References
1. Littauer,U.Z. and Grunberg‐Manago,M. (2002) Polynucleotide Phosphorylase. In Creighton
T.E. (ed), Encyclopedia of Molecular Biology. Wiley, New York, pp. 1911–1918.
2. Bermüdez-Cruz,R.M., Ramïrez,F., Kameyama-Kawabe,L. and Montañez,C. (2005) Conserved
domains in polynucleotide phosphorylase among eubacteria. Biochimie, 87, 737–745.
3. Briani,F., Carzaniga,T. and Dehò,G. (2016) Regulation and functions of bacterial PNPase.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA, 7, 241–258.
4. Falchi,F.A., Pizzoccheri,R. and Briani,F. (2022) Activity and Function in Human Cells of the
Evolutionary Conserved Exonuclease Polynucleotide Phosphorylase. Int J Mol Sci, 23, 1652.
5. Shi,Z., Yang,W.Z., Lin-Chao,S., Chak,K.F. and Yuan,H.S. (2008) Crystal structure of
Escherichia coli PNPase: Central channel residues are involved in processive RNA
degradation. RNA, 14, 2361–2371.
6. Golzarroshan,B., Lin,C.-L., Li,C.-L., Yang,W.-Z., Chu,L.-Y., Agrawal,S. and Yuan,H.S. (2018)
Crystal structure of dimeric human PNPase reveals why disease-linked mutants suffer from
low RNA import and degradation activities. Nucleic Acids Res, 46, 8630–8640.
7. Dendooven,T., Sinha,D., Roeselová,A., Cameron,T.A., De Lay,N.R., Luisi,B.F. and
Bandyra,K.J. (2021) A cooperative PNPase-Hfq-RNA carrier complex facilitates bacterial
riboregulation. Mol Cell, 81, 2901-2913.e5.
8. Hardwick,S.W., Gubbey,T., Hug,I., Jenal,U. and Luisi,B.F. (2012) Crystal structure of
Caulobacter crescentus polynucleotide phosphorylase reveals a mechanism of RNA substrate
channelling and RNA degradosome assembly. Open Biol, 2, 120028.
9. Symmons,M.F., Jones,G.H. and Luisi,B.F. (2000) A duplicated fold is the structural basis for
polynucleotide phosphorylase catalytic activity, processivity, and regulation. Structure, 8,
1215–1226.
10. Nurmohamed,S., Vaidialingam,B., Callaghan,A.J. and Luisi,B.F. (2009) Crystal Structure of
Escherichia coli Polynucleotide Phosphorylase Core Bound to RNase E, RNA and
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 7, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.03.616462doi: bioRxiv preprint
27
Manganese: Implications for Catalytic Mechanism and RNA Degradosome Assembly. J Mol
Biol, 389, 17–33.
11. Unciuleac,M.C., Ghosh,S., de la Cruz,M.J., Goldgur,Y. and Shuman,S. (2021) Structure and
mechanism of Mycobacterium smegmatis polynucleotide phosphorylase. RNA, 27, 959–969.
12. Carzaniga,T., Mazzantini,E., Nardini,M., Regonesi,M.E., Greco,C., Briani,F., De Gioia,L.,
Dehò,G. and Tortora,P. (2014) A conserved loop in polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase)
essential for both RNA and ADP/phosphate binding. Biochimie, 97, 49–59.
13. Lin,C.L., Wang,Y.T., Yang,W.Z., Hsiao,Y.Y. and Yuan,H.S. (2012) Crystal structure of
human polynucleotide phosphorylase: insights into its domain function in RNA binding and
degradation. Nucleic Acids Res, 40, 4146–4157.
14. Leszczyniecka,M., Kang,D.-C., Sarkar,D., Su,Z.-Z., Holmes,M., Valerie,K. and Fisher,P.B.
(2002) Identification and cloning of human polynucleotide phosphorylase, hPNPase old-35,
in the context of terminal differentiation and cellular senescence. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences USA, 99, 16636–16641.
15. Chen,H.-W., Rainey,R.N., Balatoni,C.E., Dawson,D.W., Troke,J.J., Wasiak,S., Hong,J.S.,
McBride,H.M., Koehler,C.M., Teitell,M.A., et al. (2006) Mammalian Polynucleotide
Phosphorylase Is an Intermembrane Space RNase That Maintains Mitochondrial
Homeostasis. Mol Cell Biol, 26, 8475–8487.
16. Borowski,L.S., Dziembowski,A., Hejnowicz,M.S., Stepien,P.P. and Szczesny,R.J. (2013)
Human mitochondrial RNA decay mediated by PNPase-hSuv3 complex takes place in
distinct foci. Nucleic Acids Res, 41, 1223–1240.
17. Hart,T., Chandrashekhar,M., Aregger,M., Steinhart,Z., Brown,K.R., MacLeod,G., Mis,M.,
Zimmermann,M., Fradet-Turcotte,A., Sun,S., et al. (2015) High-Resolution CRISPR Screens
Reveal Fitness Genes and Genotype-Specific Cancer Liabilities. Cell, 163, 1515–1526.
18. Shimada,E., Ahsan,F.M., Nili,M., Huang,D., Atamdede,S., TeSlaa,T., Case,D., Yu,X.,
Gregory,B.D., Perrin,B.J., et al. (2018) PNPase knockout results in mtDNA loss and an
altered metabolic gene expression program. PLoS One, 13, e0200925.
19. Wang,G., Chen,H.W., Oktay,Y., Zhang,J., Allen,E.L., Smith,G.M., Fan,K.C., Hong,J.S.,
French,S.W., McCaffery,J.M., et al. (2010) PNPASE regulates RNA import into
mitochondria. Cell, 142, 456–467.
20. Sarkar,D., Lebedeva,I. V., Emdad,L., Kang,D.C., Baldwin,A.S. and Fisher,P.B. (2004) Human
polynucleotide phosphorylase (hPNPaseold-35): a potential link between aging and
inflammation. Cancer Res, 64, 7473–7478.
21. Rius,R., Van Bergen,N.J., Compton,A.G., Riley,L.G., Kava,M.P., Balasubramaniam,S.,
Amor,D.J., Fanjul-Fernandez,M., Cowley,M.J., Fahey,M.C., et al. (2019) Clinical spectrum
and functional consequences associated with bi-allelic pathogenic PNPT1 variants. J Clin
Med, 8, 2020.
22. Barbier,M., Bahlo,M., Pennisi,A., Jacoupy,M., Tankard,R.M., Ewenczyk,C., Davies,K.C.,
Lino-Coulon,P., Colace,C., Rafehi,H., et al. (2022) Heterozygous PNPT1 Variants Cause
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 25. Ann Neurol, 92, 122–137.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 7, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.03.616462doi: bioRxiv preprint
28
23. Falchi,F.A., Forti,F., Carnelli,C., Genco,A., Pizzoccheri,R., Manzari,C., Pavesi,G. and
Briani,F. (2023) Human PNPase causes RNA stabilization and accumulation of R-loops in
the Escherichia coli model system. Sci Rep, 13, 11771.
24. Portnoy,V., Palnizky,G., Yehudai-Resheff,S., Glaser,F. and Schuster,G. (2008) Analysis of the
human polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) reveals differences in RNA binding and
response to phosphate compared to its bacterial and chloroplast counterparts. RNA, 14, 297–
309.
25. Vedrenne,V., Gowher,A., De Lonlay,P., Nitschke,P., Serre,V., Boddaert,N., Altuzarra,C.,
Mager-Heckel,A.M., Chretien,F., Entelis,N., et al. (2012) Mutation in PNPT1, which
encodes a polyribonucleotide nucleotidyltransferase, impairs RNA import into mitochondria
and causes respiratory-chain deficiency. Am J Hum Genet, 91, 912–918.
26. Von Ameln,S., Wang,G., Boulouiz,R., Rutherford,M.A., Smith,G.M., Li,Y., Pogoda,H.M.,
Nürnberg,G., Stiller,B., Volk,A.E., et al. (2012) A mutation in PNPT1, encoding
mitochondrial-RNA-import protein PNPase, causes hereditary hearing loss. Am J Hum Genet,
91, 919–927.
27. Matilainen,S., Carroll,C.J., Richter,U., Euro,L., Pohjanpelto,M., Paetau,A., Isohanni,P. and
Suomalainen,A. (2017) Defective mitochondrial RNA processing due to PNPT1 variants
causes Leigh syndrome. Hum Mol Genet, 26, 3352–3361.
28. Eaton,A., Bernier,F.P., Goedhart,C., Caluseriu,O., Lamont,R.E., Boycott,K.M.,
Parboosingh,J.S. and Innes,A.M. (2018) Is PNPT1-related hearing loss ever non-syndromic?
Whole exome sequencing of adult siblings expands the natural history of PNPT1-related
disorders. Am J Med Genet A, 176, 2487–2493.
29. Sasaki,I. and Bertani,G. (1965) Growth abnormalities in Hfr derivatives of Escherichia coli
strain C. J Gen Microbiol, 40, 365–376.
30. Datsenko,K.A. and Wanner,B.L. (2000) One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in
Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 97, 6640–6645.
31. Wittig,I., Braun,H.P. and Schägger,H. (2006) Blue native PAGE. Nat Protoc, 1, 418–428.
32. Regonesi,M.E., Briani,F., Ghetta,A., Zangrossi,S., Ghisotti,D., Tortora,P. and Dehò,G. (2004)
A mutation in polynucleotide phosphorylase from Escherichia coli impairing RNA binding
and degradosome stability. Nucleic Acids Res, 32, 1006–1017.
33. Carzaniga,T., Falchi,F.A., Forti,F., Antoniani,D., Landini,P. and Briani,F. (2021) Different
csra expression levels in c versus k‐12 E. coli strains affect biofilm formation and impact the
regulatory mechanism presided by the CsrB and CsrC small RNAs. Microorganisms, 9,
1010.
34. Rooney,J.P., Ryde,I.T., Sanders,L.H., Howlett,E. V., Colton,M.D., Germ,K.E., Mayer,G.D.,
Timothy Greenamyre,J. and Meyer,J.N. (2015) PCR based determination of mitochondrial
DNA copy number in multiple species. Methods in Molecular Biology, 1241, 23–38.
35. Nassar,L.R., Barber,G.P., Benet-Pagès,A., Casper,J., Clawson,H., Diekhans,M., Fischer,C.,
Gonzalez,J.N., Hinrichs,A.S., Lee,B.T., et al. (2023) The UCSC Genome Browser database:
2023 update. Nucleic Acids Res, 51, D1188–D1195.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 7, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.03.616462doi: bioRxiv preprint
29
36. Robinson,M.D., McCarthy,D.J. and Smyth,G.K. (2010) edgeR: a Bioconductor package for
differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics, 26, 139–140.
37. Kuleshov,M. V., Jones,M.R., Rouillard,A.D., Fernandez,N.F., Duan,Q., Wang,Z., Koplev,S.,
Jenkins,S.L., Jagodnik,K.M., Lachmann,A., et al. (2016) Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set
enrichment analysis web server 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res, 44, W90–W97.
38. Shi,Y., Mowery,R.A., Ashley,J., Hentz,M., Ramirez,A.J., Bilgicer,B., Slunt-Brown,H.,
Borchelt,D.R. and Shaw,B.F. (2012) Abnormal SDS-PAGE migration of cytosolic proteins
can identify domains and mechanisms that control surfactant binding. Protein Science, 21,
1197–1209.
39. de Jong,W.W., Zweers,A. and Cohen,L.H. (1978) Influence of single amino acid substitutions
on electrophoretic mobility of sodium dodecyl sulfate-protein complexes. Biochem Biophys
Res Commun, 82, 532–539.
40. Carzaniga,T., Sbarufatti,G., Briani,F. and Dehò,G. (2017) Polynucleotide phosphorylase is
implicated in homologous recombination and DNA repair in Escherichia coli. BMC
Microbiol, 17, 81.
41. Cardenas,P.P., Carzaniga,T., Zangrossi,S., Briani,F., Garcia-Tirado,E., Dehò,G. and
Alonso,J.C. (2011) Polynucleotide phosphorylase exonuclease and polymerase activities on
single-stranded DNA ends are modulated by RecN, SsbA and RecA proteins. Nucleic Acids
Res, 39, 9250–9261.
42. Koblan,L.W., Doman,J.L., Wilson,C., Levy,J.M., Tay,T., Newby,G.A., Maianti,J.P.,
Raguram,A. and Liu,D.R. (2018) Improving cytidine and adenine base editors by expression
optimization and ancestral reconstruction. Nat Biotechnol, 36, 843–848.
43. Grünewald,J., Zhou,R., Iyer,S., Lareau,C.A., Garcia,S.P., Aryee,M.J. and Joung,J.K. (2019)
CRISPR DNA base editors with reduced RNA off-target and self-editing activities. Nat
Biotechnol, 37, 1041–1048.
44. Kohrogi,K., Imagawa,E., Muto,Y., Hirai,K., Migita,M., Mitsubuchi,H., Miyake,N.,
Matsumoto,N., Nakamura,K. and Endo,F. (2015) Biotin-responsive basal ganglia disease: A
case diagnosed by whole exome sequencing. J Hum Genet, 60, 381–385.
45. Ortigoza-Escobar,J.D., Molero-Luis,M., Arias,A., Martí-Sánchez,L., Rodriguez-Pombo,P.,
Artuch,R. and Pérez-Dueñas,B. (2016) Treatment of genetic defects of thiamine transport and
metabolism. Expert Rev Neurother, 16, 755–763.
46. Cavalcanti,F., Kidd,T., Patitucci,A., Valentino,P., Bono,F., Nistico,R. and Quattrone,A. (2009)
An axon regeneration signature in a Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease type 2 patient. J
Neurogenet, 23, 324–328.
47. López-Murcia,F.J., Terni,B. and Llobet,A. (2015) SPARC triggers a cell-autonomous program
of synapse elimination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 112, 13366–13371.
48. Chen,S., Zou,Q., Chen,Y., Kuang,X., Wu,W., Guo,M., Cai,Y. and Li,Q. (2020) Regulation of
SPARC family proteins in disorders of the central nervous system. Brain Res Bull, 163, 178–
189.
49. Kalashnikova,E., Lorca,R.A., Kaur,I., Barisone,G.A., Li,B., Ishimaru,T., Trimmer,J.S.,
Mohapatra,D.P. and Díaz,E. (2010) SynDIG1: An Activity-Regulated, AMPA- Receptor-
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 7, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.03.616462doi: bioRxiv preprint
30
Interacting Transmembrane Protein that Regulates Excitatory Synapse Development. Neuron,
65, 80–93.
50. Díaz,E. (2012) SynDIG1 regulation of excitatory synapse maturation. Journal of Physiology,
590, 33–38.
51. Chenaux,G., Matt,L., Hill,T.C., Kaur,I., Liu,X.B., Kirk,L.M., Speca,D.J., McMahon,S.A.,
Zito,K., Hell,J.W., et al. (2016) Loss of SynDIG1 reduces excitatory synapse maturation but
not formation in Vivo. eNeuro, 3, e0130-16.2016 1–17
52. Akiyama,T., Suzuki,N., Ishikawa,M., Fujimori,K., Sone,T., Kawada,J., Funayama,R.,
Fujishima,F., Mitsuzawa,S., Ikeda,K., et al. (2019) Aberrant axon branching via Fos-B
dysregulation in FUS-ALS motor neurons. EBioMedicine, 45, 362–378.
53. Manning,C.E., Eagle,A.L., Kwiatkowski,C.C., Achargui,R., Woodworth,H., Potter,E.,
Ohnishi,Y., Leinninger,G.M. and Robison,A.J. (2019) Hippocampal Subgranular Zone FosB
Expression Is Critical for Neurogenesis and Learning. Neuroscience, 406, 225–233.
54. Hiroi,N., Marek,G.J., Brown,J.R., Ye,H., Saudou,F., Vaidya,V.A., Duman,R.S.,
Greenberg,M.E. and Nestler,E.J. (1998) Essential role of the fosB gene in molecular, cellular,
and behavioral actions of chronic electroconvulsive seizures. Journal of Neuroscience, 18,
6952–6962.
55. Liu,X., Fu,R., Pan,Y., Meza-Sosa,K.F., Zhang,Z. and Lieberman,J. (2018) PNPT1 Release
from Mitochondria during Apoptosis Triggers Decay of Poly(A) RNAs. Cell, 174, 187-
201.e12.
56. Iwata,R., Casimir,P. and Vanderhaeghen,P. (2020) Mitochondrial dynamics in postmitotic
cells regulate neurogenesis. Science, 369, 858–862.
57. Vujovic,F., Simonian,M., Hughes,W.E., Shepherd,C.E., Hunter,N. and Farahani,R.M. (2024)
Mitochondria facilitate neuronal differentiation by metabolising nuclear-encoded RNA. Cell
Commun Signal, 22, 450.
58. Chankova,S.G., Dimova,E., Dimitrova,M. and Bryant,P.E. (2007) Induction of DNA double-
strand breaks by zeocin in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and the role of increased DNA
double-strand breaks rejoining in the formation of an adaptive response. Radiat Environ
Biophys, 46, 409–416.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 7, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.03.616462doi: bioRxiv preprint
31
TABLES
Table 1. Results of editing experiments
P140L E475G
Editing round
1 2 1 2
Sorted cells 192 192 192 192 384 384 384 192
Clones obtained 113 6 24 7 14 12 170 64
Sequenceda 36 6 24 7 14 12 51 16
Codon Editedb 17 0 0 0 0 0 15 8
Desired homozygous
clones 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
aRelevant PNPT1 exons were sequenced as detailed in the text
bAll the identified mutations in the 140 and 475 codons are considered
Table 2. Top10 significant p-values and q-values for GO Biological Process 2023
Gene Ontology 2023 Terma p-value q-value
p. E475G homozygous vs. wt cells
Positive Regulation of Transcription by RNA Polymerase II (GO:0045944) 3.26E-07 0.001
Nervous System Development (GO:0007399) 1.41E-06 0.003
Positive Regulation of Neurogenesis (GO:0050769) 3.69E-06 0.005
Neuron Projection Development (GO:0031175) 6.11E-06 0.005
Regulation of Cell Cycle (GO:0051726) 7.70E-06 0.005
Dendrite Morphogenesis (GO:0048813) 8.01E-06 0.005
Regulation of Dendritic Spine Morphogenesis (GO:0061001) 9.13E-06 0.005
Positive Regulation of Signal Transduction (GO:0009967) 1.07E-05 0.005
Peptidyl-Serine Phosphorylation (GO:0018105) 1.42E-05 0.006
Neuron Migration (GO:0001764) 1.47E-05 0.006
aAnalysis performed with Enrichr (37) on DEGs with FDR > 0.01 in the indicated pairwise
comparison. p- and q-values were calculated by the software using the Benjamini-Hochberg method
for correction for multiple hypotheses testing.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 7, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.03.616462doi: bioRxiv preprint
32
FIGURES
Fig. 1. hPNPase domains and PNPT1 mutations in 293T edited cells. A. RPH1 and RPH2, RNase
PH domains 1 and 2; AAH, all α-helical domain; KH and S1, RNA binding domains. B. PNPT1+
mutations in edited 293T lines. Left panels. Sequence of the region of interest in exon 5 in PNPT1+
homozygous (wt, on top), c.418C>T / c.419C>T compound heterozygous (he, middle
electropherogram) and homozygous c.418C>T lines (ho, on bottom). Right panels. Sequence of the
region of interest in exon 17 in PNPT1+ homozygous (wt, on top), heterozygous (he) and
homozygous (ho) lines for the c.1424A>G mutation (middle and bottom electropherograms,
respectively). Nucleotide substitutions are represented with the red letter “N”. Aminoacidic
sequence is shown with amino acid abbreviations above the nucleotide sequences.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 7, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.03.616462doi: bioRxiv preprint
33
Fig. 2. Migration in denaturing and native gels of hPNPase variants. A. Commassie staining
(upper panel) and western blot (lower panel) of purified hPNPase variants. 4 or 0.8 µg of purified
hPNPase variants run in 10 % SDS-PAGE were analysed either by gel-staining with Coomassie or
by western blotting with monoclonal anti-hPNPase antibodies, respectively. The migration of
molecular weight (MW; kDa) markers (Thermo Scientific PageRuler Plus Prestained Ladder) is
reported on the left. hPNPase pathological variants are indicated with the position of the mutated
amino acid. N and C indicate the wt hPNPase with the His tag at the N- or C-terminal, respectively.
B. Migration of EcPNPase (Ec) and hPNPase with His-tag at either the N-ter (N) or the C-ter (C) in
4-16% Blue Native (BN) gel. 2 µg of purified proteins were loaded. C. Migration of wt and mutated
hPNPase variants in 4-16% BN gel. 4 µg of purified proteins were loaded. hPNPase pathological
variants are indicated as in A. In B and C, the migration of MW (kDa) markers (NativeMark
Unstained Protein Standard, Invitrogen) is reported on the left.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 7, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.03.616462doi: bioRxiv preprint
34
Fig. 3. RNA binding and degradation activity. A. EMSA with fluorescent COX RNA (0.4 nM)
incubated with the indicated amount of hPNPase (HsPNP) and run in 5% polyacrylamide native
gels. C1, C2 and C3, complex 1, 2 and 3, respectively; COX, unbound COX probe. B and C.
Degradation assay. 0.3 nM COX RNA (B) and 1.9 nM RNA20 (C) incubated at 37 °C with 50 nM
hPNPase (hPNP) for the time specified on top of the lanes. Samples were run in 10%
polyacrylamide denaturing gel. COX, full-length COX probe. In all panels, experiments
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 7, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.03.616462doi: bioRxiv preprint
35
representative of ≥ 2 replicates are shown. hPNPase variants are indicated with the mutated
residue.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 7, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.03.616462doi: bioRxiv preprint
36
Fig. 4. DNA binding and degradation activity. DNA20 is a DNA oligonucleotide with the same
sequence as RNA20, and thymine in place of uracil. A. EMSA with radiolabelled DNA20 or
RNA20 (0.6 nM) incubated with the indicated amount of hPNPase (HsPNP) and run in 5%
polyacrylamide native gels. C1, complex 1; U, unbound DNA20 or RNA20 probes. B.
Degradation assay. 1.9 nM DNA20 incubated at 37 °C with 50 nM hPNPase (HsPNP) for the time
specified on top of the lanes. Samples were run in 10% polyacrylamide denaturing gel. FL, full-
length DNA20. Experiments representative of two replicates are shown in both panels. Mutated
hPNPase variants are indicated with the mutated residues.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 7, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.03.616462doi: bioRxiv preprint
37
Fig. 5. Phenotype of E. coli expressing mutated hPNPases. A. and B. Western blot analysis of
protein levels and stability. Crude extracts were subjected to 10 % SDS-PAGE and immunoblot
using hPNPase- and S3- specific (loading control) antibodies. hPNPase signals were quantified
and normalized against S3 and wt hPNPase signals. A. R.A., relative amount. Symbols represent
replicates, bars median values and stars significance of the difference with respect to wt hPNPase
amount (dotted line) estimated with ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison. ***, P< 0.001;
**, P < 0.01, no symbol, not significant. A representative experiment is shown on the right of the
graph. The position of MW markers (kDa) is reported on the left. B. hPNPase stability. hPNPase
signals were quantified with ImageLab (Bio-Rad) and normalized against the signal at t = 0.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 7, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.03.616462doi: bioRxiv preprint
38
Symbols represent average (N = 2) with range. Bars are in some cases hidden by symbols. The
exponential one phase decay curves interpolating data are shown as dotted lines (calculated with
GraphPad Prism). C. Cultures were grown in LB or M9 supp measuring the optical density
(OD600) at intervals. Symbols indicate average (N = 3) with standard deviation. D. Cultures of the
indicated strains were serially diluted (x10 from left to right) and replicated on LB-agar containing
the indicated amount of zeocin. Plates were incubated 24h at 37 °C. E. ROS, R-loops and recA
mRNA levels. Histograms represent average with SD and dots represent single determinations.
Significance of the difference with respect to the wt is indicated by stars and was evaluated with
Welch (ROS) or ordinary ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison using GraphPad Prism. *,
P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001. N. F., Normalized fluorescence with
respect to that of the Δpnp; R.A., relative amount with respect to wt levels. A-E. Different PNPase
loci are indicated as follows: Ec, endogenous pnp gene; wt, wt PNPT1Ec; Δ, Δpnp mutant.
PNPT1Ec mutant alleles are denoted by the number of the mutated codon.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 7, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.03.616462doi: bioRxiv preprint
39
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 7, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.03.616462doi: bioRxiv preprint
40
Fig. 6. Phenotype of stable cell lines with PNPT1 mutations. A and B. PNPT1 expression at the
mRNA (A) and protein (B) levels estimated by RT-qPCR and western blotting, respectively. In
the two graphs, symbols represent single determinations and bars the average with standard
deviation. B. Typical results of a western blotting experiment are shown on the left. GAPDH was
used as loading control. C. MT-CO1 expression levels measured by real-time RT-PCR. Dots,
single determinations; bars, average with standard deviation. D-F. Agilent Seahorse XF analysis of
mitochondrial stress. The graphs summarize the results of three independent experiments, with
four technical replicates each. Average and SD are plotted in all cases. D. Oxygen consumption
rate (OCR, measured in pmol/min/1000 cells) over time following the addition of mitochondrial
inhibitors: O, oligomycin; F, FCCP; R/A, rotenone and antimycin A. E. Basal respiration
(pmol/min/1000 cells), proton leak (pmol/min/1000 cells), and relative spare respiratory capacity
(%). F. OCR plotted over the extracellular acidification rate (ECAR). Data from each experiment
were normalized to the respective average values of OCR and ECAR. A-F. 293T are indicated as
wt and 293T mutant derivatives are denoted by the amino acid substitutions in hPNPase. he,
heterozygous; ho, homozygous. A to E. Significance of the difference with the wt determined with
ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison (calculated with GraphPad Prism) is indicated by
stars. ***, P < 0.001; *, P < 0.05. Non-significant comparisons are not indicated.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 7, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.03.616462doi: bioRxiv preprint
41
Fig. 7. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in human cells expressing E475G hPNPase. A.
Principal Component analysis of transcriptomic data. wt, 293T PNPT1+; he and ho, heterozygous
and homozygous E475G mutation, respectively; NT, not treated; T, treated with staurosporine. B,
left panel. Number of up- and down-regulated genes with |log2(FoldChange)| ≥ 1 and FDR < 0.01
in the indicated pairwise comparisons. STS, staurosporine. Right panel, numbers of up- and down-
regulated genes in wt and mutant cell lines, indicated as in A, upon STS incubation.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted October 7, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.03.616462doi: bioRxiv preprint