Analytical Accuracy and Clinical Agreement of a Novel Internet of Things and AI-based Point-of-Care Testing Laboratory

preprint OA: gold CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT Point-of-care testing (POCT) offers several advantages over conventional laboratory testing. Nonetheless, a faster turnaround time, with less invasive procedures, is not enough if not associated with an acceptable level of accuracy. Here, we show the analytical validation behind the Hilab Flow (HiF), a multi-analyte POCT analyzer. HiF quantitative and qualitative tests for 6,175 clinical samples were compared to gold-standard methods from College of American Pathologists accredited laboratories. The compatibility between methods was evaluated in terms of association and clinical agreement. The established approval criteria was a kappa agreement > 0.8. A strong concordance was observed for the 27 analytes tested. Accuracy was greater than 90% for all HiF exams, indicating a good clinical agreement to gold standard laboratory testing. Results indicate that all quantitative and qualitative tests are suitable for POCT and present a reliable performance. HiF stands as a useful tool to aid decision-making in the clinical setting, with potential to contribute to healthcare solutions in diagnostic medicine worldwide.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T02:00:01.467718+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0