DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF TRANSVAGINAL ULTRASOUND IN DIAGNOSING ENDOMETRIAL POLYP TAKING HISTOPATHOLOGY AS GOLD STANDARD

article OA: hybrid CC0

Abstract

Background: Endometrial polyps are a frequent cause of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) in women of reproductive and perimenopausal age. Accurate, noninvasive diagnosis is essential for appropriate management. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) is widely used for evaluating endometrial pathology, but its diagnostic accuracy varies across studies. Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound in detecting endometrial polyps, using histopathology as the gold standard. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Lahore General Hospital / PGMI, Lahore, and included 112 women aged 22–45 years presenting with AUB. All underwent TVS followed by histopathological evaluation of endometrial tissue obtained by biopsy or hysteroscopy. Diagnostic indices, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy, were calculated using histopathology as the reference standard. Results: Endometrial polyps were confirmed on histopathology in 16 (14.3%) patients. TVS identified polyps in 58 (51.8%) cases. The diagnostic performance of TVS was: sensitivity 68.8%, specificity 51.0%, PPV 19.0%, NPV 90.7%, and overall accuracy 53.6%. The high NPV indicated good reliability of TVS in ruling out endometrial polyps, whereas the low PPV reflected over-diagnosis due to overlapping sonographic features with other endometrial conditions. Conclusion: Transvaginal ultrasound is a useful, noninvasive, and readily available screening tool for detecting endometrial polyps in women with AUB. A negative TVS reliably excludes polyps; however, positive findings should be confirmed by hysteroscopy and histopathology before therapeutic intervention.
Full text 2,777 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Background

Endometrial polyps are a frequent cause of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) in women of reproductive and perimenopausal age. Accurate, noninvasive diagnosis is essential for appropriate management. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) is widely used for evaluating endometrial pathology, but its diagnostic accuracy varies across studies.

Objective

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound in detecting endometrial polyps, using histopathology as the gold standard.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Lahore General Hospital / PGMI, Lahore, and included 112 women aged 22–45 years presenting with AUB. All underwent TVS followed by histopathological evaluation of endometrial tissue obtained by biopsy or hysteroscopy. Diagnostic indices, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy, were calculated using histopathology as the reference standard.

Results

Endometrial polyps were confirmed on histopathology in 16 (14.3%) patients. TVS identified polyps in 58 (51.8%) cases. The diagnostic performance of TVS was: sensitivity 68.8%, specificity 51.0%, PPV 19.0%, NPV 90.7%, and overall accuracy 53.6%. The high NPV indicated good reliability of TVS in ruling out endometrial polyps, whereas the low PPV reflected over-diagnosis due to overlapping sonographic features with other endometrial conditions.

Conclusion

Transvaginal ultrasound is a useful, noninvasive, and readily available screening tool for detecting endometrial polyps in women with AUB. A negative TVS reliably excludes polyps; however, positive findings should be confirmed by hysteroscopy and histopathology before therapeutic intervention. Downloads Downloads Published Issue Section License Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Aaima Bakhtawar, Dr. Nadia Hanif, Dr. Sumaira Yousaf, Dr. Fatima Iqbal, Dr. Muneeb Ahmad, Dr. Samia Pervaiz (Author) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. All articles published in the Journal of Medical & Health Sciences Review (JMHSR) remain the copyright of their respective authors. JMHSR publishes its content under the Creative Commons Attribution‑NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY‑NC 4.0), which allows readers to freely share, copy, adapt, and build upon the work for non‑commercial purposes, provided proper credit is given to both the authors and the journal.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-14T06:28:07.472223+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK