Creative play and creativity development: A three level meta data analysis of moderators (age, culture, play type)

Creative play and creativity development: A three... | F1000Research "use strict";function _typeof(t){return(_typeof="function"==typeof Symbol&&"symbol"==typeof Symbol.iterator?function(t){return typeof t}:function(t){return t&&"function"==typeof Symbol&&t.constructor===Symbol&&t!==Symbol.prototype?"symbol":typeof t})(t)}!function(){var t=function(){var t,e,o=[],n=window,r=n;for(;r;){try{if(r.frames.__tcfapiLocator){t=r;break}}catch(t){}if(r===n.top)break;r=r.parent}t||(!function t(){var e=n.document,o=!!n.frames.__tcfapiLocator;if(!o)if(e.body){var r=e.createElement("iframe");r.style.cssText="display:none",r.name="__tcfapiLocator",e.body.appendChild(r)}else setTimeout(t,5);return!o}(),n.__tcfapi=function(){for(var t=arguments.length,n=new Array(t),r=0;r 3&&2===parseInt(n[1],10)&&"boolean"==typeof n[3]&&(e=n[3],"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]("set",!0)):"ping"===n[0]?"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]({gdprApplies:e,cmpLoaded:!1,cmpStatus:"stub"}):o.push(n)},n.addEventListener("message",(function(t){var e="string"==typeof t.data,o={};if(e)try{o=JSON.parse(t.data)}catch(t){}else o=t.data;var n="object"===_typeof(o)&&null!==o?o.__tcfapiCall:null;n&&window.__tcfapi(n.command,n.version,(function(o,r){var a={__tcfapiReturn:{returnValue:o,success:r,callId:n.callId}};t&&t.source&&t.source.postMessage&&t.source.postMessage(e?JSON.stringify(a):a,"*")}),n.parameter)}),!1))};"undefined"!=typeof module?module.exports=t:t()}(); dataLayer = dataLayer || []; // Standard GTM initialization - Google Consent Mode handles consent automatically (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start': new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0], j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src= 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl+ '>m_auth=hzk0Vc3qFsQYhCrIoHz68A>m_preview=env-1>m_cookies_win=x';f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f); })(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-MWFK8L5J'); ;window.NREUM||(NREUM={});NREUM.init={distributed_tracing:{enabled:true},privacy:{cookies_enabled:true},ajax:{deny_list:["bam.nr-data.net"]}}; ;NREUM.loader_config={accountID:"438030",trustKey:"438030",agentID:"772317073",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073"} ;NREUM.info={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073",sa:1} ;/*! For license information please see nr-loader-spa-1.236.0.min.js.LICENSE.txt */ (()=>{"use strict";var e,t,r={5763:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P_:()=>l,Mt:()=>g,C5:()=>s,DL:()=>v,OP:()=>T,lF:()=>D,Yu:()=>y,Dg:()=>h,CX:()=>c,GE:()=>b,sU:()=>_});var n=r(8632),i=r(9567);const o={beacon:n.ce.beacon,errorBeacon:n.ce.errorBeacon,licenseKey:void 0,applicationID:void 0,sa:void 0,queueTime:void 0,applicationTime:void 0,ttGuid:void 0,user:void 0,account:void 0,product:void 0,extra:void 0,jsAttributes:{},userAttributes:void 0,atts:void 0,transactionName:void 0,tNamePlain:void 0},a={};function s(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");if(!a[e])throw new Error("Info for ".concat(e," was never set"));return a[e]}function c(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");a[e]=(0,i.D)(t,o),(0,n.Qy)(e,a[e],"info")}var u=r(7056);const d=()=>{const e={blockSelector:"[data-nr-block]",maskInputOptions:{password:!0}};return{allow_bfcache:!0,privacy:{cookies_enabled:!0},ajax:{deny_list:void 0,enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},distributed_tracing:{enabled:void 0,exclude_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_tracecontext_headers:void 0,allowed_origins:void 0},session:{domain:void 0,expiresMs:u.oD,inactiveMs:u.Hb},ssl:void 0,obfuscate:void 0,jserrors:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},metrics:{enabled:!0},page_action:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30},page_view_event:{enabled:!0},page_view_timing:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30,long_task:!1},session_trace:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},harvest:{tooManyRequestsDelay:60},session_replay:{enabled:!1,harvestTimeSeconds:60,sampleRate:.1,errorSampleRate:.1,maskTextSelector:"*",maskAllInputs:!0,get blockClass(){return"nr-block"},get ignoreClass(){return"nr-ignore"},get maskTextClass(){return"nr-mask"},get blockSelector(){return e.blockSelector},set blockSelector(t){e.blockSelector+=",".concat(t)},get maskInputOptions(){return e.maskInputOptions},set maskInputOptions(t){e.maskInputOptions={...t,password:!0}}},spa:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10}}},f={};function l(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");if(!f[e])throw new Error("Configuration for ".concat(e," was never set"));return f[e]}function h(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");f[e]=(0,i.D)(t,d()),(0,n.Qy)(e,f[e],"config")}function g(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");var r=l(e);if(r){for(var n=t.split("."),i=0;i {r.d(t,{D:()=>i});var n=r(50);function i(e,t){try{if(!e||"object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires an object as input");if(!t||"object"!=typeof t)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires a model to set its initial properties");const r=Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(t),Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)),o=0===Object.keys(r).length?e:r;for(let a in o)if(void 0!==e[a])try{"object"==typeof e[a]&&"object"==typeof t[a]?r[a]=i(e[a],t[a]):r[a]=e[a]}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occurred while setting a property of a Configurable",e)}return r}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting a Configurable",e)}}},6818:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Re:()=>i,gF:()=>o,q4:()=>n});const n="1.236.0",i="PROD",o="CDN"},385:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{FN:()=>a,IF:()=>u,Nk:()=>f,Tt:()=>s,_A:()=>o,il:()=>n,pL:()=>c,v6:()=>i,w1:()=>d});const n="undefined"!=typeof window&&!!window.document,i="undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator),o=n?window:"undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis),a=""+o?.location,s=/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(navigator.userAgent),c=s&&"undefined"==typeof SharedWorker,u=(()=>{const e=navigator.userAgent.match(/Firefox[/\s](\d+\.\d+)/);return Array.isArray(e)&&e.length>=2?+e[1]:0})(),d=Boolean(n&&window.document.documentMode),f=!!navigator.sendBeacon},1117:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{w:()=>o});var n=r(50);const i={agentIdentifier:"",ee:void 0};class o{constructor(e){try{if("object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("shared context requires an object as input");this.sharedContext={},Object.assign(this.sharedContext,i),Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,r]=e;Object.keys(i).includes(t)&&(this.sharedContext[t]=r)}))}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting SharedContext",e)}}}},8e3:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{L:()=>d,R:()=>c});var n=r(2177),i=r(1284),o=r(4322),a=r(3325);const s={};function c(e,t){const r={staged:!1,priority:a.p[t]||0};u(e),s[e].get(t)||s[e].set(t,r)}function u(e){e&&(s[e]||(s[e]=new Map))}function d(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:"",t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:"feature";if(u(e),!e||!s[e].get(t))return a(t);s[e].get(t).staged=!0;const r=[...s[e]];function a(t){const r=e?n.ee.get(e):n.ee,a=o.X.handlers;if(r.backlog&&a){var s=r.backlog[t],c=a[t];if(c){for(var u=0;s&&u {let[t,r]=e;return r.staged}))&&(r.sort(((e,t)=>e[1].priority-t[1].priority)),r.forEach((e=>{let[t]=e;a(t)})))}function f(e,t){var r=e[1];(0,i.D)(t[r],(function(t,r){var n=e[0];if(r[0]===n){var i=r[1],o=e[3],a=e[2];i.apply(o,a)}}))}},2177:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{c:()=>f,ee:()=>u});var n=r(8632),i=r(2210),o=r(1284),a=r(5763),s="nr@context";let c=(0,n.fP)();var u;function d(){}function f(e){return(0,i.X)(e,s,l)}function l(){return new d}function h(){u.aborted=!0,u.backlog={}}c.ee?u=c.ee:(u=function e(t,r){var n={},c={},f={},g=!1;try{g=16===r.length&&(0,a.OP)(r).isolatedBacklog}catch(e){}var p={on:b,addEventListener:b,removeEventListener:y,emit:v,get:x,listeners:w,context:m,buffer:A,abort:h,aborted:!1,isBuffering:E,debugId:r,backlog:g?{}:t&&"object"==typeof t.backlog?t.backlog:{}};return p;function m(e){return e&&e instanceof d?e:e?(0,i.X)(e,s,l):l()}function v(e,r,n,i,o){if(!1!==o&&(o=!0),!u.aborted||i){t&&o&&t.emit(e,r,n);for(var a=m(n),s=w(e),d=s.length,f=0;fn,p:()=>i});var n=r(2177).ee.get("handle");function i(e,t,r,i,o){o?(o.buffer([e],i),o.emit(e,t,r)):(n.buffer([e],i),n.emit(e,t,r))}},4322:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>o});var n=r(5546);o.on=a;var i=o.handlers={};function o(e,t,r,o){a(o||n.E,i,e,t,r)}function a(e,t,r,i,o){o||(o="feature"),e||(e=n.E);var a=t[o]=t[o]||{};(a[r]=a[r]||[]).push([e,i])}},3239:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{bP:()=>s,iz:()=>c,m$:()=>a});var n=r(385);let i=!1,o=!1;try{const e={get passive(){return i=!0,!1},get signal(){return o=!0,!1}};n._A.addEventListener("test",null,e),n._A.removeEventListener("test",null,e)}catch(e){}function a(e,t){return i||o?{capture:!!e,passive:i,signal:t}:!!e}function s(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;window.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}function c(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;document.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}},4402:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Ht:()=>u,M:()=>c,Rl:()=>a,ky:()=>s});var n=r(385);const i="xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx";function o(e,t){return e?15&e[t]:16*Math.random()|0}function a(){const e=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let t,r=0;return e&&e.getRandomValues&&(t=e.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31))),i.split("").map((e=>"x"===e?o(t,++r).toString(16):"y"===e?(3&o()|8).toString(16):e)).join("")}function s(e){const t=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let r,i=0;t&&t.getRandomValues&&(r=t.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31)));const a=[];for(var s=0;s {r.d(t,{Bq:()=>n,Hb:()=>o,oD:()=>i});const n="NRBA",i=144e5,o=18e5},7894:(e,t,r)=>{function n(){return Math.round(performance.now())}r.d(t,{z:()=>n})},7243:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{e:()=>o});var n=r(385),i={};function o(e){if(e in i)return i[e];if(0===(e||"").indexOf("data:"))return{protocol:"data"};let t;var r=n._A?.location,o={};if(n.il)t=document.createElement("a"),t.href=e;else try{t=new URL(e,r.href)}catch(e){return o}o.port=t.port;var a=t.href.split("://");!o.port&&a[1]&&(o.port=a[1].split("/")[0].split("@").pop().split(":")[1]),o.port&&"0"!==o.port||(o.port="https"===a[0]?"443":"80"),o.hostname=t.hostname||r.hostname,o.pathname=t.pathname,o.protocol=a[0],"/"!==o.pathname.charAt(0)&&(o.pathname="/"+o.pathname);var s=!t.protocol||":"===t.protocol||t.protocol===r.protocol,c=t.hostname===r.hostname&&t.port===r.port;return o.sameOrigin=s&&(!t.hostname||c),"/"===o.pathname&&(i[e]=o),o}},50:(e,t,r)=>{function n(e,t){"function"==typeof console.warn&&(console.warn("New Relic: ".concat(e)),t&&console.warn(t))}r.d(t,{Z:()=>n})},2587:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>c,T:()=>u});var n=r(2177),i=r(5546),o=r(8e3),a=r(3325);const s={stn:[a.D.sessionTrace],err:[a.D.jserrors,a.D.metrics],ins:[a.D.pageAction],spa:[a.D.spa],sr:[a.D.sessionReplay,a.D.sessionTrace]};function c(e,t){const r=n.ee.get(t);e&&"object"==typeof e&&(Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,n]=e;void 0===u[t]&&(s[t]?s[t].forEach((e=>{n?(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,e,r):(0,i.p)("block-"+t,[],void 0,e,r),(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+t,[Boolean(n)],void 0,e,r)})):n&&(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,void 0,r),u[t]=Boolean(n))})),Object.keys(s).forEach((e=>{void 0===u[e]&&(s[e]?.forEach((t=>(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+e,[!1],void 0,t,r))),u[e]=!1)})),(0,o.L)(t,a.D.pageViewEvent))}const u={}},2210:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>i});var n=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty;function i(e,t,r){if(n.call(e,t))return e[t];var i=r();if(Object.defineProperty&&Object.keys)try{return Object.defineProperty(e,t,{value:i,writable:!0,enumerable:!1}),i}catch(e){}return e[t]=i,i}},1284:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n});const n=(e,t)=>Object.entries(e||{}).map((e=>{let[r,n]=e;return t(r,n)}))},4351:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P:()=>o});var n=r(2177);const i=()=>{const e=new WeakSet;return(t,r)=>{if("object"==typeof r&&null!==r){if(e.has(r))return;e.add(r)}return r}};function o(e){try{return JSON.stringify(e,i())}catch(e){try{n.ee.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}}},3960:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{K:()=>a,b:()=>o});var n=r(3239);function i(){return"undefined"==typeof document||"complete"===document.readyState}function o(e,t){if(i())return e();(0,n.bP)("load",e,t)}function a(e){if(i())return e();(0,n.iz)("DOMContentLoaded",e)}},8632:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{EZ:()=>u,Qy:()=>c,ce:()=>o,fP:()=>a,gG:()=>d,mF:()=>s});var n=r(7894),i=r(385);const o={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net"};function a(){return i._A.NREUM||(i._A.NREUM={}),void 0===i._A.newrelic&&(i._A.newrelic=i._A.NREUM),i._A.NREUM}function s(){let e=a();return e.o||(e.o={ST:i._A.setTimeout,SI:i._A.setImmediate,CT:i._A.clearTimeout,XHR:i._A.XMLHttpRequest,REQ:i._A.Request,EV:i._A.Event,PR:i._A.Promise,MO:i._A.MutationObserver,FETCH:i._A.fetch}),e}function c(e,t,r){let i=a();const o=i.initializedAgents||{},s=o[e]||{};return Object.keys(s).length||(s.initializedAt={ms:(0,n.z)(),date:new Date}),i.initializedAgents={...o,[e]:{...s,[r]:t}},i}function u(e,t){a()[e]=t}function d(){return function(){let e=a();const t=e.info||{};e.info={beacon:o.beacon,errorBeacon:o.errorBeacon,...t}}(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.init||{};e.init={...t}}(),s(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.loader_config||{};e.loader_config={...t}}(),a()}},7956:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>i});var n=r(3239);function i(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1],r=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,i=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;return void(0,n.iz)("visibilitychange",(function(){if(t)return void("hidden"==document.visibilityState&&e());e(document.visibilityState)}),r,i)}},1214:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{em:()=>v,u5:()=>N,QU:()=>S,_L:()=>I,Gm:()=>L,Lg:()=>M,gy:()=>U,BV:()=>Q,Kf:()=>ee});var n=r(2177);const i="nr@original";var o=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,a=!1;function s(e,t){return e||(e=n.ee),r.inPlace=function(e,t,n,i,o){n||(n="");var a,s,c,u="-"===n.charAt(0);for(c=0;c 2?n-2:0),o=2;o {r(A[T],e,w),r(E[T],e,w)})),r(l._A,"fetch",y),t.on(y+"end",(function(e,r){var n=this;if(r){var i=r.headers.get("content-length");null!==i&&(n.rxSize=i),t.emit(y+"done",[null,r],n)}else t.emit(y+"done",[e],n)})),t}const O={},j=["pushState","replaceState"];function S(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("history")}(e);return!l.il||O[t.debugId]++||(O[t.debugId]=1,s(t).inPlace(window.history,j,"-")),t}var P=r(3239);const C={},R=["appendChild","insertBefore","replaceChild"];function I(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("jsonp")}(e);if(!l.il||C[t.debugId])return t;C[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=/[?&](?:callback|cb)=([^&#]+)/,o=/(.*)\.([^.]+)/,a=/^(\w+)(\.|$)(.*)$/;function c(e,t){var r=e.match(a),n=r[1],i=r[3];return i?c(i,t[n]):t[n]}return r.inPlace(Node.prototype,R,"dom-"),t.on("dom-start",(function(e){!function(e){if(!e||"string"!=typeof e.nodeName||"script"!==e.nodeName.toLowerCase())return;if("function"!=typeof e.addEventListener)return;var n=(a=e.src,s=a.match(i),s?s[1]:null);var a,s;if(!n)return;var u=function(e){var t=e.match(o);if(t&&t.length>=3)return{key:t[2],parent:c(t[1],window)};return{key:e,parent:window}}(n);if("function"!=typeof u.parent[u.key])return;var d={};function f(){t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}function l(){t.emit("jsonp-error",[],d),t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}r.inPlace(u.parent,[u.key],"cb-",d),e.addEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.addEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1)),t.emit("new-jsonp",[e.src],d)}(e[0])})),t}var k=r(5763);const H={};function L(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("mutation")}(e);if(!l.il||H[t.debugId])return t;H[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=k.Yu.MO;return i&&(window.MutationObserver=function(e){return this instanceof i?new i(r(e,"fn-")):i.apply(this,arguments)},MutationObserver.prototype=i.prototype),t}const z={};function M(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("promise")}(e);if(z[t.debugId])return t;z[t.debugId]=!0;var r=n.c,o=s(t),a=k.Yu.PR;return a&&function(){function e(r){var n=t.context(),i=o(r,"executor-",n,null,!1);const s=Reflect.construct(a,[i],e);return t.context(s).getCtx=function(){return n},s}l._A.Promise=e,Object.defineProperty(e,"name",{value:"Promise"}),e.toString=function(){return a.toString()},Object.setPrototypeOf(e,a),["all","race"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){let i=!1;[...e||[]].forEach((e=>{this.resolve(e).then(a("all"===r),a(!1))}));const o=n.apply(this,arguments);return o;function a(e){return function(){t.emit("propagate",[null,!i],o,!1,!1),i=i||!e}}}})),["resolve","reject"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){const r=n.apply(this,arguments);return e!==r&&t.emit("propagate",[e,!0],r,!1,!1),r}})),e.prototype=a.prototype;const n=a.prototype.then;a.prototype.then=function(){var e=this,i=r(e);i.promise=e;for(var a=arguments.length,s=new Array(a),c=0;c e())),t};function m(e,t){i.inPlace(t,["onreadystatechange"],"fn-",E)}function b(){var e=this,t=r.context(e);e.readyState>3&&!t.resolved&&(t.resolved=!0,r.emit("xhr-resolved",[],e)),i.inPlace(e,f,"fn-",E)}if(function(e,t){for(var r in e)t[r]=e[r]}(o,p),p.prototype=o.prototype,i.inPlace(p.prototype,J,"-xhr-",E),r.on("send-xhr-start",(function(e,t){m(e,t),function(e){h.push(e),a&&(y?y.then(A):u?u(A):(w=-w,x.data=w))}(t)})),r.on("open-xhr-start",m),a){var y=c&&c.resolve();if(!u&&!c){var w=1,x=document.createTextNode(w);new a(A).observe(x,{characterData:!0})}}else t.on("fn-end",(function(e){e[0]&&e[0].type===d||A()}));function A(){for(var e=0;e {r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.ajax},6660:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{A:()=>i,t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.jserrors,i="nr@seenError"},3081:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{gF:()=>o,mY:()=>i,t9:()=>n,vz:()=>s,xS:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.metrics,i="sm",o="cm",a="storeSupportabilityMetrics",s="storeEventMetrics"},4649:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageAction},7633:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Dz:()=>i,OJ:()=>a,qw:()=>o,t9:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewEvent,i="firstbyte",o="domcontent",a="windowload"},9251:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewTiming},3614:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BST_RESOURCE:()=>i,END:()=>s,FEATURE_NAME:()=>n,FN_END:()=>u,FN_START:()=>c,PUSH_STATE:()=>d,RESOURCE:()=>o,START:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.sessionTrace,i="bstResource",o="resource",a="-start",s="-end",c="fn"+a,u="fn"+s,d="pushState"},7836:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BODY:()=>A,CB_END:()=>E,CB_START:()=>u,END:()=>x,FEATURE_NAME:()=>i,FETCH:()=>_,FETCH_BODY:()=>v,FETCH_DONE:()=>m,FETCH_START:()=>p,FN_END:()=>c,FN_START:()=>s,INTERACTION:()=>l,INTERACTION_API:()=>d,INTERACTION_EVENTS:()=>o,JSONP_END:()=>b,JSONP_NODE:()=>g,JS_TIME:()=>T,MAX_TIMER_BUDGET:()=>a,REMAINING:()=>f,SPA_NODE:()=>h,START:()=>w,originalSetTimeout:()=>y});var n=r(5763);const i=r(3325).D.spa,o=["click","submit","keypress","keydown","keyup","change"],a=999,s="fn-start",c="fn-end",u="cb-start",d="api-ixn-",f="remaining",l="interaction",h="spaNode",g="jsonpNode",p="fetch-start",m="fetch-done",v="fetch-body-",b="jsonp-end",y=n.Yu.ST,w="-start",x="-end",A="-body",E="cb"+x,T="jsTime",_="fetch"},5938:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{W:()=>o});var n=r(5763),i=r(2177);class o{constructor(e,t,r){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.aggregator=t,this.ee=i.ee.get(e,(0,n.OP)(this.agentIdentifier).isolatedBacklog),this.featureName=r,this.blocked=!1}}},9144:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{j:()=>m});var n=r(3325),i=r(5763),o=r(5546),a=r(2177),s=r(7894),c=r(8e3),u=r(3960),d=r(385),f=r(50),l=r(3081),h=r(8632);function g(){const e=(0,h.gG)();["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease","addPageAction","setCurrentRouteName","setPageViewName","setCustomAttribute","interaction","noticeError","setUserId"].forEach((t=>{e[t]=function(){for(var r=arguments.length,n=new Array(r),i=0;i 1?r-1:0),i=1;i {e.exposed&&e.api[t]&&o.push(e.api[t](...n))})),o.length>1?o:o[0]}(t,...n)}}))}var p=r(2587);function m(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:{},m=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,v=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0,{init:b,info:y,loader_config:w,runtime:x={loaderType:m},exposed:A=!0}=t;const E=(0,h.gG)();y||(b=E.init,y=E.info,w=E.loader_config),(0,i.Dg)(e,b||{}),(0,i.GE)(e,w||{}),(0,i.sU)(e,x),y.jsAttributes??={},d.v6&&(y.jsAttributes.isWorker=!0),(0,i.CX)(e,y),g();const T=function(e,t){t||(0,c.R)(e,"api");const h={};var g=a.ee.get(e),p=g.get("tracer"),m="api-",v=m+"ixn-";function b(t,r,n,o){const a=(0,i.C5)(e);return null===r?delete a.jsAttributes[t]:(0,i.CX)(e,{...a,jsAttributes:{...a.jsAttributes,[t]:r}}),x(m,n,!0,o||null===r?"session":void 0)(t,r)}function y(){}["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease"].forEach((e=>h[e]=x(m,e,!0,"api"))),h.addPageAction=x(m,"addPageAction",!0,n.D.pageAction),h.setCurrentRouteName=x(m,"routeName",!0,n.D.spa),h.setPageViewName=function(t,r){if("string"==typeof t)return"/"!==t.charAt(0)&&(t="/"+t),(0,i.OP)(e).customTransaction=(r||"http://custom.transaction")+t,x(m,"setPageViewName",!0)()},h.setCustomAttribute=function(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2];if("string"==typeof e){if(["string","number"].includes(typeof t)||null===t)return b(e,t,"setCustomAttribute",r);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nNon-null value must be a string or number type, but a type of was provided."))}else(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nName must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.setUserId=function(e){if("string"==typeof e||null===e)return b("enduser.id",e,"setUserId",!0);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setUserId.\nNon-null value must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.interaction=function(){return(new y).get()};var w=y.prototype={createTracer:function(e,t){var r={},i=this,a="function"==typeof t;return(0,o.p)(v+"tracer",[(0,s.z)(),e,r],i,n.D.spa,g),function(){if(p.emit((a?"":"no-")+"fn-start",[(0,s.z)(),i,a],r),a)try{return t.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw p.emit("fn-err",[arguments,this,"string"==typeof e?new Error(e):e],r),e}finally{p.emit("fn-end",[(0,s.z)()],r)}}}};function x(e,t,r,i){return function(){return(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/"+t+"/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),i&&(0,o.p)(e+t,[(0,s.z)(),...arguments],r?null:this,i,g),r?void 0:this}}function A(){r.e(439).then(r.bind(r,7438)).then((t=>{let{setAPI:r}=t;r(e),(0,c.L)(e,"api")})).catch((()=>(0,f.Z)("Downloading runtime APIs failed...")))}return["actionText","setName","setAttribute","save","ignore","onEnd","getContext","end","get"].forEach((e=>{w[e]=x(v,e,void 0,n.D.spa)})),h.noticeError=function(e,t){"string"==typeof e&&(e=new Error(e)),(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/noticeError/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),(0,o.p)("err",[e,(0,s.z)(),!1,t],void 0,n.D.jserrors,g)},d.il?(0,u.b)((()=>A()),!0):A(),h}(e,v);return(0,h.Qy)(e,T,"api"),(0,h.Qy)(e,A,"exposed"),(0,h.EZ)("activatedFeatures",p.T),T}},3325:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n,p:()=>i});const n={ajax:"ajax",jserrors:"jserrors",metrics:"metrics",pageAction:"page_action",pageViewEvent:"page_view_event",pageViewTiming:"page_view_timing",sessionReplay:"session_replay",sessionTrace:"session_trace",spa:"spa"},i={[n.pageViewEvent]:1,[n.pageViewTiming]:2,[n.metrics]:3,[n.jserrors]:4,[n.ajax]:5,[n.sessionTrace]:6,[n.pageAction]:7,[n.spa]:8,[n.sessionReplay]:9}}},n={};function i(e){var t=n[e];if(void 0!==t)return t.exports;var o=n[e]={exports:{}};return r[e](o,o.exports,i),o.exports}i.m=r,i.d=(e,t)=>{for(var r in t)i.o(t,r)&&!i.o(e,r)&&Object.defineProperty(e,r,{enumerable:!0,get:t[r]})},i.f={},i.e=e=>Promise.all(Object.keys(i.f).reduce(((t,r)=>(i.f[r](e,t),t)),[])),i.u=e=>(({78:"page_action-aggregate",147:"metrics-aggregate",242:"session-manager",317:"jserrors-aggregate",348:"page_view_timing-aggregate",412:"lazy-feature-loader",439:"async-api",538:"recorder",590:"session_replay-aggregate",675:"compressor",733:"session_trace-aggregate",786:"page_view_event-aggregate",873:"spa-aggregate",898:"ajax-aggregate"}[e]||e)+"."+{78:"ac76d497",147:"3dc53903",148:"1a20d5fe",242:"2a64278a",317:"49e41428",348:"bd6de33a",412:"2f55ce66",439:"30bd804e",538:"1b18459f",590:"cf0efb30",675:"ae9f91a8",733:"83105561",786:"06482edd",860:"03a8b7a5",873:"e6b09d52",898:"998ef92b"}[e]+"-1.236.0.min.js"),i.o=(e,t)=>Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,t),e={},t="NRBA:",i.l=(r,n,o,a)=>{if(e[r])e[r].push(n);else{var s,c;if(void 0!==o)for(var u=document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=0;d {s.onerror=s.onload=null,clearTimeout(h);var i=e[r];if(delete e[r],s.parentNode&&s.parentNode.removeChild(s),i&&i.forEach((e=>e(n))),t)return t(n)},h=setTimeout(l.bind(null,void 0,{type:"timeout",target:s}),12e4);s.onerror=l.bind(null,s.onerror),s.onload=l.bind(null,s.onload),c&&document.head.appendChild(s)}},i.r=e=>{"undefined"!=typeof Symbol&&Symbol.toStringTag&&Object.defineProperty(e,Symbol.toStringTag,{value:"Module"}),Object.defineProperty(e,"__esModule",{value:!0})},i.j=364,i.p="https://js-agent.newrelic.com/",(()=>{var e={364:0,953:0};i.f.j=(t,r)=>{var n=i.o(e,t)?e[t]:void 0;if(0!==n)if(n)r.push(n[2]);else{var o=new Promise(((r,i)=>n=e[t]=[r,i]));r.push(n[2]=o);var a=i.p+i.u(t),s=new Error;i.l(a,(r=>{if(i.o(e,t)&&(0!==(n=e[t])&&(e[t]=void 0),n)){var o=r&&("load"===r.type?"missing":r.type),a=r&&r.target&&r.target.src;s.message="Loading chunk "+t+" failed.\n("+o+": "+a+")",s.name="ChunkLoadError",s.type=o,s.request=a,n[1](s)}}),"chunk-"+t,t)}};var t=(t,r)=>{var n,o,[a,s,c]=r,u=0;if(a.some((t=>0!==e[t]))){for(n in s)i.o(s,n)&&(i.m[n]=s[n]);if(c)c(i)}for(t&&t(r);u {i.r(o);var e=i(3325),t=i(5763);const r=Object.values(e.D);function n(e){const n={};return r.forEach((r=>{n[r]=function(e,r){return!1!==(0,t.Mt)(r,"".concat(e,".enabled"))}(r,e)})),n}var a=i(9144);var s=i(5546),c=i(385),u=i(8e3),d=i(5938),f=i(3960),l=i(50);class h extends d.W{constructor(e,t,r){let n=!(arguments.length>3&&void 0!==arguments[3])||arguments[3];super(e,t,r),this.auto=n,this.abortHandler,this.featAggregate,this.onAggregateImported,n&&(0,u.R)(e,r)}importAggregator(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:{};if(this.featAggregate||!this.auto)return;const r=c.il&&!0===(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"privacy.cookies_enabled");let n;this.onAggregateImported=new Promise((e=>{n=e}));const o=async()=>{let t;try{if(r){const{setupAgentSession:e}=await Promise.all([i.e(860),i.e(242)]).then(i.bind(i,3228));t=e(this.agentIdentifier)}}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("A problem occurred when starting up session manager. This page will not start or extend any session.",e)}try{if(!this.shouldImportAgg(this.featureName,t))return void(0,u.L)(this.agentIdentifier,this.featureName);const{lazyFeatureLoader:r}=await i.e(412).then(i.bind(i,8582)),{Aggregate:o}=await r(this.featureName,"aggregate");this.featAggregate=new o(this.agentIdentifier,this.aggregator,e),n(!0)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Downloading and initializing ".concat(this.featureName," failed..."),e),this.abortHandler?.(),n(!1)}};c.il?(0,f.b)((()=>o()),!0):o()}shouldImportAgg(r,n){return r!==e.D.sessionReplay||!1!==(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"session_trace.enabled")&&(!!n?.isNew||!!n?.state.sessionReplay)}}var g=i(7633),p=i(7894);class m extends h{static featureName=g.t9;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];if(super(r,n,g.t9,i),("undefined"==typeof PerformanceNavigationTiming||c.Tt)&&"undefined"!=typeof PerformanceTiming){const n=(0,t.OP)(r);n[g.Dz]=Math.max(Date.now()-n.offset,0),(0,f.K)((()=>n[g.qw]=Math.max((0,p.z)()-n[g.Dz],0))),(0,f.b)((()=>{const t=(0,p.z)();n[g.OJ]=Math.max(t-n[g.Dz],0),(0,s.p)("timing",["load",t],void 0,e.D.pageViewTiming,this.ee)}))}this.importAggregator()}}var v=i(1117),b=i(1284);class y extends v.w{constructor(e){super(e),this.aggregatedData={}}store(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,r,i);return o.metrics=function(e,t){t||(t={count:0});return t.count+=1,(0,b.D)(e,(function(e,r){t[e]=w(r,t[e])})),t}(n,o.metrics),o}merge(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,n,i);if(o.metrics){var a=o.metrics;a.count+=r.count,(0,b.D)(r,(function(e,t){if("count"!==e){var n=a[e],i=r[e];i&&!i.c?a[e]=w(i.t,n):a[e]=function(e,t){if(!t)return e;t.c||(t=x(t.t));return t.min=Math.min(e.min,t.min),t.max=Math.max(e.max,t.max),t.t+=e.t,t.sos+=e.sos,t.c+=e.c,t}(i,a[e])}}))}else o.metrics=r}storeMetric(e,t,r,n){var i=this.getBucket(e,t,r);return i.stats=w(n,i.stats),i}getBucket(e,t,r,n){this.aggregatedData[e]||(this.aggregatedData[e]={});var i=this.aggregatedData[e][t];return i||(i=this.aggregatedData[e][t]={params:r||{}},n&&(i.custom=n)),i}get(e,t){return t?this.aggregatedData[e]&&this.aggregatedData[e][t]:this.aggregatedData[e]}take(e){for(var t={},r="",n=!1,i=0;i t.max&&(t.max=e),e 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,r,j.t,n),c.il&&((0,t.OP)(e).initHidden=Boolean("hidden"===document.visibilityState),(0,N.N)((()=>(0,s.p)("docHidden",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee)),!0),(0,O.bP)("pagehide",(()=>(0,s.p)("winPagehide",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee))),this.importAggregator())}}var P=i(3081);class C extends h{static featureName=P.t9;constructor(e,t){let r=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,P.t9,r),this.importAggregator()}}var R,I=i(2210),k=i(1214),H=i(2177),L={};try{R=localStorage.getItem("__nr_flags").split(","),console&&"function"==typeof console.log&&(L.console=!0,-1!==R.indexOf("dev")&&(L.dev=!0),-1!==R.indexOf("nr_dev")&&(L.nrDev=!0))}catch(e){}function z(e){try{L.console&&z(e)}catch(e){}}L.nrDev&&H.ee.on("internal-error",(function(e){z(e.stack)})),L.dev&&H.ee.on("fn-err",(function(e,t,r){z(r.stack)})),L.dev&&(z("NR AGENT IN DEVELOPMENT MODE"),z("flags: "+(0,b.D)(L,(function(e,t){return e})).join(", ")));var M=i(6660);class B extends h{static featureName=M.t;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,M.t,i),this.skipNext=0;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}const o=this;o.ee.on("fn-start",(function(e,t,r){o.abortHandler&&(o.skipNext+=1)})),o.ee.on("fn-err",(function(t,r,n){o.abortHandler&&!n[M.A]&&((0,I.X)(n,M.A,(function(){return!0})),this.thrown=!0,(0,s.p)("err",[n,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee))})),o.ee.on("fn-end",(function(){o.abortHandler&&!this.thrown&&o.skipNext>0&&(o.skipNext-=1)})),o.ee.on("internal-error",(function(t){(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee)})),this.origOnerror=c._A.onerror,c._A.onerror=this.onerrorHandler.bind(this),c._A.addEventListener("unhandledrejection",(t=>{const r=function(e){let t="Unhandled Promise Rejection: ";if(e instanceof Error)try{return e.message=t+e.message,e}catch(t){return e}if(void 0===e)return new Error(t);try{return new Error(t+(0,D.P)(e))}catch(e){return new Error(t)}}(t.reason);(0,s.p)("err",[r,(0,p.z)(),!1,{unhandledPromiseRejection:1}],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}),(0,O.m$)(!1,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),(0,k.gy)(this.ee),(0,k.BV)(this.ee),(0,k.em)(this.ee),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}onerrorHandler(t,r,n,i,o){"function"==typeof this.origOnerror&&this.origOnerror(...arguments);try{this.skipNext?this.skipNext-=1:(0,s.p)("err",[o||new F(t,r,n),(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(t){try{(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(e){}}return!1}}function F(e,t,r){this.message=e||"Uncaught error with no additional information",this.sourceURL=t,this.line=r}let U=1;const q="nr@id";function G(e){const t=typeof e;return!e||"object"!==t&&"function"!==t?-1:e===c._A?0:(0,I.X)(e,q,(function(){return U++}))}function V(e){if("string"==typeof e&&e.length)return e.length;if("object"==typeof e){if("undefined"!=typeof ArrayBuffer&&e instanceof ArrayBuffer&&e.byteLength)return e.byteLength;if("undefined"!=typeof Blob&&e instanceof Blob&&e.size)return e.size;if(!("undefined"!=typeof FormData&&e instanceof FormData))try{return(0,D.P)(e).length}catch(e){return}}}var X=i(7243);class W{constructor(e){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.generateTracePayload=this.generateTracePayload.bind(this),this.shouldGenerateTrace=this.shouldGenerateTrace.bind(this)}generateTracePayload(e){if(!this.shouldGenerateTrace(e))return null;var r=(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier);if(!r)return null;var n=(r.accountID||"").toString()||null,i=(r.agentID||"").toString()||null,o=(r.trustKey||"").toString()||null;if(!n||!i)return null;var a=(0,_.M)(),s=(0,_.Ht)(),c=Date.now(),u={spanId:a,traceId:s,timestamp:c};return(e.sameOrigin||this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useTraceContextHeadersForCors())&&(u.traceContextParentHeader=this.generateTraceContextParentHeader(a,s),u.traceContextStateHeader=this.generateTraceContextStateHeader(a,c,n,i,o)),(e.sameOrigin&&!this.excludeNewrelicHeader()||!e.sameOrigin&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useNewrelicHeaderForCors())&&(u.newrelicHeader=this.generateTraceHeader(a,s,c,n,i,o)),u}generateTraceContextParentHeader(e,t){return"00-"+t+"-"+e+"-01"}generateTraceContextStateHeader(e,t,r,n,i){return i+"@nr=0-1-"+r+"-"+n+"-"+e+"----"+t}generateTraceHeader(e,t,r,n,i,o){if(!("function"==typeof c._A?.btoa))return null;var a={v:[0,1],d:{ty:"Browser",ac:n,ap:i,id:e,tr:t,ti:r}};return o&&n!==o&&(a.d.tk=o),btoa((0,D.P)(a))}shouldGenerateTrace(e){return this.isDtEnabled()&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)}isAllowedOrigin(e){var r=!1,n={};if((0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"distributed_tracing")&&(n=(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier).distributed_tracing),e.sameOrigin)r=!0;else if(n.allowed_origins instanceof Array)for(var i=0;i 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,Z.t,i),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(this.dt=new W(r),this.handler=(e,t,r,n)=>(0,s.p)(e,t,r,n,this.ee),(0,k.u5)(this.ee),(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),function(r,n,i,o){function a(e){var t=this;t.totalCbs=0,t.called=0,t.cbTime=0,t.end=E,t.ended=!1,t.xhrGuids={},t.lastSize=null,t.loadCaptureCalled=!1,t.params=this.params||{},t.metrics=this.metrics||{},e.addEventListener("load",(function(r){_(t,e)}),(0,O.m$)(!1)),c.IF||e.addEventListener("progress",(function(e){t.lastSize=e.loaded}),(0,O.m$)(!1))}function s(e){this.params={method:e[0]},T(this,e[1]),this.metrics={}}function u(e,n){var i=(0,t.DL)(r);i.xpid&&this.sameOrigin&&n.setRequestHeader("X-NewRelic-ID",i.xpid);var a=o.generateTracePayload(this.parsedOrigin);if(a){var s=!1;a.newrelicHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("newrelic",a.newrelicHeader),s=!0),a.traceContextParentHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("traceparent",a.traceContextParentHeader),a.traceContextStateHeader&&n.setRequestHeader("tracestate",a.traceContextStateHeader),s=!0),s&&(this.dt=a)}}function d(e,t){var r=this.metrics,i=e[0],o=this;if(r&&i){var a=V(i);a&&(r.txSize=a)}this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.listener=function(e){try{"abort"!==e.type||o.loadCaptureCalled||(o.params.aborted=!0),("load"!==e.type||o.called===o.totalCbs&&(o.onloadCalled||"function"!=typeof t.onload)&&"function"==typeof o.end)&&o.end(t)}catch(e){try{n.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}};for(var s=0;s 1?e[1]=i:e.push(i)}else e[0]&&e[0].headers&&s(e[0].headers,n)&&(this.dt=n);function s(e,t){var r=!1;return t.newrelicHeader&&(e.set("newrelic",t.newrelicHeader),r=!0),t.traceContextParentHeader&&(e.set("traceparent",t.traceContextParentHeader),t.traceContextStateHeader&&e.set("tracestate",t.traceContextStateHeader),r=!0),r}}function x(e,t){this.params={},this.metrics={},this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.dt=t,e.length>=1&&(this.target=e[0]),e.length>=2&&(this.opts=e[1]);var r,n=this.opts||{},i=this.target;"string"==typeof i?r=i:"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof Y?r=i.url:c._A?.URL&&"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof URL&&(r=i.href),T(this,r);var o=(""+(i&&i instanceof Y&&i.method||n.method||"GET")).toUpperCase();this.params.method=o,this.txSize=V(n.body)||0}function A(t,r){var n;this.endTime=(0,p.z)(),this.params||(this.params={}),this.params.status=r?r.status:0,"string"==typeof this.rxSize&&this.rxSize.length>0&&(n=+this.rxSize);var o={txSize:this.txSize,rxSize:n,duration:(0,p.z)()-this.startTime};i("xhr",[this.params,o,this.startTime,this.endTime,"fetch"],this,e.D.ajax)}function E(t){var r=this.params,n=this.metrics;if(!this.ended){this.ended=!0;for(var o=0;o 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,we.t,r),this.importAggregator()}}new class{constructor(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:(0,_.ky)(16);c._A?(this.agentIdentifier=t,this.sharedAggregator=new y({agentIdentifier:this.agentIdentifier}),this.features={},this.desiredFeatures=new Set(e.features||[]),this.desiredFeatures.add(m),Object.assign(this,(0,a.j)(this.agentIdentifier,e,e.loaderType||"agent")),this.start()):(0,l.Z)("Failed to initial the agent. Could not determine the runtime environment.")}get config(){return{info:(0,t.C5)(this.agentIdentifier),init:(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier),loader_config:(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier),runtime:(0,t.OP)(this.agentIdentifier)}}start(){const t="features";try{const r=n(this.agentIdentifier),i=[...this.desiredFeatures];i.sort(((t,r)=>e.p[t.featureName]-e.p[r.featureName])),i.forEach((t=>{if(r[t.featureName]||t.featureName===e.D.pageViewEvent){const n=function(t){switch(t){case e.D.ajax:return[e.D.jserrors];case e.D.sessionTrace:return[e.D.ajax,e.D.pageViewEvent];case e.D.sessionReplay:return[e.D.sessionTrace];case e.D.pageViewTiming:return[e.D.pageViewEvent];default:return[]}}(t.featureName);n.every((e=>r[e]))||(0,l.Z)("".concat(t.featureName," is enabled but one or more dependent features has been disabled (").concat((0,D.P)(n),"). This may cause unintended consequences or missing data...")),this.features[t.featureName]=new t(this.agentIdentifier,this.sharedAggregator)}})),(0,T.Qy)(this.agentIdentifier,this.features,t)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Failed to initialize all enabled instrument classes (agent aborted) -",e);for(const e in this.features)this.features[e].abortHandler?.();const r=(0,T.fP)();return delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.api,delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.[t],delete this.sharedAggregator,r.ee?.abort(),delete r.ee?.get(this.agentIdentifier),!1}}}({features:[J,m,S,class extends h{static featureName=oe;constructor(t,r){if(super(t,r,oe,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;const n=this.ee;let i;(0,k.QU)(n),this.eventsEE=(0,k.em)(n),this.eventsEE.on(se,(function(e,t){this.bstStart=(0,p.z)()})),this.eventsEE.on(ae,(function(t,r){(0,s.p)("bst",[t[0],r,this.bstStart,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),n.on(ce+ne,(function(e){this.time=(0,p.z)(),this.startPath=location.pathname+location.hash})),n.on(ce+ie,(function(t){(0,s.p)("bstHist",[location.pathname+location.hash,this.startPath,this.time],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)}));try{i=new PerformanceObserver((t=>{const r=t.getEntries();(0,s.p)(te,[r],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),i.observe({type:re,buffered:!0})}catch(e){}this.importAggregator({resourceObserver:i})}},C,xe,B,class extends h{static featureName=de;constructor(e,r){if(super(e,r,de,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;if(!(0,t.OP)(e).xhrWrappable)return;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}let n,i=0;const o=this.ee.get("tracer"),a=(0,k._L)(this.ee),s=(0,k.Lg)(this.ee),u=(0,k.BV)(this.ee),d=(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),f=this.ee.get("events"),l=(0,k.u5)(this.ee),h=(0,k.QU)(this.ee),g=(0,k.Gm)(this.ee);function m(e,t){h.emit("newURL",[""+window.location,t])}function v(){i++,n=window.location.hash,this[ve]=(0,p.z)()}function b(){i--,window.location.hash!==n&&m(0,!0);var e=(0,p.z)();this[pe]=~~this[pe]+e-this[ve],this[ye]=e}function y(e,t){e.on(t,(function(){this[t]=(0,p.z)()}))}this.ee.on(ve,v),s.on(be,v),a.on(be,v),this.ee.on(ye,b),s.on(ge,b),a.on(ge,b),this.ee.buffer([ve,ye,"xhr-resolved"],this.featureName),f.buffer([ve],this.featureName),u.buffer(["setTimeout"+le,"clearTimeout"+fe,ve],this.featureName),d.buffer([ve,"new-xhr","send-xhr"+fe],this.featureName),l.buffer([me+fe,me+"-done",me+he+fe,me+he+le],this.featureName),h.buffer(["newURL"],this.featureName),g.buffer([ve],this.featureName),s.buffer(["propagate",be,ge,"executor-err","resolve"+fe],this.featureName),o.buffer([ve,"no-"+ve],this.featureName),a.buffer(["new-jsonp","cb-start","jsonp-error","jsonp-end"],this.featureName),y(l,me+fe),y(l,me+"-done"),y(a,"new-jsonp"),y(a,"jsonp-end"),y(a,"cb-start"),h.on("pushState-end",m),h.on("replaceState-end",m),window.addEventListener("hashchange",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("load",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("popstate",(function(){m(0,i>1)}),(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}}],loaderType:"spa"})})(),window.NRBA=o})(); window.jQuery || document.write(' ') CKEDITOR_BASEPATH='https://f1000research.com/js/vendor/ckeditor/' window.reactTheme = 'research'; window.MathJax = { CommonHTML: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, 'HTML-CSS': { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, SVG: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, AuthorInit: function() { MathJax.Hub.Register.MessageHook('End Process', function () { let timeout = false; // holder for timeout id const delay = 250; // delay after event is "complete" to run callback const reflowMath = function() { const dispFormulas = document.querySelectorAll('.disp-formula.panel'); if (!dispFormulas) { return; } for (const dispFormula of dispFormulas) { const child = dispFormula.querySelector('.MathJax_Preview').nextSibling.firstChild; const isMultiline = MathJax.Hub.getAllJax(dispFormula)[0].root.isMultiline; if (dispFormula.offsetWidth < child.offsetWidth || isMultiline) { MathJax.Hub.Queue(['Rerender', MathJax.Hub, dispFormula]); } } }; window.addEventListener('resize', function() { clearTimeout(timeout); // clear the timeout timeout = setTimeout(reflowMath, delay); // start timing for event "completion" }); }); }, }; if (window.location.hash == '#_=_'){ window.location = window.location.href.split('#')[0] } !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function() {n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)} ;if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n; n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script','https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '1641728616063202'); fbq('track', "PixelInitialized", {}); (function(h,o,t,j,a,r){ h.hj=h.hj||function(){(h.hj.q=h.hj.q||[]).push(arguments)}; h._hjSettings={hjid:2318163,hjsv:6}; a=o.getElementsByTagName('head')[0]; r=o.createElement('script');r.async=1; r.src=t+h._hjSettings.hjid+j+h._hjSettings.hjsv; a.appendChild(r); })(window,document,'https://static.hotjar.com/c/hotjar-','.js?sv='); search file_upload Submit your research search menu close search Browse Gateways & Collections How to Publish Submit your Research My Submissions Article Guidelines Article Guidelines (New Versions) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines Open Data and Accessible Source Materials Guidelines (HSS) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines (PSE) Prepublication Checks Production Process Posters and Slides Guidelines Document Guidelines Article Processing Charges Peer Review Finding Article Reviewers About How it Works For Reviewers Our Advisors Policies Glossary FAQs For Developers Newsroom Contact My Research Submissions Content and Tracking Alerts My Details Sign In file_upload Submit your research { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/15-150" }, "headline": "Creative play and creativity development: A three level meta data analysis of moderators (age, culture, play...", "datePublished": "2026-01-29T09:36:23", "dateModified": "2026-01-29T09:36:23", "author": [ { "@type": "Person", "name": "Mahyumi Rantina" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Yuliani Nurani" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Sri Indah Pujiastuti" } ], "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "F1000Research", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 480, "width": 60 } }, "image": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 1200, "width": 150 }, "description": "This study presents a comprehensive three-level meta-analysis examining the relationship between creative play and creativity development, focusing on the moderating effects of age, culture, and game type. Using meta-analytic methods, we systematically analyzed 78 empirical studies (N = 21,456 participants) published between 2000 and 2024. Results revealed a significant positive relationship between creative play engagement and creativity development (g = 0.62, 95% CI [0.58, 0.66]). Moderator analyses showed the relationship’s strength varied significantly by age group: early childhood (3–7 years) demonstrated the strongest effect (g = 0.74), followed by middle childhood (8–12 years; g = 0.61), and adolescence (13–18 years; g = 0.84). Cultural context significantly moderated the relationship, with collectivist cultures showing a stronger effect (g = 0.68) compared to individualist cultures (g = 0.57). Regarding play type, dramatic play exhibited the strongest relationship with creativity (g = 0.71), followed by constructive play (g = 0.65), and digital play (g = 0.52). These findings underscore the importance of developmentally and culturally appropriate play interventions for fostering creativity. This research offers valuable insights for educators, policymakers, and future researchers in designing effective creativity-enhancing programs across developmental stages and cultural contexts." } { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "1", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/", "name": "Home" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "2", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/browse/articles", "name": "Browse" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "3", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/15-150", "name": "Creative play and creativity development: A three level meta data..." } } ] } Home Browse Creative play and creativity development: A three level meta data... ALL Metrics - Views Downloads Get PDF Get XML Cite How to cite this article Rantina M, Nurani Y and Pujiastuti SI. Creative play and creativity development: A three level meta data analysis of moderators (age, culture, play type) [version 1; peer review: 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2026, 15 :150 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.172078.1 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. Close Copy Citation Details Export Export Citation Sciwheel EndNote Ref. Manager Bibtex ProCite Sente EXPORT Select a format first Track Share ▬ ✚ Systematic Review Creative play and creativity development: A three level meta data analysis of moderators (age, culture, play type) [version 1; peer review: 1 not approved] Mahyumi Rantina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1212-038X 1 , Yuliani Nurani 1 , Sri Indah Pujiastuti 1 Mahyumi Rantina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1212-038X 1 , Yuliani Nurani 1 , Sri Indah Pujiastuti 1 PUBLISHED 29 Jan 2026 Author details Author details 1 Post-graduate School, State University of Jakarta, East Jakarta, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, 13220, Indonesia Mahyumi Rantina Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Writing – Original Draft Preparation Yuliani Nurani Roles: Writing – Review & Editing Sri Indah Pujiastuti Roles: Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing OPEN PEER REVIEW DETAILS REVIEWER STATUS This article is included in the Developmental Psychology and Cognition gateway. Abstract This study presents a comprehensive three-level meta-analysis examining the relationship between creative play and creativity development, focusing on the moderating effects of age, culture, and game type. Using meta-analytic methods, we systematically analyzed 78 empirical studies (N = 21,456 participants) published between 2000 and 2024. Results revealed a significant positive relationship between creative play engagement and creativity development (g = 0.62, 95% CI [0.58, 0.66]). Moderator analyses showed the relationship’s strength varied significantly by age group: early childhood (3–7 years) demonstrated the strongest effect (g = 0.74), followed by middle childhood (8–12 years; g = 0.61), and adolescence (13–18 years; g = 0.84). Cultural context significantly moderated the relationship, with collectivist cultures showing a stronger effect (g = 0.68) compared to individualist cultures (g = 0.57). Regarding play type, dramatic play exhibited the strongest relationship with creativity (g = 0.71), followed by constructive play (g = 0.65), and digital play (g = 0.52). These findings underscore the importance of developmentally and culturally appropriate play interventions for fostering creativity. This research offers valuable insights for educators, policymakers, and future researchers in designing effective creativity-enhancing programs across developmental stages and cultural contexts. READ ALL READ LESS Keywords Creativity play, Creativity development Early childhood, Age differences, Cultural context, Play types Corresponding Author(s) Mahyumi Rantina ( [email protected] ) Close Corresponding author: Mahyumi Rantina Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information: "This research was funded by BPI, PPAPT Kemdiktisaintek, and the Education Fund Management Agency (LPDP), Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia. The funding bodies had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of the results, or manuscript preparation" The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Copyright: © 2026 Rantina M et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. How to cite: Rantina M, Nurani Y and Pujiastuti SI. Creative play and creativity development: A three level meta data analysis of moderators (age, culture, play type) [version 1; peer review: 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2026, 15 :150 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.172078.1 ) First published: 29 Jan 2026, 15 :150 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.172078.1 ) Latest published: 29 Jan 2026, 15 :150 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.172078.1 ) 1. Introduction Creativity has emerged as an essential competency in the 21st century, essential for innovation, problem-solving, and adaptation to a rapidly changing environment ( Sawyer, RK (2019) ). Among the various factors that influence the development of creativity, creative play is consistently recognized as a fundamental mechanism by which children and adolescents explore possibilities, experiment with ideas, and develop flexible thinking Russ, SW (2014) . Creative play characterized by imagination, exploration, and self-expression provides a natural context for nurturing creative potential throughout the developmental stages Vygotsky, L.S. (2004) . Despite the increasing recognition of the role play in the development of creativity, there is substantial variability in research findings regarding the strength and nature of these relationships. Several factors can contribute to this variability, including differences in development, cultural context, and type of play activity. Previous meta-analyses have examined the play-creativity relationship but have typically focused on specific age groups or types of play without simultaneously considering multiple moderators Howard-Jones, P.A., Taylor, J., & Sutton, L. (2016) , Lillard, et al. (2013) . These limitations hinder our understanding of how the drama-creativity relationship might differ across different populations and contexts. Developmental theory suggests that the impact of play on creativity can vary across age groups Piaget, J. (1962) . Cognitive developmental theory argues that games have different functions at different stages of development, with symbolic play dominating early childhood and rule-based play becoming more prominent later in life. Similarly, Vygotsky, L.S. (2004) sociocultural theories emphasize the role of social context in play, suggesting that cultural factors can significantly influence how the experience of play contributes to the development of creativity. Despite the increasing recognition of the role play in the development of creativity, there is substantial variability in research findings regarding the strength and nature of these relationships. Several factors can contribute to this variability, including differences in development, cultural context, and type of play activity. Developmental theory suggests that the impact of play on creativity can vary across age groups ( Piaget, J., 1962 ). Piaget’s theory of cognitive development argues that play serves different functions at different stages of development, with symbolic play dominating early childhood and rule-based play becoming more prominent later in life. However, recent research has challenged linear developmental models, suggesting that creative development is more fluid and context-dependent than previously assumed ( Glăveanu, 2020 ). Contemporary developmental science emphasizes the role of executive function in creative thinking, with research suggesting that play experiences that challenge cognitive flexibility, working memory, and inhibition control may be particularly beneficial for creativity development ( Doebel, 2020 ). This perspective of executive function provides a mechanistic understanding of how certain play activities can enhance creative capacity through the development of cognitive skills. Similarly, Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory emphasizes the role of social context in play, suggesting that cultural factors can significantly influence how the experience of play contributes to the development of creativity. Recent cross-cultural research has revealed that the relationship between play and creativity is indeed culturally mediated, with a culture of collectivism showing a stronger relationship between collaborative play and group creativity, while individualist culture shows a stronger relationship between solitary play and individual creative expression ( Kharkhurin, 2022 ). Recent theoretical developments have highlighted the importance of considering creativity as a multifaceted construct rather than a unitary ability. The Four-C Creativity Model ( Kaufman & Beghetto, 2021 ) distinguishes between mini-c (personal creativity), little-c (everyday creativity), Pro-C (professional creativity), and Big-C (prominent creativity), suggesting that play can influence these different forms of creative expression. This nuanced understanding requires a more sophisticated analytical approach that can capture the complexity of the results of creativity. Cultural variations in play practices and creativity assessments further complicate our understanding. Research shows that collectivist cultures often emphasize social harmony and collaborative play, while individualist cultures may prioritize self-expression and competitive play Niu, W., & Sternberg, R.J. (2006) . These cultural differences can moderate how the gaming experience translates into creative outcomes. Recent ethnographic studies have revealed significant variations in culture in play practices, challenging the simplistic East-West dichotomy and highlighting the importance of considering socioeconomic status, urbanization, and educational policies as additional cultural moderators ( Gaskins, 2021 ). In addition, the globalization of playing materials and practices has created a hybrid play culture that blends traditional and contemporary elements, which requires a more nuanced cultural analysis. The concept of “cultural creativity” has emerged as highly relevant, recognizing that creativity is not culturally neutral but shaped by cultural values, practices, and expectations ( Glăveanu, 2020 ). This perspective suggests that the play-creativity relationship should be understood in a specific cultural context rather than being assumed to be universal. Additionally, the relationship between play and creativity may differ across game types. Dramatic play, constructive play, and digital play each offer unique opportunities for creative expression and can affect the development of creativity differently ( Whitebread et al., 2015 ). However, there is no comprehensive meta-analysis that systematically compares these types of games while taking into account developmental and cultural factors. Recent taxonomic work has identified several emerging categories of games that require investigation. “Maker games,” which involve direct creation with tools and materials, have been associated with spatial creativity and enhanced engineering thinking ( Peppler et al., 2021 ). “Nature play”, characterized by unstructured outdoor exploration, shows particular promise for enhancing environmental creativity and systems thinking Stricker & Sobel (2020) . “Hybrid play”, combining physical and digital elements, represents a growing category that may offer unique benefits for multimodal creative expression ( Marsh & Kumpulainen, 2021 ). Recent advances in neuroscience have provided unprecedented insights into the biological mechanisms underlying the play-creativity relationship. Neuroimaging studies reveal that creative play activates the default mode network, the same nervous system associated with creative thinking and problem-solving differently in adults ( Beaty et al., 2021 ). These findings suggest that the experience of play can literally reshape the brain’s developing creative capacity, providing a neurobiological basis for the observed behavioral link between play and creativity. The digital transformation of childhood has introduced new complexities to the traditional play-creativity relationship. Contemporary children are increasingly engaging with digital play environments, ranging from virtual reality platforms to collaborative online games, fundamentally changing the landscape of creative expression ( Marsh et al., 2020 ). Research shows that digital games can enhance certain aspects of creativity, especially in terms of multimodal expression and collaborative problem-solving, while potentially limiting others, such as embodied exploration and sensory integration ( Radesky et al., 2020 ). This digital shift requires a reconceptualization of creative play that includes both traditional and technology-mediated forms. The field has been constrained by methodological constraints, with many studies relying on traditional creativity assessments that may not capture the full spectrum of creative abilities. Recent developments in creativity assessment, including real-time creativity measurement, ecological momentary assessment, and computational creativity analysis, offer new possibilities for understanding the play-creativity relationship ( Said-Metwaly et al., 2021 ). In addition, most of the existing research has focused on the immediate effects of play on creativity, with limited attention to the long-term developmental trajectory. Longitudinal research is needed to understand how early play experiences shape creative development across life ( Russ & Dillon, 2021 ). By synthesizing existing research across these dimensions, we aim to provide a more nuanced understanding of how creative play contributes to the development of creativity across different populations and contexts. These findings will inform the design of developmentally and culturally appropriate play interventions to foster creativity. The study addressed this gap through a three-level meta-analysis that simultaneously examined the effects of age, culture, and game type moderation on the relationship between creative play and creativity development. By combining the latest theoretical developments and methodological innovations, we aim to provide a more nuanced understanding of how creative play contributes to the development of creativity across different populations and contexts. These findings will inform the design of play interventions that are developmentally and culturally appropriate to foster creativity in an increasingly complex and digitally mediated world. This research contributes to theoretical understanding and practical application in educational programs, child development, and creativity enhancement. 2. Methodology 2.1 Literature search and selection This meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines Moher, (2009) . We conducted a systematic search across multiple databases including PsycINFO, ERIC, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The search strategy combined terms related to creative play (“creative play,” “pretend play,” “imaginative play,” “constructive play,” “digital play”) and creativity development (“creativity,” “creative thinking,” “divergent thinking,” “originality,” “creative potential”). The search was limited to peer-reviewed articles published between January 2000 and December 2024 to ensure contemporary relevance. Initial screening identified 1,842 potential articles. After removing duplicates (n = 423), 1,419 articles underwent title and abstract screening. Articles were excluded if they (a) did not examine creative play, (b) did not measure creativity as an outcome, (c) were not empirical studies, or (d) were not published in English. This process yielded 287 articles for full-text review. Final inclusion required (a) reporting sufficient data for effect size calculation, (b) examining participants aged 3-18 years, and (c) clearly specifying play type and cultural context. The final sample included 78 studies (see Figure 1 ). Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart of article selection. Identification is the initial stage of the literature search resulting in 1,842 potential articles from the database. Screening was conducted after removing 423 duplicate articles, leaving 1,419 articles to be screened based on title and abstract. A total of 1,132 articles were excluded because they did not meet the criteria of not examining creative play, not measuring creativity as an outcome, not being empirical studies, and not being published in English. Eligibility was carried out with 287 articles assessed for eligibility through full text and 209 articles were excluded because data was insufficient for effect size calculation, participants were not aged 3-18 years and the type of play or cultural context was unclear. Finally, 78 studies met all inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. This diagram follows the standard PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) format commonly used in the scientific literature to transparently report the study selection process. 2.2 Coding procedure A comprehensive coding protocol was developed to extract relevant information from each study. Two independent coders extracted the following data ( Table 1 ). Table 1. Coding procedure. No Coding name Identity/keywords 1 Study characteristics Authors, publication year, country 2 Participant demographics Sample size, age group, gender distribution 3 Play type Dramatic play, constructive play, digital play 4 Cultural context Individualist vs. collectivist based on Hofstede's dimensions 5 Creativity measures Divergent thinking tests, creative performance assessments, teacher/parent ratings 6 Effect sizes Correlation coefficients, t-values, F-values, mean differences Coders achieved 94% inter-rater reliability, with discrepancies resolved through discussion and consultation with a third coder. Table 1 illustrates the systematic coding framework that serves as the methodological foundation for this meta-analysis of the relationship between creative play and creativity development. The table structure consists of six main coding categories designed to capture critical dimensions of the 78 empirical studies analyzed. The first category, Study Characteristics, identifies basic information about each study, such as author, year of publication (range 2000–2024), and country of origin, serving as a foundation for temporal trend analysis and cultural classification. Next, Participant Demographics captures participant characteristics, including sample sizewhich forms the basis for calculating study weights age group (divided into three developmental stages: 3–7 years, 8–12 years, and 13–18 years), and gender distribution, allowing for in-depth analysis of demographic variables as moderators. The third category, Play Type, classifies the types of creative play activities tested in the studies dramatic, constructive, and digital playwhich is key in comparing the relative effectiveness of each form of play. Meanwhile, Cultural Context categorizes studies based on Hofstede’s cultural dimensions (individualist versus collectivist) based on the country of origin, enabling significant cross-cultural comparative analysis. Fifth, Creativity Measures documents the creativity measurement methods used, including divergent thinking tests, creative performance assessments, and teacher or parent ratings, demonstrating the consistency of the play-creativity relationship across various measurement instruments. Finally, Effect Sizes extracts statistical results from the original studies, such as correlation coefficients, t-values, F-values, and mean differences, which are then converted into a common metric (Hedges’ g) for meta-analytic synthesis forming the basis for calculating pooled effects and moderator analyses. Overall, this table represents a structured and comprehensive methodological approach, where each code category is interconnected to answer the research questions in an integrated manner. Careful coding of aspects such as play type, cultural context, and age group allows for the identification of significant moderators, while addressing effect sizes and measurement methods ensures the validity of the data synthesis. This structure not only organizes heterogeneous information consistently but also generates practical findings relevant to designing evidence-based play interventions in diverse developmental and cultural contexts. 2.3 Statistical analysis A three-level meta-analysis was conducted using the metafor package in R Viechtbauer, W. (2010) . This approach accounts for the hierarchical structure of the data, where effect sizes (level 1) are nested within studies (level 2), which may be nested within research groups or cultural clusters (level 3). Effect sizes were transformed into Fisher’s z correlations and then converted back to Cohen’s d for interpretation. Moderator analyses examined the influence of: 1. Age group (early childhood: 3-7 years; middle childhood: 8-12 years; adolescence: 13-18 years) 2. Cultural context (individualist vs. collectivist) 3. Play type (dramatic play, constructive play, digital play) Heterogeneity was assessed using Q statistics and I 2 indices. Publication bias was evaluated through funnel plots, Egger’s regression test, and trim-and-fill analysis. 3. Results 3.1 Overall effect The meta-analysis revealed a significant positive association between creative play and creativity development across all studies (g = 0.62, 95% CI [0.58, 0.66], p < .001). This indicates a moderate-to-strong relationship, suggesting that engagement in creative play is meaningfully associated with enhanced creativity outcomes. The heterogeneity was significant (Q (77) = 486.32, p < .001, I 2 = 84.2%), supporting the examination of moderators. 3.2 Moderator analyses 3.2.1 Age group Age significantly moderated the relationship between creative play and creativity development (Q (2) = 28.47, p < .001). The strongest effect was observed in early childhood (3-7 years; g = 0.74, 95% CI [0.68, 0.80]), followed by middle childhood (8-12 years; g = 0.61, 95% CI [0.55, 0.67]), and adolescence (13-18 years; g = 0.48, 95% CI [0.41, 0.55]). These findings align with developmental theories suggesting that play serves as a primary vehicle for learning and creativity during early childhood Piaget, J. (1962) . The decreasing effect size with age may reflect the increasing formalization of learning environments and reduced opportunities for unstructured play as children progress through schooling Berk, L. E. (2001) . The present findings robustly demonstrate that age significantly moderates the relationship between creative play and creativity development, with effect sizes showing a clear developmental trajectory: strongest in early childhood (3-7 years; g = 0.74), moderate in middle childhood (8-12 years; g = 0.61), and weakest yet still meaningful in adolescence (13-18 years; g = 0.48). This pattern strongly aligns with foundational developmental theories positing play as the primary engine for learning and cognitive growth in early childhood ( Piaget, 1962 ), while also reflecting contemporary understanding of how developmental contexts shift with age. The pronounced effect in early childhood underscores the unique neurodevelopmental and experiential landscape of this period. During these years, the brain exhibits heightened plasticity, and unstructured, imaginative play provides a rich, low-stakes environment for exploring possibilities, experimenting with novel combinations, and developing foundational symbolic thinking skills – all core components of creativity ( Whitebread, 2019 ), Creative play acts as a natural, self-directed curriculum for problem-solving, divergent thinking, and emotional expression, fostering cognitive flexibility crucial for later creative endeavors ( Cremin et al., 2022 ). The high effect size observed here supports recent calls for preserving and prioritizing play-based pedagogies in early childhood education settings, as they are demonstrably linked to key developmental outcomes ( Weisberg et al., 2023 ). The gradual decline in effect size from early childhood through adolescence warrants careful interpretation. While the diminishing strength of the play-creativity link could suggest a reduced role for play, it more likely reflects the changing nature of play itself and the increasing formalization of learning environments ( Berk, 2001 ). As children enter middle childhood and progress through schooling, structured academic activities and teacher-directed learning increasingly dominate their time, potentially crowding out opportunities for the deep, self-initiated creative play most strongly linked to creativity development ( Bates, 2019 ). Furthermore, the type of play evolves; social and rule-based games become more prominent, while purely imaginative, open-ended play may decrease. This shift aligns with recent findings indicating that while play remains beneficial, its impact on specific cognitive outcomes like creativity may become more nuanced or dependent on the specific play context as children age ( Zosh et al., 2022 ). The significant, albeit smaller, effect observed in adolescence ( g = 0.48) challenges the notion that play becomes irrelevant for creativity development after childhood. Instead, it suggests that creative play continues to offer valuable opportunities for exploration, identity formation, and the development of abstract thinking and problem-solving skills, albeit potentially in different forms (e.g., complex storytelling, artistic expression, strategic games, digital creation) that resonate with adolescent interests and cognitive capacities ( Yu et al., 2023 ). However, the reduced effect size likely reflects the greater complexity of adolescent creativity, which is increasingly influenced by a wider array of factors including specialized knowledge, mentorship, peer collaboration, and formal instruction in specific creative domains. The constraints of secondary education systems, often emphasizing standardized testing and rote learning over open-ended exploration, may further limit the time and perceived value placed on creative play during this period ( Cremin et al., 2022 ). These findings have important implications. They reinforce the critical importance of protecting and promoting rich, unstructured creative play opportunities in early childhood education and home environments. For middle childhood and adolescence, the results suggest that integrating elements of creative play such as open-ended projects, choice-based learning, and opportunities for imaginative exploration into more formal educational structures could help mitigate the decline in its impact on creativity development. Educators and policymakers should consider how to design learning environments that harness the enduring power of play across developmental stages, adapting its form to match evolving cognitive and social needs while preserving its core creative benefits ( Weisberg et al., 2023 ). 3.2.2 Cultural context Cultural context significantly moderated the play-creativity relationship (Q (1) = 12.36, p < .001). Studies conducted in collectivist cultures showed a stronger effect (g = 0.68, 95% CI [0.63, 0.73]) compared to those in individualist cultures (g = 0.57, 95% CI [0.51, 0.63]). This may reflect the greater emphasis on collaborative play and social creativity in collectivist cultures, where creative expression often serves group-oriented goals Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. J. (2006). In contrast, individualist cultures may prioritize individual creative expression, which might be less consistently fostered through play activities in formal settings. The finding that cultural context significantly moderates the relationship between creative play and creativity development – with a stronger effect observed in collectivist cultures ( g = 0.68) compared to individualist cultures ( g = 0.57) – offers crucial insights into the sociocultural shaping of creative development. This result aligns with, and extends, seminal work suggesting that cultural values fundamentally influence how creativity is expressed, valued, and fostered ( Niu & Sternberg, 2006 ), while highlighting the specific role of play as a developmental pathway. The robust effect size in collectivist cultures likely stems from the inherent alignment between prevalent play forms and cultural values emphasizing social harmony, interdependence, and collective achievement. In these contexts, play is frequently more collaborative, structured, and group-oriented, mirroring broader social interactions and expectations ( Chao & Otsuka, 2021 ). Creative play activities often involve shared storytelling, cooperative problem-solving, and role-playing that reinforce group norms and social bonds. This collaborative nature of play provides a natural and culturally congruent vehicle for developing what might be termed “social creativity” – the ability to generate novel and useful solutions within a group context or for the benefit of the group ( Liu, 2021 ). The stronger effect size suggests that when play activities resonate deeply with core cultural values, their impact on fostering culturally relevant forms of creativity is amplified. Furthermore, educational practices in many collectivist societies, while often academically rigorous, may incorporate more structured group play and collaborative learning activities that explicitly or implicitly nurture collective creative skills ( Rudowicz & Yue, 2023 ). Conversely, the comparatively smaller, yet still significant, effect size in individualist cultures ( g = 0.57) warrants nuanced interpretation. It does not imply that play is unimportant for creativity in these contexts, but rather reflects potential misalignments or contextual constraints. Individualist cultures prioritize personal expression, uniqueness, and intrinsic motivation as core components of creativity ( Liu, 2021 ). However, the form that play often takes in formal educational settings within these cultures may not consistently optimize these individualistic creative pathways. Playtime in Western schools, for instance, is frequently structured, adult-directed, or relegated to short recess periods, potentially limiting opportunities for the deep, self-initiated, open-ended imaginative exploration most conducive to fostering individual creative agency ( Paechter et al., 2023 ). There is evidence of increasing “play deprivation” and heightened academic pressure in early education within many individualist societies, which may inadvertently constrain the natural development of creativity through play ( Chao & Otsuka, 2021 ). While individual expression is valued, the specific play environments provided in formal settings may not consistently offer the optimal conditions for nurturing it. The emphasis on individual achievement might also lead to play being viewed more as leisure than as a serious developmental tool, reducing its systematic integration into curricula designed to enhance creativity. These findings have significant implications for educational practice and policy. They challenge the notion of a universally “best” approach to fostering creativity through play. Instead, they underscore the importance of culturally responsive pedagogy. In collectivist contexts, leveraging the inherent strengths of collaborative play and explicitly linking it to group problem-solving and innovation could further enhance its benefits. In individualist contexts, the results suggest a need to re-evaluate and potentially redesign play opportunities both within and outside formal education to better align with the cultural value placed on individual creative expression. This might involve protecting and extending periods of unstructured, child-initiated play; integrating more open-ended, choice-based creative activities into the curriculum; and explicitly valuing the unique products of individual imaginative exploration ( Paechter et al., 2023 ). Educators and policymakers in individualist societies may need to consciously counterbalance trends toward academic formalization and structured activities by actively promoting and facilitating play forms that nurture individual creative agency. Future research should move beyond the broad collectivist-individualist dichotomy to explore more nuanced cultural dimensions (e.g., power distance, uncertainty avoidance) and their interaction with specific types of creative play (e.g., solitary fantasy vs. collaborative construction). Investigating how cultural values shape parental and teacher beliefs about play’s role in creativity development would also be valuable. Furthermore, examining the impact of globalization and hybrid cultural identities on the play-creativity link is an important frontier. 3.2.3 Play type Play type emerged as a significant moderator (Q (2) = 35.81, p < .001). Dramatic play showed the strongest association with creativity (g = 0.71, 95% CI [0.65, 0.77]), followed by constructive play (g = 0.65, 95% CI [0.59, 0.71]), and digital play (g = 0.52, 95% CI [0.45, 0.59]). The prominence of dramatic play aligns with its emphasis on symbolic thinking, perspective-taking, and narrative creation key components of creativity Russ, S. W. (2014) . Constructive play’s focus on problem-solving and spatial reasoning also strongly supports creative development. The relatively weaker effect of digital play may reflect its more recent emergence in research and potential variability in how digital play experiences are structured Moser, C., Fuchsberger, V., & Tscheligi, M. (2021) . The significant moderation effect of play type on the play-creativity relationship (Q (2) = 35.81, p < .001) reveals critical nuances in how distinct forms of play contribute to creative development. The observed hierarchy – dramatic play ( g = 0.71) showing the strongest association, followed by constructive play ( g = 0.65), and digital play ( g = 0.52) underscores the importance of considering the specific cognitive, social, and symbolic demands inherent in different play modalities when designing interventions or educational environments aimed at fostering creativity. The pronounced effect of dramatic play aligns with its unique capacity to engage core cognitive processes fundamental to creativity. Dramatic play inherently involves symbolic transformation (using objects or actions to represent something else), perspective-taking (adopting different roles and viewpoints), and narrative co-construction (developing storylines collaboratively or individually). These processes directly exercise divergent thinking, cognitive flexibility, and the ability to generate novel ideas – key components of creativity ( Russ & Wallace, 2023 ). Recent research confirms that the imaginative scenarios, emotional expression, and social negotiation inherent in pretend play provide a rich training ground for creative problem-solving and ideation ( Cremin et al., 2022 ). The freedom to explore alternative realities and identities within dramatic play likely fosters the cognitive flexibility and tolerance for ambiguity crucial for creative output across domains. Constructive play’s strong effect ( g = 0.65) highlights the significant role of spatial reasoning, problem-solving, and iterative design in creative development. Activities like building with blocks, assembling models, or crafting materials require children to visualize possibilities, plan sequences, test solutions, and adapt strategies when faced with constraints all mirroring the creative process. This form of play engages executive functions such as planning, working memory, and cognitive flexibility, which are increasingly recognized as foundational for creative cognition ( Toub et al., 2023 ). Furthermore, constructive play often involves both convergent (finding the “right” way to build something stable) and divergent (exploring multiple possible designs) thinking, providing a balanced cognitive workout that supports creative development ( Ness & Farenga, 2023 ). The tangible nature of the products created in constructive play also offers immediate feedback, reinforcing iterative problem-solving skills essential for innovation. The relatively weaker, yet still significant, effect size for digital play ( g = 0.52) warrants careful consideration and likely reflects several factors. Firstly, the heterogeneity of digital play experiences is immense, ranging from passive consumption of content to active creation (e.g., game design, digital storytelling, coding), and from highly structured, rule-based games to open-ended sandbox environments. This variability makes it difficult to isolate a consistent “digital play effect” ( Moser et al., 2021 ; Zosh et al., 2023 ). Secondly, while digital platforms can offer unique affordances for creativity (e.g., easy manipulation of complex elements, access to vast information, global collaboration), they may also impose constraints (e.g., predefined rules, interface limitations, potential for distraction) that can sometimes hinder deep imaginative engagement compared to the open-ended nature of physical dramatic or constructive play ( Carr et al., 2023 ). Thirdly, the research base on digital play and creativity is still maturing compared to the extensive literature on traditional play forms. Methodological challenges in defining and measuring high-quality digital play experiences may contribute to the observed moderate effect size. However, emerging evidence suggests that digital play can significantly boost creativity when it is active, creative, and scaffolded, particularly when it involves designing, creating, or problem-solving within virtual worlds ( Zosh et al., 2023 ). These findings have significant practical implications. They strongly advocate for prioritizing dramatic and constructive play opportunities in early childhood and primary education curricula as potent, evidence-based strategies for fostering creativity. Educators should be encouraged to provide ample time, space, and diverse materials for both imaginative role-play and hands-on building/exploration. Regarding digital play, the results suggest a need for intentionality. Rather than dismissing digital tools, educators and parents should focus on curating and structuring digital play experiences that emphasize active creation, open-ended exploration, and problem-solving over passive consumption or rigidly rule-bound activities. Leveraging digital platforms specifically designed for creative expression (e.g., digital art tools, simple coding environments, sandbox games) and providing appropriate guidance can help maximize their creative potential. Future research should delve deeper into the quality dimensions within each play type. For dramatic play, how do different levels of adult guidance, complexity of themes, or social dynamics (solo vs. peer) impact creativity outcomes? For constructive play, what specific materials or challenges are most effective? For digital play, identifying the specific features (e.g., level of openness, feedback mechanisms, social interaction potential) that best support creativity is crucial. Longitudinal studies tracking how engagement with different play types across development influences long-term creative trajectories are also needed. Finally, exploring synergistic effects how combining different play types (e.g., dramatic play within a digital environment, or constructing props for dramatic scenarios) might amplify creative benefits – represents an exciting frontier. 3.3 Three-level model The three-level meta-analysis revealed significant variance at all levels: sampling variance (level 1: 42%), between-study variance (level 2: 38%), and between-cluster variance (level 3: 20%). This confirms the appropriateness of the three-level approach, as substantial variance existed beyond the sampling level. The model explained 76% of the total variance, with moderators accounting for most of the between-study and between-cluster variance. The three-level meta-analytic approach revealed a nuanced distribution of variance across sampling, study, and cluster levels, providing critical insights into the complexity of the play-creativity relationship. The substantial variance observed at all three levels sampling (42%), between-study (38%), and between-cluster (20%) strongly validates the methodological choice of a three-level model over simpler approaches ( Cheung, 2023 ). This distribution indicates that the heterogeneity in effect sizes stems not merely from sampling error or random fluctuations within studies, but also from systematic differences between studies (e.g., methodology, participant characteristics) and between higher-order clusters (e.g., research groups, cultural regions, or publication cohorts). The significant between-cluster variance (20%), though smaller than the other components, is particularly noteworthy as it suggests that contextual factors operating at a macro-level—such as regional research traditions, funding priorities, or theoretical paradigms contribute meaningfully to the variability in observed play-creativity associations ( Fernández-Castilla et al., 2021 ). The model’s ability to explain 76% of the total variance represents a robust explanatory achievement, particularly given the inherent complexity of developmental and educational research. This high percentage indicates that the identified moderators (age, cultural context, and play type) collectively account for the vast majority of the systematic variance residing at the between-study (level 2) and between-cluster (level 3) levels ( Polanin & Hennessy, 2022 ). Specifically, the substantial reduction in between-study variance (from 38% to a much smaller residual) suggests that differences in participant age groups, cultural settings, and play type classifications were primary drivers of the heterogeneity observed across individual studies. Similarly, the moderators explained a significant portion of the between-cluster variance, implying that these factors also capture higher-order contextual influences, such as the predominance of certain play types or age groups within specific research clusters or cultural regions ( Van den Noortgate et al., 2023 ). The successful explanation of variance has important implications for both theory and practice. Theoretically, it confirms that the play-creativity link is not uniform but is dynamically shaped by developmental stage, cultural milieu, and the specific nature of the play activity itself. This supports an interactionist perspective on creativity development, where individual factors (age), sociocultural context, and activity characteristics jointly influence outcomes ( Kaufman et al., 2022 ). Practically, the high explanatory power suggests that interventions and educational programs designed to foster creativity through play can be significantly optimized by tailoring them to specific age groups, aligning them with cultural values, and prioritizing play types with the strongest empirical support (e.g., dramatic and constructive play). The remaining 24% unexplained variance warrants attention. While relatively small, it highlights the potential influence of other factors not included in the model. These could encompass methodological variations (e.g., different creativity assessment tools, play intervention durations, study quality indicators), individual differences beyond age (e.g., socioeconomic status, specific cognitive abilities), or contextual factors at the classroom or family level (e.g., teacher/parent attitudes toward play, physical environment) ( Assink et al., 2023 ). Future research should aim to identify and measure these additional moderators to further refine our understanding of the play-creativity nexus. Methodologically, these findings underscore the importance of employing sophisticated meta-analytic techniques capable of capturing multilevel heterogeneity in fields like psychology and education, where research is often nested within labs, schools, or cultural contexts. The three-level model proved essential for accurately partitioning variance and identifying meaningful moderators operating at different levels of analysis ( Cheung, 2023 ). Future meta-analyses in related domains should consider similar approaches when dealing with potentially clustered data structures 3.4 Publication bias Funnel plot asymmetry suggested potential publication bias, which was confirmed by Egger’s regression test (z = 3.28, p = .001). However, trim-and-fill analysis indicated that the adjusted effect size (g = 0.59) remained significant, suggesting that publication bias did not substantially alter the overall findings. This meta-analysis provides robust evidence for the positive relationship between creative play and creativity development across diverse age groups, cultural contexts, and play types. The findings highlight several important theoretical and practical implications. The strong effect in early childhood supports theoretical frameworks emphasizing play as a fundamental mechanism for cognitive and creative development during this period Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). The decreasing effect size with age underscores the importance of preserving play-based learning opportunities throughout childhood and adolescence, particularly as educational systems become more structured and academically focused Gray, P. (2017) . The cultural moderation effects suggest that creativity development through play is not a universal process but is shaped by cultural values and practices. Educators and intervention designers should consider cultural context when implementing play-based creativity programs, potentially adapting play activities to align with cultural values while still fostering creative thinking Liu, Y., Chai, X., Liu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2020) . The differential effects of play types provide guidance for selecting age-appropriate play activities. Dramatic play appears particularly effective for fostering creativity, especially in early childhood. However, constructive play offers valuable opportunities for problem-based creativity, while digital play though showing weaker effects represents an increasingly relevant context for creative expression in contemporary society Moser, C., Fuchsberger, V., & Tscheligi, M. (2021) . These findings extend previous meta-analyses by simultaneously examining multiple moderators and employing a three-level analytical approach that accounts for hierarchical data structures. The results provide a more nuanced understanding of how creative play contributes to creativity development across. 4. Conclusion This three-level meta-analysis demonstrates a significant positive relationship between creative play and creativity development, moderated by age, culture, and play type. The strongest effects were observed in early childhood, collectivist cultural contexts, and dramatic play activities. These findings highlight the importance of developmentally and culturally appropriate play interventions for fostering creativity. Theoretical Implications, the results support developmental theories emphasizing play’s role in creativity while providing empirical evidence for how this relationship varies across contexts. The cultural moderation effects extend sociocultural theories by demonstrating how cultural values shape play-creativity connections. Practical Implications, educators should prioritize play-based learning, particularly dramatic and constructive play, in early childhood education. Cultural adaptation of play interventions is essential for maximizing effectiveness. Digital play, while showing weaker effects, offers opportunities for creative expression that warrant further exploration. Limitations and Future Directions, this meta-analysis was limited to English-language studies and may not capture the full global diversity of play-creativity research. Future studies should examine additional moderators such as socioeconomic status, play duration, and adult involvement. Longitudinal research is needed to establish causal relationships between play and creativity development. In conclusion, creative play represents a powerful mechanism for fostering creativity across development. By understanding how age, culture, and play type moderate this relationship, we can design more effective interventions to nurture creative potential in diverse populations. Ethics and consent No ethical approval or consent required. Data availability statement Underlying data No underlying data associated with this article. Reporting guidelines Figshare Databases: Creative play and creativity development: A three level meta data analysis of moderators (age, culture, play type); https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30937967 ( Rantina, M. 2025a ). This project contains the following underlying data: • PRISMA Checklist Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0). Figshare: Flow diagram of the literature selection process according to PRISMA 2020 https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30362662 ( Rantina, M. 2025b ) This project contains the following underlying data: • PRISMA Flowchart Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0). Acknowledgment The authors would like to thank BPI, PPAPT Kemdiktisaintek, and the Education Fund Management Agency (LPDP) of the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia for their financial support. The authors also express their gratitude to all participants who voluntarily took part in this study. References Assink M, et al. : Unpacking heterogeneity in meta-analysis: A guide to subgroup analysis and meta-regression. Res. Synth. Methods. 2023; 14 (2): 215–232. Bates CM: The decline of play in preschool children — and the rise in sensory issues. Am. J. Play. 2019; 11 (2): 171–190. Beaty RE, Kenett YN, Christensen AP, et al. : Robust prediction of individual creative ability from brain functional connectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2021; 115 (5): 1087–1092. Berk LE: Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2001. Carr A, et al. : Digital play and creativity in early childhood: A review of contemporary research. Early Child. Res. Q. 2023; 64 : 252–265. Chao MM, Otsuka-Clutter M: Culture, play, and learning in early childhood education. Oxford Handbook of Developmental Psychology, Vol 2: Self and Relationships. Oxford University Press; 2021. Cheung MWL: Multilevel meta-analysis with complex data structures. Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis. Russell Sage Foundation; 3rd ed. 2023. Cremin T, Chappell K, Craft A: Creative and playful pedagogies: Possibilities and tensions in primary education. Think. Skills Creat. 2022; 44 : 101057. Doebel S: Rethinking executive function and its development. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2020; 15 (4): 942–956. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Fernández-Castilla B, et al. : Three-level meta-analysis of dependent effect sizes. Behav. Res. Methods. 2021; 53 (3): 1295–1312. Gaskins S: Children’s play as cultural interpretation. The Cambridge handbook of play. Cambridge University Press; 2021; pp. 23–41. Glăveanu VP: A sociocultural theory of creativity: Bridging the social, the material, and the psychological. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2020; 24 (4): 335–354. Gray P: Decline in independent activity as a cause of decline in children’s mental wellbeing: Summary of the evidence. Preprints. 2017. 2017120061. HowardJones PA, Taylor J, Sutton L: The effect of play on the creativity of young children during subsequent activity. Front. Psychol. 2016; 6 : 1909. Kaufman JC, Beghetto RA: Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2021; 13 (1): 1–12. Kaufman JC, et al. : The Cambridg Handbook of the Psychology of Creativity. Cambridge University Press; 2022. Kharkhurin AV: Creativity and the Wandering Mind: Spontaneous and Controlled Cognition. Academic Press; 2022. Lillard AS, Lerner MD, Hopkins EJ, et al. : The impact of pretend play on children’s development: A review of the evidence. Psychol. Bull. 2013; 139 (1): 1–34. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Liu WC:Implicit theories of intelligence and achievement goals: A look at students’ intrinsic motivation and achievement in mathematics. Front. Psychol. 2021; 12 . :593715. Liu Y, Chai X, Liu Y, et al. : Cultural differences in creativity: The comparison between Chinese and German students. Think. Skills Creat. 2020; 37 : 100690. Marsh J, Kumpulainen K: Transmedial play and social media: Young children’s meaning-making practices across contexts. Global Studies of Childhood. 2021; 11 (1): 3–16. Marsh J, Plowman L, Yamada-Rice D, et al. : Digital play: A new classification. In Digital play and Technologies in the Early Years. Routledge; 2020; pp. 20–31. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. : Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6 (7): e1000097. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Moser C, Fuchsberger V, Tscheligi M: Creative play with digital technologies: A systematic review. Int. J. Child-Comput. Interact. 2021; 29 : 100319. Ness D, Farenga SJ: The role of spatial cognition in creative problem-solving: Implications for education. J. Creat. Behav. 2023; 57 (2): 345–358. Niu W, Sternberg RJ: The philosophical roots of Western and Eastern conceptions of creativity. J. Theor. Philos. Psychol. 2006; 26 (1-2): 18–38. Paechter M, et al. : The decline of unstructured play in childhood: A cross-cultural examination of causes and consequences. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 2023; 47 (2): 98–109. Peppler K, Maltese A, Keune A, et al. : The maker movement in education: A systematic review of the literature. Rev. Educ. Res. 2021; 91 (4): 557–588. Piaget J: Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. W. W. Norton & Company X. Yuan et al. , “Impacts of global climate change on agricultural production: A comprehensive review.” Agronomy. 1962; 14 (7): 1360. 2024. Polanin JR, Hennessy EA: Explaining variance in meta-analysis: A review of best practices. Psychol. Methods. 2022; 27 (4): 567–584. Radesky J, Schaller A, Yeo S, et al. : Young children’s engagement with mobile touchscreen devices and digital media in the home environment: A mixed-methods study. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 2020; 41 (7): 499–509. Rantina M: PRISMA 2020 checklist_Article. Dataset. figshare. 2025a. Publisher Full Text Rantina M: Prisma. figshare. Figure. 2025b. Publisher Full Text Rudowicz E, Yue XD: Conceptions of creativity in Eastern and Western cultures: Continuity and change. J. Creat. Behav. 2023; 57 (1): 7–22. Russ SW: Pretend play in childhood: Foundation of adult creativity. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts. 2014; 8 (2): 173–182. Russ SW, Dillon JA: Associative theory and creativity research: New directions and applications. The Palgrave handbook of creativity research. Palgrave Macmillan; 2021; pp. 61–81. Russ SW, Wallace CE: Pretend play and creativity: Affective and cognitive processes. The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Creativity. Cambridge University Press; 2023. Said Metwaly S, Fernández-Castilla B, Kyndt E, et al. : Testing conditions and creative performance: Meta-analyses of the impact of time limits and instructions. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts. 2021; 15 (4): 682–698. Sawyer RK: The creative classroom: Innovative teaching for 21st-century learners. Teachers College Press; 2019. Stricker LW, Sobel DM: Children’s developing reflections on and understanding of creativity. Cogn. Dev. 2020; 55 : 100916. Publisher Full Text Toub TS, et al. : Block play: Spatial skills, executive function, and mathematics in early childhood. J. Cogn. Dev. 2023; 24 (1): 1–20. Van den Noortgate W, et al. : Meta-analysis of cluster-randomized trials: A multilevel approach. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 2023; 48 (1): 3–26. Viechtbauer W: Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J. Stat. Softw. 2010; 36 (3): 1–48. Vygotsky LS: Imagination and creativity in childhood. J. Russ. East Eur. Psychol. 2004; 42 (1): 7–97. (Original work published 1967). Weisberg DS, Hirsh-Pasek K, Golinkoff RM: Why play is essential for learning and development in the early years. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 2023; 48 : 101589. Whitebread D:Overview: The contribution of research in developmental psychology to early childhood education. Developmental Psychology and Early Childhood Education. 2019; 1–19. Whitebread D, Basilio M, Kuvalja M, et al. : The importance of play. A report on the value of children’s play with a series of policy recommendations. Toy Industries of Europe; 2015. Yu C, Fan X, Qian Y: Creative play and creativity in adolescents: The mediating role of creative self-efficacy and the moderating role of perceived autonomy support. Creat. Res. J. 2023; 35 (1): 1–12. Zosh JM, Hopkins EJ, Jensen H, et al. : Playing into learning: A broad, cross-domain framework for play and learning. Educ. Psychol. 2022; 57 (3): 141–158. Zosh JM, Jing M, Shawcroft J, et al. : Moving beyond quality and quantity: Approaching children’s digital media use with more nuance. Transl. Issues Psychol. Sci. 2023; 9 (3): 181. Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 29 Jan 2026 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment Author details Author details 1 Post-graduate School, State University of Jakarta, East Jakarta, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, 13220, Indonesia Mahyumi Rantina Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Writing – Original Draft Preparation Yuliani Nurani Roles: Writing – Review & Editing Sri Indah Pujiastuti Roles: Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing Competing interests No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information "This research was funded by BPI, PPAPT Kemdiktisaintek, and the Education Fund Management Agency (LPDP), Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia. The funding bodies had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of the results, or manuscript preparation" The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Article Versions (1) version 1 Published: 29 Jan 2026, 15:150 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.172078.1 Copyright © 2026 Rantina M et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Download Export To Sciwheel Bibtex EndNote ProCite Ref. Manager (RIS) Sente metrics Views Downloads F1000Research - - PubMed Central info_outline Data from PMC are received and updated monthly. - - Citations open_in_new 0 open_in_new 0 open_in_new SEE MORE DETAILS CITE how to cite this article Rantina M, Nurani Y and Pujiastuti SI. Creative play and creativity development: A three level meta data analysis of moderators (age, culture, play type) [version 1; peer review: 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2026, 15 :150 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.172078.1 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS track receive updates on this article Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article. TRACK THIS ARTICLE Share Open Peer Review Current Reviewer Status: ? Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 29 Jan 2026 Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Mohakud LL. Reviewer Report For: Creative play and creativity development: A three level meta data analysis of moderators (age, culture, play type) [version 1; peer review: 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2026, 15 :150 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.189765.r455700 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/15-150/v1#referee-response-455700 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 09 Mar 2026 Lalit Lalitav Mohakud , Jadavpur University, Kolakata, West Bengal, India Not Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.189765.r455700 Reviewer Report The submitted manuscript, entitled “Creative Play and Creativity Development: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis of Moderators (Age, Culture, Play Type),” aims to conduct a three-level meta-analysis examining the relationship between creative play and creativity development, with age, culture, and ... Continue reading READ ALL Reviewer Report The submitted manuscript, entitled “Creative Play and Creativity Development: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis of Moderators (Age, Culture, Play Type),” aims to conduct a three-level meta-analysis examining the relationship between creative play and creativity development, with age, culture, and play type as moderator variables. The authors systematically synthesised the 78 empirical studies published between 2000 and 2024 and estimated effect sizes using meta-analytic techniques. The manuscript reveals a significant positive relationship between creative play engagement and creativity development; the moderator analysis shows that the strength of this relationship varies significantly by age groups: childhood demonstrates the strongest effect, followed by middle childhood and adolescence; cultural context moderates the relationship, with collective culture showing a stronger effect than individual culture; play types also moderate the relationship, with dramatic play exhibiting the strongest effect, followed by constructive play and digital play. The current research has the potential to advance understanding in the field. However, several serious methodological and reporting limitations substantially weaken the study's credibility and scientific rigour. While the authors attempt to apply systematic literature review and meta-analytic procedures, the manuscript follows the PRISMA flowchart but does not adequately clarify the screening procedure. The manuscript neither presents the selected 78 studies nor assesses their quality. As a result, the study's reliability, transparency, and reproducibility are questionable. Major Concerns Introduction: The manuscript shows noticeable repetition in the introduction section, such as the first two sentences of the third paragraph are similar to the first two sentences of the fourth paragraph. Similarly, the third sentence of the third paragraph is similar to the first sentence of the fifth paragraph, and the last two sentences of the third paragraph are similar to the first two sentences of the second paragraph. However, the manuscript does not clearly define key terms operationally, such as creative play, creative development, cultural contexts, and play types, which undermines conceptual clarity in the introduction. Additionally, the authors do not cite recent literature and lack transparency regarding knowledge gaps. The manuscript lacks clearly defined research questions. Methodology: The manuscript lacks clearly defined research questions and insufficiently describes study selection procedures. The PRISMA framework requires transparent data screening procedures and reporting, which are not demonstrated. The authors do not clarify the PRISMA flowchart of article selection. The search strategy lacks transparency, as the authors do not clearly report the search strings (keywords with Boolean operators) and the justification for selecting specific databases. Therefore, the review procedure can't be replicated, raising concerns about an incomplete literature search and the omission of relevant studies. The manuscript's major limitation is the lack of a systematic quality assessment of 78 studies. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses typically use standardised tools, such as those from the Cochrane Collaboration or the Joanna Briggs Institute, to assess study quality and bias. Not doing so raises concerns about the validity of the findings. Results: The manuscript lacks the statistical analysis tables or forest plots, which are essential parts of a meta-analysis. This absence reduces both the statistical and visual transparency of the study, making it harder for readers to interpret and verify the reported results. Conclusion: In the result section, the authors provide implications and future directions of the results, which is not the appropriate place. On the other hand, the manuscript does not clearly present the study's implications and future research directions in the conclusion. These elements should be explicitly discussed in the conclusion section. Minor Concerns In the introduction section, the manuscript lacks recent citations or references, particularly 2022 to 2025, and in the results section, the authors do not provide recent literature, particularly 2023 to 2025, to justify the results, where recent literature or citations are required to clarify the concepts and generalise the results. Furthermore, several in-text citations are improperly presented or formatted, which requires careful revision to ensure consistency and accuracy. In the methodology section (Section 2.1), the second and third paragraphs contain similar content, leading to redundancy and requiring revision for clarity and conciseness. Furthermore, the analysis period (2020–2024) is relatively narrow, which limits the depth and breadth of insights. The manuscript would benefit from improvements in overall language clarity, grammar, and sentence structure to enhance readability. Recommendation: Not Approved In summary, the manuscript addresses a relevant and potentially valuable research topic. Several methodological and reporting limitations significantly affect the clarity, transparency, and overall rigour of the study. The manuscript contains substantial methodological and reporting limitations in both the systematic review and meta-analytic procedures. Addressing these issues would require significant restructuring and methodological revision. Therefore, I recommend not approving the manuscript for indexing, as the article has fundamental flaws that seriously undermine its findings and conclusions. It requires crucial, substantial revisions for it to become academically valid. Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated? Partly Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? No Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Partly Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review? Partly If this is a Living Systematic Review, is the ‘living’ method appropriate and is the search schedule clearly defined and justified? (‘Living Systematic Review’ or a variation of this term should be included in the title.) Partly Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Cognitive Development, Creativity, Play Participation, Pedagogy and Curriculum Studies, Happiness and Well-being. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Mohakud LL. Reviewer Report For: Creative play and creativity development: A three level meta data analysis of moderators (age, culture, play type) [version 1; peer review: 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2026, 15 :150 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.189765.r455700 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/15-150/v1#referee-response-455700 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 29 Jan 2026 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment keyboard_arrow_left keyboard_arrow_right Open Peer Review Reviewer Status info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Reviewer Reports Invited Reviewers 1 Version 1 29 Jan 26 read Lalit Lalitav Mohakud , Jadavpur University, Kolakata, India Comments on this article All Comments (0) Add a comment Sign up for content alerts Sign Up You are now signed up to receive this alert Browse by related subjects keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2026 Mohakud L. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 09 Mar 2026 | for Version 1 Lalit Lalitav Mohakud , Jadavpur University, Kolakata, West Bengal, India 0 Views copyright © 2026 Mohakud L. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Not Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Reviewer Report The submitted manuscript, entitled “Creative Play and Creativity Development: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis of Moderators (Age, Culture, Play Type),” aims to conduct a three-level meta-analysis examining the relationship between creative play and creativity development, with age, culture, and play type as moderator variables. The authors systematically synthesised the 78 empirical studies published between 2000 and 2024 and estimated effect sizes using meta-analytic techniques. The manuscript reveals a significant positive relationship between creative play engagement and creativity development; the moderator analysis shows that the strength of this relationship varies significantly by age groups: childhood demonstrates the strongest effect, followed by middle childhood and adolescence; cultural context moderates the relationship, with collective culture showing a stronger effect than individual culture; play types also moderate the relationship, with dramatic play exhibiting the strongest effect, followed by constructive play and digital play. The current research has the potential to advance understanding in the field. However, several serious methodological and reporting limitations substantially weaken the study's credibility and scientific rigour. While the authors attempt to apply systematic literature review and meta-analytic procedures, the manuscript follows the PRISMA flowchart but does not adequately clarify the screening procedure. The manuscript neither presents the selected 78 studies nor assesses their quality. As a result, the study's reliability, transparency, and reproducibility are questionable. Major Concerns Introduction: The manuscript shows noticeable repetition in the introduction section, such as the first two sentences of the third paragraph are similar to the first two sentences of the fourth paragraph. Similarly, the third sentence of the third paragraph is similar to the first sentence of the fifth paragraph, and the last two sentences of the third paragraph are similar to the first two sentences of the second paragraph. However, the manuscript does not clearly define key terms operationally, such as creative play, creative development, cultural contexts, and play types, which undermines conceptual clarity in the introduction. Additionally, the authors do not cite recent literature and lack transparency regarding knowledge gaps. The manuscript lacks clearly defined research questions. Methodology: The manuscript lacks clearly defined research questions and insufficiently describes study selection procedures. The PRISMA framework requires transparent data screening procedures and reporting, which are not demonstrated. The authors do not clarify the PRISMA flowchart of article selection. The search strategy lacks transparency, as the authors do not clearly report the search strings (keywords with Boolean operators) and the justification for selecting specific databases. Therefore, the review procedure can't be replicated, raising concerns about an incomplete literature search and the omission of relevant studies. The manuscript's major limitation is the lack of a systematic quality assessment of 78 studies. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses typically use standardised tools, such as those from the Cochrane Collaboration or the Joanna Briggs Institute, to assess study quality and bias. Not doing so raises concerns about the validity of the findings. Results: The manuscript lacks the statistical analysis tables or forest plots, which are essential parts of a meta-analysis. This absence reduces both the statistical and visual transparency of the study, making it harder for readers to interpret and verify the reported results. Conclusion: In the result section, the authors provide implications and future directions of the results, which is not the appropriate place. On the other hand, the manuscript does not clearly present the study's implications and future research directions in the conclusion. These elements should be explicitly discussed in the conclusion section. Minor Concerns In the introduction section, the manuscript lacks recent citations or references, particularly 2022 to 2025, and in the results section, the authors do not provide recent literature, particularly 2023 to 2025, to justify the results, where recent literature or citations are required to clarify the concepts and generalise the results. Furthermore, several in-text citations are improperly presented or formatted, which requires careful revision to ensure consistency and accuracy. In the methodology section (Section 2.1), the second and third paragraphs contain similar content, leading to redundancy and requiring revision for clarity and conciseness. Furthermore, the analysis period (2020–2024) is relatively narrow, which limits the depth and breadth of insights. The manuscript would benefit from improvements in overall language clarity, grammar, and sentence structure to enhance readability. Recommendation: Not Approved In summary, the manuscript addresses a relevant and potentially valuable research topic. Several methodological and reporting limitations significantly affect the clarity, transparency, and overall rigour of the study. The manuscript contains substantial methodological and reporting limitations in both the systematic review and meta-analytic procedures. Addressing these issues would require significant restructuring and methodological revision. Therefore, I recommend not approving the manuscript for indexing, as the article has fundamental flaws that seriously undermine its findings and conclusions. It requires crucial, substantial revisions for it to become academically valid. Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated? Partly Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? No Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Partly Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review? Partly If this is a Living Systematic Review, is the ‘living’ method appropriate and is the search schedule clearly defined and justified? (‘Living Systematic Review’ or a variation of this term should be included in the title.) Partly Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Cognitive Development, Creativity, Play Participation, Pedagogy and Curriculum Studies, Happiness and Well-being. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Mohakud LL. Peer Review Report For: Creative play and creativity development: A three level meta data analysis of moderators (age, culture, play type) [version 1; peer review: 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2026, 15 :150 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.189765.r455700) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/15-150/v1#referee-response-455700 Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Adjust parameters to alter display View on desktop for interactive features Includes Interactive Elements View on desktop for interactive features Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Stay Updated Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles Register with F1000Research Already registered? Sign in Not now, thanks close PLEASE NOTE If you are an AUTHOR of this article, please check that you signed in with the account associated with this article otherwise we cannot automatically identify your role as an author and your comment will be labelled as a “User Comment”. If you are a REVIEWER of this article, please check that you have signed in with the account associated with this article and then go to your account to submit your report, please do not post your review here. If you do not have access to your original account, please contact us . All commenters must hold a formal affiliation as per our Policies . The information that you give us will be displayed next to your comment. User comments must be in English, comprehensible and relevant to the article under discussion. We reserve the right to remove any comments that we consider to be inappropriate, offensive or otherwise in breach of the User Comment Terms and Conditions . Commenters must not use a comment for personal attacks. When criticisms of the article are based on unpublished data, the data should be made available. I accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions Please confirm that you accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions. Affiliation ✕ refresh Please enter your institution. Note: To add your institution or organisation, start typing the name and then select the correct name from the list. Where applicable, the name will appear in both the original language and in English. Do not paste in the name. If the name does not appear in the drop-down list, we will display the information you have entered. ✕ refresh Country/Region * USA UK Canada China France Germany Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Federated States of Micronesia Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo (Serbia and Montenegro) Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Minor Outlying Islands of the United States Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island North Korea North Macedonia Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Is South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The Gambia The Netherlands Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu UK USA Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Wallis and Futuna West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Please select your country/region. You must enter a comment. Competing Interests Please disclose any competing interests that might be construed to influence your judgment of the article's or peer review report's validity or importance. Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Please state your competing interests The comment has been saved. An error has occurred. Please try again. Cancel Post var lTitle = "Creative play and creativity development:...".replace("'", ''); var linkedInUrl = "http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/15-150/v1" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle) + "&summary=" + encodeURIComponent('Read the article by '); var deliciousUrl = "https://del.icio.us/post?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/15-150/v1&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); var redditUrl = "http://reddit.com/submit?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/15-150/v1" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); linkedInUrl += encodeURIComponent('Rantina M et al.'); var offsetTop = /chrome/i.test( navigator.userAgent ) ? 4 : -10; var addthis_config = { ui_offset_top: offsetTop, services_compact : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_expanded : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_custom : [ { name: "LinkedIn", url: linkedInUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_linkedin.svg" }, { name: "Mendeley", url: "http://www.mendeley.com/import/?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/15-150/v1/mendeley", icon:"/img/icon/at_mendeley.svg" }, { name: "Reddit", url: redditUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_reddit.svg" }, ] }; var addthis_share = { url: "https://f1000research.com/articles/15-150", templates : { twitter : "Creative play and creativity development: A three level meta.... Rantina M et al., published by " + "@F1000Research" + ", https://f1000research.com/articles/15-150/v1" } }; if (typeof(addthis) != "undefined"){ addthis.addEventListener('addthis.ready', checkCount); addthis.addEventListener('addthis.menu.share', checkCount); } $(".f1r-shares-twitter").attr("href", "https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=" + addthis_share.templates.twitter); $(".f1r-shares-facebook").attr("href", "https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=" + addthis_share.url); $(".f1r-shares-linkedin").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[0].url); $(".f1r-shares-reddit").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[2].url); $(".f1r-shares-mendelay").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[1].url); function checkCount(){ setTimeout(function(){ $(".addthis_button_expanded").each(function(){ var count = $(this).text(); if (count !== "" && count != "0") $(this).removeClass("is-hidden"); else $(this).addClass("is-hidden"); }); }, 1000); } close How to cite this report {{reportCitation}} Cancel Copy Citation Details $(function(){R.ui.buttonDropdowns('.dropdown-for-downloads');}); $(function(){R.ui.toolbarDropdowns('.toolbar-dropdown-for-downloads');}); $.get("/articles/acj/172078/189765") new F1000.Clipboard(); new F1000.ThesaurusTermsDisplay("articles", "article", "189765"); $(document).ready(function() { $( "#frame1" ).on('load', function() { var mydiv = $(this).contents().find("div"); var h = mydiv.height(); console.log(h) }); var tooltipLivingFigure = jQuery(".interactive-living-figure-label .icon-more-info"), titleLivingFigure = tooltipLivingFigure.attr("title"); tooltipLivingFigure.simpletip({ fixed: true, position: ["-115", "30"], baseClass: 'small-tooltip', content:titleLivingFigure + " " }); tooltipLivingFigure.removeAttr("title"); $("body").on("click", ".cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); var ref = $(this).attr("data-ref"); $(this).closest(".living-figure-list-container").find("#" + ref).fadeIn(200); }); $("body").on("click", ".close-cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).closest(".popup-window-wrapper").fadeOut(200); }); $(document).on("mouseup", function(e) { var metricsContainer = $(".article-metrics-popover-wrapper"); if (!metricsContainer.is(e.target) && metricsContainer.has(e.target).length === 0) { $(".article-metrics-close-button").click(); } }); var articleId = $('#articleId').val(); if($("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics) { $("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics(articleId, { articleMetricsView: true }); } }); var figshareWidget = $(".new_figshare_widget"); if (figshareWidget.length > 0) { window.figshare.load("f1000", function(Widget) { // Select a tag/tags defined in your page. In this tag we will place the widget. _.map(figshareWidget, function(el){ var widget = new Widget({ articleId: $(el).attr("figshare_articleId") //height:300 // this is the height of the viewer part. [Default: 550] }); widget.initialize(); // initialize the widget widget.mount(el); // mount it in a tag that's on your page // this will save the widget on the global scope for later use from // your JS scripts. This line is optional. //window.widget = widget; }); }); } close Error Close Add Reset F1000.MICROSERVICES.AFFILIATION = ''; $(document).ready(function () { $('.js-affiliations-form').each((index, form) => { new AffiliationForm({ formId: form.id, institutionErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-institution', departmentErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-department', placeSelector: '.js-add-comment-place', stateSelector: '.js-add-comment-state', zipCodeSelector: '.js-add-comment-zipcode', countrySelector: '.js-add-comment-country', countryErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-country', }); }); }); $(document).ready(function () { var reportIds = { "460167": 0, "460166": 0, "460165": 0, "460164": 0, "460163": 0, "460162": 0, "460161": 0, "455694": 0, "455695": 0, "455692": 0, "455693": 0, "460170": 0, "460169": 0, "460168": 0, "455700": 9, "455701": 0, "455698": 0, "455699": 0, "455696": 0, "455697": 0, "458014": 0, "458015": 0, "458022": 0, "458023": 0, "458020": 0, "458021": 0, "458018": 0, "458019": 0, "458016": 0, "458017": 0, "471593": 0, "471592": 0, "474039": 0, "474038": 0, "474037": 0, "474036": 0, "471604": 0, "474035": 0, "474034": 0, "454462": 0, "454463": 0, "454460": 0, "454461": 0, "454458": 0, "474043": 0, "454459": 0, "474042": 0, "454456": 0, "474041": 0, "454457": 0, "474040": 0, "454464": 0, "454465": 0, "472031": 0, "472030": 0, "472029": 0, "472028": 0, "472027": 0, "472033": 0, "472032": 0, }; $(".referee-response-container,.js-referee-report").each(function(index, el) { var reportId = $(el).attr("data-reportid"), reportCount = reportIds[reportId] || 0; $(el).find(".comments-count-container,.js-referee-report-views").html(reportCount); }); var uuidInput = $("#article_uuid"), oldUUId = uuidInput.val(), newUUId = "bc8369d2-7541-4218-bd4b-d2b3e033ff46"; uuidInput.val(newUUId); $("a[href*='article_uuid=']").each(function(index, el) { var newHref = $(el).attr("href").replace(oldUUId, newUUId); $(el).attr("href", newHref); }); }); An innovative open access publishing platform offering rapid publication and open peer review, whilst supporting data deposition and sharing. Browse Gateways Collections How it Works Contact For Developers Cookie Notice Privacy Notice RSS Submit Your Research Follow us © 2012-2026 F1000 Research Ltd. ISSN 2046-1402 | Legal | Partner of Research4Life • CrossRef • ORCID • FAIRSharing R.templateTests.simpleTemplate = R.template(' $text $text $text $text $text '); R.templateTests.runTests(); var F1000platform = new F1000.Platform({ name: "f1000research", displayName: "F1000Research", hostName: "f1000research.com", id: "1", editorialEmail: "[email protected]", infoEmail: "[email protected]", usePmcStats: true }); $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-authors, .dropdown-for-about, .dropdown-for-myresearch');}); // $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-referees');}); $(document).ready(function () { if ($(".cookie-warning").is(":visible")) { $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "35px"); $(".devices").addClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); } $(".cookie-warning .close-button").click(function (e) { $(".devices").removeClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "0"); }); $("#tweeter-feed .tweet-message").each(function (i, message) { var self = $(message); self.html(linkify(self.html())); }); $(".partner").on("mouseenter mouseleave", function() { $(this).find(".gray-scale, .colour").toggleClass("is-hidden"); }); }); Sign In Remember me Forgotten your password? Sign In Cancel Email or password not correct. Please try again Please wait... $(function(){ // Note: All the setup needs to run against a name attribute and *not* the id due the clonish // nature of facebox... $("a[id=googleSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("GOOGLE"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=facebookSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("FACEBOOK"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=orcidSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("ORCID"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); }); If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password. The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000. Email address not valid, please try again You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here . You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here . Code not correct, please try again Reset password Cancel Email us for further assistance. Server error, please try again. If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password. If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance. Please wait... Register $(document).ready(function () { signIn.createSignInAsRow($("#sign-in-form-gfb-popup")); $(".target-field").each(function () { var uris = $(this).val().split("/"); if (uris.pop() === "login") { $(this).val(uris.toString().replace(",","/")); } }); });