Keywords
malaria; insecticide-treated nets; long-lasting insecticidal net; children under-5 years; pregnant women.
1. Introduction
Malaria persists as a major global health burden which continues to worsen, with 247 million cases and
619,000 related deaths reported globally in 2021 [1]. Malaria remains endemic in most sub-Saharan African
countries, constituting 85% of global cases and accounting for almost 93% of all malaria -related deaths
worldwide. Unfortunately, over three-quarters of these mortalities are children under the age of 5 [2, 3].
Among these sub-Saharan African countries, Nigeria carries the highest burden, representing nearly 27%
of the global malaria cases [2]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), Nigeria reported an
estimated 68 million cases and 194,000 deaths from malaria in 2021, making it a major public health concern
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 3, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.30.23299264doi: medRxiv preprint
NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice.
[4]. The economic toll is equally substantial, with Nigeria losing about 646 billion Naira ($1.1 billion USD)
annually due to malaria-related cases [5].
In the global battle against malaria, a myriad of interventions has been employed. These interventions
constitute the WHO-recommended package to prevent and reduce morbidity and mortality. They include
vector control through in-door residual spraying and insecticide-treated nets, seasonal chemoprevention,
rapid diagnostic testing, and treatment with artemisinin -based combination therapies [6,7,8]. More
recently, the groundbreaking utilization of malaria vaccines has been incorporated into this comprehensive
approach [7,8]. Despite their effectiveness, the implementation of these interventions entails substantial
costs [9,10]. Notably, among these strategies, the use of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) has emerged as the
most cost-effective, contributing signi ficantly to averting over 50% of malaria cases and reducing child
mortality by 27% [11,12]. Over the last 2 decades, ITNs have contributed significantly to the progress seen
in reducing malaria cases worldwide and drove most of the declines in malaria seen from 2005–2015,
especially in moderate-to-high transmission areas [12].
The use of ITNs remains a crucial component of the WHO's strategy to combat the transmission of malaria
in malaria-endemic regions, especially sub-Saharan Africa [7,8]. The distribution of ITNs in this region has
seen a significant increase in an effort to protect every household at risk of malaria transmission, with a
particular focus on pregnant women and children under the age of five [13, 14,15].
The Abuja Declaration, signed in 2000, marked a pivotal moment in the fight against malaria, with 44
malaria-endemic countries in Africa committing to halving malaria -attributable mortality by 2010 and
protecting 60% of pregnant women and children under-5 years with measures such as ITNs by 2005 [16].
The effectiveness of ITNs, demonstrated by reducing clinical malaria by over 50% and decreasing all-cause
mortality in young children by 15 -30% when overall population usage exceeds 70%, underscore s their
critical role in achieving these ambitious goals [17,18,19]. As the Roll Back Malaria Partnership evolved, so
did the strategies and targets [8]. The Nigeria National Malaria Strategic Plan (NMSP) builds on these
efforts, aiming to improve access and utilizati on of vector control interventions to 80% of the target
population by 2025 [20]. The NMSP includes priorities such as reducing malaria -related mortality,
decreasing malaria parasite prevalence in children under-5 years, and increasing ownership and use of
ITNs and long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) [20].
Over the past decade, Nigeria has made significant progress in improving the utilization of ITNs among
children under-5 years old and pregnant women [6,21]. The implementation of various malaria control
strategies, including mass distribution campaigns, antenatal care programs, and community -based
interventions, has contributed to increased ITN usage [6]. Despite the overall progress, disparities in I TN
utilization still persist. Factors contributing to these disparities include differences in access to hea lthcare
services, socioeconomic conditions, level of maternal education, household wealth, and awareness of the
importance of ITNs [21, 22]. This study was aimed at determining some demographic factors associated
with the use of ITNs among children under 5- years and pregnant women in Nigeria based on the recent
2021 Nigeria Malaria Indicator Survey (NMIS).
2. Materials and Methods
Study design
This study was a secondary analysis based on data drawn from the Nigeria Malaria Indicator Survey
(NMIS) 2021 [21]. The 2021 NMIS marks the third iteration of malaria indicator surveys conducted in
Nigeria, following the inaugural survey in 2010 and the subsequent one in 2015. The survey collected data
on household ownership of an ITN, and number of children who slept under an ITN on the night preceding
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 3, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.30.23299264doi: medRxiv preprint
the survey. The survey defined an ITN as a factory treated net not requiring any further treatment. The
data collection process also encompassed sociodemographic and economic characteristics of the household
and child, such as the child's age, sex, residence, geopolitical zone, and household wealth quintile.
Study population
The survey was conducted in 13,727 households and a total of 14,476 women aged 15-49 years from the
selected households were successfully interviewed in the survey.
Data analysis
Data analysis was performed in two phases. In the first phase, data abstracted from the NMIS were
uploaded into R version 4.3.2 statistical software and descriptive analysis was carried out to describe the
selected socio-demographic characteristics. Furthermore, an association between the use of ITNs and socio-
demographic variables was assessed with th e chi-square test to explore the individual effect of socio -
demographic factors on ITN usage. In the second phase, odd ratios (OR) and the respective 95% confidence
interval (CI) were calculated to determine the strength of association.
3. Results
Household Ownership of ITNs.
The initial analysis of the data covers the association between ITN access and various socio -demographic
variables. As shown in Table 1, 56% of Nigerian households possessed at least one ITN. If it is assumed
that one ITN can be shared by two people who stayed in the household on the night preceding the survey,
25% of households own enough ITNs to cover all household members. This translates to an average of 1.3
ITNs per household.
Subsequent analysis using the chi -square test, as presented in Table 1, indicated a significant association
between ITN ownership in Nigeria and factors such as place of residence, geopolitical zone, and household
wealth quintile. Specifically, rural households (p = 0.005), households from the North West and North East
geopolitical zones (p <0.001), and households in the second and lowest wealth quintiles (p <0.001) possessed
a significantly higher number of ITNs compared to their respective counterparts [Table 1].
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 3, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.30.23299264doi: medRxiv preprint
Table 1. Households in possession of at least one ITN.Ω
Characteristic No of Households n∆ Households with ITNs n∆ (%) p-value†
Residence 0.005*
Urban 4,546 2400 (52.8)
Rural 9,181 5279 (57.5)
Geopolitical Zone <0.001*
North Central 2,210 1103 (49.9)
North East 2,089 1504 (72.0)
North West 3,629 2751 (75.8)
South East 1,356 500 (36.9)
South South 2,037 801 (39.3)
South West 2,406 1023 (42.5)
Wealth quintile <0.001*
Lowest 2,219 1420 (64.0)
Second 2,365 1615 (68.3)
Middle 2,707 1621 (59.9)
Fourth 3,018 1536 (50.9)
Highest 3,418 1487 (43.5)
Total 13,727 7687 (56.0)
ΩTable is based on households with at least one ITN per two persons who stayed in the household the night before
the survey.
∆n may vary by characteristic due to missing data †p-value calculated using chi-squared test.
ITN Usage Among Children Under 5 Years Old.
An average of only 41.4% of children under 5 years old in all households surveyed slept under an ITN on
the night before the survey [Table 2]. The likelihood of a child sleeping under an ITN was found to be
significantly associated with the child's age ( p = 0.007), residence (p = 0.001), geopolitical zone ( p <0.001),
and the wealth quintile of the household (p <0.001), and not significantly associated with sex (p=0.665). The
use of ITNs decreased with increasing child age and household wealth quintile. Children under 12 months
old (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.09-1.33, p <0.001) were 1.2 times more likely to sleep under an ITN compared to 4 -
year-olds (48–59 months old). Additionally, children in rural areas (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.22, p =0.001) had
a 1.14-fold likelihood of sleeping under an ITN compared to their urban counterparts. Geopolitical zone
also significantly impacts the usage of ITNs, with children in the North West (OR 2.46, 95% CI 2.14-2.82, p
<0.001) and North East (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.98-2.65, p <0.001) regions being twice as likely to sleep under an
ITN compared to those from other geopolitical zones. Lastly, children from lower wealth quintiles—lowest
(OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.41-1.77, p <0.001), second (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.51-1.89, p <0.001), and middle (OR 1.53, 95%
CI 1.37-1.72, p <0.001)—were 1.5 to 1.6 times more likely to sleep under an ITN than those in the highest
wealth quintile.
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 3, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.30.23299264doi: medRxiv preprint
Table 2. Children who slept under an ITN in households with at least one ITNs.Ω
Characteristic Children in all
Households n∆
% who slept
under ITNs p-value† OR (95% CI) p-value‡
Age in months 0.007*
<12 2,273 46.1 1.21 (1.09-1.33) <0.001*
12-23 2,262 41.2 1.08 (0.97-1.19) 0.145
24-35 2,457 41.0 1.07 (0.97-1.18) 0.166
36-47 2,645 40.6 1.06 (0.96-1.17) 0.222
48-59r 3,104 38.2 1.00 -
Sex of Child 0.665
Maler 6,509 40.9 1.00 -
Female 6,233 41.5 1.01 (0.95-1.08) 0.653
Residence 0.001*
Urban 3,545 37.5 1.00 -
Ruralr 9,196 42.6 1.14 (1.06-1.22) 0.001*
Geopolitical Zone < 0.001*
North Central 2,212 30.5 1.37 (1.18 -1.60) <0.001*
North East 2,264 50.8 2.28 (1.98-2.65) <0.001*
North Westr 4,618 54.6 2.46 (2.14-2.82) <0.001*
South East 994 29.5 1.33 (1.11-1.59) <0.001*
South South 1,357 23.7 1.07 (0.90-1.27) 0.466
South West 1,296 22.2 1.00 -
Wealth quintile < 0.001*
Lowest 2,772 45.2 1.58 (1.41-1.77) <0.001*
Second 2,784 48.3 1.69 (1.51-1.89) <0.001*
Middle 2,660 43.9 1.53 (1.37-1.72) <0.001*
Fourth 2,313 36.7 1.28 (1.14-1.44) <0.001*
Highestr 2,213 28.6 1.00 -
Total 12,742 41.2
ΩTable is based on children who slept under an ITN in the households the night before the survey.
∆n may vary by characteristic due to missing data.
†p-value calculated using chi-squared test
‡mid-p-value calculated using Fisher's exact test.
rReference group.
ITN Usage Among Pregnant Women.
Almost one-half of pregnant women in all households slept under an ITN the night before the survey [Table
3]. As with our data for children under the age of 5, various socio -dem-graphic variables significantly
impact the usage of ITNs. Pregnant women from the North East (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.79-4.75, p <0.001) and
North West (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.67-4.24, p <0.001) are twice as likely to sleep under an ITN compared to
those from other geopolitical zones. Interestingly, we found that ITN usage was less common amon gst
more educated women, as women with no (1.46, 95% CI 1.00-2.18, p=0.048) or primary (1.57, 95% CI 1.02-
2.44, p=0.042) education were roughly 1.5 times more likely to use an ITN compared to women who
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 3, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.30.23299264doi: medRxiv preprint
received beyond primary education. Similar to Table 2, the use of ITNs increases with decreasing
household wealth status, as pregnant women from lower wealth quintiles—lowest (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.27-
2.63, p <0.001), second (OR 1.82, , 95% CI 1.28-2.61, p <0.001), middle (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.34-2.73, p <0.001),
and fourth (OR 1.47, , 95% CI 1.01-2.15, p =0.042)—were 1.4 to almost 2 times more likely to sleep under an
ITN than those from the highest wealth quintile.
Table 3. Pregnant women who slept under an ITN in all households.Ω
Characteristic Pregnant women in all
households n∆
% who slept
under ITNs p-value† OR (95% CI) p-value‡
Residence 0.158
Urban 357 157 (44.1) 1.00 -
Rural 963 498 (51.7) 1.18 (0.95-1.46) 0.142
Geopolitical Zone <0.001*
North Central 184 65 (35.1) 1.55 (0.93 - 2.67) 0.095
North East 247 161 (65.0) 2.86 (1.79-4.75) < 0.001*
North West 615 366 (59.5) 2.61 (1.67-4.24) < 0.001*
South East 73 20 (27.4) 1.21 (0.62-2.36) 0.577
South South 94 19 (20.6) 0.89 (0.45-1.74) 0.743
South West 106 24 (22.8) 1.00 -
Education 0.112
No education 614 325 (52.9) 1.46 (1.00-2.18) 0.048*
Primary 175 99 (56.8) 1.57 (1.02-2.44) 0.042*
Secondary 420 191 (45.4) 1.26 (0.85-1.90) 0.255
More than secondary 111 40 (36.2) 1.00 -
Wealth quintile 0.003*
Lowest 273 149 (54.6) 1.82 (1.27-2.63) < 0.001*
Second 308 168 (54.6) 1.82 (1.28-2.61) < 0.001*
Middle 298 170 (57.0) 1.90 (1.34-2.73) < 0.001*
Fourth 257 113 (44.0) 1.47 (1.01-2.15) 0.042*
Highest 184 55 (29.9) 1.00 -
Total 1,320 655 (49.6)
ΩTable is based on pregnant women age 15 – 49 who slept under an ITN in the households the night before the
survey.
∆n may vary by characteristic due to missing data.
†p-value calculated using chi-squared test.
‡mid-p-value calculated using Fisher's exact test.
rReferent group.
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 3, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.30.23299264doi: medRxiv preprint
4. Discussion
In the past decade, Nigeria has made considerable progress in improving the use of ITNs among children
under-5 years old and pregnant women. This study aimed to assess the association between socio -
demographic factors and the use of Insecticide -Treated Nets (ITNs) in children under-5 years old and
pregnant women in Nigeria, using nationally representative data from the 2021 Nigeria Malaria Indicator
Survey (NMIS). The percentage of households possessing at least one ITN experienced a substantial rise
from 8% in 2008 to 69% in 2015, before s ubsequently declining to 56% in 2021, and this decline can be
attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic thus overshadowing some of the previously recorded gains [21, 23].
However, a quick snapshot review of comparative data from other Sub-Saharan African countries in 2021
showed higher ownership rates in Niger (96%), Mali (91%), Burkina Faso (93%), Cote d’Ivoire (72%),
Madagascar (69%), and Guinea (63%) [24]. The substantial rise in ownership within households over the
past decade can be attributed to the more as sertive implementation of various reported malaria control
strategies, including mass distribution campaigns, antenatal care (ANC) initiatives, and community-based
interventions, fostering increased ITN utilization [25]. According to the NMIS 2021 report [21], over three-
quarters of ITNs in Nigerian households were acquired through mass distribution campaigns, with other
sources including markets, ANC visits, immunization visits, and government or private health facilities.
In this study, factors such as place of residence, geopolitical zone, and household wealth quintile were
significantly associated with ITN ownership in Nigeria. Notably, household ownership of ITNs is higher
in rural areas (58%) compared to urban areas (53 %). Additionally, regional disparities are evident, with
household ownership of ITNs being highest in the North West (76%) and lowest in the South East (37%).
Also noteworthy is that households in the second and lowest wealth quintiles possessed a signific antly
higher number of ITNs (68% and 64%, respectively) compared to the remaining quintiles, especially the
highest wealth quintile (44%). These findings tend to reflect the successful reach of ITN distribution
programs to rural communities and positive aftermath of several strategies to improve ownership of ITNs
targeted at these population groups that have had low ITN coverage in the past [22, 26].
The findings of this study also provide valuable insights into the factors influencing ITNs utilization among
specific population groups, namely children under-5 years old and pregnant women. Assessing ITN usage
among children under -5 years reveals dispari ties between households. In all households, an overage of
only 41.4% of children under-5 years slept under an ITN, exposing a notable gap in optimal coverage. At
both bivariate and multivariate levels, ITN usage was significantly associated with age, resid ence,
geopolitical zone, and wealth quintile. Younger children and those in rural areas showed higher
likelihoods of sleeping under ITNs. The North West and North East regions stood out with a twofold
likelihood of ITN usage, underlining regional variations. Lower wealth quintiles exhibited a 1.5 to 1.6 times
higher likelihood of ITN usage than the highest quintile. Other similar studies report that children under
12 months are still being breastfed by their mothers who are more likely to share a bed cove red with ITN
with them, and this tends to diminish with increasing age of the children [27,28]. Increase in ITN usage
observed in financially disadvantaged households may be attributed to the economic conditions, wherein
individuals in these households ten d to share beds, as opposed to wealthier households that have the
luxury of more separate sleeping arrangements. Another study from Nigeria reported that ITN utilization
increases when children share beds with other family members [29].
In the present study, ITN usage among pregnant women varies between all households. This variation
offers insights into the impact of ITN availability within a household. In all households, about half of
pregnant women (50%) used an ITN, with a significant association found at the bivariate analytical level,
linking this usage to geopolitical zone and household wealth quintile. Pregnant women from the North
East and North West regions as well as those from middle, second and lowest quintiles utilizes ITN more.
At the multivariate level, pregnant women from the North East and North West regions had twice the odds
of using an ITN compared to other zones, while the odds decreased with increasing educational level and
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 3, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.30.23299264doi: medRxiv preprint
increasing household wealth status. A similar study done in Nigeria also reports higher ITN ownerships
and usage among pregnant women in the North East and North West [30]. These two geopolitical zones
tend to be more rural in nature, with extreme poverty and illiteracy rates than the urbanized South West.
Thus, the increased utilization reported in this present study may reflect the success of targeted
interventions through massive community -level distribution of ITNs at antenatal care facilities in these
areas.
Our study reveals the dynamic nature of ITN usage patterns which should necessitate ongoing monitoring
and adaptive strategies. Regular assessments of demographic and socio-economic trends can inform timely
adjustments to intervention programs, ensuring their relevance and effectiveness over time. Additionally,
continuous efforts are essential to bridge the gap in ITN usage among specific population groups and
ensure comprehensive malaria prevention in diverse household settings.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, while strides have been made in improving ITN utilization among children under 5 and
pregnant women, it is far from the target of 80% set for both indicators in the NMSP. Addressing identified
regional disparities, socioeconomic factors, and maintaining awareness initiatives are pivotal for achieving
universal and equitable ITN coverage. These interventions should include increasing access to healthcare
services, expanding ITN distribution programs, and strengthening health education initiatives. These
inferences guide future interventions to ensure sustained progress in malaria prevention efforts across
diverse populations in Nigeria.
Author Contributions:
Conceptualization, E.B.O. and O.S.N.; methodology, E.B.O. and O.S.N.; data curation, E.B.O. and O.S.N.; software,
E.B.O.; formal analysis, E.B.O. and O.S.N.; writing—original draft preparation, E.B.O. and O.S.N.; writing—review and
editing, E.B.O. and O.S. N.; visualization, E.B.O. and O.S.N.; supervision, E.B.O.; project administration, E.B.O. and
O.S.N.
Funding:
This research received no external funding.
Data Availability Statement:
The data that support the findings of this research is accessible through the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS)
Program upon reasonable requests and approval from the DHS Program. The datasets analyzed in this research can be
found in the DHS repository at https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm. The codes for the data analysis
used in this research are available upon request.
Acknowledgments:
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) Program for access
to the survey datasets used for this study and to James Richard Ellegate Jr for his guidance in R programming and
revision of the manuscript materials.
Conflicts of Interest:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Abbreviations :
DHS: Demographic and Health Surveys
ITN: Insecticide-treated net
LLIN: Long-Lasting Insecticidal Net
NMIS: Nigeria Malaria Indicator Survey
NMSP: Nigeria National Malaria Strategic Plan
WHO: World Health Organization
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 3, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.30.23299264doi: medRxiv preprint
References
1. World Health Organization. (2022). World Malaria Report 2022 . Available from:
https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/365169/9789240064898-eng.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 18th
November 2023.
2. World Health Organization. (2023). Malaria. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-
room/fact-sheets/detail/malaria. Accessed 18th August 2022.
3. Oresanya, O. B., Hoshen, M., & Sofola, O. T. (2008). Utilization of insecticide -treated nets by
under-five children in Nigeria: Assessing progress towards the Abuja targets. Malaria Journal, 7(1), 1-15.
4. World Health Organization. (2023). Report on malaria in Nigeria
2022. https://www.afro.who.int/sites/default/files/2023-08/WEB_7784%20WMR%20-
%20Nigeria%202022_2408.pdf
5. Muanya C. (2022). World Malaria Day: Nigeria records 200,000 deaths, loses N646bn yearly to
malaria. The Guardian. Accessed 22 nd November 2023. https://guardian.ng/news/world-malaria-day-
nigeria-records-200000-deaths-loses-n646bn-yearly-to-malaria/
6. Ujuju, C. N., Okoronkwo, C., Okoko, O. O., Akerele, A., Okorie, C. N., & Adebayo, S. B. (2022).
Use of insecticide-treated nets in children under five and children of school age in Nigeria: Evidence from
a secondary data analysis of demographic health survey. Plos One, 17(9), e0274160.
7. World Health Organization. Global technical strategy for malaria 2016 -2030. (2015).
https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/documents/global-technical-strategy-for-malaria-2016-2030.pdf
8. Roll Back Malaria (2015). Action and investment to defeat malaria 2015–2030. Geneva: World Health
Organization, on behalf of the Roll Back Malaria Partnership Secretariat.
https://endmalaria.org/sites/default/files/RBM_AIM_Report_0.pdf
9. Ezenduka, C. C., Falleiros, D. R., & Godman, B. B. (2017). Evaluating the treatment costs for
uncomplicated malaria at a public healthcare facility in Nigeria and the implications. PharmacoEconomics-
Open, 1, 185-194.
10. Conteh, L., Shuford, K., Agboraw, E., Kont, M., Kolaczinski, J., & Patouillard, E. (2021). Costs
and cost-effectiveness of malaria control interventions: a systematic literature review. Value in Health, 24(8),
1213-1222.
11. Mueller, D. H., Wiseman, V., Bakusa, D., Morgah, K., Daré, A., & Tchamdja, P. (2008). Cost-
effectiveness analysis of insecticide -treated net distribution as part of the Togo Integrated Child Health
Campaign. Malaria Journal, 7(1), 1-7.
12. Bhatt, S., Weiss, D. J., Cameron, E., Bisanzio, D., Mappin, B., Dalrymple, U., ... & Gething, P. W.
(2015). The effect of malaria control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015. Nature,
526(7572), 207-211.
13. Taylor, C., Florey, L., & Ye, Y. (2017). Equity trends in ownership of insecticide-treated nets in 19
sub-Saharan African countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 95(5), 322.
14. Kilian, A., Wijayanandana, N., & Ssekitoleeko, J. (2010). Review of delivery strategies for
insecticide-treated mosquito nets: are we ready for the next phase of malaria control efforts? TropIKA. net,
1(1), 0-0.
15. Willey, B. A., Paintain, L. S., Mangham, L., Car, J., & Schellenberg, J. A. (2012). Strategies for
delivering insecticide-treated nets at scale for malaria control: a systematic review. Bulletin of the World
Health Organization, 90, 672-684.
16. Global Partnership to Roll Back Malaria. (2000). The African Summit on Roll Back Malaria, Abuja,
Nigeria, April 25, 2000. World Health Organization. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/67815
17. Eisele, T. P., Macintyre, K., Yukich, J., & Ghebremeskel, T. (2006). Interpreting household survey
data intended to measure insecticide-treated bednet coverage: results from two surveys in Eritrea. Malaria
Journal, 5, 1-8.
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 3, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.30.23299264doi: medRxiv preprint
18. Lengeler, C. (2004). Insecticide‐treated bed nets and curtains for preventing malaria. Cochrane
database of systematic reviews, (2).
19. Ter Kuile, F. O., Terlouw, D. J., Phillips-Howard, P. A., Hawley, W. A., Friedman, J. F., Kolczak,
M. S., ... & Nahlen, B. L. (2003). Impact of permethrin-treated bed nets on malaria and all-cause morbidity
in young children in an area of intense perennial malaria transmission in western Kenya: cross -sectional
survey. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 68(4_suppl), 100-107.
20. National Malaria Strategic Plan, 2021-2025 (2021). Available from: https://nmcp.gov.ng/. Accessed
20th November 2023).
21. Nigeria Malaria Indicator Survey 2021 Final Report (2022).
https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/MIS41/MIS41.pdf.
22. Auta, A. (2012). Demographic factors associated with insecticide-treated net use among Nigerian
women and children. North American journal of medical sciences, 4(1), 40.
23. Benjamin, G. Y., Mallam, F., Alhamdu, J., Ladan, I. A., & Yakubu, S. T. (2023). A review of the
impact of COVID-19 pandemic on malaria control in Africa. Microbes and Infectious Diseases.
STATcompiler (2023). Households with at least one insecticide-treated mosquito net (ITN). Available
from https://tinyurl.com/statcompiler. Accessed on 27th November 2023.
24. Iwuafor, A. A., Egwuatu, C. C., Nnachi, A. U., Ita, I. O., Ogban, G. I., Akujobi, C. N., & Egwuatu,
T. O. (2016). Malaria Parasitaemia and the use of insecticide-treated nets (INTs) for malaria control amongst
under-5 year old children in Calabar, Nigeria. BMC infectious diseases, 16(1), 1-12.
27. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2008 Final Report (2009).
https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR222/FR222.pdf
28. Mugisha, F., & Arinaitwe, J. (2003). Sleeping arrangements and mosquito net use among under-
fives: results from the Uganda Demographic and Health Survey. Malaria Journal, 2(1), 1-10.
28. Eisele, T. P., Keating, J., Littrell, M., Larsen, D., & Macintyre, K. (2009). Assessment of insecticide-
treated bednet use among children and pregnant women across 15 countries using standardized national
surveys. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 80(2), 209-214.
29. Ovadje, L. (2014). Adherence to the use of insecticide -treated bed nets by Nigerian children.
University of Michigan.
30. Ankomah, A., Adebayo, S. B., Arogundade, E. D., Anyanti, J., Nwokolo, E., Ladipo, O., &
Meremikwu, M. M. (2012). Determinants of insecticide -treated net ownership and utilization among
pregnant women in Nigeria. BMC public health, 12(1), 1-10.
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 3, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.30.23299264doi: medRxiv preprint