Affective biases encoded by the central arousal systems dynamically modulate inequality aversion in human interpersonal negotiations
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
Abstract
Negotiating with others about how finite resources should be distributed is an important aspect of human social life. However, little is known about mechanisms underlying human social-interactive decision-making. Here, we report results from a novel iterative Ultimatum Game (UG) task, in which the proposer’s facial emotions and offer amounts were sampled probabilistically based on the participant’s decisions, creating a gradually evolving social-interactive decision-making environment. Our model-free results confirm the prediction that both the proposer’s facial emotions and the offer amount influence human choice behaviour. These main effects demonstrate that biases in facial emotion recognition also contribute to violations of the Rational Actor model (i.e. all offers should be accepted). Model-based analyses extend these findings, indicating that participants’ decisions are guided by an aversion to inequality in the UG. We highlight that the proposer’s facial responses to participant decisions dynamically modulate how human decision-makers perceive self–other inequality, relaxing its otherwise negative influence on decision values. In iterative games, this cognitive model underlies how offers initially rejected can gradually become more acceptable under increasing affective load, and accurately predicts 86% of participant decisions. Activity of the central arousal systems, assessed by measuring pupil size, encode a key element of this model: proposer’s affective reactions in response to participant decisions. Taken together, our results demonstrate that, under affective load, participants’ aversion to inequality is a malleable cognitive process which is modulated by the activity of the pupil-linked central arousal systems.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (57)
- doi:10.1073/pnas.0630443100 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.1155577 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.1100735 via crossref
- doi:10.1017/s0140525x07000581 via crossref
- doi:10.1162/003355399556151 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.1082976 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1009396107 via crossref
- doi:10.1006/game.2000.0837 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s10683-011-9280-x via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.289.5485.1773 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.30.020179.002523 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(97)00003-6 via crossref
- doi:10.3758/cabn.10.1.8 via crossref
- doi:10.1017/s1930297500006045 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00237-0 via crossref
- doi:10.1017/s1930297500004204 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nn.3961 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nn.3130 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.27879 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.028 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0454-15.2015 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.04.026 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.39404 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1206569109 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.025 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nature16961 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nature24270 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1724-z via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.007 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.0711099105 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000254 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5895-09.2010 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.045 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.275.5306.1593 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nn1954 via crossref
- doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.106.031393 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0012-17.2017 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2761-12.2013 via crossref
- doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.108.056093 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300004 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jad.2009.01.028 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.11.015 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0893-133x(96)00134-0 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nn.2468 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.conb.2008.06.003 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.1169694 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.05.004 via crossref
- doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09020149 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41380-019-0405-5 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/xge0000621 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.1108062 via crossref
- doi:10.2307/2998573 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005848 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00302 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/ncomms7149 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00491-3 via crossref
- doi:10.3758/s13428-017-1007-2 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-08-24T06:27:02.095521+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0