Dim Green Light Enables Day-and-Night Monitoring of Leaf Movements

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Understanding plant growth dynamics requires imaging across day-and-night cycles to quantify growth, movement and development in the aerial plant body and to capture the rhythmic nature of these processes. This requires imaging in light during the day and in darkness at night without perturbing plant physiology. Nighttime imaging has typically depended on infrared (IR) illumination, producing monochrome datasets that require specialised hardware and separate analysis pipelines when combined with daytime RGB imaging. Here, we evaluated very low-intensity green (dimG) illumination from standard LEDs as a practical alternative for colour-consistent nighttime imaging and assessed its physiological impact in Arabidopsis thaliana and Lactuca sativa (lettuce). We show that high resolution colour images can be obtained under dimG using low- cost cameras, with sufficient consistency between full-spectrum and dimG images to allow direct comparison and unified image analysis. We show that very low-fluence green light (<0.5 μmol m -2 s -1 ) does not sustain circadian oscillations of gene activity under continuous exposure and does not perturb rhythms when applied during the dark phase of diel cycles. DimG imaging enabled accurate detection of diel leaf movement profiles in Arabidopsis circadian mutants, revealing genotype-specific phase differences under varying photoperiods. In lettuce, dimG pulses and continuous dimG enabled accurate quantification of diel leaf movement without affecting growth, stomatal opening, electron transport rate or chlorophyll content. Motion profiles under continuous dimG mirrored those under darkness. Our findings establish dim green illumination as a cost-effective solution for night-time imaging, simplifying phenotyping workflows with minimal impact on physiology.
Full text 1,897 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Understanding plant growth dynamics requires imaging across day-and-night cycles to quantify growth, movement and development in the aerial plant body and to capture the rhythmic nature of these processes. This requires imaging in light during the day and in darkness at night without perturbing plant physiology. Nighttime imaging has typically depended on infrared (IR) illumination, producing monochrome datasets that require specialised hardware and separate analysis pipelines when combined with daytime RGB imaging. Here, we evaluated very low-intensity green (dimG) illumination from standard LEDs as a practical alternative for colour-consistent nighttime imaging and assessed its physiological impact in Arabidopsis thaliana and Lactuca sativa (lettuce). We show that high resolution colour images can be obtained under dimG using low- cost cameras, with sufficient consistency between full-spectrum and dimG images to allow direct comparison and unified image analysis. We show that very low-fluence green light (<0.5 μmol m-2 s-1) does not sustain circadian oscillations of gene activity under continuous exposure and does not perturb rhythms when applied during the dark phase of diel cycles. DimG imaging enabled accurate detection of diel leaf movement profiles in Arabidopsis circadian mutants, revealing genotype-specific phase differences under varying photoperiods. In lettuce, dimG pulses and continuous dimG enabled accurate quantification of diel leaf movement without affecting growth, stomatal opening, electron transport rate or chlorophyll content. Motion profiles under continuous dimG mirrored those under darkness. Our findings establish dim green illumination as a cost-effective solution for night-time imaging, simplifying phenotyping workflows with minimal impact on physiology. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-07-20T07:01:09.845843+00:00