Land remains a blind spot in tracking progress under the Paris Agreement due to lack of data comparability

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Carbon fluxes from land use are key to the Paris Agreement. However, data comparability issues persist between countries’ inventories and targets (Nationally Determined Contributions, NDCs), which generally include direct and indirect anthropogenic net emissions, and what models provide as Paris-aligned benchmarks (direct net emissions only). As a result, the first Global Stocktake, aiming to track collective mitigation progress, did not explicitly consider country targets for land. This blind spot leaves countries uninformed of the 2030 gap between their ambitions for mitigation on land and models’ benchmarks, affecting net-zero trajectories. We provide an analysis of land-related targets under NDC 2020, splitting reduced emissions and additional sinks. Land use holds a quarter of global mitigation pledges in 2030, mostly through conditional support (-1.5ǂ1.1 GtCO2e/yr, of which − 0.6 GtCO2e/yr are additional sinks). To provide more policy-relevant information to decision makers, it is crucial that future Global Stocktakes also include appropriate comparisons of modelled scenarios and country land-use data.
Full text 13,945 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Land remains a blind spot in tracking progress under the Paris Agreement due to lack of data comparability | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Land remains a blind spot in tracking progress under the Paris Agreement due to lack of data comparability Rosa Maria Roman-Cuesta, Michel den Elzen, Zuelclady Araujo, Nicklas Forsell, and 10 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5440972/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Carbon fluxes from land use are key to the Paris Agreement. However, data comparability issues persist between countries’ inventories and targets (Nationally Determined Contributions, NDCs), which generally include direct and indirect anthropogenic net emissions, and what models provide as Paris-aligned benchmarks (direct net emissions only). As a result, the first Global Stocktake, aiming to track collective mitigation progress, did not explicitly consider country targets for land. This blind spot leaves countries uninformed of the 2030 gap between their ambitions for mitigation on land and models’ benchmarks, affecting net-zero trajectories. We provide an analysis of land-related targets under NDC 2020, splitting reduced emissions and additional sinks. Land use holds a quarter of global mitigation pledges in 2030, mostly through conditional support (-1.5ǂ1.1 GtCO 2 e/yr, of which − 0.6 GtCO 2 e/yr are additional sinks). To provide more policy-relevant information to decision makers, it is crucial that future Global Stocktakes also include appropriate comparisons of modelled scenarios and country land-use data. Environmental Policy Forestry NDCs Land use Climate change mitigation Global Stocktake Paris Agreement Full Text Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Supplementary Material is not available with this version. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-5440972","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":377277328,"identity":"0da35929-7ee8-4d33-b5d9-5e80673d34f8","order_by":0,"name":"Rosa Maria Roman-Cuesta","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6945-8402","institution":"Joint Research Centre","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Rosa","middleName":"Maria","lastName":"Roman-Cuesta","suffix":""},{"id":377277329,"identity":"f1fc6eb4-0bdb-4667-a7cc-7ca16381650d","order_by":1,"name":"Michel den Elzen","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Michel","middleName":"den","lastName":"Elzen","suffix":""},{"id":377277330,"identity":"757ff0b9-95c7-4700-8e86-e6faf1748e92","order_by":2,"name":"Zuelclady Araujo","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"IIASA","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Zuelclady","middleName":"","lastName":"Araujo","suffix":""},{"id":377277331,"identity":"f275a071-5e87-46bd-b476-9ace25566ef5","order_by":3,"name":"Nicklas Forsell","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"IIASA","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Nicklas","middleName":"","lastName":"Forsell","suffix":""},{"id":377282680,"identity":"681b2f7b-fb28-480a-a930-f3191619a746","order_by":4,"name":"William F. Lamb","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"William","middleName":"F.","lastName":"Lamb","suffix":""},{"id":377282681,"identity":"9488a42a-3dfc-4157-b01b-3a0987067301","order_by":5,"name":"Emily McGlynn","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Emily","middleName":"","lastName":"McGlynn","suffix":""},{"id":377282682,"identity":"04824423-90ff-42cd-a99a-690b24a6d6cd","order_by":6,"name":"Joana Melo","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Joint Research Centre","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Joana","middleName":"","lastName":"Melo","suffix":""},{"id":377282683,"identity":"63e04df0-082d-4db9-a658-913c7ce1eb3b","order_by":7,"name":"Simone Rossi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Joint Research Centre","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Simone","middleName":"","lastName":"Rossi","suffix":""},{"id":377282684,"identity":"f6e6455a-d855-4006-842a-aec234d7c0a7","order_by":8,"name":"Malte Meinshausen","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The University of Melbourne","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Malte","middleName":"","lastName":"Meinshausen","suffix":""},{"id":377282685,"identity":"9bf3cb07-0d41-4312-b08d-d96a939ab1ab","order_by":9,"name":"Sandro Federici","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Institute for Global Environmental Strategies","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sandro","middleName":"","lastName":"Federici","suffix":""},{"id":377282686,"identity":"d76adfd7-ca99-4c7b-874f-7c8d6807ac6e","order_by":10,"name":"Matthew Gidden","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"IIASA","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Matthew","middleName":"","lastName":"Gidden","suffix":""},{"id":377282687,"identity":"1f2ec452-2e28-4510-add1-4b0de3e41ddb","order_by":11,"name":"Kimon Keramidas","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Joint Research Centre","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kimon","middleName":"","lastName":"Keramidas","suffix":""},{"id":377282688,"identity":"2d36653c-d8a1-4110-a490-4fb2d64fac20","order_by":12,"name":"Anu Korouso","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Joint Research Centre","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Anu","middleName":"","lastName":"Korouso","suffix":""},{"id":377282689,"identity":"3106e537-4c42-4cdc-82cf-b81fa9025ca1","order_by":13,"name":"Giacomo Grassi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Joint Research Centre","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Giacomo","middleName":"","lastName":"Grassi","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-11-12 15:53:19","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5440972/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5440972/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":69651994,"identity":"e9fe33b5-4231-4849-9d3a-7b1416b42feb","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-11-22 16:27:29","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1297551,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"RomanCuestaetalLULUCFandtheGST2023manuscriptfinal.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5440972/v1_covered_164a92f9-af73-4f3e-95a6-6d5918ddbcb4.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSupplementary Material is not available with this version.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLand remains a blind spot in tracking progress under the Paris Agreement due to lack of data comparability\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"Joint Research Centre","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"NDCs, Land use, Climate change mitigation, Global Stocktake, Paris Agreement","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5440972/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5440972/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eCarbon fluxes from land use are key to the Paris Agreement. However, data comparability issues persist between countries\u0026rsquo; inventories and targets (Nationally Determined Contributions, NDCs), which generally include direct and indirect anthropogenic net emissions, and what models provide as Paris-aligned benchmarks (direct net emissions only). As a result, the first Global Stocktake, aiming to track collective mitigation progress, did not explicitly consider country targets for land. This blind spot leaves countries uninformed of the 2030 gap between their ambitions for mitigation on land and models\u0026rsquo; benchmarks, affecting net-zero trajectories. We provide an analysis of land-related targets under NDC 2020, splitting reduced emissions and additional sinks. Land use holds a quarter of global mitigation pledges in 2030, mostly through conditional support (-1.5ǂ1.1 GtCO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003ee/yr, of which \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.6 GtCO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003ee/yr are additional sinks). To provide more policy-relevant information to decision makers, it is crucial that future Global Stocktakes also include appropriate comparisons of modelled scenarios and country land-use data.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Land remains a blind spot in tracking progress under the Paris Agreement due to lack of data comparability","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-11-20 20:15:30","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5440972/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"73b5dfb0-ffbd-4506-a436-9391443d7a8f","owner":[],"postedDate":"November 20th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":40166296,"name":"Environmental Policy"},{"id":40166297,"name":"Forestry"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-11-20T20:15:30+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-11-20 20:15:30","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-5440972","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-5440972","identity":"rs-5440972","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0