Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of HPV Screening Strategies in Tunisia: A Modeling Study

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-15

This study modeled cervical cancer prevention in Tunisia, finding that vaccination combined with current Pap-smear screening is most cost-effective, but reducing HPV test costs could make more frequent HPV testing the preferred strategy.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-15 · read from full text

This paper evaluates, using the HPVsim multi-agent-based transmission and progression model, the cost-effectiveness of HPV screening strategies in Tunisia when combined with a national HPV vaccination program for girls aged 11–12. It compares four screening options that differ in when HPV DNA testing is introduced and how frequently it is performed among women aged 35–60, while also modeling varying screening coverage rates from 15% to 70%. All modeled strategies reduced cumulative cervical cancer cases between 2025 and 2090 by 41% to 59%, with the most intensive once-every-5-years HPV DNA testing for ages 35–60 achieving the largest reduction but at the highest costs, while keeping current Pap-smear screening plus vaccination was the least costly and least effective. The paper is a preprint (not peer reviewed) and the results depend on model inputs, including costs and epidemiologic parameters drawn from academic literature. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Background: In Tunisia, cervical cancer ranks as the 14th most common cancer, largely driven by high-risk of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) types, notably HPV 16 and 18. Current screening efforts are limited, with only 17% of all women aged 35-60 undergoing Pap-smear testing. The introduction of the HPV vaccine in 2025 through the national school vaccination program, targeting girls aged 11-12, is expected to reduce the burden of cervical cancer. However, alongside vaccination, enhanced screening strategies are essential for early detection and prevention of HPV-related cancers. Aim: This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of different HPV screening strategies in Tunisia, specifically examining the combination of varying HPV screening frequencies and a vaccination program targeting girls aged 11-12. The objective is to determine the most cost-efficient screening strategy to complement vaccination efforts in reducing cervical cancer incidence. Methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the perspective of the Tunisian healthcare system using the HPVsim model, a multi-agent-based simulation tool that captures HPV transmission dynamics and cervical cancer progression. Four approaches were compared: (1) maintaining the current Pap-smear screening strategy combined with vaccination; (2) introducing HPV DNA testing once between ages 35-40; (3) introducing HPV DNA testing twice between ages 35-45, with a 5-year interval; and (4) introducing HPV DNA testing every 5 years for women aged 35-60. All approaches were combined with the vaccination program. Screening coverage rates of 15%, 25%, 33%, 50%, and 70% were tested for each approach. Primary outcomes included the number of cancer cases averted, total intervention costs, and cost increase per cancer case averted. Academic literature and existing evidence were included on the demographic variables, cervical cancer incidence and mortality, treatment costs, vaccine delivery costs and other model parameters. Results: All interventions resulted in substantial reductions in cervical cancer cases, with decreases ranging from 41% to 59% in cumulative cases between 2025 and 2090. The most intensive approach, involving HPV DNA testing every 5 years for women aged 35-60, achieved the largest reduction, with a 59% decrease in cumulative cervical cancer cases by 2090, although it also incurred the highest costs. The least costly option, which retained current Pap-smear testing alongside vaccination, reduced cervical cancer cases by 41%. Although the introduction of HPV DNA testing significantly increases costs, a high frequency of screening allows for quicker public health benefits. The scenario combining vaccination and maintaining current screening practices is found to be the most cost-effective for the Tunisian context. If the price of the HPV DNA test is reduced to $9 USD, the most frequent testing strategy would become the most cost-effective option, offering both high effectiveness and financial viability. Conclusion: Lowering the cost of HPV DNA testing could make more frequent screening financially sustainable, providing greater public health benefits. These findings offer valuable guidance for decision-makers in shaping future strategies for cervical cancer prevention in Tunisia.
Full text 19,580 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of HPV Screening Strategies in Tunisia: A Modeling Study | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of HPV Screening Strategies in Tunisia: A Modeling Study Anas Lahdhiri, Beya Benzina, Emna Ennaifer, Ahlem Gzara, Soumaya Rammeh-Rommani, and 6 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5267309/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 31 Jul, 2025 Read the published version in Scientific Reports → Version 1 posted 11 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background: In Tunisia, cervical cancer ranks as the 14th most common cancer, largely driven by high-risk of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) types, notably HPV 16 and 18. Current screening efforts are limited, with only 17% of all women aged 35-60 undergoing Pap-smear testing. The introduction of the HPV vaccine in 2025 through the national school vaccination program, targeting girls aged 11-12, is expected to reduce the burden of cervical cancer. However, alongside vaccination, enhanced screening strategies are essential for early detection and prevention of HPV-related cancers. Aim: This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of different HPV screening strategies in Tunisia, specifically examining the combination of varying HPV screening frequencies and a vaccination program targeting girls aged 11-12. The objective is to determine the most cost-efficient screening strategy to complement vaccination efforts in reducing cervical cancer incidence. Methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the perspective of the Tunisian healthcare system using the HPVsim model, a multi-agent-based simulation tool that captures HPV transmission dynamics and cervical cancer progression. Four approaches were compared: (1) maintaining the current Pap-smear screening strategy combined with vaccination; (2) introducing HPV DNA testing once between ages 35-40; (3) introducing HPV DNA testing twice between ages 35-45, with a 5-year interval; and (4) introducing HPV DNA testing every 5 years for women aged 35-60. All approaches were combined with the vaccination program. Screening coverage rates of 15%, 25%, 33%, 50%, and 70% were tested for each approach. Primary outcomes included the number of cancer cases averted, total intervention costs, and cost increase per cancer case averted. Academic literature and existing evidence were included on the demographic variables, cervical cancer incidence and mortality, treatment costs, vaccine delivery costs and other model parameters. Results: All interventions resulted in substantial reductions in cervical cancer cases, with decreases ranging from 41% to 59% in cumulative cases between 2025 and 2090. The most intensive approach, involving HPV DNA testing every 5 years for women aged 35-60, achieved the largest reduction, with a 59% decrease in cumulative cervical cancer cases by 2090, although it also incurred the highest costs. The least costly option, which retained current Pap-smear testing alongside vaccination, reduced cervical cancer cases by 41%. Although the introduction of HPV DNA testing significantly increases costs, a high frequency of screening allows for quicker public health benefits. The scenario combining vaccination and maintaining current screening practices is found to be the most cost-effective for the Tunisian context. If the price of the HPV DNA test is reduced to $9 USD, the most frequent testing strategy would become the most cost-effective option, offering both high effectiveness and financial viability. Conclusion: Lowering the cost of HPV DNA testing could make more frequent screening financially sustainable, providing greater public health benefits. These findings offer valuable guidance for decision-makers in shaping future strategies for cervical cancer prevention in Tunisia. Biological sciences/Cancer/Cancer prevention Biological sciences/Cancer/Cancer screening Health sciences/Health care/Health care economics Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 31 Jul, 2025 Read the published version in Scientific Reports → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 28 Feb, 2025 Reviews received at journal 03 Feb, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 08 Jan, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 08 Jan, 2025 Reviews received at journal 22 Dec, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 25 Nov, 2024 Reviewers invited by journal 22 Nov, 2024 Editor assigned by journal 22 Nov, 2024 Editor invited by journal 14 Nov, 2024 Submission checks completed at journal 12 Nov, 2024 First submitted to journal 15 Oct, 2024 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-5267309","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":383554000,"identity":"edf4680b-5711-4beb-bce2-8e5ee7a469fe","order_by":0,"name":"Anas Lahdhiri","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Tunis El Manar","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Anas","middleName":"","lastName":"Lahdhiri","suffix":""},{"id":383554001,"identity":"8f3fe825-a29b-4689-ba42-5333b6349234","order_by":1,"name":"Beya Benzina","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Tunis El Manar","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Beya","middleName":"","lastName":"Benzina","suffix":""},{"id":383554002,"identity":"b48a6125-ca64-47a0-bb53-04408835d7d9","order_by":2,"name":"Emna Ennaifer","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Tunis El Manar","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Emna","middleName":"","lastName":"Ennaifer","suffix":""},{"id":383554003,"identity":"a12cc225-aafd-45cf-b4ef-a4082b401436","order_by":3,"name":"Ahlem Gzara","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Tunis El Manar","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ahlem","middleName":"","lastName":"Gzara","suffix":""},{"id":383554004,"identity":"f491df96-7824-4603-b124-2c3997e4b77c","order_by":4,"name":"Soumaya Rammeh-Rommani","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Charles Nicolle University Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Soumaya","middleName":"","lastName":"Rammeh-Rommani","suffix":""},{"id":383554005,"identity":"bdda5e4e-b627-4d49-97fb-fcc886e6f482","order_by":5,"name":"Oumaima Laraj","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Tunis El Manar","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Oumaima","middleName":"","lastName":"Laraj","suffix":""},{"id":383554006,"identity":"9efa3691-f480-4127-81ad-55091faff5bb","order_by":6,"name":"Heger Arfaoui","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Tunis El Manar","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Heger","middleName":"","lastName":"Arfaoui","suffix":""},{"id":383554007,"identity":"35259906-e24d-456b-92b8-37d7bb9044f0","order_by":7,"name":"Robyn Stuart","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Bill \u0026 Melinda Gates Foundation","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Robyn","middleName":"","lastName":"Stuart","suffix":""},{"id":383554008,"identity":"25e9c56f-4cf8-4e3c-aab2-5bfcae02653d","order_by":8,"name":"Amira Kebir","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Tunis El Manar","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Amira","middleName":"","lastName":"Kebir","suffix":""},{"id":383554009,"identity":"ad2dcb89-9fae-4210-acc4-0447168293cd","order_by":9,"name":"Slimane BenMiled","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Tunis El Manar","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Slimane","middleName":"","lastName":"BenMiled","suffix":""},{"id":383554010,"identity":"ad05c907-a458-4145-9cb3-ed7bb9446477","order_by":10,"name":"Haifa tounsi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Tunis El Manar","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Haifa","middleName":"","lastName":"tounsi","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-10-15 09:08:35","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5267309/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5267309/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13423-3","type":"published","date":"2025-07-31T16:12:59+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":88268160,"identity":"b5068bdf-d8d7-4a97-9ce7-e65c0990c20f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-08-04 16:49:42","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":959422,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"CostEffectivenessAnalysisofHPVScreeningStrategiesinTunisiaAModelingStudy5.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5267309/v1_covered_06a438d4-307c-48c1-8cb2-5d58c7edbd66.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of HPV Screening Strategies in Tunisia: A Modeling Study","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5267309/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5267309/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBackground:\u003c/strong\u003e In Tunisia, cervical cancer ranks as the 14th most common cancer, largely driven by high-risk of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) types, notably HPV 16 and 18. Current screening efforts are limited, with only 17% of all women aged 35-60 undergoing Pap-smear testing. The introduction of the HPV vaccine in 2025 through the national school vaccination program, targeting girls aged 11-12, is expected to reduce the burden of cervical cancer. However, alongside vaccination, enhanced screening strategies are essential for early detection and prevention of HPV-related cancers.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAim: This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of different HPV screening strategies in Tunisia, specifically examining the combination of varying HPV screening frequencies and a vaccination program targeting girls aged 11-12. The objective is to determine the most cost-efficient screening strategy to complement vaccination efforts in reducing cervical cancer incidence.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethods: \u003c/strong\u003eA cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the perspective of the Tunisian healthcare system using the HPVsim model, a multi-agent-based simulation tool that captures HPV transmission dynamics and cervical cancer progression. Four approaches were compared: (1) maintaining the current Pap-smear screening strategy combined with vaccination; (2) introducing HPV DNA testing once between ages 35-40; (3) introducing HPV DNA testing twice between ages 35-45, with a 5-year interval; and (4) introducing HPV DNA testing every 5 years for women aged 35-60. All approaches were combined with the vaccination program. Screening coverage rates of 15%, 25%, 33%, 50%, and 70% were tested for each approach. Primary outcomes included the number of cancer cases averted, total intervention costs, and cost increase per cancer case averted. Academic literature and existing evidence were included on the demographic variables, cervical cancer incidence and mortality, treatment costs, vaccine delivery costs and other model parameters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResults:\u003c/strong\u003e All interventions resulted in substantial reductions in cervical cancer cases, with decreases ranging from 41% to 59% in cumulative cases between 2025 and 2090. The most intensive approach, involving HPV DNA testing every 5 years for women aged 35-60, achieved the largest reduction, with a 59% decrease in cumulative cervical cancer cases by 2090, although it also incurred the highest costs. The least costly option, which retained current Pap-smear testing alongside vaccination, reduced cervical cancer cases by 41%. Although the introduction of HPV DNA testing significantly increases costs, a high frequency of screening allows for quicker public health benefits. The scenario combining vaccination and maintaining current screening practices is found to be the most cost-effective for the Tunisian context. If the price of the HPV DNA test is reduced to $9 USD, the most frequent testing strategy would become the most cost-effective option, offering both high effectiveness and financial viability.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusion:\u003c/strong\u003e Lowering the cost of HPV DNA testing could make more frequent screening financially sustainable, providing greater public health benefits. These findings offer valuable guidance for decision-makers in shaping future strategies for cervical cancer prevention in Tunisia.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of HPV Screening Strategies in Tunisia: A Modeling Study","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-11-29 05:58:48","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5267309/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2025-02-28T05:29:34+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-02-03T16:31:25+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"150431509137340915738265584876984888068","date":"2025-01-08T08:33:52+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"192079063817959192663265935068835083548","date":"2025-01-08T08:09:57+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2024-12-22T10:23:54+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"257021433891878266522463912705610031212","date":"2024-11-25T07:12:44+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2024-11-22T13:55:16+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2024-11-22T13:50:32+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2024-11-14T17:05:41+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2024-11-12T12:39:58+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Scientific Reports","date":"2024-10-15T08:59:08+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"565247b2-1709-4578-b795-7196893460d2","owner":[],"postedDate":"November 29th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[{"id":40859576,"name":"Biological sciences/Cancer/Cancer prevention"},{"id":40859577,"name":"Biological sciences/Cancer/Cancer screening"},{"id":40859578,"name":"Health sciences/Health care/Health care economics"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-08-04T16:40:11+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-5267309","link":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13423-3","journal":{"identity":"scientific-reports","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Scientific Reports"},"publishedOn":"2025-07-31 16:12:59","publishedOnDateReadable":"July 31st, 2025"},"versionCreatedAt":"2024-11-29 05:58:48","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1038/s41598-025-13423-3","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13423-3","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-5267309","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-5267309","identity":"rs-5267309","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"_2-kVJe1T_tPrBINL-cwx","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0