R Code for Development and Temporal Validation of a Machine Learning–Based Diagnostic Model for Endometriosis Using Routine Clinical Indicators
This repository provides R code for developing and temporally validating a machine learning-based diagnostic model for endometriosis using routine clinical indicators, including XGBoost algorithm implementation and performance assessment.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This repository provides the R code and analytical workflow for developing a machine learning diagnostic model for endometriosis using routine clinical indicators. The study employed repeated nested cross-validation, feature-selection stability assessment, and benchmark comparisons across six candidate algorithms to create an XGBoost model. Internal and temporal validation were conducted to assess discrimination, calibration, and decision-curve analysis, with SHAP-based interpretation used for model explainability. Individual-level data are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions, though the fitted model object may be requested from the authors. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically the development of a machine learning tool for its diagnosis based on clinical indicators.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,669 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-09-27T06:00:52.009428+00:00