Clinical audit of surgical waste reduction in an equine theatre

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Background: Operating theatres are major generators of waste and greenhouse gases. Methods: The weights / types of waste from equine orthopaedic, colic, soft tissue and arthroscopic surgeries (convenience sampling) were audited during three six months periods: period 1, prior to intervention; period 2, following training / education of teams about waste segregation; period 3, following introduction of reusable surgical textiles (drapes, gowns, instrument packaging). Results: In all surgery types, the mean total waste mass in period 3 was lower than the other two time periods. For all surgery types, the mean percentage of the waste that was offensive reduced from period 1 to period 2, followed by a further reduction in period 3. In all surgery types, the mean percentage of domestic waste was higher in period 3 than in period 1. The mean percentage of recyclable waste was lower during period 3 than during period 2. Main limitations Low numbers of surgeries. Conclusions: Education and training of surgical teams on appropriate waste segregation and introduction of reusable surgical textiles resulted in reduced total waste and offensive waste, and increased domestic waste generated in equine surgery. These changes have reduced the carbon footprint of equine surgery in this theatre.
Full text 2,156 characters · extracted from oa-pdf · click to expand
Posted on 9 Jan 2026 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176798170.04777892/v1 — This is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed. Data may be preliminary. Clinical audit of surgical waste reduction in an equine theatre Tim Mair 1 and T A Dawson 1 1University of Exeter Business School January 09, 2026 Abstract Background Operating theatres are major generators of waste and greenhouse gases. Methods The weights / types of waste from equine orthopaedic, colic, soft tissue and arthroscopic surgeries (convenience sampling) were audited during three six months periods: period 1, prior to intervention; period 2, following training / education of teams about waste segregation; period 3, following introduction of reusable surgical textiles (drapes, gowns, instrument packaging). Results In all surgery types, the mean total waste mass in period 3 was lower than the other two time periods. For all surgery types, the mean percentage of the waste that was offensive reduced from period 1 to period 2, followed by a further reduction in period 3. In all surgery types, the mean percentage of domestic waste was higher in period 3 than in period 1. The mean percentage of recyclable waste was lower during period 3 than during period 2. Main limitations Low numbers of surgeries. Conclusions Education and training of surgical teams on appropriate waste segregation and introduction of reusable surgical textiles resulted in reduced total waste and offensive waste, and increased domestic waste generated in equine surgery. These changes have reduced the carbon footprint of equine surgery in this theatre. Hosted file Audit_of_equine_surgery_waste_EVE_25.11.25_with clinical relevance.docx available at https://authorea.com/users/515346/articles/1377546-clinical-audit-of-surgical-waste- reduction-in-an-equine-theatre 1 Posted on 9 Jan 2026 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176798170.04777892/v1 — This is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 2

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-pdf

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-07-10T06:41:27.906138+00:00