Keywords
ROP GTPase signaling, ARP2/3 complex, actin cytoskeleton, cell morphogenesis
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine whether RIC4, a CRIB domain-containing protein that functions
as an effector of ROP GTPases, and the Arp2/3 complex, an actin nucleator, functionally cooperate in
controlling the shape of Arabidopsis cotyledon epiderm al cells. The combination of KO mutants
demonstrated that loss of RIC4 and loss of the Arp2/3 complex result in completely opposite epidermal
cell shape phenotypes. The double KO mutation is phenotypically similar to the Arp2/3 mutation, and
the effect of RIC4 loss is completely eliminated. Analysis of overexpression revealed that excess RIC4
significantly suppresses the formation of pavement cell lobes. However, RIC4 does not require an
active Arp2/3 complex for this effect. Our data further show that overexpression of RIC4 has a specific
actin stabilization effect in cotyledon epidermal cells. However, we could not demonstrate that actin
stabilization is directly related to the cell shape changes that RIC4 overexpression induces. In
conclusion, RIC4 and the Arp2/3 complex do not share the same signaling pathway in their function in
the control of cotyledon epidermal cell shape.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
2
Epidermal cells of the leaves of many plants adopt a distinctive shape resembling a jigsaw puzzle, which
is thought to enhance mechanical stress resistance across the tissue (Sapala et al. 2018). This epidermal
cell shape is the result of a morphogenetic process that is controlled at several levels. Current research
suggests that an interconnected complex of control mechanisms is involved in the initiation and
growth of these puzzle-like cells, including signaling at the plasma membrane, formation of membrane
microdomains, reorganization of the cytoskeleton, and subsequent synthesis of a cell wall with
domain-specific mechanical properties (Liu et al. 2021). While many of the components of the control
mechanism are well-defined in terms of their contribution to epidermal cell morphogenesis, they have
yet to be integrated into a cohesive, experimentally supported model that explains the full patterning
of cell -wall domains. The role of microtubules in shaping epidermal cell shape is probably best
explored. Cortical microtubules guide the direction of deposition of cellulose microfibrils (Paredez et
al. 2006) . These microfibrils form the primary load -bearing framework of the cell wall, creating
anisotropic mechanical properties, where regions with dense, aligned cellulose resist turgor -induced
expansion (Baskin 2001) . According to the main current model, the cell wall with non -uniform
mechanical properties with patterned stiffness causes non-uniform expansion under turgor pressure:
stiffer zones bulge less, while more permissive regions expand outward, giving rise to the characteristic
lobed morphology (Baskin 2005; Szymanski 2014) . Published observations suggest that specific
domains on anticlinal walls are enriched with cortical microtubules (Fu et al. 2005; Armour et al. 2015;
Bidhendi et al. 2019; Altartouri et al. 2019; Lauster et al. 2022), although there is still doubt about the
exact localization of microtubules in a given cell (Liu et al. 2021) and other studies have not consistently
confirmed this arrangement (Zhang et al. 2011; Belteton et al. 2018). The cortical microtubules in the
enriched domains would deposit more cellulose at this site and locally stiffen the cell wall, which gives
rise to indentations in pavement cells. Pectins—particularly demethylesterified homogalacturonan—
also play a critical role by accumulating at the future neck regions of anticlinal walls, to locally increase
stiffness prior to visible lobe formation . Furthermore, arrays of pectin nanofilaments in these walls
create a spatially patterned, reversible context that restrict s neck expansion while permitting lateral
stretching at the emerging lobes (Majda et al. 2017; Altartouri et al. 2019; Haas et al. 2020; Lin et al.
2022).
The organization of cortical microtubules is controlled by signaling pathways involving the Rho of
Plants (ROP) GTPases (Smokvarska et al. 2021). The formation of alternating lobes and indentations is
coordinated by the spatially segregated activity of ROP2/4 and ROP6 (Fu et al. 2005, 2009) . It is well
established that ROP6 is localized to the plasma membrane at indentations, where it promotes the
activity of its effector, the CRIB domain-containing protein RIC1 (Fu et al. 2009). There, RIC1 interacts
with the microtubule -associated protein katanin to induce microtubule ordering, supporting
indentation formation in these regions (Lin et al. 2013) . The ROP6 signaling pathway at indentations
actively suppresses ROP2/4 activity in those regions, establishing complementary domains for cell -
shaping signals. This inhibition is executed via the microtubule -dependent recruitment of PhGAP
proteins to these sites, thereby inactivating ROP2 (Lauster et al. 2022). Moreover, phosphorylation of
PhGAPs by the kinase BIN2 stabilizes their localization in indentation domains, ensuring sustained
ROP2 inactivation and robust domain separation (Zhang et al. 2022). At the plasma membrane of lobes,
ROP2/4 further reinforces the maintenance of alternating domains by inactivating RIC1, preventing
microtubule organization and allowing cell wall loosening for correct outgrowth (Fu et al. 2005, 2009).
While the link of the signaling pathway using ROP6 to the organization of microtubules at anticlinal cell
walls in indentations is well characterized, events in lobes domains are not as well defined. Previous
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
3
work has suggested that the lobes -located ROP2/4 signaling pathway, in addition to restricting MT
formation through sequestration of RIC1 (Fu et al. 2005), also activates the formation of fine actin in
lobe tips (Fu et al. 2002) through interaction with its effector RIC4 (Fu et al. 2005; Xu et al. 2010, 2014).
Indeed, it is indisputable that the actin cytoskeleton also plays an important role in cell patterning, as
latrunculin B treatment (Akita et al. 2017) and a number of actin mutants (Mathur et al. 2003; Le et al.
2003; Li et al. 2004; Zhang et al. 2005; Kotchoni et al. 2009; Rosero et al. 2016; Cifrová et al. 2020;
Bellinvia et al. 2023) exhibit pavement cell shape phenotypes. The model predicts that actin filaments
in the lobes promote vesicle transport of cell wall components such as hemicelluloses, pectins or their
modifying enzymes to enable cell wall expansion (Fu et al. 2002, 2005; Breuer et al. 2017; Chebli et al.
2021). Actin accumulation in lobes has been suggested in works that primarily used transient mTalin
expression or fixed material for actin labelling (Fu et al. 2002; Frank and Smith 2002; Li et al. 2003;
Panteris and Galatis 2005; Djakovic et al. 2006; Xu et al. 2010) . However, actin accumulation in the
lobes of growing epidermal cells was not observed using stably expressed in vivo markers (Zhang et al.
2013; Armour et al. 2015; Lauster et al. 2022) , and some work suggests that actin in lobes may occur
as a consequence of being displaced by cortical microtubules from sites of indentation. Thus, the
specific accumulation of actin in expanding lobes may be an observation that needs to be confirmed.
Moreover, an experimentally confirmed link between ROP2 and actin in this model is still lacking, as
the frequently mentioned RIC4 protein does not directly interact with actin (Fu et al. 2005; Lin et al.
2015). Finally, the function of polymerized actin itself in controlling lobe expansion also remains
unknown.
Nevertheless, it is clear that actin plays a specific role in the morphogenetic process of leaf epidermal
cells. One piece of evidence for the influence of actin on this process is provided by some actin mutants
in which phenotypes associated with epidermal patterning are well known and documented. Among
the most thoroughly researched actin -related mutants impacting the shape of pavement cells are
those in the Arp2/3 complex, which is one of the only two known actin nucleators in plants. The Arp2/3
complex needs activation by the SCAR/WAVE complex to bind actin and initiate the formation of
additional actin filaments (Weaver et al. 2003; Frank et al. 2004). Mutants lacking a functional Arp2/3
or SCAR/WAVE complex have an impaired ability to form lobes (Mathur et al. 2003; Li et al. 2003, 2004;
Le et al. 2003; Brembu et al. 2004; Saedler et al. 2004; Zhang et al. 2005, 2013; Djakovic et al. 2006;
Kotchoni et al. 2009; Bellinvia et al. 2023). Importantly, the Arp2/3 complex is a potential link between
actin and ROP signaling. Subunits of the SCAR/WAVE complex interact with ROPs (Basu et al. 2004,
2008; Uhrig et al. 2007; Feiguelman et al. 2018) . In addition, the SCAR/WAVE complex interacts with
SPIKE1, a DOCK-family ROP-GEF, which interacts with several ROP GTPases primarily in the ROP -GDP
form (Basu et al. 2008) . These findings position the Arp2/3 complex downstream of ROP signaling
during epidermal cell morphogenesis.
However, it is unclear whether the function of RIC4 in the reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton in
epidermal cell lobes is functionally connected to the Arp2/3 complex (Fu et al. 2005). In this study, we
use genetic and biochemical tools to confirm or refute the theory that RIC4 and Arp2/3 operate in the
same pathway in Arabidopsis epidermal cell formation.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
4
Material and methods
Plant cultivation:
Plants were grown in peat pellets or in vitro (vertical agar plates containing half -strength Murashige
and Skoog medium supplemented with 1% w/v sucrose) under a photoperiod of 16h light:8h darkness
and 23 °C and light intensity 110 µmol/m2/s. Arabidopsis thaliana genotypes used in this study were
Col-0 (wild-type, wt), arp2 (SALK_077920.56.00), arpc5 (SALK_123936.41.55), arpc4 (SALK_013909;
Pratap Sahi et al. 2017), ric4 (SALK_015799), phgap1 phgap2 (Stöckle et al. 2016) and CA-rop2 (Li et al.
2001). ric4 line was genotyped to confirm insertion using gene and SALK specific primers (Table 1). PCR
product sequencing confirmed T -DNA insertion after the nucleotide 164 of the coding sequence,
corresponding to AA 60 in protein sequence resulting in a stop codon in position AA 80. qRT -PCR was
performed to confirm the knock -out state of the line (p rimers described in Table 1, supplementary
figure 1A). Briefly, two non-overlapping primer pairs were designed within the RIC4 coding sequence
on either side of the T-DNA insertion mapped after nucleotide 164. The pair RIC4-A amplifies a 106bp
region upstream of the insertion, and pair RIC4 -B amplifies a 124b p region downstream of the
insertion. The upstream amplicon (RIC4 -A) controls for residual transcript, whereas the downstream
amplicon (RIC4-B) tests for read -through across the disrupted locus. The RIC4-A reverse primer and
the RIC4-B forward primer span exon–exon junctions, preventing amplification from intron-containing
genomic DNA, ensuring that cDNA specificity. Data was analyzed using the protocol described by
Ganger and colleagues (Ganger et al. 2017).
Cloning:
To prepare the Lat52::AtRIC4:YFP and Lat52::YFP:AtRIC4 constructs, the RIC4 coding sequence was
amplified from Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 cDNA using Q5 High -Fidelity DNA Polymerase (NEB), with
primers flanked by NgoMIV and ApaI restriction sites (Table 1). The amplified fragments were cloned
into the multiple cloning sites of the pollen -specific expression vectors pHD32 (C -terminal) and
pWEN240 (N-terminal) (Klahre et al. 2006).
To generate the XVE::mCherry:RIC4 reporter, total RNA was isolated from wild-type Arabidopsis using
the NucleoSpin RNA Plant kit (Macherey-Nagel), and first-strand cDNA was synthesized using M‑MuLV
reverse transcriptase (Thermo Fisher). The coding sequences of mCherry and RIC4 were PCR-amplified
using Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (NEB), with primers containing XhoI/BamHI sites for mCherry
and BamHI/SpeI sites for RIC4 (see Table 1). Amplified products were purified via agarose gel extraction
and ligated sequentially into the pER8 vector backbone harboring the XVE estrogen receptor -based
transactivator (Zuo et al. 2000) . Proper insertion orientation and the integrity of the resulting
XVE::mCherry:RIC4 were confirmed by sequencing.
Transformation of Arabidopsis
Four to five-week-old plants were transformed according to the modified floral dip method (Zhang et
al. 2006). T2 progeny of independent transformants were tested for the expression under induction
conditions (1 μM β -estradiol; Sigma-Aldrich, Cat. No. E2758, stock solution 20 M in DMS O) and
representative lines were used in further experiments.
Transient pollen expression:
Nicotiana tabacum pollen transformation and the microscopic analysis of expression of RIC4 fused to
YFP and pollen tube growth was performed as described in (Pejchar et al. 2020). Particles for biolistics
were coated with 1.5 ug of DNA. For detailed protocol of pollen transformation see (Noack et al. 2019).
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
5
Microscopy:
For pavement cell shape analysis, propidium iodide ( PI; aqueous solution 0.01 mg/ml) stained
cotyledons were observed under the laser scanning microscope Leica TCS SP2 using HC PL APO
20.0x/0.70 IMM/CORR λ BL objective (ex: 488 + 496 nm; em: 593 -668 nm). Dual‐color imaging of
mCherry–RIC4 and Lifeact –GFP was performed on a Leica TCS SP8 with an HC PL APO CS2 63x/1.20
water-immersion objective with excitation and emission set for GFP (ex: 488 nm, em: 493-556 nm and
mCherry (ex: 561 nm, em: 588-645 nm). Actin dynamics in Lifeact-GFP-expressing cells was recorded
on a spinning disc Nikon Eclipse Ti-E (Yokogawa CSU-X1) microscope, with a Plan Apo VC 60x/1.20 WI
DIC N2 objective and Andor Zyla sCMOS camera (ex: 488 nm, ex: 535 nm). Actin analysis was performed
on videos with 149 frames and 400 ms frame rate. Cotyledons or hypocotyls from 4 -day-old plants
expressing Lifeact-GFP, or co -expressing Lifeact-GFP and mCherry -RIC4 were cut, mounted into an
observation chamber beneath a thin block of agar cultivation medium for better contact with the
coverslip. If required, cells overexpressing mCherry-RIC4 were located in the microscope prior to actin
cytoskeleton recording.
Pollen tubes expressing RIC4 fusions with YFP were likewise imaged on the same spinning disk system
with a 60x Plan Apochromat 1.20 NA water -immersion objective and Andor Zyla sCMOS camera. YFP
was excited at 514 nm and collected through a 542/27 nm bandpass filter (Semrock Brightline). Laser
and camera settings were kept constant throughout each imaging experiments, allowing for
comparative imaging.
Method
of pavement cell analysis and statistics:
For pavement cell shape comparison between mutants, cotyledons of seedlings grown for 14 days
were incubated for 20 -30 min in aqueous solution of PI. For the analysis the effect of inducible
mCherry-RIC4 expression, pavement cells of cotyledons of seedlings grown for 8 days on medium with
1-5 μM β-estradiol were analyzed under the confocal microscope. Only cells expressing mCherry were
chosen for further analysis. Mock‐treated controls (0.1% DMSO) of the same genotype were stained
and imaged in parallel, using exactly the same settings. Pavement cell shape parameters were
quantified using ImageJ/Fiji (2.16.0/1.54p) platform (Schindelin et al. 2012) . Pavement cell shape
analysis was carried out as described in (Pratap Sahi et al. 2017). Statistical analysis of pavement-cell
shape parameters (area, circularity and solidity) was performed in R (v4.5.0). Biological repetition was
included as a random effect and genotype and/or treatment as fixed effects. To optimize model fit,
area was log-transformed, and alternative models (log-LMM, Gaussian GLMM, Gamma GLMM) were
compared for goodness -of-fit. For each dataset, the final model was chosen based on AIC, BIC,
likelihood-ratio test and model assumptions diagnostics. Because circularity and solidity are bounded
between the 0-1 interval, they were analyzed via beta-regression GLMMs, after comparison with other
LMM/GLMMs models via AIC and likelihood-ratio tests. Final models were further validated for specific
assumptions via appropriate diagnostics (residual, dispersion, collinearity, normality and
homoscedasticity checks using the performance or DHARMa (Residual Diagnostics for Hierarchical
(Multi-Level/Mixed) Regression Models) package simulations alongside Shapiro –Wilks or Breusch –
Pagan tests). Tukey -adjusted pairwise contrasts were extracted using the e mmeans package. Data
visualization was generated with ggplot2.
All tests were two-sided. When only comparisons between induced and uninduced lines were made,
exact p-values are reported. When multiple genotypes were compared within a panel, significance is
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
6
summarized with letters (CLDs), where groups sharing a letter do not differ at the α specified after
multiple-comparison adjustment. We used α < 0.01 for significance in all analyses except cases where
higher within -group variance existed despite consistent effect. The significance threshold used is
disclosed in every caption.
Actin dynamics measurement:
Actin dynamics was recorded in cotyledon and hypocotyl epidermal cells of four -day-old seedlings.
Seedlings were grown on standard medium or, for lines carrying the XVE::mCherry:RIC4 construct, on
medium supplemented with either 0.01% DMSO (mock) or 2 nM β-estradiol. In the β-estradiol–treated
samples, only cells exhibiting detectable mCherry fluorescence were selected for further analysis.
Actin dynamics analysis was performed based on the method described by Vidali, L. et al. (Vidali et al.
2010). Portions of the final code were adapted from the materials used by Gavrin, A. et al. (Gavrin et
al. 2020). Raw time-series images were processed in ImageJ/Fiji (2.16.0/1.54p) using a custom script.
Background
subtraction was carried out using the rolling -ball algorithm (radius = 50 pixels), followed
by linear contrast enhancement across the full dynamic range. Photobleaching was corrected via
histogram matching. To reduce selection bias, regions of interest (ROI) were defined using a randomly
generated grid overlay (with line spacing of 20 µm spacing). ROIs were then manually selected within
the grid image; these ROIs were saved as a ZIP file. Due to curvature of the epidermis and focal plane
variation, only signal from cells touching the coverslip was retained. Areas lacking clear signal we re
omitted manually. Pairwise Pearson correlation coefficients (r) between image frames within each ROI
were computed using a custom MATLAB based on the corr2 function, adapted from Vidali and
colleagues (Vidali et al. 2010).
Data analysis and visualization were performed in R (v4.5.0) using librarian to load stringr (1.5.1),
openxlsx (4.2.8), dplyr (1.1.4), tidyr (1.3.1), tidyverse (2.0.0), purr (1.0.4), tiff (0.0.12), ggplot2 (3.5.2),
glmmTMB (1.1.11), forecast (8.24.0), and ggforce (0.5.0). File metadata were parsed using custom
regular expressions, and low -quality data were filtered prior to analysis. Statistical modelling was
carried out following the approach proposed by (Spyroglou et al. 2021) , and is briefly described in
Supplementary data 1.
Image segmentation and actin structure analysis
The algorithm for actin enhancement, segmentation and organization measurement was implemented
in python, based on the work of (Liu et al. 2018, 2019) and (Li et al. 2023) . Image enhancement and
segmentation method is described in Supplementary data 2.
Occupancy was computed as the ratio of actin -positive pixels in the binary mask to the total image
area, providing a measure of spatial coverage. Anisotropy was quantified by performing local
orientation analysis on the skeletonized structures. Specificall y, the structure tensor was calculated
within sampling regions across each frame, and anisotropy was defined as the absolute difference
between the principal eigenvalues of the tensor. These local anisotropy values were weighted by
filament length and aver aged across the image to obtain a global alignment score. Skewness was
computed from the distribution of intensity values within the actin mask and reflects the asymmetry
of filament brightness. The coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated as the stand ard deviation
divided by the mean of the pixel intensities within the same masked regions, providing a measure of
local intensity heterogeneity. Frame-wise results were averaged over time for statistical evaluation.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
7
Statistical analyses were conducted in R (v4.5.0). Per -ROI trait means were transformed to meet
modelling assumptions—occupancy and anisotropy were scaled to values in the 0 -1 interval, while
skewness and CV were log-transformed. For each trait we fitted and compared ordinary linear models,
linear mixed -effects models, and (where appropriate) generalized line ar mixed models by AIC and
residual diagnostics; models that failed to improve fit or violated assumptions were discarded.
Occupancy and anisotropy were best described by beta -family GLMMs (glmmTMB) with a logit link,
incorporating fixed effects for treatment, genotype and their interaction, plus random intercepts for
individual plants and biological replicate. Skewness was analyzed using a robust linear regression on
the log -transformed values with the same fixed -effect structure, and CV was modeled by linear
regression on log-transformed CV with fixed effects for treatment, genotype and interaction. Pairwise
contrasts between DMSO and β -estradiol within each genotype were estimated for the linear and
mixed models, and by bootstrap resampling of residuals for the robust skewness model. Final model
assumptions were verified via Shapiro –Wilk and Breusch –Pagan tests for the linear model s and by
DHARMa simulations for the GLMMs.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
8
arpc5 and ric4 mutants have opposite phenotype in pavement cell shape
As the first step of the analysis of the interaction of pathways using the Arp2/3 complex and the RIC4
protein, we carefully compared morphological defects in pavement cells in single and double mutants
of Arabidopsis. The shape of adaxial epidermal cells in the arpc5 line, expressed as circularity and
solidity variables as indicator or lobe number and outgrowth, and the size of epidermal cells, expressed
as area, confirmed previously published results (Pratap Sahi et al. 2017). In comparison to wild-type
(Fig. 1a), the loss of Arp2/3 complex (Fig. 1b) results in an increase in both circularity and solidity (Fig.
1 e, g) as an expression of reduced complexity of epidermal cell shape. Cell surface area was slightly
but statistically significantly increased in the arpc5 mutant (Fig. 1f). The cell shape of the ric4 single
mutant (Fig. 1c) showed the opposite trend. Loss of RIC4 led to a statistically significant decrease in
circularity and solidity compared to control (Fig. 1e, g). The cell area of ric4 was statistically significantly
increased compared to wild-type, and the values were comparable to those of arpc5 (Fig. 1f). The
arpc5/ric4 double mutant (Fig. 1d) had circularity and solidity values clearly similar to the arpc5 single
mutant with some additive effect (Fig. 1e, g) while cell area was comparable to wild-type controls (Fig.
1f). The results suggest that the function of the Arp2/3 complex, which is executed during epidermal
cell shaping is dominant to that of the RIC4 protein. However, additive changes in both shape and size
features indicate measurable interaction elements characteristic of epistasis in complex traits, which
suggests that the Arp2/3 complex and RIC4 might operate in parallel but partially overlapping
pathways.
Overexpression of RIC4 results in reduction of cell lobes formation
Proteins of the ROP GTPase regulatory pathway belong to multigene families with considerable
redundancy, so single loss-of-function mutants often show less pronounced phenotypes, whereas their
overexpression typically produce stronger effects. Therefore, we tested the effect of RIC4
overexpression on cell shape in different cell types and its relationship to Arp2/3 mutants. Arabidopsis
RIC4 was fused to YFP at either the N - or C-terminus and expressed under the pollen -specific Lat52
promoter in tobacco pollen tubes. Both fusion varia nts (Lat52::AtRIC4 -YFP and Lat52::YFP -AtRIC4)
accumulated at the growing tip (Supp. Fig. 1a, c), and higher expression levels caused apical swelling,
a characteristic effect of RIC4 overactivity ( Supp. Fig. 1b, d) (Gu et al. 2005). These assays confirmed
that our RIC4 fusions are functional. (Gu et al. 2005). To analyze RIC4 function in epidermal cells, we
cloned the protein into a vector with the estradiol -activated XVE system (Zuo et al. 2000) and
Arabidopsis ric4 plants were stably transformed with the resulting vector harboring the mCherry-RIC4
fusion protein. In comparison to uninduced ric4 mutant ( Fig. 2a), transgenic ric4 plants expressing
mCherry-RIC4 (Fig. 2b) after induction by 1 μM beta-estradiol had significantly increased cell circularity
and solidity ( Fig. 2c, e) , while their cell area was statistically significantly lower than that of mock -
treated plants (Fig. 2d). Three independent transformation lines showed the same trend (Supp. Fig.
2). We concluded that overexpression of RIC4 causes the opposite phenotype when compared to ric4
mutants.
We next tested whether overexpression of RIC4 would have an effect in plants lacking a functional
Arp2/3 complex. We expressed RIC4 in an inducible vector in Arp2/3 arpc4 mutants and compared the
effect of RIC4 overexpression on cell morphology. RIC4 overexpression clearly induced a significant
loss of cell shape complexity in transgenic arpc4 plants induced with β-estradiol (Fig. 3d, e, g), whereas
the cell shape was unchanged in mock -treated plants ( Fig. 3c, e, g ). No influence on cell size was
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
9
detected ( Fig. 3b). In the same experiment, we confirmed that neither DMSO ( Fig. 3a, e -g) nor β -
estradiol (Fig. 3b, e -g) treatment alone had an effect in arpc4 non-transformed plants ( Fig. 3). This
Result
demonstrated that the pathway using the RIC4 protein is not dependent on the Arp2/3 complex,
because the overexpression of RIC4 effectively influenced the cell shape in the absence of active
Arp2/3 complex.
We examined whether the same relationship between the Arp2/3 complex and the ROP signaling
pathway holds true for the ROP2 protein. CA-rop2 and phgap1/phgap2 mutants are defective in ROP2
inactivation, leading to a distinct phenotype of loss of lobes in epidermal cells (Fu et al. 2002; Lauster
et al. 2022) (Supp. Fig 3 ). We generated the double and triple mutants of CA-rop2/arpc5 and
phgap1/phgap2/arpc5 and compared the phenotype of epidermal cotyledon shape. Circularity,
solidity, and area were statistically significantly increased in the arpc5 mutant. However, CA-rop2 and
phgap1/phgap2 caused a much more dramatic effect that was virtually unaffected by whether the
Arp2/3 complex was active in the plants (Supp. Fig 3). Thus, both ROP2 gain‐of‐function and PHGAP1/2
loss‐of‐function reshape pavement cells via a pathway that bypasses Arp2/3 for lobe control. Arp2/3
loss showed an additive influence on overall cell‐surface area only in CA-rop2 plants but not in
phgap1/phgap2 or RIC4 overexpressing plants. This further suggests that the Arp2/3 complex does not
appear to be a primary signaling node downstream of ROP GTPases.
Cortical actin cytoskeleton has reduced dynamics in cells overexpressing RIC4
Because the function of both ROP2 and RIC4 is associated with the actin cytoskeleton, we explored the
relationship between RIC4 and actin in epidermal cells. We crossed mCherry -RIC4 expressing plants
with the actin cytoskeleton marker Lifeact-GFP. We analyzed the dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton
in RIC4 -expressing cotyledon epidermal cells. The method employed correlation coefficient-based
analysis that relies on the change in fluorescent pixel intensities over all temporal pairs from a time -
lapse series (Vidali et al. 2010).
We compared actin dynamics in the cortical region in induced (RIC4 overexpressing) and uninduced
(mock treated) plants. The results clearly showed a significant reduction in actin cytoskeleton dynamics
in cells that overexpressed RIC4 protein (Fig. 4). To rule out the possibility that actin dynamics changes
in induced cells was influenced by the inducing chemical ( 𝛽-estradiol), we used the same method of
actin dynamics analysis to compare the dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton in wild-type plants
expressing Lifeact-GFP that were cultured on medium with the 𝛽-estradiol and on medium with the
solvent DMSO. The experiments showed that 𝛽-estradiol- and DMSO-treated plants had comparable
cortical actin dynamics (Supp. Fig. 4a). Thus, the reduced dynamics in RIC4 overexpressing cells was
due to RIC4 overexpression, not to the inducing chemical 𝛽-estradiol.
Interestingly, the effect of RIC4 overexpression on actin dynamics was much less dramatic in hypocotyl
pavement cells (Supp. Fig. 4b). This suggests that the capacity of RIC4 to mediate filaments stabilization
depends on the unique morphogenetic context of cotyledons , where specific signaling modules,
protein partners, and cell‐shape cues converge to sensitize the cortex to RIC4’s action.
The relationship between cortical actin dynamics and cell shape changes is inconclusive
RIC4 overexpressing cells have increased circularity, suggesting a negative effect of RIC4 on lobes
formation. RIC4 overexpressing cells also have reduced cortical actin network dynamics. Mutants
without functional Arp2/3 complex develop epidermal cells of increased circularity as well. To
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
10
determine whether our method of actin dynamics analysis could demonstrate a relationship between
cortical actin dynamics and the process of pavement cells shape formation, we compared the dynamics
of wild-type plants and arpc5 plants cortical actin (Fig. 5 ). Therefore, we crossed an
arpc5/UBQ10::Lifeact-GFP plant to wild-type Col-0 plant to generate arpc5⁺/⁻ UBQ10::Lifeact-GFP⁺/⁻
progeny, and in parallel to an arpc5 homozygote to obtain arpc5⁻/⁻ UBQ10::Lifeact-GFP⁺/⁻ F1 plants.
Because both lines were derived from the same Lifeact -GFP–expressing parent, they exhibited
comparable levels of marker fluorescence. This ensured that any observed differences in cortical actin
dynamics arose from the Arp2/3 genotype rather than from variation in Lifeact-GFP expression, which
is known to bias cytoskeletal measurements (Cvrčková and Oulehlová 2017). In our previous research,
we showed that arpc5 plants, which have increased circularity of pavement cells in cotyledons, have
slightly increased bundling (skewness) and occupancy, but the dynamic properties measured as
lifetime of actin using QuACK method (Cvrčková and Oulehlová 2017) were not changed (Cifrová et al.
2020). In this work, we have combined spinning disc confocal time series imaging with the correlation
coefficient-based method for actin dynamics measurements. Our results demonstrate that arpc5+/- and
arpc5-/- plants show similar dynamics of actin (Fig. 5), confirming our previous results. Although RIC4
overexpression in cotyledons markedly stabilizes cortical actin and reduces the cell shape complexity,
the absence of any detectable decrease in overall actin dynamics in arpc5 mutants—despite their
similar high circularity and solidity—indicates that bulk actin‐dynamics measurements can miss local,
lobe‐specific changes in filaments behavior. Consequently, reduced actin dynamics and increased
circularity cannot be assumed to be causally linked based on whole‐cell assays alone.
RIC4 and actin are not enriched in cell lobes, but RIC4 overexpressing cells show mild actin structure
changes
We further attempted to establish a link between the organization of the actin cytoskeleton and the
localization of the RIC4 protein. The motivation for this experiment came from studies in which fine
actin was detected in developing lobes, and its abundan ce was further increased in cells
overexpressing RIC4 (Fu et al. 2005) . In our experimental material, mCherry -RIC4 was evenly
distributed in the cytoplasm in cells overexpressing RIC4 and no specific enrichment was observed in
lobes or other cell compartments (Fig. 6a, b ). Small round motile organelles of unknown origin that
were positive for RIC4 protein were also regularly detected in the cells. These structures were also
uniformly distributed in the cell and their preferential localization in lobes was not observed (Fig. 6b).
The uniform distribution of the protein was particularly evident, where RIC4 was expressed as a mosaic
in few epidermal cells, which allowed precise 3D microscopical analysis and reconstruction. The actin
cytoskeleton in cells overexpressing mCherry -RIC4 did not show increased depolymerization or
enrichment in cell lobes (Fig. 6c, d ). For quantitative evaluation of actin structure in cells
overexpressing mCherry-RIC4, we analyzed actin in the cortical layer of epidermal cells, where we
previously observed reduced actin dynamics. The reason for this is that current methods of actin
analysis do not allow for accurate analysis of actin structure directly in lobes. We used several well-
known parameters to characterize actin organization: the coefficient of variation (cv) and skewness to
quantify the degree of bundling (Higaki et al. 2020), anisotropy to measure directionality of the actin
network, and occupancy as a measure of actin density. First, we evaluated actin structure in wild-type
cells expressing the actin marker, treated with DMSO (mock) and β-estradiol. We found that there was
no difference in any of the parameters between wild -type cells treated with DMSO and β -estradiol
(Fig. 6e-h), confirming that β-estradiol itself does not affect the cells. Analysis of the actin structure in
cells overexpressing mCherry-RIC4 showed a reduced cv factor at a low level of significance compared
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
11
to cells in which overexpression was not induced (Fig. 6e). This suggests that actin in cells with induced
expression of mCherry -RIC4 tends to form less bundled actin. Skewness, another widely used
parameter to quantify filament bundling, also confirmed the observation (Fig. 6g ). We therefore
concluded that mCherry-RIC4 expression induces a slight reduction of actin bundling. The occupancy
factor showed a slight increase in induced cells, also at a very low level of statistical significance ( Fig.
6h). Aniso tropy quantifies the degree to which actin filaments share a common orientation —high
anisotropy indicates strongly aligned bundles, whereas low anisotropy reflects a more random
filament network. In cells expressing mCherry -RIC4, reduced anisotropy was det ected (Fig. 6f). Our
Results
showed that induction of mCherry-RIC4 overexpression in cotyledon epidermal cells results in
rather minor structural changes in the sense of forming less bundled actin, increasing actin network
density, and a tendency to form m ore randomly organized arrays, which could affect the polarity of
actin-based processes that are necessary for proper shape formation.
Discussion
The aim of this study was to determine whether RIC4 and Arp2/3 complex are functionally related in
the control of Arabidopsis epidermal cell shape. Both factors are linked to the actin cytoskeleton and
the formation of specific puzzle-like epidermal cell shapes. Analysis of phenotypes of single and double
mutants showed that Arp2/3 and RIC4 have distinct roles. Loss of the Arp2/3 complex (arpc5) resulted
in increased cell circularity, consistent with previous studies (Pratap Sahi et al. 2017; Cifrová et al.
2020). However, careful cell shape analysis showed that single KO mutant ric4 has decreased circularity
of cotyledon pavement cells, which suggests that the cells have increased lobes formation and cell
shape complexity. Moreover, the arpc5/ric4 double mutant clearly showed principally the same
morphological phenotype as the arpc5 single mutant, although mild additive effects were also present.
Generally, loss of the Arp2/3 complex masked the effect of the ric4 mutation. This result ruled out the
possibility tha t RIC4 affects the actin cytoskeleton through activation of Arp2/3. Interestingly,
unchanged pavement cell shape of ric4 mutant was reported by (Belteton et al. 2018). The discrepancy
of the two analyses is probably related to different developmental stages of analyzed plants and
cultivation conditions, where our study used fully expanded cotyledons of 14-day-old plants cultivated
at 8/16 photoperiod.
Both of studied factors are involved in the control of cell shape by the actin cytoskeleton, but the
molecular mechanism of this process is unknown. Arp2/3 is a conserved actin nucleator and it is
proposed that actin nucleated by Arp2/3 is specifically involved in epidermal cell expansion and lobes
formation. RIC4 is not a direct actin -binding protein, nor is there any other known mechanism of
interaction with actin, but its overexpression has been proposed to induce the formation of fine actin
in epidermal cells at the site of the lobes (Fu et al. 2005). However, since we have shown that loss of
ric4 results in increased formation of complex cell shapes, it is clear that the function of RIC4 is in fact
lobes formation inhibition. This hypothesis is supported by our further observation that
overexpression of mCherry -RIC4 in cotyledon epidermal cells dra matically increases circularity.
Importantly, these RIC4-induced cell shape changes occurred also in mutants lacking functional Arp2/3
(arpc4) (Pratap Sahi et al. 2017) . These observations have ruled out the possibility that Arp2/3 and
RIC4 are functionally dependent components of the same signaling pathway controlling cell shape
formation.
RIC4 is a putative downstream effector of ROP GTPases (Wu et al. 2001) , which are involved in the
regulation of epidermal cell shape (Yang 2002). It is probable that the overexpression phenotype is the
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
12
Result
of an imbalance of ROP signaling in epidermal cells rather than a specific RIC4 protein function.
Imbalance of ROP signaling components usually leads to similar dramatic phenotypes (Kost et al. 1999;
Li et al. 1999; Fu et al. 2002). Therefore, we compared the effect of CA-rop2 expression (Fu et al. 2002)
and the effect of the phgap1/phgap2 mutation (Lauster et al. 2022) in plants lacking a functional
Arp2/3 complex ( arpc5 and arp2). We found that the effect of CA-rop2 and phgap1/phgap2 is
consistently independent of the existence of an active complex, although small additive effects could
be measured in cell shape and size traits also here . We concluded that the Arp2/3 complex is not a
primary downstream effector of RIC4 protein or general ROP signaling in epidermal cells. However,
mild additive effects in double mutants arpc5/ric4, arpc5/CA-rop2 and arp2 or arpc5 combined with
phgap1/phgap2 triple mutants also leads us to a suggestion that Arp2/3 and ROP signaling functions
rather in parallel pathways and we cannot exclude the possibility of their cooperation in pavement cell
morphogenesis.
We attempted to determine the correlation between the phenotype of overexpressed RIC4 and the
actin cytoskeleton. According to our analysis of the structure and distribution of the actin cytoskeleton,
there is no specific actin remodeling in the lobes or elsewhere in the cells of plants expressing Lifeact-
GFP and mCherry-RIC4. We did not see any fine actin localized specifically in lobes. To learn as much
as possible about the actin cytoskeleton in these cells, we focused on actin dynamics and actin
structure in the cortical layer of epidermal cells. Because actin dynamics in lobes is difficult to measure
with current microscopic methods, we focused on the cortical actin in epidermal cells at the outer
periclinal wall and we used a method based on correlatio n coefficient measurements. We
hypothesized that if RIC4 influences shape changes through the actin cytoskeleton, we should detect
a change in actin in overexpressing cells. The results clearly showed that cells overexpressing RIC4 have
a more stable actin cytoskeleton. Surprisingly, the analysis of actin structure showed only mild changes
induced by mCherry-RIC4, which were slightly decreased bundling, increased density and decreased
anisotropy of actin arrays, all detected at a low level of statistical si gnificance with the exception of
statistically more significant changes in anisotropy.
If simple actin stabilization measured with our approach in the cortical region of epidermal cells is the
main factor responsible for the increase in cell circularity, we should also detect actin stabilization in
cells lacking the Arp2/3 complex, whose phenotype is also increased circularity. However, correlation
coefficient analysis showed no significant changes in actin dynamics in Arp2/3 mutants. Thus, while
our results confirmed a functional relationship between RIC4 and actin, they also suggested that a clear
functional link between changes in actin dynamics and changes in cell shape could not be established.
Actin dynamics and cell shape changes may be completely independent phenomena. Interestingly, we
were unable to demonstrate similarly dramatic cha nge in actin dynamics in hypocotyl cells that
overexpressed mCherry-RIC4. This means that actin structure and regulation mechanisms are rather
tissue or developmentally specific in Arabidopsis seedling. Importantly, cotyledon epidermal cells must
possess a regulation pathway that responds to mCherry -RIC4 expression in contrast to hypocotyl
epidermal cells. In future studies, this finding could lead to the identification of a cellular factor
required for the function of RIC4.
This study certainly has limitations in the context of actin analysis. We measured actin dynamics just
below the plasma membrane on the periclinal walls of cotyledon epidermal cells, but not actin
dynamics in the lobes themselves, where this is technically impossible because of the high abundance
and dynamics of actin and limited visibility by microscopes. In our experiments, we were aware of the
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
13
influence of marker expression on actin dynamics (Cvrčková and Oulehlová 2017) , so we carefully
compared only marker lines derived from crosses between a single marker line (arpc5-/- vs arpc5+/-). In
the case of RIC4 overexpressing lines, we used inducible expression to compare actin dynamics in cells
of a single line. Finally, we verified that induction by β-estradiol alone does not affect actin dynamics.
However, the actin cytoskeleton is an ab undant structure, and it is very likely that the function of
Arp2/3-nucleated actin is highly localized in the cell and therefore does not affect the overall dynamics
of the actin network. This is suggested by our previous results, when we were able to demonstrate
very little change in the overall actin cytoskeleton dynamics of the cotyledon epidermal cells of Arp2/3
mutant arpc5 in confocal microscope images (Cifrová et al. 2020) using semi -manual method
Quantitative Analysis of Cytoskeletal Kymograms ( QuACK) that evaluates kymograms constructed
based on manually positioned transects (Cvrčková and Oulehlová 2017). In the work of (Xu et al. 2024)
in etiolated hypocotyls, detailed analysis did reveal changes of the actin structure and dynamics in
mutants lacking the Arp2/3 complex. The mutants had reduced filament abundance and bundling. At
the single filament level, reduced frequency of lateral nucleation, longer filament length and longer
lifetime were detected (Xu et al. 2024). Since our present results suggest that actin in different organs
shows different responsiveness to regulatory factors, it is probable that the data from dark -grown
hypocotyls and expanded light -grown cotyledon pavement cells cannot be compared. Our analy sis
suggests that Arp2/3 mutants do not have affected overall actin dynamics in cotyledons when
compared to wild-type, and structural analysis revealed only minor changes – slightly increased
density, decreased bundling and decreased anisotropy in cotyledon pavement cells. Yet the same cells
have a phenotype of increased circularity when Arp2/3 complex is not available. Therefore, our present
Results
suggest that to understand the role of actin in specific cellular processes, we need to study the
structure and dynamics of actin at these specific sites, because th e general structure or dynamics of
abundant actin in other regions does not need to be affected by local processes. In many cases, our
current technical capabilities are insufficient for such observations.
Acknowledgement
Confocal and TIRF microscopy was performed in the Vinicna Microscopy Core Facility
(RRID:SCR_026602) co-financed by the Czech-BioImaging large RI project LM2023050. Computational
resources were supplied by the e-INFRA CZ project (ID:90254) provided within the program Projects of
Large Research, Development, and Innovations Infrastructures. Spinning disc microscopy was
performed at the Imaging Facility of the Institute of Experimental Botany AS CR supported by the MEYS
CR (LM2023050 Czech-Bioimaging), the Czech Academy of Sciences and IEB AS CR.
Author contribution
KS and JG conceived and designed research. JG, LH, EB, IC, PP, MP and KS conducted experiments. JG
and KS analyzed data. KS and JG wrote the manuscript. All authors read, corrected and approved the
manuscript.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
14
Figure 1: Pavement cell shape analysis of Arp2/3 mutant arpc5, ric4 mutant and double mutant
arpc5/ric4. (a-d) Representative pictures (maximum-intensity z-projections) of propidium iodide-
stained cotyledon pavement cells: wild-type (a), arpc5 (b), ric4 (c) and the double mutants arpc5/ric4.
(e-g) Violin plots of cell circularity (e), area (f) and solidity (g) for each genotype (n=239-314 cells per
group). Statistical significance was assessed by mixed-effects (log-transformed area) or beta-
regression (circularity and solidity), followed by Benjamini–Hochberg (FDR)-adjusted pairwise
comparisons. A two-sided threshold of α = 0.05 (95% confidence level) was used to define
significance. Distributions are overlaid with 99% confidence intervals (yellow bar), mean (white circle)
and median (red cross). Scale bar = 100 µm.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
15
Figure 2: Cotyledon pavement cell analysis of ric4 mutant expressing mCherry-RIC4 in an estradiol-
activated XVE system. (a-b) Representative pictures of propidium iodide-stained cotyledon pavement
cells shown as maximum-intensity projections, of uninduced, mock (0.1% DMSO)-treated cells (a) and
mCherry-RIC4 expressing plants induced by 2nM β-estradiol (b). (c-e) Violin plots of circularity (c),
area (d) and solidity (e) of cotyledon pavement cells for each treatment (total cells: mock, n=172;
treated, n = 98 cells across biological replicates). Distributions are overlaid with 99% confidence
intervals (yellow bar), mean (white circle) and median (red cross). Statistical comparisons were made
using beta-regression GLMMs for circularity and solidity, and a log-transformed linear mixed model
for area, followed by Tukey’s HSD-adjusted pairwise contrasts. A significance threshold of α=0.01
(99% confidence) was applied. Scale bar = 50 µm.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
16
Figure 3: Cotyledon pavement cell analysis of Arp2/3 mutant arpc4 expressing mCherry-RIC4 induced
by the β- estradiol-activated XVE system. (a-d) Maximum-intensity z-projections of propidium iodide-
stained cotyledon epidermal cells of uninduced, mock (0.1% DMSO)-treated plants of arpc4 (a) and
arpc4/XVE::mCherry–AtRIC4 (c) (n=167 and n=201 cells, respectively) and 2nM β-estradiol-treated
arpc4 (b) and arpc4/XVE::mCherry:AtRIC4 (d) (n=176 and n=207, respectively) plants. (e-g) Violin
plots of circularity (e), area (f) and solidity for each genotype and treatment combination. Model
fitting for was done via beta-regression GLMM for circularity and solidity, and a log-transformed
LMM for area with Tukey’s HSD-adjusted pairwise contrasts (α = 0.01). Distributions are overlaid with
99% confidence intervals (yellow bar), mean (white circle) and median (red cross). Scale bar = 50 µm.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
17
Figure 4: Inducible mCherry–RIC4 expression stabilizes actin filaments in Arabidopsis cotyledon
pavement cells. The actin reporter UBQ::Lifeact-GFP was introduced into the ric4/XVE::mCherry-
AtRIC4 background, and seedlings were mock-treated with 0.1% DMSO (purple) or induced with 2nM
β-estradiol (orange). Statistical analysis was performed on Fisher z-transformed correlation
coefficients, and data was back-transformed for visualization purposes. Grey shading marks time
windows in which β-estradiol-treated cells differ significantly from mock-treated cells (* p < 0.05; **
p < 0.01; two-tailed t-tests with Benjamini-Hochberg correction). Across three independent biological
replicates, three cotyledons per treatment—except in the third replicate, where two induced
cotyledons were available—were analyzed. Within each plant, three to four regions across the two
cotyledons were imaged, and within each region two to four regions of interest (ROIs) were
quantified, yielding a total of 53 ROIs for DMSO controls and 47 ROIs for β-estradiol treated plants.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
18
Figure 5: Correlation coefficient analysis of actin dynamics in arpc5 +/- and arpc5 -/- plants. Actin
marker UBQ10::Lifeact-GFP was introduced into arpc5 mutants and crossed with wild-type and arpc5
mutants. The resulting F1 generation of heterozygous (arpc5 +/-) and homozygous (arpc5 -/-) plants
expressing Lifeact-GFP were used for actin dynamics evaluation in cotyledon pavement cells imaged
using spinning-disc confocal microscope. Correlation coefficients (normalized Fisher z-transformed,
back-transformed for visualization) showed no significant difference between arpc5 +/- and arpc5 -/-
(two-tailed t-tests with Benjamini–Hochberg correction, α=0.05). Data were collected across three
independent biological replicates: in replicate 1, three arpc5 +/- and three arpc5 -/- plants; in replicate
2, two plants of each genotype; and in replicate 3, three arpc5 +/- and four arpc5 -/- plants were
imaged. Within each plant, two to four distinct cotyledon regions were imaged, and 1–5 regions of
interest (ROIs) per imaged area were quantified—total 56 ROIs for arpc5 +/- and 62 ROIs for arpc5 -/-.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
19
Figure 6: Cortical actin organization in pavement cells expressing mCherry–RIC4 versus wild-type
controls. (a-b) mCherry-RIC4 in pavement cells is distributed homogenously in the cytoplasm and in
small organelles. Maximum intensity projection of four central optical sections (a); maximum
intensity projection of optical sections through whole cell thickness (b). (c-d) Organization of actin
cytoskeleton in cells expressing Lifeact-GFP shows no specific accumulation in lobes. Maximum
projection of five central optical sections (c); single optical section through the cortical cytoplasm (d).
Confocal microscopy, scale bar = 10 µm. (e-h) Quantification of cortical actin organization in
ric4/XVE::mCherry-AtRIC4/UBQ10::Lifeact-GFP versus wt/UBQ10::Lifeact-GFP under mock (0.1%
DMSO, purple) or 2nM β-estradiol (blue) induction. Shown are coefficient of variation (e), anisotropy
(f), skewness (g), and occupancy (h). Data derive from three independent biological replicates of the
ric4/XVE::mCherry-AtRIC4 line, three plants per treatment per replicate; 2–8 cotyledon regions per
plant; 1–3 ROIs per region), yielding 52 ROIs in the DMSO control and 55 ROIs under β-estradiol. wt
controls were processed in parallel (three plants per treatment; 1–6 regions per plant; 2–3 ROIs per
region), for 15 ROIs (DMSO) and 27 ROIs (β-estradiol). In the violin plots, the yellow bar denotes the
99% confidence interval, the white circle marks the mean, and the red cross indicates the median.
Occupancy and anisotropy were analyzed by beta-GLMM (logit link, estimated marginal means
contrasts, Tukey adjustment), skewness by robust linear regression on the log-transformed values
with bootstrapped contrasts (2000 iterations), and CV by linear regression on log-transformed values
(estimated marginal mean contrasts, Tukey adjustments). For all statistical analysis, two-tailed tests
were performed, and p-values were adjusted for multiple comparisons (Benjamini-Hochberg).
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
20
Forward Reverse
Quantitative PCR
qRT-PCR_RIC4-A TGGTGCTTCCTTTCTCCATCG TGTTCACGAATCACTTGACGA
qRT-PCR_RIC4-B ACCATTTCTCAACTCTTTGCTGAC TTAGACCGCTTTCCCAACCG
Genotyping
ric4 (SALK_015799) CCAGAAGTTCTACTCCCCGAG CAAAACATTTGGTGGGTTGTC
LBb1.3 (SALK
insertion specific)
ATTTTGCCGATTTCGGAAC
CA-rop2 ATCAACCGCCAAATCAACCT (gene-specific)
CCGTGGTGCTGATGTTTTCATT (insert-specific)
CACGGTAACTCAAAGGTCGT (gene-specific)
CATCAAACACTGCCTTCACGTT (insert-specific)
phgap1 GGTACCATGGAGGCTTCTCTAGCTGTTA TCTTCAGGACTGAATTCTGTCTT
phgap2 GGATCCATGGAGGCTTCTTTAGCGGCTTT AGTCGATTCCTCCCAGAGT
Lba1
(phgap
genotyping)
TGGTTCACGTAGTGGGCCATCG
Cloning
LAT52::AtRIC4:YFP ATAGCCGGCATGAGAGATAGAATGGAGAGACTT ATAGGGCCCTAAAGTTGGATGAAGATGAGGG
LAT52::YFP:AtRIC4 ATAGCCGGCATGAGAGATAGAATGGAGAGACTT ATAGGGCCCTTATAAAGTTGGATGAAGATGAGG
XVE::mCherry:AtRIC4 TTTTTTCTCGAGATGGTGAGCAAGGGC (XhoI-mCherry)
CCGGCGGCATGGACGAGCTGTACAAGGATCCCATGAGAGATAGAATGGAG
(BamHI-RIC4)
GAAGCACCACAAGTCTCTCCATTCTATCTCTCATGGGATCCTTGTACAGC
(mCherry-BamHI)
AAAAAAACTAGTGAGGGAGTGGATTATAAAGTTGG (RIC4-SpeI)
Table 1: Oligonucleotides used in this study. All sequences are written in 5’ → 3’ sense. For
quantitative PCR, two independent RIC4 primer pairs were used on cDNA, upstream (RIC4-A) and
downstream (RIC4-B) of the T-DNA insertion site. For genotyping of homozygous ric4 (SALK_015799)
line, gene-specific primers were used either together to detect the wild-type allele or in combination
with the SALK left-border primer (LBb1.3) to detect the insertion allele. The CA-rop2 line contains a
mutated coding sequence in the wild-type genome; accordingly, the gene-specific primer pair yields a
single product from the endogenous locus in both wild-type and CA-rop2 line, whereas the insert-
specific primer pair yields two products for the mutant – a shorter band from the intronless cDNA
and a longer band from the intron-containing gDNA, allowing for the detection of the presence of the
insert. Primer pairs specific to phgap1 and phgap2 lines were used in combination with the left
border primer Lba1 for T-DNA insertion line homozygote genotyping. Primers for cloning were used
as described in the methods; underlined nucleotides denote restriction sites used later for ligation.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
21
Akita K, Kobayashi M, Sato M, et al (2017) Cell wall accumulation of fluorescent proteins derived from
a trans-Golgi cisternal membrane marker and paramural bodies in interdigitated Arabidopsis
leaf epidermal cells. Protoplasma 254:367–377
Altartouri B, Bidhendi AJ, Tani T, et al (2019) Pectin Chemistry and Cellulose Crystallinity Govern
Pavement Cell Morphogenesis in a Multi-Step Mechanism. Plant Physiol 181:127–141
Armour WJ, Barton DA, Law AMK, Overall RL (2015) Differential Growth in Periclinal and Anticlinal
Walls during Lobe Formation in Arabidopsis Cotyledon Pavement Cells. Plant Cell 27:2484 –
2500
Baskin TI (2001) On the alignment of cellulose microfibrils by cortical microtubules: a review and a
model. Protoplasma 215:150–171
Baskin TI (2005) Anisotropic expansion of the plant cell wall. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 21:203–222
Basu D, El-Assal S, Le J, et al (2004) Interchangeable functions of Arabidopsis PIGORI and the human
WAVE complex subunit SRA1 during leaf epidermal development. Development 131:4345 –
4355
Basu D, Le J, Zakharova T, et al (2008) A SPIKE1 signaling complex controls actin -dependent cell
morphogenesis through the heteromeric WAVE and ARP2/3 complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U
S A 105:4044–4049
Bellinvia E, García -González J, Cifrová P, et al (2023) Author Correction: CRISPR ‑Cas9 Arabidopsis
mutants of genes for ARPC1 and ARPC3 subunits of ARP2/3 complex reveal differential roles
of complex subunits. Sci Rep 13:6018
Belteton SA, Sawchuk MG, Donohoe BS, et al (2018) Reassessing the Roles of PIN Proteins and
Anticlinal Microtubules during Pavement Cell Morphogenesis. Plant Physiol 176:432–449
Bidhendi AJ, Altartouri B, Gosselin FP, Geitmann A (2019) Mechanical Stress Initiates and Sustains the
Morphogenesis of Wavy Leaf Epidermal Cells. Cell Rep 28:1237-1250.e6
Brembu T, Winge P, Seem M, Bones AM (2004) NAPP and PIRP encode subunits of a putative wave
regulatory protein complex involved in plant cell morphogenesis. Plant Cell 16:2335–2349
Breuer D, Nowak J, Ivakov A, et al (2017) System -wide organization of actin cytoskeleton determines
organelle transport in hypocotyl plant cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:E5741–E5749
Chebli Y, Bidhendi AJ, Kapoor K, Geitmann A (2021) Cytoskeletal regulation of primary plant cell wall
assembly. Curr Biol 31:R681–R695
Cifrová P, Oulehlová D, Kollárová E, et al (2020) Division of Labor Between Two Actin Nucleators -the
Formin FH1 and the ARP2/3 Complex -in Arabidopsis Epidermal Cell Morphogenesis. Front
Plant Sci 11:148
Cvrčková F, Oulehlová D (2017) A new kymogram-based method reveals unexpected effects of marker
protein expression and spatial anisotropy of cytoskeletal dynamics in plant cell cortex. Plant
Methods
13:19
Djakovic S, Dyachok J, Burke M, et al (2006) BRICK1/HSPC300 functions with SCAR and the ARP2/3
complex to regulate epidermal cell shape in Arabidopsis. Development 133:1091–1100
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
22
Feiguelman G, Fu Y, Yalovsky S (2018) ROP GTPases structure -function and signaling pathways. Plant
Physiol 176:57–79
Frank M, Egile C, Dyachok J (2004) Activation of Arp23 complex -dependent actin polymerization by
plant proteins distantly related to ScarWAVE
Frank MJ, Smith LG (2002) A small, novel protein highly conserved in plants and animals promotes the
polarized growth and division of maize leaf epidermal cells. Curr Biol 12:849–853
Fu Y, Gu Y, Zheng Z, et al (2005) Arabidopsis interdigitating cell growth requires two antagonistic
pathways with opposing action on cell morphogenesis. Cell 120:687–700
Fu Y, Li H, Yang Z (2002) The ROP2 GTPase controls the formation of cortical fine F-actin and the early
phase of directional cell expansion during Arabidopsis organogenesis. Plant Cell 14:777–794
Fu Y, Xu T, Zhu L, et al (2009) A ROP GTPase signaling pathway controls cortical microtubule ordering
and cell expansion in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 19:1827–1832
Ganger MT, Dietz GD, Ewing SJ (2017) A common base method for analysis of qPCR data and the
application of simple blocking in qPCR experiments. BMC Bioinformatics 18:534
Gavrin A, Rey T, Torode TA, et al (2020) Developmental modulation of root cell wall architecture
confers resistance to an Oomycete pathogen. Curr Biol 30:4165-4176.e5
Gu Y, Fu Y, Dowd P, et al (2005) A Rho family GTPase controls actin dynamics and tip growth via two
counteracting downstream pathways in pollen tubes. The Journal of Cell Biology 169:127–138
Haas KT, Wightman R, Meyerowitz EM, Peaucelle A (2020) Pectin homogalacturonan nanofilament
expansion drives morphogenesis in plant epidermal cells. Science 367:1003–1007
Higaki T, Akita K, Katoh K (2020) Coefficient of variation as an image-intensity metric for cytoskeleton
bundling. Sci Rep 10:1–13
Klahre U, Becker C, Schmitt AC, Kost B (2006) Nt -RhoGDI2 regulates Rac/Rop signaling and polar cell
growth in tobacco pollen tubes. Plant J 46:1018–1031
Kost B, Lemichez E, Spielhofer P, et al (1999) Rac homologues and compartmentalized
phosphatidylinositol 4, 5-bisphosphate act in a common pathway to regulate polar pollen tube
growth. The Journal of cell biology 145:317–330
Kotchoni SO, Zakharova T, Mallery EL, et al (2009) The association of the Arabidopsis actin -related
protein2/3 complex with cell membranes is linked to its assembly status but not its activation.
Plant Physiol 151:2095–2109
Lauster T, Stöckle D, Gabor K, et al (2022) Arabidopsis pavement cell shape formation involves spatially
confined ROPGAP regulators. Curr Biol 32:532-544.e7
Le J, El -Assal SE -D, Basu D, et al (2003) Requirements for Arabidopsis ATARP2 and ATARP3 during
epidermal development. Curr Biol 13:1341–1347
Li H, Lin Y, Heath RM, et al (1999) Control of Pollen Tube Tip Growth by a Rop GTPase -Dependent
Pathway That Leads to Tip-Localized Calcium Influx. The Plant Cell 11:1731
Li H, Shen JJ, Zheng ZL, et al (2001) The Rop GTPase switch controls multiple developmental processes
in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 126:670–684
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
23
Li P, Zhang Z, Tong Y, et al (2023) ILEE: Algorithms and toolbox for unguided and accurate quantitative
analysis of cytoskeletal images. J Cell Biol 222:. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202203024
Li S, Blanchoin L, Yang Z, Lord EM (2003) The putative Arabidopsis arp2/3 complex controls leaf cell
morphogenesis. Plant Physiol 132:2034–2044
Li Y, Sorefan K, Hemmann G, Bevan MW (2004) Arabidopsis NAP and PIR regulate actin -based cell
morphogenesis and multiple developmental processes. Plant Physiol 136:3616–3627
Lin D, Cao L, Zhou Z, et al (2013) Rho GTPase signaling activates microtubule severing to promote
microtubule ordering in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 23:290–297
Lin D, Ren H, Fu Y (2015) ROP GTPase-mediated auxin signaling regulates pavement cell interdigitation
in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Integr Plant Biol 57:31–39
Lin W, Tang W, Pan X, et al (2022) Arabidopsis pavement cell morphogenesis requires FERONIA binding
to pectin for activation of ROP GTPase signaling. Curr Biol 32:497-507.e4
Liu S, Jobert F, Rahneshan Z, et al (2021) Solving the puzzle of shape regulation in plant epidermal
pavement cells. Annu Rev Plant Biol 72:525–550
Liu Y, Kolagunda A, Treible W, et al (2019) Intersection to overpass: Instance segmentation on
filamentous structures with an orientation -aware neural network and terminus pairing
algorithm. Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit Workshops 2019:125–133
Liu Y, Treible W, Kolagunda A, et al (2018) Densely connected stacked U -network for filament
segmentation in microscopy images. 403–411
Majda M, Grones P, Sintorn I -M, et al (2017) Mechanochemical polarization of contiguous cell walls
shapes plant pavement cells. Dev Cell 43:290-304.e4
Mathur J, Mathur N, Kirik V, et al (2003) Arabidopsis CROOKED encodes for the smallest subunit of the
ARP2/3 complex and controls cell shape by region specific fine F-actin formation. Development
130:3137–3146
Noack LC, Pejchar P, Sekereš J, et al (2019) Transient gene expression as a tool to monitor and
manipulate the levels of acidic phospholipids in plant cells. Methods Mol Biol 1992:189–199
Panteris E, Galatis B (2005) The morphogenesis of lobed plant cells in the mesophyll and epidermis:
organization and distinct roles of cortical microtubules and actin filaments. New Phytol
167:721–732
Paredez AR, Somerville CR, Ehrhardt DW (2006) Visualization of cellulose synthase demonstrates
functional association with microtubules. Science 312:1491–1495
Pejchar P, Sekereš J, Novotný O, et al (2020) Functional analysis of phospholipase Dδ family in tobacco
pollen tubes. Plant J 103:212–226
Pratap Sahi V, Cifrová P, García-González J, et al (2017) Arabidopsis thaliana plants lacking the ARP2/3
complex show defects in cell wall assembly and auxin distribution. Annals of Botany 122:777–
789
Rosero A, Oulehlová D, Stillerová L, et al (2016) Arabidopsis FH1 formin affects cotyledon pavement
cell shape by modulating cytoskeleton dynamics. Plant Cell Physiol 57:488–504
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
24
Saedler R, Zimmermann I, Mutondo M, Hülskamp M (2004) The Arabidopsis KLUNKER gene controls
cell shape changes and encodes the AtSRA1 homolog. Plant Mol Biol 56:775–782
Sapala A, Runions A, Routier-Kierzkowska A-L, et al (2018) Why plants make puzzle cells, and how their
shape emerges. Elife 7:. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32794
Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, et al (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image
analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682
Smokvarska M, Jaillais Y, Martinière A (2021) Function of membrane domains in rho-of-plant signaling.
Plant Physiol 185:663–681
Spyroglou I, Skalák J, Balakhonova V, et al (2021) Mixed models as a tool for comparing groups of time
series in plant sciences. Plants 10:362
Stöckle D, Herrmann A, Lipka E, et al (2016) Putative RopGAPs impact division plane selection and
interact with kinesin-12 POK1. Nat Plants 2:16120
Szymanski DB (2014) The kinematics and mechanics of leaf expansion: new pieces to the Arabidopsis
puzzle. Curr Opin Plant Biol 22:141–148
Uhrig JF, Mutondo M, Zimmermann I, et al (2007) The role of Arabidopsis SCAR genes in ARP2 -ARP3-
dependent cell morphogenesis. Development 134:967–977
Vidali L, Burkart GM, Augustine RC, et al (2010) Myosin XI is essential for tip growth in Physcomitrella
patens. Plant Cell 22:1868–1882
Weaver AM, Young ME, Lee W -L, Cooper JA (2003) Integration of signals to the Arp2/3 complex This
review comes from a themed issue on Cell structure and dynamics Edited by Michel Bornens
and Laura M Machesky. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 15:23–30
Wu G, Gu Y, Li S, Yang Z (2001) A genome -wide analysis of Arabidopsis Rop -interactive CRIB motif -
containing proteins that act as Rop GTPase targets. The Plant cell 13:2841–2856
Xu L, Cao L, Li J, Staiger CJ (2024) Cooperative actin filament nucleation by the Arp2/3 complex and
formins maintains the homeostatic cortical array in Arabidopsis epidermal cells. Plant Cell
36:764–789
Xu T, Dai N, Chen J, et al (2014) Cell surface ABP1 -TMK auxin-sensing complex activates ROP GTPase
signaling. Science 343:1025–1028
Xu T, Wen M, Nagawa S, et al (2010) Cell surface - and rho GTPase -based auxin signaling controls
cellular interdigitation in Arabidopsis. Cell 143:99–110
Yang Z (2002) Small GTPases: versatile signaling switches in plants. The Plant cell 14 Suppl:S375-88
Zhang C, Halsey LE, Szymanski DB (2011) The development and geometry of shape change in
Arabidopsis thaliana cotyledon pavement cells. BMC Plant Biol 11:27
Zhang C, Lauster T, Tang W, et al (2022) ROPGAP-dependent interaction between brassinosteroid and
ROP2-GTPase signaling controls pavement cell shape in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 32:518-531.e6
Zhang C, Mallery EL, Szymanski DB (2013) ARP2/3 localization in Arabidopsis leaf pavement cells: a
diversity of intracellular pools and cytoskeletal interactions. Front Plant Sci 4:238
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
25
Zhang X, Dyachok J, Krishnakumar S, et al (2005) IRREGULAR TRICHOME BRANCH1 in Arabidopsis
encodes a plant homolog of the actin -related protein2/3 complex activator Scar/WAVE that
regulates actin and microtubule organization. Plant Cell 17:2314–2326
Zhang X, Henriques R, Lin S -S, et al (2006) Agrobacterium -mediated transformation of Arabidopsis
thaliana using the floral dip method. Nat Protoc 1:641–646
Zuo J, Niu Q -W, Chua N -H (2000) An estrogen receptor -based transactivator XVE mediates highly
inducible gene expression in transgenic plants. The Plant Journal 24:265–273
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
Circularity (a.u.)
e
0.2
0.4
0.6
a b c d
WT arpc5 ric4 arpc5
ric4
Area (mm²)
f
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04 a b b ab
arpc5 ric4WT arpc5
ric4
Solidity (a.u.)
g a b c d
arpc5 ric4WT
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
arpc5
ric4
a
WT
b
arpc5
c
ric4 arpc5 ric4
d
100µm
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
a b
50 µmDMSO β-estradiol
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75Circularity (a.u.)
c p = 1.49e−54
DMSO β-estradiol
0.00
0.01
0.02Area (mm²)
d p = 5.20e−06
DMSO
0.0
0.5
1.0Solidity (a.u.)
e p = 5.16e−13
DMSO
ric4/XVE::mCherry-RIC4
β-estradiol β-estradiol
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
a
b
c
d
arpc4 arpc4 + mCherry-RIC4
arpc4 arpc4
XVE::mCherry-RIC4
arpc4 arpc4
XVE::mCherry-RIC4
arpc4 arpc4
XVE::mCherry-RIC4
e f gp = 0.5697 p = 4.33e−88
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00 Circularity (a.u.)
p = 0.8704 p = 6.50e−46
0.9
0.6
0.3
0.0
p = 0.2807 p = 0.1106
0.009
0.006
0.003
0.000 Area (mm²)
Solidity (a.u.)
β-estradiol β-estradiol DMSODMSO 50 µm
DMSO β−estradiol
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
* **
0.0
0.2
0.6
0.8
0.4
0 10 20 30 40 50
Time (s)
Normalized Pearson Correlation (r)
DMSO
b−estradiol
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Time (s)
Normalized Pearson Correlation (r)
arpc5 +/-
arpc5 -/-
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
e f
g h
p = 5.0e-05 p = 0.3137
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00 Anisotropy
p = 0.0572 p = 0.3765
40
20
0
Occupancy (%)
ric4
XVE::mCherry-RIC4
WT
p = 0.0240 p = 0.89741.2
0.9
0.6
0.3
0.0Coefficient of Variation (CV)
p = 0.0120 p = 0.1700
4
2
0
Skewness
ric4
XVE::mCherry-RIC4
WT
DMSO β−estradiol
a b c
d
10 µm
ric4 / XVE::mCherry-RIC4 / UBQ10::Lifeact-GFP
mCherry-RIC4
mid planes
mCherry-RIC4
full cell
Lifeact-GFP
mid planes
Lifeact-GFP
full cell
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 16, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675338doi: bioRxiv preprint
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.