Fluoroscopic examination of stomach shapes after sleeve gastrectomy: Implications for long-term weight loss and esophagitis

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

This preprint studied how stomach morphology after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) relates to five-year weight loss and post-operative esophagitis. In 162 patients, the authors used postoperative fluoroscopy contrast pooling to classify stomach shape into upper-and-lower portions (ULP), lower portion (LP), or smooth flow (SF), then compared operative outcomes, endoscopically diagnosed esophagitis (L A classifications), and weight-loss metrics across groups; a key limitation is that the work is a preprint and the reported p-values did not show statistical significance for de novo esophagitis differences. Most patients had SF shape (59%), and while overall endoscopic changes were similar, de novo esophagitis occurred more often in SF than in ULP or LP, whereas LP was associated with higher total weight-loss percentage at 5 years. Relevance to endometriosis and/or adenomyosis: The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Stomach morphology influences laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) outcomes, including weight loss and gastroesophageal reflux. This study examined the impact of stomach shape on long-term weight loss and esophagitis post-LSG. Methods: We analyzed 162 patients who underwent LSG. Stomach shape was categorized into three subgroups based on postoperative fluoroscopy contrast pooling: upper and lower portions (ULP), lower portion (LP), and smooth flow (SF) postoperatively. Short-term operative outcomes, surgical procedures, five-year weight loss, and esophagitis, diagnosed by upper endoscopy using the L A classifications, were compared across groups. Results: The stomach shape distribution was ULP (12%), LP (29%), and SF (59%)). Operative outcomes were generally comparable; however, ULP tended to exhibit smaller bougie sizes (ULP: 31.8±9.7 vs. LP: 34.3±6.4 vs. SF: 34.4±6.3 cm). Preoperative assessments revealed no Grade C esophagitis, with most patients exhibiting normal findings. Post-LSG clinical changes were comparable, although de novo esophagitis was more frequent in the SF shape (ULP vs. LP vs. SF, de novo/improved/persistent/worsened, 10%/ 0% 84%/ 6% vs. 21%/ 0% 72% 6% vs. 31%/ 4%/ 60%/4%, respectively; p=0.24). Weight loss after LSG was compared, and no significant differences were observed among the groups; however, LP tended to maintain total weight loss (TWL) at 5 years (TWL%: ULP vs. LP vs. SF; 21.3±3.9 vs. 23.1±7.4 vs. 21.5 ±8.8 %, respectively; p=0.859). Conclusion: Patients with SF had the highest de novo esophagitis incidence. The LP shape was linked with sustained long-term weight loss. Therefore, creating an LP shape should be the optimal surgical objective.
Full text 11,887 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Fluoroscopic examination of stomach shapes after sleeve gastrectomy: Implications for long-term weight loss and esophagitis | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Fluoroscopic examination of stomach shapes after sleeve gastrectomy: Implications for long-term weight loss and esophagitis Kotaro Wakamatsu, Taiki Nabekura, Natsumi Kitahara, Yuuki Moriyama, and 1 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6435338/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Introduction: Stomach morphology influences laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) outcomes, including weight loss and gastroesophageal reflux. This study examined the impact of stomach shape on long-term weight loss and esophagitis post-LSG. Methods: We analyzed 162 patients who underwent LSG. Stomach shape was categorized into three subgroups based on postoperative fluoroscopy contrast pooling: upper and lower portions (ULP), lower portion (LP), and smooth flow (SF) postoperatively. Short-term operative outcomes, surgical procedures, five-year weight loss, and esophagitis, diagnosed by upper endoscopy using the L A classifications, were compared across groups. Results: The stomach shape distribution was ULP (12%), LP (29%), and SF (59%)). Operative outcomes were generally comparable; however, ULP tended to exhibit smaller bougie sizes (ULP: 31.8±9.7 vs. LP: 34.3±6.4 vs. SF: 34.4±6.3 cm). Preoperative assessments revealed no Grade C esophagitis, with most patients exhibiting normal findings. Post-LSG clinical changes were comparable, although de novo esophagitis was more frequent in the SF shape (ULP vs. LP vs. SF, de novo/improved/persistent/worsened, 10%/ 0% 84%/ 6% vs. 21%/ 0% 72% 6% vs. 31%/ 4%/ 60%/4%, respectively; p=0.24). Weight loss after LSG was compared, and no significant differences were observed among the groups; however, LP tended to maintain total weight loss (TWL) at 5 years (TWL%: ULP vs. LP vs. SF; 21.3±3.9 vs. 23.1±7.4 vs. 21.5 ±8.8 %, respectively; p=0.859). Conclusion: Patients with SF had the highest de novo esophagitis incidence. The LP shape was linked with sustained long-term weight loss. Therefore, creating an LP shape should be the optimal surgical objective. Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6435338","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":453283180,"identity":"cb778b88-05fc-4820-a5e8-6fbb3a48bd45","order_by":0,"name":"Kotaro Wakamatsu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Toho University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kotaro","middleName":"","lastName":"Wakamatsu","suffix":""},{"id":453283181,"identity":"bdf58bb9-9288-401d-a26a-499bbf9c15c4","order_by":1,"name":"Taiki Nabekura","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Toho University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Taiki","middleName":"","lastName":"Nabekura","suffix":""},{"id":453283183,"identity":"886ad3f3-b644-4618-876d-58f108ad66c9","order_by":2,"name":"Natsumi Kitahara","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Toho University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Natsumi","middleName":"","lastName":"Kitahara","suffix":""},{"id":453283184,"identity":"72c5ce71-d855-48ab-aba8-ae1c686ba765","order_by":3,"name":"Yuuki Moriyama","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Toho University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yuuki","middleName":"","lastName":"Moriyama","suffix":""},{"id":453283186,"identity":"851a5183-838b-4b67-95be-356edd4f393c","order_by":4,"name":"Takashi Oshiro","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Jikei University School of Medicine","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Takashi","middleName":"","lastName":"Oshiro","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-04-12 15:08:17","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6435338/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6435338/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":87637698,"identity":"95e19fc1-6158-443a-ac4d-b33409254731","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-07-26 12:46:37","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":501763,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SGmorphologyDraft20250416Submit.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6435338/v1_covered_2898dadb-bc43-406c-8193-4f7d2f49a5fd.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eFluoroscopic examination of stomach shapes after sleeve gastrectomy: Implications for long-term weight loss and esophagitis\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6435338/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6435338/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eIntroduction: Stomach morphology influences laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) outcomes, including weight loss and gastroesophageal reflux. This study examined the impact of stomach shape on long-term weight loss and esophagitis post-LSG.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMethods: We analyzed 162 patients who underwent LSG. Stomach shape was categorized into three subgroups based on postoperative fluoroscopy contrast pooling: upper and lower portions (ULP), lower portion (LP), and smooth flow (SF) postoperatively. Short-term operative outcomes, surgical procedures, five-year weight loss, and esophagitis, diagnosed by upper endoscopy using the L A classifications, were compared across groups.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eResults: The stomach shape distribution was ULP (12%), LP (29%), and SF (59%)). Operative outcomes were generally comparable; however, ULP tended to exhibit smaller bougie sizes (ULP: 31.8±9.7 vs. LP: 34.3±6.4 vs. SF: 34.4±6.3 cm).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePreoperative assessments revealed no Grade C esophagitis, with most patients exhibiting normal findings. Post-LSG clinical changes were comparable, although de novo esophagitis was more frequent in the SF shape (ULP vs. LP vs. SF, de novo/improved/persistent/worsened, 10%/ 0% 84%/ 6% vs. 21%/ 0% 72% 6% vs. 31%/ 4%/ 60%/4%, respectively; p=0.24). Weight loss after LSG was compared, and no significant differences were observed among the groups; however, LP tended to maintain total weight loss (TWL) at 5 years (TWL%: ULP vs. LP vs. SF; 21.3±3.9 vs. 23.1±7.4 vs. 21.5 ±8.8 %, respectively; p=0.859).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eConclusion: Patients with SF had the highest de novo esophagitis incidence. The LP shape was linked with sustained long-term weight loss. Therefore, creating an LP shape should be the optimal surgical objective.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Fluoroscopic examination of stomach shapes after sleeve gastrectomy: Implications for long-term weight loss and esophagitis","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-05-09 11:43:11","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6435338/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"4654ee70-c048-49ef-94e5-499d74ff99f1","owner":[],"postedDate":"May 9th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-07-26T12:38:32+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-05-09 11:43:11","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6435338","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6435338","identity":"rs-6435338","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0