Are tropical ant and termite assemblages along a forest recovery gradient habitat or dispersal limited?

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

Regenerating forests comprise a significant proportion of forest ecosystems in the tropics. While we are beginning to understand assembly mechanisms of tree communities after anthropogenic disturbances, those of animal communities are still poorly understood. It has been shown that locally established ant communities clearly assemble along gradients of forest recovery from active agriculture over the time of succession to old growth forests. However, if this is determined by dispersal limitation or habitat filtering is unclear. To disentangle the two processes for ant and termite communities we compared community composition of dispersing and sessile life stages for both based on OTUs, in a forest landscape of about 200 km2 extend in the Chocó lowland tropical forest in Ecuador. Our chronosequence comprises a recovery gradient ranging from agricultural land to regenerating forests to old-growth forests. Our results show that winged reproductives (alates) of both taxa disperse into all regeneration stages along the gradient, but communities were more similar in spatially closer plots suggesting that alates of both taxa have the potential to reach and colonize forests of all regeneration ages, but dispersal distances are smaller than the spatial extent of our study area. Worker ant communities originating from sessile nests were driven by forest regeneration age and elevation, suggesting that ants can disperse into different regeneration stages, but not all species establish colonies in all regeneration stages and elevation. Termite worker communities were likewise more similar at similar elevation and less similar in spatially closer plots, which might be explained by species specific habitat preferences for certain elevations and by biotic interactions such as local competition for resources. These results suggest, that both taxa are only dispersal limited on the larger landscape scale, and while ant communities are more affected by the habitat filtering (abiotic and biotic conditions) of the forest structure along the chronosequence, termite communities seem to be more affected by intraspecific competition.
Full text 2,550 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Regenerating forests comprise a significant proportion of forest ecosystems in the tropics. However, species assembly mechanisms after anthropogenic disturbances are still poorly understood. It has been shown that locally established ant communities clearly assemble along gradients of forest regeneration. However, it is unclear if this is determined by dispersal limitation or habitat filtering (abiotic and biotic conditions). To disentangle the two processes for ant and termite communities we compared community composition of dispersing and sessile life stages in the Chocó lowland tropical forest in Ecuador. Our chronosequence comprises a regeneration gradient ranging from agricultural land to regenerating forests to old-growth forests. We show that assemblages of winged reproductives (alates) of both taxa do not differ significantly between forest regeneration stages, but communities were more similar in spatially closer plots. Worker ant communities originating from established colonies were driven by forest regeneration age and elevation. Termite worker communities were driven by elevation and plot location. These results suggest that alates of both taxa have the potential to reach and colonize forests of all regeneration ages and elevations, but not all species establish colonies or persist in all forest regeneration or elevational stages. For ants we conclude that the distribution of colonies is more affected by habitat filters associated with elevation and the forest structure along the chronosequence. For termites we conclude that the distribution of colonies is more affected by habitat filtering associated with elevation and by possible intraspecific interactions, as their communities were more dissimilar in spatially closer plots. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X2N92C Subjects Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Entomology, Life Sciences

Keywords

chronosequence, alates, assembly rules, reassembly, secondary succession Dates Published: 2025-03-27 15:26 Last Updated: 2026-03-20 07:44 Older Versions License CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Additional Metadata Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: Annotated R code, including the data needed to reproduce the statistical analyses and figures, is publicly available from figshare: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28650614.v1 Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0