Robotic resection of adnexal masses during pregnancy

other OA: closed public-domain-us
View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13

Robotic adnexal mass resection during pregnancy is safe and feasible, showing comparable surgical outcomes to laparoscopy but with reduced hospital stay and blood loss.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the safety and feasibility of robotic adnexal surgery during pregnancy, and to compare surgical and obstetric outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic treatment of adnexal masses during pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of all cases of robotic resection of adnexal masses in gravid patients performed at our institution between 2006 and 2009 compared with 50 consecutive historic laparoscopic controls performed between 1999 and 2007. RESULTS: During the study period, 19 parturients underwent planned robotic resection of adnexal masses, all of which were uncomplicated. Compared with 50 consecutive laparoscopic controls, no differences in operative time, conversion to laparotomy, intraoperative or postoperative complications, or observed obstetric outcomes were apparent. The robotic cohort had a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (p < 0.01) and estimated blood loss (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Robotic resection of adnexal masses during pregnancy appears both safe and feasible, with similar surgical outcomes when compared with a historic laparoscopic cohort.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Adnexal Diseases Pregnancy Complications Robotics Adnexal Diseases Adult Case-Control Studies Cohort Studies Cystadenoma, Mucinous Cystadenoma, Mucinous Cystadenoma, Serous Cystadenoma, Serous Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Humans Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Ovarian Cysts Ovarian Cysts Ovarian Neoplasms

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-17T06:14:45.765109+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:16:04.919516+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-07-17T06:50:26.839124+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine