A new participatory conservation framework built on the rise of native plant gardening

2025 · doi:10.32942/x2t350
preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
🔓 Open OA copy Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Global biodiversity strategies are ambitious on paper but fall short in practice. It is not strategy we lack, but the capacity to translate these plans into action on the ground. Akin to the community scientists that revolutionised biodiversity monitoring, we posit that community stewards, emerging from the rapidly growing native plant gardening movement, could scale up science-informed plant conservation. We present evidence that willingness to engage in conservation efforts is high amongst this community. We suggest a novel framework connecting these community stewards with the complementary strengths of existing institutions: the scientific expertise of botanical gardens, the legal mandates of conservation programs, the horticultural capacity of native plant producers, and the social infrastructure of gardening networks. Three case studies show how our framework could be operationalised. Activating the native plant gardening movement to bolster on-the-ground conservation may offer a promising way to close the doing gap in conservation.
Full text 1,661 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Global biodiversity strategies are ambitious on paper but fall short in practice. It is not strategy we lack but the capacity to translate these plans into action on the ground. Akin to the community scientists that revolutionized biodiversity monitoring, we posit that community stewards, emerging from the growing native plant gardening movement, could help scale up science-informed plant conservation. We present evidence that willingness to engage in conservation efforts is high within this community. To unlock this potential, we propose a framework that links stewards with the complementary strengths of existing institutions: the scientific expertise of botanical gardens, the legal mandates of conservation programs, the horticultural capacity of native plant producers, and the social infrastructure of gardening networks. Three case studies show how our framework could be operationalized. Activating the native plant gardening movement to bolster on-the-ground conservation may offer a promising way to narrow the knowing–doing gap in conservation. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X2T350 Subjects Life Sciences, Social and Behavioral Sciences

Keywords

Participatory conservation, native plant gardening, ex-situ and in-situ conservation, botanical gardens, native plant producers, implementation gap Dates Published: 2025-09-10 11:06 Last Updated: 2026-02-18 14:19 Older Versions License CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Additional Metadata Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0