Inaudible and invisible: epistemic injustice and the failure of recognition as a single intersubjective relation. Pain as particularly illuminating case.
Other
OA: gold
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
Miranda Fricker's concept of epistemic injustice and Axel Honneth's theory of recognition have each been applied, separately, to chronic pain. The relationship between them is usually construed as sequential: epistemic injustice is thought to produce failures of recognition, or prior misrecognition to ground later epistemic marginalisation. This article rejects that reading. It argues that, in the clinical encounter with a person in pain, the relation between the two is not exhausted by causal succession. They are analytically separable dimensions of a single intersubjective relation, dimensions that cannot, in that encounter, be treated apart without descriptive and practical loss. The act by which a clinician withholds credibility from a patient's testimony is the same act by which recognition is refused to that patient as a suffering subject. The claim is offered as a heuristic rather than an ontological thesis. Pain is presented not as uniquely paradigmatic but as a particularly illuminating case within a broader class of testimonially dependent suffering, since its privacy, its dependence on testimony, and the mediating role of diagnostic language converge in it with unusual clarity. The argument bears on recognition theory; on medical ethics, where remedies addressed to one dimension alone prove insufficient; and on clinical practice, where diagnostic classification operates as a technology of recognition.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Funding
- funders
- [{'doi': None, 'name': 'Medical University of Graz', 'awards': []}]
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
References (29)
- "I feel like I'm being stabbed by a thousand tiny men": The challenges of communicating endometriosis pain via crossref
- doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669653.001.0001 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11019-014-9560-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1192/pb.bp.115.050682 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/japp.70032 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01177.x via crossref
- doi:10.1080/02691728.2013.782585 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.847460 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11019-026-10342-6 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001 via crossref
- doi:10.5206/fpq/2018.4.6235 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11019-025-10279-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.2401331121 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524021.003.0012 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1516047113 via crossref
- doi:10.4324/9780429435133-3 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/japp.12172 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/09515089.2022.2156333 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11019-021-10040-5 via crossref
- doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000507 via crossref
- doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002324 via crossref
- doi:10.5206/fpq/2018.4.6232 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11019-025-10266-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11019-025-10259-6 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.pec.2025.109402 via crossref
- doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001939 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/s13010-021-00105-x via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11673-016-9761-x via crossref
- doi:10.1017/hyp.2025.8 via crossref
SciLite annotations
organisms 3
human
ursus sp.
human
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-10-19T06:34:31.442995+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-18T09:30:06.152893+00:00
- scilite
- last seen: 2026-10-18T10:02:22.262471+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Per Europe PMC
Per Europe PMC