the environments of domesticated animals but has broadened perspective to consider that our well-being relies on improving our knowledge of biodiversity interactions at-large, coupled with ecosystem processes. For instance, the Sars-CoV-2 coronavirus was linked to a spillover event between a wild mammal reservoir to humans, and subsequently from humans to multiple other species on a global scale, including both livestock and wildlife (Alluwaimi et al., 2020). Since then, One Health perspectives have increasingly considered how relationships between environmental variables such as biodiversity, ecological communities, and connectivity also intersect with human population trajectories, together affecting the risk of zoonotic disease spread (Lefrançois et al., 2023). Here, we argue that much of the data and specimen resources needed to rise to this One Health challenge exist but need a long-term approach that can link disparate fields together with the speed called for by this moment—an idea we refer to as One Data. The complexities of host-parasite-pathogen relationships associated with zoonoses are not new. A growing archive of research on changing dynamics of wildlife hosts, parasitic vectors, and zoonotic disease attests to recent observed shifts in the ranges of host reservoirs, pathogens, and the dynamics of exposure and infection (Daszak et al., 2000; Morand & Krasnov, 2010; Hoberg & Brooks, 2015; de Angeli Dutra et al., 2022). Given recent and accelerating global change, predictive models based on traits of reservoir species suggest that the geography of near-future zoonotic disease emergence (hotspots for zoonotic risk) may not be limited to tropical latitudes or recognized biodiversity hotspots where species richness, and diversity of zoonotic pathogens is highest (Han et al., 2015). Instead, zoonoses are often associated with wide-ranging and synanthropic reservoir species occupying variable environments that support relatively depauperate faunas (Han et al., 2015; 2016). Several factors typify these new systems: evidence of exacerbated population cycles of wildlife species in response to more pronounced seasonality with climate change, leading to years with high reservoir abundance (McMahon et al., 2018), more extreme weather events that impact short and long-term population trajectories (Sergio et al., 2018), and direct linkages between loss of biodiversity and increased risk of emerging disease (Keesing & Ostfeld, 2024). These are all long-term phenomena that are difficult to capture from short small-scale studies. It is now clear that the evolving arena of One Health must link the risks of zoonotic disease in humans with long-term wildlife dynamics, and global environmental change (e.g., García-Moreno, 2023). We focus on the Great Plains of North America in the context of a conceptual framework for how One Health practitioners and environmental scientists can mutually benefit from long-term ecological research (LTER). These LTER initiatives include international long-term ecological research (ILTER), long-term agricultural research (LTAR), and a range of U.S. state and federal initiatives, such as experimental forests and agricultural research stations. LTERs fuel fundamental research that often explicitly focuses on habitat variables and ecosystem processes. This is the same arena within which relationships between hosts, parasites, and pathogens are rapidly changing. The development of accessible and relational data streams based on these experimental systems provides enormous opportunities for applied research into environmental health, maintenance of biodiversity, and human health. In this article, we draw attention to the Great Plains as one of Earth’s largest grassland ecosystems, which in many respects epitomizes an emerging high-risk system for zoonoses (Han et al., 2015; Keesing & Ostfeld, 2024). Global grasslands are among the most human-altered ecosystems on Earth (Hoekstra et al., 2005; Scholtz & Twidwell, 2022). The Great Plains are located at the cross-roads of faunal communities distributed across multiple distinct ecosystems and yet support relatively low faunal diversity and endemism (Jenkins et al., 2015). This region also exhibits high environmental seasonality coupled with extensive and progressive human-induced land-cover change, and associated declines in native biodiversity (Ratajczak et al., 2022). For a finer scale perspective, we narrow our focus to the U.S. state of Kansas. At the center of North America, we argue that Kansas reflects a pivot point for both biotic and abiotic components of Great Plains environments (e.g., Burke et al., 1991). Like many other developed and grazed land areas in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, and South America, the Great Plains has a high percentage of land tenure under the control of private landowners. Continuing land-use intensification in increasingly fragmented landscapes is expanding the potential for interactions with disease vectors (Duik-Wasser et al., 2020; Ortiz et al., 2021). Private land tenure also means that affecting meaningful changes will require demonstrating overwhelming evidence of risks to humans with inaction, and broad benefits of supporting mitigation, because land-use decisions that reduce zoonotic disease exposure often cut against immediate economic benefits (Vanwambeke et al., 2024). Using information gathered across Kansas and the Great Plains, we demonstrate that continued development of targeted linkages between diverse data-streams spanning life sciences can positively impact One Health outcomes – an idea we term “One Data” (Fig. 1). One Data is the idea that tackling One Health in a meaningful way will require currently siloed data-streams and expertise to come together and achieve synergistic inference that is currently lacking. 1.1 The challenge for One Data linkages Evolutionary, ecological, and biomedical sciences are all increasingly understood as essential components towards achieving One Health outcomes yet are traditionally independent disciplines that lack clear data connections (e.g., Manlove et al., 2016). Work outlined in this paper demonstrates that systematic and targeted sampling of host specimens that explicitly parallels the rigor of associated long-term ecological data series (e.g., Hope et al., 2018) can provide vast potential for One Health. Such synergy would allow exploration not only of host evolutionary legacies, but temporal trends in parasite and pathogen diversity through genomic surveillance based on modern preservations, effectively bridging the gap across disciplines. Still, the hurdle is developing digital connections, so-called relational linkages, that provide ready access to associated data collected through solo or trans-disciplinary efforts. For instance, these can be reciprocal hyperlinks between a museum specimen, an environmental dataset, and a pathogen genetic sequence. All of these are held in multiple independent databases, but are rarely explicitly linked, meaning that the existing relationships between them are not easily realized by potential data users. For instance, specimen data accessible through the Integrated Digitized Biocollections (iDigBio), Ecological data held in the Environmental Data Initiative (EDI), and host/pathogen genetic data held within GenBank (all as examples of respective data repositories developed from North America) are still not readily relational in most cases. This is despite each repository being a leading initiative towards mobilizing digitized data. The very present global need for One Health, a framework that increasingly relies on all three data streams, presents a strong opportunity to catalyze such linkages. Currently, the leading example of robust relational linkages within biodiversity sciences hinges on the existence of vouchered host specimens held in digitized collection databases (e.g., Arctos.database.org). This highlights another intrinsic value of physical specimens that, more than simply recorded data points (e.g. field measurements), offer tangible source material that can be revisited and re-used repeatedly as One Health investigations develop more intricate questions, through relational pathways (e.g., Thompson et al., 2021). 1.2 Using the Great Plains to understand extrinsic changes to environmental “health” Before western settlement of the Great Plains in the early 1800s, expansive grasslands stretched from northern Mexico to central Canada and were maintained by relatively intact and stable consumer guilds, fire regimes, and climatic gradients (Axelrod, 1985; Samson et al., 2004). In the past 150 years, local land conversion of the Great Plains region, wholesale declines in native wildlife (Flores, 2017), and global anthropogenic forcing have transformed these grasslands to an increasingly fragmented mosaic of remnant habitats, agriculture, urban zones, and woodland (Samson et al., 2004; Scholtz & Twidwell, 2022). Impacts on global climate systems include predicted increases in the intensity and severity of extreme events, such as droughts that are more severe and longer than any in recent centuries (Cook et al., 2015). The stability of wildlife has also been progressively altered. Great Plains grasslands historically divided forested ecosystems of the western and eastern North America, while also maintaining a strong filter for dispersal of species (e.g., Reding et al., 2021) and pathogens (e.g., Alkishe et al., 2021) from east to west and from north to south across steep gradients of precipitation and temperature, respectively. Small mammal communities of Great Plains grasslands transition in both diversity and composition from western arid grasslands (higher richness and western origin species) to eastern mesic grasslands (lower richness and greater influence of plains endemics and eastern origin species; Jenkins et al., 2015). Similarly, components of mammalian communities associated with north-temperate grassland and boreal zones dominate in the northern plains, and species typical of sub-tropics and arid chaparral push into the southern plains (Armstrong et al., 1986). This turnover of communities across the middle of the continent translates to relatively high total diversity across this vast region, but relatively low local diversity or endemism (Jenkins et al., 2015), with community structure in a given area maintained by the consistency of strong environmental gradients, at least through ecological timeframes (Johnsgard, 1978). But environmental changes are accelerating. Warming global climate and rising atmospheric CO 2 have shifted the Great Plains climatic envelope north by over 500 km in the last 50 years (Roberts et al., 2019). Similarly, the transition zone between arid western grasslands and eastern mesic grasslands has shifted east from roughly the 100 th meridian to the 98 th meridian longitude in the same time frame (Seager et al., 2018). With these atmospheric shifts are concomitant changes in environmental drivers. Cessation of natural wildfire regimes has substantially contributed to westward woody encroachment by eastern woodland flora (Ratajczak et al., 2016). Invasive species are spreading throughout the Great Plains, resulting in patchier prairies, often confined to more upland and marginal soils that remain drier and less productive (Van Auken, 2009). At the broadest scale, remaining unfragmented tracts of Great Plains grasslands are often relegated to the arid short-grass and mixed-grass regions of the western and northern Plains (Samson et al., 2004). This means that locally distinct lineages (evolutionarily discrete intra-specific units) and ecotypes (adaptive population units) of biota that occur in more mesic regions of the eastern Plains (east of the 100 th meridian) are experiencing highest levels of change (Galliart et al., 2019). 2. Evolutionary and Ecological Data Streams Because native grasslands globally are experiencing massive reduction through human action (Scholtz & Twidwell, 2022), they are also the focus of extensive and often multi-decadal ecosystem studies, and provide opportunities to repurpose data towards emerging considerations, including One Health. In the Great Plains, long-term data collection through broad-scale monitoring efforts allows us, at least in part, to summarize environmental and biodiversity dynamics (Schmidt et al., 2021) and quantify change through landscape-scale experimental initiatives (e.g., Ratajczak et al., 2014; Bruckerhoff et al., 2020; Hope et al., 2021). Data on trends of small mammals across this region span methods that include spatially broad, site-intensive, and temporally deep specimen sampling. However, rigorous biodiversity archives are much less consistent across the global stage, often given perceived ethical conflict between biodiversity conservation and science-based specimen collection (McLean et al., 2016; Nachman et al., 2023). Natural history collections and biorepositories are archives of physical specimens that record the existence of species at a given place and time and represent a permanent record of biodiversity from which we can assess change thanks to persistent sampling effort across decadal timeframes (for illustrated reviews, see figures in Dunnum et al., 2017; Miller et al., 2020). Continuing series of specimens through time, including progressive changes in methods of collection and preservation of specimen materials can greatly extend the value of these resources towards understanding disease dynamics, community turnover, evolutionary trends, and many other emerging applications (Galbreath et al., 2019; Paul et al., 2025). Whole-specimen resources allow for inter-disciplinary collaborative research and educational initiatives to build knowledge of the connections between extrinsic environmental variables, and the intrinsic traits of species that collectively govern the likelihood of disease emergence and transmission (Cook et al., 2014; Colella et al., 2021). In recent years, shifting priorities in conservation biology, biomedical science, and precedence of national funding (in the U.S. and elsewhere) have led to major advances in data digitization and dissemination, allowing for aggregated online information on species distributions based on specimen resources (Hedrick et al., 2020). This change reflects an accelerating demand for use of specimens in multi-disciplinary science, including One Health (Thompson et al., 2021). Kansas, and the Great Plains in general, has a long history of mammal biodiversity research through field sampling and curation of specimen resources and these efforts are recorded through specimen archives housed in museums across North America and available through digitized specimen catalogs (e.g., the Global Biodiversity Information Facility [GBIF] and Integrative Digitized Biocollections [iDigBio]). In addition to a region-wide specimen record of mammal occurrence data, certain local sites have emphasized more site-intensive efforts. In 1980, the U.S. National Science Foundation commenced funding for the Long-Term Ecological Research Network with an overriding emphasis on experimental data collection to understand processes of ecosystem change. The Konza LTER site in northeast Kansas, one of three LTER sites that have explicitly focused on North American grasslands, is also one of the original landscape-scale experimental stations within this network and has collected environmental data, and floral and faunal data for over 40 years (Knapp et al., 1998). Included in the research priorities is understanding how populations of consumers influence ecosystem state and how drivers of change impact consumers. Konza is one of only two U.S. LTER sites (along with the Sevilleta LTER in New Mexico) that regularly combine long-term small mammal monitoring data with site-intensive and temporally deep specimen sampling, with an explicit goal of enabling scientific inquiry into changes in intrinsic traits of small mammals as related to experimental manipulation of ecosystems (e.g., Hope et al., 2021). This includes their genetic legacies (through collection of genomic resources), trophic relationships (through stable isotopic analysis of multiple tissue types), parasite biodiversity and co-evolution (through preservation of ecto- and endoparasites), and disease dynamics (through host and parasite pathogen surveillance). Data sampled from both landcover change and small mammal reservoirs can yield surprises. For instance, we recently found that reintroducing frequent fires to an encroached area reduced shrub height by half and allowed much of the grass layer to recover (Collins et al., 2021). However, woodland-associated species still dominated the small mammal community (Hope et al., 2021). If we had relied on vegetation alone, we would have predicted a small mammal community dominated by grassland species, missing a strong legacy effect of the remaining woody vegetation. As such, an investment like the Konza LTER is uniquely poised to fuel One Health perspectives by coordinating data streams that include both robust time-series of whole-specimen resources, and rigorous long-term ecological data from a landscape-scale experimental system. 2.1 Intrinsic traits of focal reservoir species A decade ago, the risks of emerging zoonotic disease through development of new host-pathogen relationships between small mammals and their parasites (considering micro-parasitic pathogens) were summarized on a global scale using trait-based predictive modeling (Han et al., 2015). The central Great Plains of Kansas and Nebraska were highlighted as one potential hotspot for development of emerging zoonotic disease as a function of the geography and associated environments of this region and based on multiple life history traits of resident small mammal faunas. Other predicted regions, also strikingly coincident with the distribution of northern hemisphere grasslands include the Middle East (Kazakhstan) and central Asia (northern China). The Great Plains offers a tractable opportunity to develop rigorous epidemiological investigations based on existing and continuing data streams that might inform us more broadly of risks associated with other similar global hotspots. Critically, three of the most common small mammal species associated with the central Great Plains are within the top 15 reservoirs for known zoonoses globally, out of over 2,200 small mammal species included in the predictive models (Han et al., 2015), and these three species comprise our focal taxa. More generally, the vast majority of all zoonoses are associated with wild mammals, and there is a strong and direct positive relationship between diversity within mammalian orders and the diversity of detected pathogens (Han et al., 2016). The specific focus on small mammals, and rodents in particular, for assessing zoonotic disease risk is therefore warranted, given that rodents constitute roughly 40% of all mammals. 2.2 Focal Small Mammals Species of high zoonotic concern considered in the current synthesis include the western deer mouse ( Peromyscus sonoriensis ; previously P. maniculatus ), the white-footed mouse ( P. leucopus ), and the hispid cotton rat ( Sigmodon hispidus ; Fig. 1). Collectively, these species are known to carry zoonotic pathogens (often vector-borne) including viruses (e.g., Hantavirus, Powassan), bacteria (e.g., Borrelia, Ehrlichia, Yersinia ), and protists (e.g., Schistosoma, Trypanosoma ) (Barbour 2017; Rochlin and Toledo 2020). Deer mice, including the western deer mouse, are wide-ranging across North America and can be found in virtually all terrestrial habitats. These mice are perhaps the nearest to a “model” for scientific inquiry among wildlife species (Bedford & Hoekstra, 2015). Despite range-wide complexity, deer mice across the central Great Plains constitute a single intra-specific lineage (Dragoo et al., 2006). They are grassland obligate mammals rarely detected in even modestly shrubby habitats (Pergams & Nyberg, 2001). They respond positively to frequent grassland fires and are the numerically dominant small mammal species throughout most native prairie regions that experience periodic fire (Kaufman et al., 1988). Carrying capacity of rodents in these open habitats is characteristically low (Hope, 2023; Rowland‐Schaefer et al., 2024). Although deer mice collectively harbor among the highest known diversity of zoonoses of all small mammals across their range (Barbour, 2017), low intra-specific genetic diversity within the Great Plains likely reflects lower resident pathogen diversity within grassland deer mice than within the broader species complex. White-footed mice are a woody-associated species of eastern and southern North America. They have multiple distinct mitochondrial lineages that are geographically and ecologically diagnosable (Walters et al., 2024). In the central Great Plains, instead of a single intra-specific lineage (as with deer mice), three lineages converge, with multiple localities that support genetic haplotypes associated with multiple lineages (Fig. 4). The high lineage diversity of these mice through the Great Plains likely amplifies zoonotic disease potential (Ostfeld & Keesing, 2012; Fountain-Jones et al., 2018). The distribution of this species is expanding through the Great Plains associated with encroachment of woody habitats, and densities of white-footed mice within newly invaded woody habitats rapidly exceed that of pre-encroachment communities (Clark et al., 1987; Fig. 2). In parallel with increases in woody plant abundance, densities of white-footed mice continue to increase through time, with impacts on the relationship between vector and pathogen densities and distributions (Figs. 1, 2). Hispid cotton rats are a southern sub-tropical species associated with a heterogeneous mix of habitat types. This species epitomizes an extreme boom-bust life history with a brief lifespan (six months) and ability to respond rapidly to interannual environmental variability (Odum, 1955). These traits are positively associated with disease potential, and like Peromyscus, hispid cotton rats are also a reservoir for multiple zoonoses (Mills et al., 2010). This species is rapidly expanding its range northward as populations experience warming climate trends. In low-density years, this species often becomes scarce to the point of undetectable using standard trapping methods, potentially also exacerbating relationships between co-distributed pools of hosts, vectors, and pathogens as communities temporarily restructure (Ecke et al., 2017). The hispid cotton rat is a potential wildcard in this dynamic environment, influencing amplification or dilution dynamics across very short timespans, and with little ability to predict or mitigate short-term outcomes (Levi et al., 2016; Luis et al., 2018). 2.3. Data Synthesis We compiled both statewide and local site data from small mammals to reveal community turnover, as related to quantifiable anthropogenic habitat change, changes in small mammal populations across spatial scales of analysis, and related changes in both host genetic legacies and vector infection prevalence, all relevant to altered risks of zoonoses. We queried digitized museum catalogs for focal mammal species distributed across Kansas to assess relative abundance as represented by archived voucher specimen resources collected across the last 50 years, and to reflect turnover in numerical dominance of potential hyper-reservoirs of zoonoses. We then summarized data from small mammal transects, long-term vegetation data, and aerial imagery, surveyed across the Konza LTER between 1980 and 2020. Sites varied by fire return intervals, including an annual, a four-year, and a 20-year burn treatment that have been applied consistently throughout the data collection interval, resulting in a clear relationship between burn frequency and levels of woody encroachment. Annual burns remained as open native grassland, four-year burns changed slowly at first but eventually became dominated by woody shrubs, and 20-year burns are approaching a woodland state following decades of almost complete fire suppression (Fig. 2; Briggs et al., 2005; Nippert et al., 2021). The small mammal data from this site, downloaded from the Environmental Data Initiative (EDI; Kaufman, 2021; Hope, 2023) includes capture-mark-recapture records of relative abundance from linear live-trapping transects annually. Voucher specimen collection occurred on half of all trapping transects between 2015-2020, providing tissue resources for genetic analysis, endoparasitic helminths, and ectoparasitic vectors, all retrieved from mammalian hosts (Hope, 2023). We procured tissue loans from these resources based on digitized specimen records from the Arctos multi-institutional database, parsing the diversity of evolutionary complexity and assessing relative prevalence of ectoparasite infection within focal small mammals in grassland versus woody encroached areas. Analysis of statewide specimen sampling included five-year sliding average gross abundance of specimens from each focal species (Fig. 2). For each mammal species within each burn treatment we developed general additive models of abundance through time as related to changes in land-cover summarized from long-term plant composition transect data similar to methods of Collins et al. (2021) and Ratajczak et al. (2022). The vegetation data come from a network of 40 10 m 2 plots (from EDI; Hartnett et al., 2019), which we used to develop a general additive model for each combination of burn frequency and plant functional type (extended from Collins et al., 2021; Ratajczak et al., 2022). We also include aerial imagery from the USDA NAIP program (Maxwell et al., 2017), NSF NEON (NEON 2022), and locally derived land-cover classes created with machine learning (Fig. 3; Noble & Ratajczak, 2025). Ectoparasite data consisted of relative incidence of infection of small mammals, including ticks (and other mites), fleas, lice, and botfly larvae. For each mammal species, we compiled genetic data based on up to 1,143 base pairs of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene, including available sequences downloaded from the NCBI GenBank, plus sequences from selected samples from the Konza LTER site and elsewhere across the Great Plains (Supplementary Data). Analyses included phylogeny construction using Bayesian statistics to identify robust monophyletic lineages within each species, which we related with geographic distribution by plotting georeferenced locality records (Fig. 4; see Herrera, 2021 for methods). 3. Descriptive epidemiology of Great Plains host-environment relationships What can close to a half-century of long-term ecological and specimen data collection on changes in habitats, climate, and small mammal populations through the central Great Plains tell us about the potential for emerging zoonotic disease more broadly? Given the application of a multi-faceted approach based on One Data linkages, the following observations are evident from our combined data streams: 1. Regular fires help to maintain native grasslands. Cessation of natural burn regimes, coupled with other quantifiable processes within grassland ecosystems has led to progressive woody encroachment through the central Great Plains (Figs. 2, 3). 2. Both locally and regionally, where habitats have changed, small mammal communities have experienced turnover in dominant species, and abundance of the most common native grassland small mammal (deer mouse; Peromyscus sonoriensis ) has declined while abundance of the most common woodland mammal species (white-footed mouse; Peromyscus leucopus ) has increased (Figs. 1, 2, S1). 3. In recently encroached woody habitats, carrying capacity and densities of small mammals has greatly increased (Figs. 1, 2). 4. Infection by ectoparasites (mostly flea and tick vectors of disease) is very high in recently encroached woody habitats but substantially lower in remaining native grassland (Fig. 1). 5. Intra-specific lineage diversity of the declining deer mouse is low, whereas lineage diversity of the expanding white-footed mouse is higher, translating to increasing complexity of lineage-specific or inter-lineage host-pathogen dynamics through time (Fig. 4). 6. Grassland and woodland-associated mammals are coming into contact more often through fragmentation and development of habitat mosaics, meaning that both vectors and pathogens associated with these mammals experience contact with new potential hosts/reservoirs with greater frequency (Fig. 1). 3.1 Inference of disease risk based on cascading biotic changes The available data provide compelling correlative evidence for biotic state change across ecosystems over the course of a single human lifetime (Briggs et al., 2005). We acknowledge that cause and effect within this system as related to risks of emerging zoonotic disease are still not firmly established. A primary strength of this synthesis is in providing a methodological model to inform future pathogen explorations based on this system, and for investigating other similar at-risk systems globally. Our analyses reveal relationships that leverage multiple existing comparative datasets, with consistency in ongoing and future data collection, and as such offer opportunity for more targeted epidemiological investigation based on actively expanding specimen archives. We can interpret our observations as follows: Native grasslands through the Great Plains are experiencing woody encroachment, causing fragmentation and loss of grassland habitat (Samson et al., 2004). Declining area of grassland reduces abundance of the dominant deer mouse, which is evident at landscape and state-wide scales. Across the region a woodland species of rodent, the white-footed mouse became the dominant small mammal species recently in the mid-2000’s (Fig. S1). This process of turnover has not been instantaneous (Fig. 2), with a lag period of nearly a decade in both the vegetation and mammal community, highlighting the importance of sustained site-intensive data collection. This transitional phase through the process of woody encroachment also reflects high potential for mixing between host small mammals, vectors, and pathogens. At this point, as much as half of the region is transitional with respect to dominant native habitats (Ratajczak et al., 2016)—a critical time for developing data resources to capture the impacts of these processes. A decline in native grassland indicator species, such as the deer mouse, signals broad regional changes in biodiversity (Pergams & Nyberg, 2001). We are also seeing substantial declines in grassland birds across the Great Plains (e.g., Bernath-Plaisted et al., 2023), heralding consideration of the conservation and associated health implications of progressive loss of the deer mouse, and other grassland species (Lindenmayer et al., 2011). Infection of deer mice by ectoparasitic vectors of disease based on our data was low. Similarly, carrying capacity for these rodents within grasslands was consistently low, compared to densities of rodents in woody encroached areas. This combination of low vector and low reservoir abundance collectively reflects low risk of disease spread within grassland habitats that historically were much more widespread (Han et al., 2016; Keesing & Ostfeld, 2024). It is therefore possible that historic fire regimes not only maintained grassland mammal communities but also limited disease potential, although this has had little exploration from a functional perspective (Axelrod et al., 1985; Briggs et al., 2005). Fires that disrupt ecosystems tend to have an opposite effect and may increase likelihood of disease (Albery et al., 2021). However, grassland ecosystem structure and function are often positively maintained by fire (Briggs et al., 2005; Bond, 2008). In these systems, fire can directly reduce free-living vector populations and free-living life-stages of potentially pathogenic parasites (reviewed in Scasta, 2015). In areas that remain grass-dominated, frequent fire still has a positive impact on incidence of deer mice (Rowland-Schaefer et al., 2024). Therefore, short-term fire cessation may lead to direct declines of native grassland species and increase in parasite loads. Longer-term fire suppression results in woody encroachment, a progressive increase in carrying capacity of woodland mice as hosts of disease, and substantial further increases in parasite vectors (Figs. 1, 2). Woody encroachment is a pervasive issue in grassland systems globally and in the Great Plains is progressively advancing both northward and westward (Engle et al., 2008). Decoupling the role of encroachment versus other related variables towards disease risks is difficult. Similar geographic shifts are occurring with rising average temperatures, and expanding ranges of multiple mammal species, tick species, and known zoonoses, especially those transmitted by ticks (Alkishe et al., 2021). Our data support an almost complete turnover in dominant small mammal species within woody habitats, but also a decline in diversity, with only three small mammal species constituting over 95% of captures in woody areas in recent years and a doubling in relative abundance. And because our experimental management units are in close proximity, we have evidence of localized encroachment as a direct driver of changes in the small mammal community (Figs. 2, 3). Declines in mammal diversity with woody encroachment have been documented previously, with negative implications for the integrity of native grassland communities more broadly (Clark et al., 1987; Horncastle et al., 2005). Low diversity and high densities of potential reservoirs coupled with high infection rates by vectors all increase disease risk (Han et al., 2016; Keesing & Ostfeld, 2024). Evolutionary complexity within a system can also influence propensity for disease spread and development of novel host-pathogen relationships (Ostfeld & Keesing, 2012; Ecke et al., 2022). The specificity of both vectors and pathogens to mammal reservoirs can be strongly co-evolved, may result from parallel co-diversification through neutral evolutionary processes (e.g., drift within small, isolated populations), or may be weak, where multiple hosts prove competent to infection by vector and/or pathogen (Hoberg & Brooks, 2015). We must strive towards greater understanding of host-parasite evolutionary relationships, as currently, little information from natural communities is available to guide treatment of ongoing ecosystem state change, when considering One Health (Poulin et al., 2024). Recent evidence from phylogeographic studies of small mammal hosts posits that regions of overlap between closely related host lineages may increase opportunity for co-evolved parasites and pathogens to experience secondary contact following long-term isolation and differentiation. This leads to potentially acute evolutionary outcomes that might include host hybridization, switching of hosts by parasites, or pathogen genomic reassortment leading to new strains of disease (Dragoo et al., 2006; Liphardt et al., 2020). The potential for amplification of emerging disease risk within the central Great Plains is high, given the co-distribution of multiple intra-specific lineages of white-footed mouse (at least six known collection localities supporting multiple lineages, Fig. 4) coupled with an accelerating increase in local densities and expanding distributions; a trend that warrants epidemiological attention (Luis et al., 2018). We acknowledge that the single mitochondrial gene used to identify intra-specific functional units of analysis is likely only a loose approximation of the evolutionary relationships among populations. But, distinct reciprocal monophyly based on this dataset reflects previous episodes of allopatry and differentiation as opposed to simple isolation by distance, with potential for similar differentiation among both hosts and pathogens that will require future comparative phylogenomic assessment (McGaughran et al., 2022). Beyond the intricacies of co-evolution among pairs of hosts and pathogens, the Great Plains generally is a hub for potentially long-term interactions between western and eastern faunas of North America (Herrera, 2021). The strong longitudinal precipitation gradient across the 100 th meridian has been a constant ecological filter and transition zone between western and eastern communities across evolutionary timeframes, and minimally through the last glacial cycle. Evidence from across multiple small mammal communities with different evolutionary origins highlights long-term associations between west and east through the Great Plains, with a persistent transition from grassland to eastern woodland through this region, that shifted southward during glacial phase(s) and northward during interglacial warm periods such as at present (Herrera, 2021). A breakdown of native habitats through human-induced change is in effect making this biodiversity filter leaky, and progressively mosaic-like habitats may exponentially increase edge effect interactions between otherwise discrete communities, resulting in increased potential for emerging disease (Duik-Wasser et al., 2020; Goethert & Telford, 2022). 4. Future One Health actions for the Great Plains and other grassland systems We are now experiencing increasing incidence of zoonotic disease transmission across the Great Plains (Han et al., 2016; Eisen et al., 2017). There are both ultimate and proximate considerations for emerging disease within this region. Here we have tried to summarize proximate issues through species interactions, contemporary evolution, and fine-scale ecological change across inter-annual timeframes. However, the sum effects of these risks will not be fully understood without a concerted effort to expand the scope of practitioners within One Health investigations, and through coordinated collection and analysis of novel combinations of diverse data. We suggest that linking and incorporating ecological data from long-term research initiatives with specimen-based trait data has disproportionate potential to offset a knowledge gap within One Health. This would include focusing long-term data collection on components of biodiversity that are traditionally not a variable of interest for understanding long-term ecological change, but that are direct contributors or antagonists to pathogen proliferation. For example, targeting surrogate biodiversity such as macroparasites (helminths) that may themselves be pathogenic, would minimally expand our purview of intricate biodiversity dynamics through their complex lifecycles that bind together the dynamics of disparate phyla of intermediate hosts (Rowan et al., 2023). Parasites respond directly to ecosystem drivers such as fire, and indirectly through disruption or promotion of intermediate hosts. For instance, decline in northern bobwhite quail has been linked to nematode infection that requires a prominent grasshopper as an intermediate host (Kistler et al., 2016). In this scenario, grasshoppers and the fire that could conceivably disrupt parasite lifecycles, are both known drivers of ecosystem state (Welti et al., 2019). A growing body of literature discusses the importance of dilution effects to bolster One Health outcomes, where higher diversity in a system tends to decrease the negative impacts of a subset of harmful species (Keesing & Ostfeld, 2021). Macroparasite diversity has been implicated as a critical variable influencing potential for microparasitic infection (Johnson & Hoverman, 2012; Bordes et al., 2015). It is also possible that ecological theories including dilution effects may play an informative role in the macroecology of ecosystem change, or stability, that would benefit long-term experimental systems (e.g., Tilman et al., 2006). A critical component of future research efforts will be establishing pathogen surveillance associated with long-term ecological research, using genomic approaches (Gardy & Loman, 2018; Colella et al., 2023). Genomic methods will enable detection of different pathogens through generation of strain- or lineage-level genetic sequence datasets from both hosts and their vectors, across multi-year timeframes, as opposed to surveillance of pathogen exposure through antibody testing. From these data we might better track changes in pathogen-reservoir relationships through time, genomic legacies of co-evolutionary relationships of lineages, and emergence of newly evolved variants. Reaching this goal demands a multi-faceted approach, such as building relational data systems that allow disparate sources to smoothly “talk” to each other, streamlining data carpentry tools, and incorporating this toolset into training programs of study at the undergraduate and graduate levels. For training, many programs in biomedical science, evolutionary biology, molecular biology, ecology, and geography rightfully require training in statistics. But similar emphasis on data carpentry remains rare, leading to common perceptions that skills such as working with relational databases and “big data” are beyond the reach of non-specialists. In reality, many of these practices and skills are attainable, and we argue, will need to become common place to meet One Health challenges. The unique strength of long-term research systems is then the ability to build linkages between these faunal dynamics and the existing robust local data streams that quantify environmental variance. For instance, the Konza LTER site in Kansas also supports long-term sampling of biodiversity (including small mammals and ticks) through the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON), that might subsequently be analyzed in conjunction with abiotic data collected through both LTER and NEON, and disseminated through the Environmental Data Initiative (EDI). Additionally, the NEON aerial observation network allows us to track with fine-scale resolution where grassland and woodland habitats come into contact (Fig 3). However, a lack of systematic sample collection of small mammals and other components of biodiversity necessary for rigorous epidemiological surveillance still impedes progress through these initiatives from the perspective of One Data and One Health (Cook et al., 2016). The necessary prerequisites for robust One Health surveillance associated with long-term ecological research could be realized through development of specimen archives consisting of site-intensive targeted whole-specimen sampling from long-term research sites (Hope et al., 2018; Colella et al., 2021). Small mammals constitute the leading source of zoonoses globally, and generally these species are extremely resilient to inter-annual population fluctuations. Modest specimen collection has been shown to have negligible impact on natural population trajectories (Hope et al., 2018). We have similarly found no detectable population impacts from eight consecutive years of specimen sampling from the Konza experimental system (data not yet published). Rodents within the families Cricetidae and Muridae combined constitute a quarter of all mammal species globally (~1,600 species in these two families), contain the vast majority of known reservoirs of disease, and are generally common (<10% of species recognized as endangered; IUCN, 2024). These mammals essentially constitute a renewable resource from which the global scientific community might better understand more consequential human-induced ecosystem perturbations. Successful conservation efforts, including of small mammals, also rely heavily on resources within biorepositories, as declines in most species normally have no single cause that can be mitigated through monitoring and management of wild populations alone (Miller et al., 2020). A major finding of our synthesis is a persistent long-term decline in the deer mouse, one of the most common species of small mammal in North America, likely associated either directly or indirectly with an increase in woodland species. We argue that conservation of such common species, here associated with grasslands of the Great Plains, should be an urgent goal now, before they become more rare. This species likely plays a critical role in curtailing the spread of disease as part of the native grassland community, while it is also recognized as a model organism globally for the study of disease transmission (Barbour, 2017). As deer mice decline, the recent increases in both white-footed mice and hispid cotton rats ( Sigmodon hispidus ) through the Great Plains have concerning implications for further emergence of disease. Whereas these species have been afforded comparatively narrow focus for epidemiological exploration, major changes are happening now, and the resources we need to generate a holistic perspective on their role in disease emergence are as yet underrepresented (Thompson et al., 2020). 5. Conclusions Understanding how ecosystems function is a primary goal of long-term ecological research programs. While the impacts of an emergent disease are both acute and urgent from a One Health perspective, the processes of environmental change that enable shifts in relationships between pathogens, reservoirs, and other potential hosts (including humans) are more protracted, and require often many years of data to resolve. If we can effectively mobilize relational linkages between digitized data streams from ecological, evolutionary, and biomedical components of One Health research, we might realize substantial benefits from embracing long-term experimentally controlled systems to readily access information from across decadal timeframes. Equally, reciprocal data yielded from analyses of small mammals, parasites, vectors, and other components of biodiversity might fill knowledge gaps towards recognizing critical linkages within complex ecological systems. Conservation of grassland biodiversity across the Great Plains and other grassland systems globally may be the single biggest solution to reducing threats of emerging pathogens in such systems. However, mitigating native biodiversity declines across this region will require reducing the intensity of biotic interactions associated with encroaching woody plant communities and the breakdown of biodiversity filters that are enforced by larger tracts of intact native grasslands. The legacy of encroachment on small mammal communities is clearly long-lasting, with remediation a difficult process. Additionally, the ongoing process of encroachment is contingent on both local and global forcing. Controlling for local ecological variables while studying the evolutionary dynamics of host-parasite interactions, all through integration of a One Data approach should provide valuable insight to the relative influence of local factors, versus global environmental trajectories, on human health outcomes.

We thank the Museum of Southwestern Biology and the Kansas State Biorepository for loan of tissue samples for genetic analyses. We thank the past data owner Don Kaufman for implementing the small mammal data collection from the Konza LTER site via standardized field protocols across multiple years and seasons. Specimens cited in this article were field collected under approved IACUC permits issued to Andrew Hope (KSU #3579, 4055, 4976). Funding related to this work was granted through the National Science Foundation (NSF2226917, NSF2025849). Conflict of interest statement The authors declare no conflict of interest. Data availability statement Sequence data for specimens included in genetic analyses are available through GenBank, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, and all accession numbers and associated museum specimen data are provided in the online supporting information. Author Contributions AGH conceived the study, collected and interpreted data, and led writing. SCS collected and analyzed mammal data. ZR analyzed and interpreted vegetation data. All authors contributed to writing, approved the manuscript, and agreed to be held accountable for the work.

Albery, G. F., Turilli, I., Joseph, M. B., Foley, J., Frere, C. H., & Bansal. S. (2021). From flames to inflammation: How wildfires affect patterns of wildlife disease. Fire Ecology, 17, 1-7. Alkishe, A., Raghavan, R. K., & Peterson, A. T. (2021). Likely geographic distributional shifts among medically important tick species and tick-associated diseases under climate change in North America: A review. Insects, 12 (3), 225. Alluwaimi, A. M., Alshubaith, I. H., Al-Ali, A. M., & Abohelaika, S. (2020). The coronaviruses of animals and birds: Their zoonosis, vaccines, and models for SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV2. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, 582287. Armstrong, D. M., Choate, J. R., & Jones, J. K. (1986). Distributional Patterns of Mammals in the Plains States . Texas Tech University Press. Axelrod, D. I. (1985). Rise of the grassland biome, central North America. The Botanical Review, 51, 163-201. Barbour, A. G. (2017). Infection resistance and tolerance in Peromyscus spp., natural reservoirs of microbes that are virulent for humans. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, 61, 115-122. Bedford, N. L., & Hoekstra, H. E. (2015). Peromyscus mice as a model for studying natural variation. eLife, 4, e06813. Bernath-Plaisted, J. S., Correll, M. D., Somershoe, S. G., Dwyer, A. M., Bankert, A., Beh, A., Berlanga, H., Boyle, W. A., Cruz-Romo, J. L., George, T. L., & Herkert, J. (2023). Review of conservation challenges and possible solutions for grassland birds of the North American Great Plains. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 90, 165-185. Bond, W. J. (2008).What limits trees in C4 grasslands and savannas? Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 39, 641-659. Bordes, F., Blasdell, K., & Morand, S. (2015). Transmission ecology of rodent‐borne diseases: new frontiers. Integrative Zoology, 10, 424-435. Briggs, J. M., Knapp, A. K., Blair, J. M., Heisler, J. L., Hoch, G. A., Lett, M. S., & McCarron, J. K. (2005). An ecosystem in transition: Causes and consequences of the conversion of mesic grassland to shrubland. BioScience, 55, 243-254. Bruckerhoff, L. A., Connell, R. K., Guinnip, J. P., Adhikari, E., Godar, A., Gido, K. B., Boyle, A. W., Hope, A. G., Joern, A., Welti, E. (2020). Harmony on the prairie? Grassland plant and animal community responses to variation in climate across land‐use gradients. Ecology, 101, e02986. Brynn, N. (2023). Early detection of wildfire risk in the Great Plains: Merging machine learning, landscape metrics, and rich data sources. MS Thesis. Burke, I. C., Kittel, T. G., Lauenroth, W. K., Snook, P., Yonker, C. M., & Parton, W. J. (1991). Regional analysis of the central Great Plains. BioScience, 41, 685-692. Clark, B. K., Kaufman, D. W., Kaufman, G. A., & Finck, E. J. (1987). Use of tallgrass prairie by Peromyscus leucopus . Journal of Mammalogy, 68, 158-160. Colella, J. P., Bates, J., Burneo, S. F., Camacho, M. A., Carrion Bonilla, C., Constable, I., D’Elía, G., Dunnum, J. L., Greiman, S., Hoberg, E. P., & Lessa, E. (2021). Leveraging natural history biorepositories as a global, decentralized, pathogen surveillance network. PLoS Pathogens, 17, e1009583. Colella, J. P., Greiman, S. E., Kutz, S., Lutz, H. L., & Cook, J. A. (2023). Genomic identification and surveillance of infectious diseases in natural systems. In O. F. Berry, C. E. Holleley, & S. N. Jarman (Eds.), Applied Environmental Genomics (pp. 299-317). CRC Press. Collins, S. L., Nippert, J. B., Blair, J. M., Briggs, J. M., Blackmore, P., & Ratajczak, Z. (2021). Fire frequency, state change and hysteresis in tallgrass prairie. Ecology Letters, 24, 636-647. Cook, B. I., Ault, T. R., & Smerdon, J. E. (2015). Unprecedented 21st century drought risk in the American Southwest and Central Plains. Science Advances, 1, e1400082. Cook, J. A., Edwards, S. V., Lacey, E. A., Guralnick, R. P., Soltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E., Welch, C. K., Bell, K. C., Galbreath, K. E., Himes, C., & Allen, J. M. (2014). Natural history collections as emerging resources for innovative education. BioScience, 64, 725-734. Cook, J. A., Greiman, S. E., Agosta, S. J., Anderson, R. P., Arbogast, B. S., Baker, R. J., Boeger, W., Bradley, R. D., Brooks, D. R., Cole, R., & Demboski, J. R. (2016). Transformational principles for NEON sampling of mammalian parasites and pathogens: A response to Springer and colleagues. BioScience, 66, 917-919. Daszak, P., Cunningham, A. A., & Hyatt, A. D. (2000). Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife–threats to biodiversity and human health. Science, 287, 443-449. de Angeli Dutra, D., Poulin, R., & Ferreira, F. C. (2022). Evolutionary consequences of vector-borne transmission: How using vectors shapes host, vector and pathogen evolution. Parasitology, 149, 1667-1678. Destoumieux-Garzón, D., Mavingui, P., Boetsch, G., Boissier, J., Darriet, F., Duboz, P., Fritsch, C., Giraudoux, P., Le Roux, F., Morand, S., & Paillard, C. (2018). The one health concept: 10 years old and a long road ahead. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 5, 14. Diuk-Wasser, M. A., VanAcker, M. C., & Fernandez, M. P. (2021). Impact of land use changes and habitat fragmentation on the eco-epidemiology of tick-borne diseases. Journal of Medical Entomology, 58, 1546-1564. Dragoo, J. W., Lackey, J. A., Moore, K. E., Lessa, E. P., Cook, J. A., & Yates, T. L. (2006). Phylogeography of the deer mouse ( Peromyscus maniculatus ) provides a predictive framework for research on hantaviruses. Journal of General Virology, 87, 1997-2003. Dunnum, J. L., Yanagihara, R., Johnson, K. M., Armien, B., Batsaikhan, N., Morgan, L., & Cook, J. A. (2017). Biospecimen repositories and integrated databases as critical infrastructure for pathogen discovery and pathobiology research. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 11, e0005133. Ecke, F., Angeler, D. G., Magnusson, M., Khalil, H., & Hörnfeldt, B. (2017). Dampening of population cycles in voles affects small mammal community structure, decreases diversity, and increases prevalence of a zoonotic disease. Ecology and Evolution, 7, 5331-5342. Ecke, F., Han, B. A., Hörnfeldt, B., Khalil, H., Magnusson, M., Singh, N. J., & Ostfeld, R. S. (2022). Population fluctuations and synanthropy explain transmission risk in rodent-borne zoonoses. Nature Communications, 13, 7532. Eisen, R. J., Kugeler, K. J., Eisen, L., Beard, C. B., & Paddock, C. D. (2017). Tick-borne zoonoses in the United States: Persistent and emerging threats to human health. ILAR Journal, 58, 319-335. Engle, D. M., Coppedge, B. R., & Fuhlendorf, S. D. (2008). From the dust bowl to the green glacier: Human activity and environmental change in Great Plains grasslands. In O.W. Auken (Ed.) Western North American Juniperus communities: A dynamic vegetation type (pp. 253-271). Springer New York, NY. Flores, D. (2017). American Serengeti: The Last Big Animals of the Great Plains . University Press of Kansas. Fountain‐Jones, N. M., Pearse, W. D., Escobar, L. E., Alba‐Casals, A., Carver, S., Davies, T. J., Kraberger, S., Papeş, M., Vandegrift, K., Worsley‐Tonks, K., & Craft, M. E. (2018). Towards an eco‐phylogenetic framework for infectious disease ecology. Biological Reviews, 93, 950-970. Galbreath, K. E., Hoberg, E. P., Cook, J. A., Bell, K. C., Campbell, M. L., Dunnum, J. L., Dursahinhan, A. T., Eckerlin, R. P., Gardner, S. L., Greiman, S. E., Henttonen, H., Jiménez, F. A., Koehler, A. V. A., Nyamsuren, B., Tkach, V. V., Torres-Pérez, F., Tsvetkova, A., & Hope, A. G. (2019). Building an integrated infrastructure for exploring biodiversity: Field collections and archives of mammals and parasites. Journal of Mammalogy, 100, 382-393. Galliart, M., Bello, N., Knapp, M., Poland, J., St Amand, P., Baer, S., Maricle, B., Smith, A. B., & Johnson, L. (2019). Local adaptation, genetic divergence, and experimental selection in a foundation grass across the US Great Plains’ climate gradient. Global Change Biology, 25, 850-868. García-Moreno, J. (2023). Zoonoses in a changing world. BioScience, 73, 711-720. Gardy, J. L., & Loman, N. J. (2018). Towards a genomics-informed, real-time, global pathogen surveillance system. Nature Reviews Genetics, 19, 9-20. Goethert, H. K., & Telford III, S. R. (2022). Host contributions to the force of Borrelia burgdorferi and Babesia microti transmission differ at edges of and within a small habitat patch. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 88, e02391-21. Greenbaum, I. F., Honeycutt, R. L., & Chirhart, S. E. (2019). Taxonomy and phylogenetics of the Peromyscus maniculatus species group. In R. D. Bradley, H. H. Genoways,D. J. Schmidly, & L. C. Bradley (Eds.) From Field to Laboratory: A Memorial Volume in Honor to Robert J. Baker (pp. 559-575). Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University 71. Han, B. A., Schmidt, J. P., Bowden, S. E., & Drake, J. M. (2015). Rodent reservoirs of future zoonotic diseases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 112, 7039-7044. Han, B. A., Kramer, A. M., & Drake, J. M. (2016). Global patterns of zoonotic disease in mammals. Trends in Parasitology, 32, 565-577. Hartnett, D., Collins, S., & Ratajczak, Z. (2024). PVC02 Plant species composition on selected watersheds at Konza Prairie ver. 23. Environmental Data Initiative https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/b04b8a06f0150248ba480412aaa58c46. Hedrick, B. P., Heberling, J. M., Meineke, E. K., Turner, K. G., Grassa, C. J., Park, D. S., Kennedy, J., Clarke, J. A., Cook, J. A., Blackburn, D. C., & Edwards, S. V. (2020). Digitization and the future of natural history collections. BioScience, 70, 243-251. Herrera, T. M. (2021). Comparative phylogeography of small mammals across the Great Plains Suture Zone highlights repeated processes of speciation and community assembly coincident with the 100th meridian. MS Thesis. Hoberg, E. P., & Brooks, D. R. (2015). Evolution in action: Climate change, biodiversity dynamics and emerging infectious disease. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370, 20130553. Hoekstra, J. M., Boucher, T. M., Ricketts, T. H., & Roberts, C. (2005). Confronting a biome crisis: Global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecology letters, 8 (1), 23-29. Hope, A. G., Gragg, S. F., Nippert, J. B., & Combe, F. J. (2021). Consumer roles of small mammals within fragmented native tallgrass prairie. Ecosphere, 12, e03441. Hope, A. G., Sandercock, B. K., & Malaney, J. L. (2018). Collection of scientific specimens: Benefits for biodiversity sciences and limited impacts on communities of small mammals. BioScience, 68, 35-42. Hope, A. G. (2023). CSM08 Small mammal host-parasite sampling data for 16 linear trapping transects located in 8 LTER burn treatment watersheds at Konza Prairie ver. 5. Environmental Data Initiative . https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/f7bfb7226b093c817dc391c34a88b514 (Accessed 2024-11-25). Horncastle, V. J., Hellgren, E. C., Mayer, P. M., Ganguli, A. C., Engle, D. M., & Leslie, D. M. (2005). Implications of invasion by Juniperus virginiana on small mammals in the southern Great Plains. Journal of Mammalogy, 86, 1144-1155. IUCN (2024). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2024-2. Accessed on 10 November 2024. Jenkins, C. N., Van Houtan, K. S., Pimm, S. L., & Sexton, J. O. (2015). US protected lands mismatch biodiversity priorities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 112, 5081-5086. Johnsgard, P. A. (1978). The ornithogeography of the Great Plains states. Prairie Naturalist, 10, 97-112. Johnson, P. T., & Hoverman, J. T. (2012). Parasite diversity and coinfection determine pathogen infection success and host fitness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109, 9006-9011. Kaufman, G. A., Kaufman, D. W., & Finck, E. J. (1988). Influence of fire and topography on habitat selection by Peromyscus maniculatus and Reithrodontomys megalotis in ungrazed tallgrass prairie. Journal of Mammalogy, 69, 342-352. Kaufman, D. W., Kaufman, G. A., Reed, A. W., Kaufman, D. M., & Rehmeier, R. L. (2020). Populations of small mammals, tallgrass prairie and prescribed fire: A fire-reversal experiment. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 123, 1-29. Kaufman, D. (2021). CSM01 Seasonal Summary of Numbers of Small Mammals on 14 LTER Traplines in Prairie Habitats at Konza Prairie (Reformatted to a Darwin Core Archive) ver. 1. Environmental Data Initiative . https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/f22e7afe924dac3799787ad36155fe69 (Accessed 2024-11-25). Keesing, F., & Ostfeld, R. S. (2021). Impacts of biodiversity and biodiversity loss on zoonotic diseases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 118, e2023540118. Keesing, F., & Ostfeld, R. S. (2024). Emerging patterns in rodent-borne zoonotic diseases. Science, 385, 1305-1310. Kistler, W. M., Hock, S., Hernout, B., Brake, E., Williams, N., Downing, C., Dunham, N. R., Kumar, N., Turaga, U., Parlos, J. A., & Kendall, R. J. (2016). Plains lubber grasshopper ( Brachystola magna ) as a potential intermediate host for Oxyspirura petrowi in northern bobwhites ( Colinus virginianus ). Parasitology Open, 2, e7. Knapp, A. K., Briggs, J. M., Hartnett, D. C., & Collins, S. L. (Eds.) (1998). Grassland dynamics: Long-term ecological research in tallgrass prairie . Oxford University Press, New York, NY. Lefrançois, T., Malvy, D., Atlani-Duault, L., Benamouzig, D., Druais, P. L., Yazdanpanah, Y., Delfraissy, J. F., & Lina, B. (2023). After 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic, translating One Health into action is urgent. The Lancet, 401, 789-794. Levi, T., Keesing, F., Holt, R. D., Barfield, M., & Ostfeld, R. S. (2016). Quantifying dilution and amplification in a community of hosts for tick‐borne pathogens. Ecological Applications, 26, 484-498. Lindenmayer, D. B., Wood, J. T., McBurney, L., MacGregor, C., Youngentob, K., & Banks, S. C. (2011). How to make a common species rare: A case against conservation complacency. Biological Conservation, 144, 1663-1672. Liphardt, S. W., Kang, H. J., Arai, S., Gu, S. H., Cook, J. A., & Yanagihara, R. (2020). Reassortment between divergent strains of Camp Ripley virus (Hantaviridae) in the northern short-tailed shrew ( Blarina brevicauda ). Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 10, 460. Luis, A. D., Kuenzi, A. J., & Mills, J. N. (2018). Species diversity concurrently dilutes and amplifies transmission in a zoonotic host–pathogen system through competing mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 115, 7979-7984. Manlove, K. R., Walker, J. G., Craft, M. E., Huyvaert, K. P., Joseph, M. B., Miller, R. S., Nol, P., Patyk, K. A., O’Brien, D., Walsh, D. P., & Cross, P. C. (2016). “One health” or three? Publication silos among the one health disciplines. PLoS Biology, 14, e1002448. Maxwell, A. E., Warner, T. A., Vanderbilt, B. C., & Ramezan, C. A. (2017). Land cover classification and feature extraction from National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) Orthoimagery: A review. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 83, 737-747. McGaughran, A., Liggins, L., Marske, K. A., Dawson, M. N., Schiebelhut, L. M., Lavery, S. D., Knowles, L. L., Moritz, C., & Riginos, C. (2022). Comparative phylogeography in the genomic age: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Biogeography, 49, 2130-2144. McLean, B. S., Bell, K. C., Dunnum, J. L., Abrahamson, B., Colella, J. P., Deardorff, E. R., Weber, J. A., Jones, A. K., Salazar-Miralles, F., & Cook, J. A. (2016). Natural history collections-based research: Progress, promise, and best practices. Journal of Mammalogy, 97, 287-297. McMahon, B. J., Morand, S., & Gray, J. S. (2018). Ecosystem change and zoonoses in the Anthropocene. Zoonoses and Public Health, 65, 755-765. Miller, S. E., Barrow, L. N., Ehlman, S. M., Goodheart, J. A., Greiman, S. E., Lutz, H. L., Misiewicz, T. M., Smith, S. M., Tan, M., Thawley, C. J., & Cook, J. A. (2020). Building natural history collections for the twenty-first century and beyond. BioScience, 70, 674-687. Mills, J. N., Gage, K. L., & Khan, A. S. (2010). Potential influence of climate change on vector-borne and zoonotic diseases: A review and proposed research plan. Environmental Health Perspectives, 118, 1507-1514. Morand, S., & Krasnov, B. R. (Eds.) (2010). The Biogeography of Host-parasite Interactions . Oxford University Press, New York, NY. Nachman, M. W., Beckman, E. J., Bowie, R. C. K., Cicero, C., Conroy, C. J., Dudley R, Hayes, T. B., Koo, M. S., Lacey, E. A., Martin, C. H., McGuire, J. A., Patton, J. L., Spencer, C. J., Tarvin, R. D., Wake, M. H., Wang, I. J., Achmadi, A., Álvarez-Castañeda, S. T., Andersen, M. J., Arroyave, J., et al. (2023). Specimen collection is essential for modern science. PLoS Biology, 21, e3002318. National Ecological Observatory Network. Canopy Height. https://www.neonscience.org (accessed 01/10/2022). Nippert, J. B., Telleria, L., Blackmore, P., Taylor, J. H. & O’Connor, R. C. (2021). Is a prescribed fire sufficient to slow the spread of woody plants in an infrequently burned grassland? A case study in tallgrass prairie. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 78, 79-89. Noble, B., & Ratajczak, Z. (2025). Combining Open-Source Machine Learning and Publicly Available Aerial Data (NAIP and NEON) to Achieve High-Resolution High-Accuracy Remote Sensing of Grass–Shrub–Tree Mosaics. Remote Sensing, 17 (13), 2224. Odum, E. P. (1955). An eleven year history of a Sigmodon population. Journal of Mammalogy, 36, 368-378. Ortiz, D. I., Piche-Ovares, M., Romero-Vega, L. M., Wagman, J., & Troyo A. (2021). The impact of deforestation, urbanization, and changing land use patterns on the ecology of mosquito and tick-borne diseases in Central America. Insects, 13, 20. Ostfeld, R. S., & Keesing, F. (2012). Effects of host diversity on infectious disease. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 43, 157-182. Pergams, O. R., & Nyberg, D. (2001). Museum collections of mammals corroborate the exceptional decline of prairie habitat in the Chicago region. Journal of Mammalogy, 82, 984-992. Piret, J., & Boivin, G. (2021). Pandemics throughout history. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11, 631736. Poulin, R., Salloum, P. M., & Bennett, J. (2024). Evolution of parasites in the Anthropocene: New pressures, new adaptive directions. Biological Reviews, 99, 2234-2252. Ratajczak, Z., Nippert, J. B., & Ocheltree, T. W. (2014). Abrupt transition of mesic grassland to shrubland: Evidence for thresholds, alternative attractors, and regime shifts. Ecology, 95, 2633-2645. Ratajczak, Z., Briggs, J. M., Goodin, D. G., Luo, L., Mohler, R. L., Nippert, J. B., & Obermeyer, B. (2016). Assessing the potential for transitions from tallgrass prairie to woodlands: are we operating beyond critical fire thresholds? Rangeland Ecology & Management, 69, 280-287. Ratajczak, Z., Collins, S. L., Blair, J. M., Koerner, S. E., Louthan, A. M., Smith, M. D., Taylor, J. H., & Nippert, J. B. (2022). Reintroducing bison results in long-running and resilient increases in grassland diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 119, e2210433119. Reding, D. M., Castañeda-Rico, S., Shirazi, S., Hofman, C. A., Cancellare, I. A., Lance, S. L., Beringer, J., Clark,W, R., & Maldonado, J. E. (2021). Mitochondrial genomes of the United States distribution of gray fox ( Urocyon cinereoargenteus ) reveal a major phylogeographic break at the Great Plains suture zone. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 666800. Roberts, C. P., Allen, C. R., Angeler, D. G., & Twidwell, D. (2019). Shifting avian spatial regimes in a changing climate. Nature Climate Change, 9, 562-566. Rochlin, I., & Toledo, A. (2020). Emerging tick-borne pathogens of public health importance: A mini-review. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 69, 781-791. Rowan, B., Hope, A. G., & Jiménez, F. A. (2023). Hymenolepis ackerti n. sp. (Eucestoda: Hymenolepididae) infecting cricetid rodents from the central Great Plains of North America. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 94, 1-12. Rowland‐Schaefer, E. G., Koehn, O., & Jones, H. P. (2024). Small mammal associations with habitat composition, configuration, and management in tallgrass prairies: A review. Mammal Review, 54, 178-192. Samson, F. B., Knopf, F. L., & Ostlie, W. R. (2004). Great Plains ecosystems: Past, present, and future. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 32, 6-15. Scasta, J. D. (2015). Fire and parasites: An under-recognized form of anthropogenic land use change and mechanism of disease exposure. EcoHealth, 12, 398-403. Schmidt, C. J., Peek, M., Kaufman, G. A., Kaufman, D. W., Finck, E. J., Patrick, L., Hope, A. G., & Timm, R. (2021). Kansas Mammal Atlas: An On-line Reference. https://webapps.fhsu.edu/ksmammal. Scholtz, R., & Twidwell, D. (2022). The last continuous grasslands on Earth: Identification and conservation importance. Conservation Science and Practice, 4, e626. Seager, R., Feldman, J., Lis, N., Ting, M., Williams, A. P, Nakamura, J., Liu, H., & Henderson, N. (2018). Whither the 100th meridian? The once and future physical and human geography of America’s arid–humid divide. Part II: The meridian moves east. Earth Interactions, 22, 1-24. Sergio, F., Blas, J., & Hiraldo, F. (2018). Animal responses to natural disturbance and climate extremes: A review. Global and Planetary Change, 161, 28-40. Thompson, C. W., Phelps, K. L., Allard, M. W., Cook, J. A., Dunnum, J. L., Ferguson, A. W., Gelang, M., Khan, F. A., Paul, D. L., Reeder, D. M., & Simmons, N. B. (2021). Preserve a voucher specimen! The critical need for integrating natural history collections in infectious disease studies. Mbio, 12, 10-128. Tilman, D., Reich, P. B., & Knops, J. M. (2006). Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment. Nature, 441, 629-632. Van Auken, O. W. (2009). Causes and consequences of woody plant encroachment into western North American grasslands. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 2931-2942. Vanwambeke, S. O., Lambin, E. F., Meyfroidt, P., Asaaga, F. A., Millins, C., & Purse, B. V. (2024). Land system governance shapes tick-related public and animal health risks. Journal of Land Use Science, 19, 78-96. Walters, S., Zimova, M., Mallinoff, J., & Kierepka, E. (2024). North American phylogeography of the white-footed mouse ( Peromyscus leucopus ) reveals strong differentiation in the desert Southwest and rapid expansion. ESS Open Archive, 953, 95303519. Welti, E. A., Qiu, F., Tetreault, H. M., Ungerer, M., Blair, J., & Joern, A. (2019). Fire, grazing and climate shape plant–grasshopper interactions in a tallgrass prairie. Functional Ecology, 33, 735-745. Figure legends Figure 1. Top: A One Data perspective on the One Health framework. This is a conceptual framework where enabling rigorous research on One Health will require relational linkages between digitized data-streams relevant to Biodiversity (such as the Arctos multi-institutional museum database or the Global Biodiversity Information Facility that aggregates archived specimen data), Environments (such as the Environmental Data Initiative that aggregates ecological data from long-term research ventures), and Humans (including pathogen genomic data from the National Center for Biotechnology Information, including GenBank). Middle: Rodents relevant to Great Plains zoonotic potential, including left: deer mouse ( Peromyscus sonoriensis ), center: hispid cotton rat ( Sigmodon hispidus ), and right: white-footed mouse ( Peromyscus leucopus ). These species are predominantly associated with grassland, shrubland, and woodland, respectively. Bottom: Biodiversity dynamics reflecting data from the Konza Long-term Ecological Research site. The curve illustrates an increase in parasitic vector infection of sampled rodents from grassland to woodland based on screening from the last five years (number and percentage of total catch infected). The histogram illustrates abundance of the three focal rodent species from each sampled habitat in the last five years combined, where values represent totals of all three species, by habitat, reflecting an associated increase in carrying capacity with woody encroachment. Figure 2. Plots illustrating long-term changes in prevalence of both vegetation types (left) and focal small mammal species (right) in response to ecosystem state as a consequence of different prescribed fire regimes. Annual fire maintains native grassland, and suppresses occurrence of woody vegetation and woodland-associated small mammals. Four-year fire leads to a lagged transition in vegetation to woody shrubs, and an associated slow turnover in dominant small mammal species. Twenty-year fire leads to a lagged transition in vegetation toward a woodland state of both shrubs and overstory trees (shown in detail in Fig. 4), and a rapid turnover in dominant small mammals accompanied by a substantial increase in carrying capacity through time. Figure 3. Images through time illustrating vegetational changes in treatment areas included in this study including Top: annual fire, Middle: four-year fire, and Bottom: twenty-year fire. Images were retrieved from Google Earth for years 1991, 2002, and 2012. Images for year 2020 were generated using remote aerial sensing coupled with ground-proofing to illustrate grass, shrubs, and trees in finer detail. Included are red lines showing long-term vegetation sampling transects. Figure 4. Phylogeographic relationships among lineages of white-footed mice, colored according to geographic regionalization. The map of North America illustrates the rangewide distribution (gray shading) with colored data points showing the samples included in phylogenetic analysis of the mtDNA cytochrome b gene sequences. The Bayesian phylogeny (left) shows four well-supported lineages distributed through east, north, south, and central portions of the range. The inset map shows lineage representation within Kansas where six sampled localities support individuals from multiple mitochondrial lineages, including the Konza LTER site. Figure S1. Small mammal sampling of the three focal species from across the state of Kansas between 1980 and 2020. Abundances represent numbers of voucher specimens collected by year and archived in online digitized museum data aggregators (retrieved from GBIF on 23 September 2024). Trend lines show moving average abundance and a long-term turnover in dominant species in the mid-2000’s. Green dashed line: Deer mouse ( Peromyscus sonoriensis ); Orange dashed line: Hispid cotton rat ( Sigmodon hispidus ); Brown solid line: White-footed mouse ( Peromyscus leucopus ). Supplementary Material File (table s1_specimensexamined_250904.pdf) - Download - 55.02 KB Information & Authors Information Version history Peer review timeline Published Ecology and Evolution Version of Record20 Jan 2026Published Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Collection

Authors Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 283views 169downloads Citations Download citation Andrew Hope, Sam Speck, Zak Ratajczak. Leveraging long-term ecological research initiatives into the One Health synthesis. Authorea. 07 November 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176250256.60798003/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176250256.60798003/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.