Individualised medicine from the perspectives of patients using complementary therapies: a meta-ethnography approach.
OA: gold
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
BackgroundPersonalised (or individualised) medicine in the days of genetic research refers to molecular biologic specifications in individuals and not to a response to individual patient needs in the sense of person-centred medicine. Studies suggest that patients often wish for authentically person-centred care and personal physician-patient interactions, and that they therefore choose Complementary and Alternative medicine (CAM) as a possibility to complement standard care and ensure a patient-centred approach. Therefore, to build on the findings documented in these qualitative studies, we investigated the various concepts of individualised medicine inherent in patients' reasons for using CAM.MethodsWe used the technique of meta-ethnography, following a three-stage approach: (1) A comprehensive systematic literature search of 67 electronic databases and appraisal of eligible qualitative studies related to patients' reasons for seeking CAM was carried out. Eligibility for inclusion was determined using defined criteria. (2) A meta-ethnographic study was conducted according to Noblit and Hare's method for translating key themes in patients' reasons for using CAM. (3) A line-of-argument approach was used to synthesize and interpret key concepts associated with patients' reasoning regarding individualized medicine.Results(1) Of a total of 9,578 citations screened, 38 studies were appraised with a quality assessment checklist and a total of 30 publications were included in the study. (2) Reasons for CAM use evolved following a reciprocal translation. (3) The line-of-argument interpretations of patients' concepts of individualised medicine that emerged based on the findings of our multidisciplinary research team were "personal growth", "holism", "alliance", "integrative care", "self-activation" and "wellbeing".ConclusionsThe results of this meta-ethnographic study demonstrate that patients' notions of individualised medicine differ from the current idea of personalised genetic medicine. Our study shows that the "personal" patients' needs are not identified with a specific high-risk group or with a unique genetic profile in the sense of genome-based "personalised" or "individualised" medicine. Thus, the concept of individualised medicine should include the humanistic approach of individualisation as expressed in concepts such as "personal growth", "holistic" or "integrative care", doctor-patient "alliance", "self-activation" and "wellbeing" needs. This should also be considered in research projects and the allocation of healthcare resources.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (62)
- doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2010.07.041 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/1534735405282361 via crossref
- doi:10.2165/11586490-000000000-00000 via crossref
- doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.pec.2006.07.011 via crossref
- doi:10.1001/jama.284.3.357 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2005.01.001 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1472-6882-11-135 via crossref
- doi:10.4135/9781412985000 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/1534735406288084 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00786.x via crossref
- doi:10.1089/acm.2010.0171 via crossref
- doi:10.2105/ajph.94.6.1049 via crossref
- doi:10.1089/acm.2009.0437 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1472-6963-6-76 via crossref
- doi:10.1097/rhu.0b013e31817a7e1f via crossref
- doi:10.3402/qhw.v5i2.5032 via crossref
- doi:10.1089/acm.2007.0718 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/1534735408329410 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/1534735404268054 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/1049732309341190 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0302-5 via crossref
- doi:10.1097/00003727-200301000-00003 via crossref
- doi:10.1188/10.onf.494-500 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2009.05.003 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.pec.2003.11.001 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/13561820701795374 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/104973299129122135 via crossref
- doi:10.1188/07.onf.359-364 via crossref
- doi:10.1089/107555303771952271 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/1534735405276721 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2006.00667.x via crossref
- doi:10.1080/09540121003668094 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/1534735405276358 via crossref
- doi:10.1089/jpm.2005.8.953 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/1467-9566.00355 via crossref
- doi:10.1097/sga.0b013e3181e01a7b via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jana.2008.12.004 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1745-6215-11-24 via crossref
- doi:10.1179/107902610x12883422813741 via crossref
- doi:10.1053/sarh.2002.33717 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-10 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.001 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1471-2288-9-59 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-21 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1741-6787.2005.05007.x via crossref
- doi:10.1258/1355819054308576 via crossref
- doi:10.1136/bmj.d4163 via crossref
- doi:10.1159/000330714 via crossref
- doi:10.1159/000317848 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00459.x via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30384.x via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1472-6963-6-21 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fphar.2012.00152 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.pec.2012.01.003 via crossref
- doi:10.3399/bjgp11x556254 via crossref
- doi:10.1089/1075553042245773 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1472-6920-10-16 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2012.03.001 via crossref
- doi:10.1155/2012/294638 via crossref
- doi:10.1089/acm.2009.0056 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/02770900903029788 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-08-23T06:29:40.656088+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-23T09:30:01.253652+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Per Europe PMC
Per Europe PMC