Habits Are Not Goal Dependent: Commentary on Buabang et al. (2023)

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher

Abstract

People sometimes commit action slips by absentmindedly repeating unwanted responses, such as entering an old password instead of the current one. In most accounts, such slips demonstrate stimulus-response habits in which familiar contexts directly trigger well-practiced but now incorrect responses. In contrast, Buabang et al. (2023) claim that action slips arise due to the continued influence of old, no longer accurate goal outcomes. Yet our reanalysis shows that Buabang et al.’s participants actually provide striking evidence of goal-independent S-R habits; they correctly repeated well-practiced responses despite reporting incorrect goals. We also show that Buabang et al. misinterpreted the results of their mediation analyses by overlooking the direct influence of stimuli on responses. Understanding how habits work is important because habit change interventions are unlikely to succeed with goal-directed strategies that overlook context cues’ direct cuing of practiced responses.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0