Evaluation of Dorado v5.2.0 de novo basecalling models for the detection of tRNA modifications using RNA004 chemistry

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

Direct RNA sequencing with Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) captures nucleotide-specific current signals that reflect both sequence and chemical modifications, offering the potential to detect RNA modifications directly from native RNA molecules. To interpret such signals, ONT provides modification-aware basecalling models that estimate the probability of selected modifications at each nucleotide. In May 2025, ONT released updated modification-calling models (Dorado v5.2.0) for pseudouridine (Ψ), inosine, m 6 A and m 5 C, alongside new models for 2′O-ribose-methylations, necessitating independent validation. Here, we benchmark Dorado v5.2.0 against v5.1.0 using ex cellulo tRNAs from Schizosaccharomyces pombe , leveraging their well-defined modification landscape. We generated modification probability profiles at single-nucleotide resolution and quantified model performance using curated sets of annotated and validated modification sites. Our results reveal that, despite notable improvements in Ψ detection, most modification callers remain challenged by the dense and heterogeneous modification environments of tRNAs. This work provides the first comprehensive evaluation of Dorado v5.2.0 on native tRNAs and establishes a methodological framework for benchmarking future ONT modification models in complex RNA modification contexts.
Full text 1,432 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Abstract Direct RNA sequencing with Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) captures nucleotide-specific current signals that reflect both sequence and chemical modifications, offering the potential to detect RNA modifications directly from native RNA molecules. To interpret such signals, ONT provides modification-aware basecalling models that estimate the probability of selected modifications at each nucleotide. In May 2025, ONT released updated modification-calling models (Dorado v5.2.0) for pseudouridine (Ψ), inosine, m6A and m5C, alongside new models for 2′O-ribose-methylations, necessitating independent validation. Here, we benchmark Dorado v5.2.0 against v5.1.0 using ex cellulo tRNAs from Schizosaccharomyces pombe, leveraging their well-defined modification landscape. We generated modification probability profiles at single-nucleotide resolution and quantified model performance using curated sets of annotated and validated modification sites. Our results reveal that, despite notable improvements in Ψ detection, most modification callers remain challenged by the dense and heterogeneous modification environments of tRNAs. This work provides the first comprehensive evaluation of Dorado v5.2.0 on native tRNAs and establishes a methodological framework for benchmarking future ONT modification models in complex RNA modification contexts. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0