Mixed Logistic Regression in Genome-Wide Association Studies

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

Motivation Mixed linear models (MLM) have been widely used to account for population structure in case-control genome-wide association studies, the status being analyzed as a quantitative phenotype. Chen et al. proved that this method is inappropriate and proposed a score test for the mixed logistic regression (MLR). However this test does not allow an estimation of the variants’ effects. Results We propose two computationally efficient methods to estimate the variants’ effects. Their properties are evaluated on two simulations sets, and compared with other methods (MLM, logistic regression). MLR performs the best in all circumstances. The variants’ effects are well evaluated by our methods, with a moderate bias when the effect sizes are large. Additionally, we propose a stratified QQ-plot, enhancing the diagnosis of p -values inflation or deflation, when population strata are not clearly identified in the sample. Availability All methods are implemented in the R package milorGWAS available at https://github.com/genostats/milorGWAS . Contact [email protected] Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0