Abstract
Background: Operating theatres are major generators of waste and greenhouse gases. Methods: The weights / types of waste from equine orthopaedic, colic, soft tissue and arthroscopic surgeries (convenience sampling) were audited during three six months periods: period 1, prior to intervention; period 2, following training / education of teams about waste segregation; period 3, following introduction of reusable surgical textiles (drapes, gowns, instrument packaging). Results: In all surgery types, the mean total waste mass in period 3 was lower than the other two time periods. For all surgery types, the mean percentage of the waste that was offensive reduced from period 1 to period 2, followed by a further reduction in period 3. In all surgery types, the mean percentage of domestic waste was higher in period 3 than in period 1. The mean percentage of recyclable waste was lower during period 3 than during period 2. Main limitations Low numbers of surgeries. Conclusions: Education and training of surgical teams on appropriate waste segregation and introduction of reusable surgical textiles resulted in reduced total waste and offensive waste, and increased domestic waste generated in equine surgery. These changes have reduced the carbon footprint of equine surgery in this theatre.
Full text
2,156 characters
· extracted from
oa-pdf
· click to expand
Posted on 9 Jan 2026 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176798170.04777892/v1 — This is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed. Data may be preliminary.
Clinical audit of surgical waste reduction in an equine theatre
Tim Mair 1 and T A Dawson 1
1University of Exeter Business School
January 09, 2026
Abstract
Background Operating theatres are major generators of waste and greenhouse gases. Methods The weights / types of waste
from equine orthopaedic, colic, soft tissue and arthroscopic surgeries (convenience sampling) were audited during three six
months periods: period 1, prior to intervention; period 2, following training / education of teams about waste segregation;
period 3, following introduction of reusable surgical textiles (drapes, gowns, instrument packaging). Results In all surgery
types, the mean total waste mass in period 3 was lower than the other two time periods. For all surgery types, the mean
percentage of the waste that was offensive reduced from period 1 to period 2, followed by a further reduction in period 3. In all
surgery types, the mean percentage of domestic waste was higher in period 3 than in period 1. The mean percentage of recyclable
waste was lower during period 3 than during period 2. Main limitations Low numbers of surgeries. Conclusions Education
and training of surgical teams on appropriate waste segregation and introduction of reusable surgical textiles resulted in reduced
total waste and offensive waste, and increased domestic waste generated in equine surgery. These changes have reduced the
carbon footprint of equine surgery in this theatre.
Hosted file
Audit_of_equine_surgery_waste_EVE_25.11.25_with clinical relevance.docx available at
https://authorea.com/users/515346/articles/1377546-clinical-audit-of-surgical-waste-
reduction-in-an-equine-theatre
1
Posted on 9 Jan 2026 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176798170.04777892/v1 — This is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed. Data may be preliminary.
2
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.