Abstract
In 2014, a six-week long fire at the Hazelwood open cut coal mine exposed residents in the
adjacent town of Morwell to high concentrations of fine particulate matter with an
aerodynamic diameter <2.5µm (PM
2.5). The long-term health consequences are being
evaluated as part of the Hazelwood Health Study (HHS).
Approximately 3.5 to 4 years after the mine fire, adults from Morwell (n=346) and the
comparison town Sale (n=173) participated in the longitudinal Respiratory Stream of the
HHS. Individual fire-related PM 2.5 exposure was retrospectively modelled. Lung mechanics
were assessed using the forced oscillation technique (FOT), which utilises pressure waves to
measure respiratory system resistance (Rrs) and reactance (Xrs). Multivariate linear
regression was used to evaluate associations between PM
2.5 and transformed Rrs5, area under
the reactance curve (AX5) and Xrs5 controlling for key confounding factors.
There were clear dose-response relationships between increasing mine fire PM 2.5 and
worsening lung mechanics, including a reduction in post-bronchodilator Xrs5 and an increase
in AX5. A 10 µg/m3 increase in mine fire related PM2.5 was associated with a 0.015 (95%CI:
0.004, 0.027) reduction in exponential(Xrs5) post bronchodilator, which was comparable to
4.7 years of aging. Similarly, the effect of exposure was associated with a 0.072 (0.005, 0.138)
increase in natural log(AX5) post-bronchodilator, equivalent to 3.9 years of aging.
This is the first study using FOT in adults evaluating long term respiratory outcomes after a
medium-term ambient PM 2.5 exposure to coal mine fire smoke. These results should inform
public health policies and planning for future events.
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 20, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.14.20213009doi: medRxiv preprint
3
Introduction
Ambient air particulate matter (PM) exposure, from sources including vehicle exhaust,
industry, biomass fuels and wildfires, collectively account for an estimated 7.5% of all deaths
globally in 2016.[1] In particular, fine PM with an aerodynamic diameter < 2.5µm (PM
2.5)
infiltrates deep into the peripheral lung. Short-term (days) exposure to PM 2.5 has been shown
to be associated with cardiovascular and respiratory morbidity and mortality.[2,3] Guo et al[4]
showed in a large cohort study that long-term ambient PM
2.5 exposure was consistently
associated with reduced lung function, accelerated annual lung function decline and an
increased risk of developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in adults.
Similarly in a review, Li et al[5] showed an association with long-term exposure to ambient
air pollution levels and increased incidence of respiratory symptoms in children.
The long-term sequelae of fine particle exposures on lung function, particularly from medium
exposure episodes (weeks to months) such as landscape fires, have not been well
characterised. Studies of wildfires predominantly use secondary data such as hospitalization
and emergency presentations to identify respiratory associations.[6] Though long-term
exposure to indoor coal burning has been found to be associated with worsening respiratory
symptoms, reduced lung function and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adults - much
remains unknown regarding the impact of coal mine fires on human lung health.[6]
Addressing the gaps in the current available evidence is critical given the increasing
incidence of catastrophic wildfires globally attributable to climate change.[7]
The forced oscillation technique (FOT) is a methodology used to measure lung mechanics.
FOT may be able to detect early changes in peripheral airway function that spirometry
cannot.[8] To our knowledge, no study has assessed the long-term impact of PM
2.5 from
exposure to coal mine fires, wildfires, or biomass fuel smoke in adults using FOT.
In February 2014, embers from nearby bush fires started a fire in the Hazelwood open-cut
brown coal mine, located in the Latrobe Valley, south-eastern Australia. It was an
unprecedented event that generated significant air pollution from coal mine fire smoke over
six weeks, particularly affecting residents in the adjacent town of Morwell. The most exposed
population at the time numbered approximately 14,000.[9] This resulted in considerable
community concerns about the potential long-term health effects of smoke exposure.
The Hazelwood Health Study (www.hazel woodhealthstudy.org.au
) was established to
investigate potential health effects in people who were exposed to smoke from the mine fire.
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 20, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.14.20213009doi: medRxiv preprint
4
The Hazelinks stream of the Hazelwood Health Study utilised hospital emergency
presentations and admissions data to show that hospitalisation for respiratory conditions
increased during the first month of the mine fire.[10] The Adult Survey stream of the
Hazelwood Health Study[11] compared self-reported health outcomes between the most
exposed community and an unexposed sample more than two years after the event. The
Survey found increasing risks of respiratory symptoms, particularly cough, phlegm and
wheeze, related to the mine fire exposure.[12] This analysis aimed to further investigate the
association between exposure to mine fire smoke and long-term lung function as assessed by
FOT, 3.5 to four years after the event.
Methods
Study design and setting
The Respiratory Stream of the Hazelwood Health Study is a longitudinal follow-up study of
selected participants from the Adult Survey.[11,13]. The study was conducted between
August and December 2017 in Morwell (exposed), and between January and March 2018 in
the nearby town of Sale (unexposed). Study data were collected and managed using REDCap
(Research Electronic Data Capture)[14] electronic data capture tools hosted at Monash
University, Australia.
Participant eligibility and recruitment
Participants were eligible for the Respiratory Stream of the Hazelwood Health Study if they
had completed the Adult Survey, were at least 18 years of age on 9 February 2014 and had
lived in the study area at the time of the mine fire. Adult Survey participants were excluded
from the Respiratory Stream if they had specified no further contact, were of unknown age or
sex, or were aged over 90 years. Participants were further excluded where a contraindication
to spirometry was identified – including recent surgery, myocardial infarction, pneumothorax,
pulmonary embolism, open pulmonary tuberculosis or known aneurysms.[15] A target
sample size of 339 from Morwell and 170 from Sale was derived based on the ability to
detect a 5ml/year or greater FEV
1 decline in exposed compared with non-exposed
participants using a two-sample t-test with a two-sided p-value of 0.05 and 80% power. A
weighted random sample (to correct for lower response rate in some subgroups of
participants, such as young people) of 1,346 Adult Survey participants was invited for
assessment of their respiratory function. Participants reporting an asthma attack or current
asthma medication use in the Adult Survey were oversampled (40%) to provide ability for
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 20, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.14.20213009doi: medRxiv preprint
5
further evaluation in an asthmatic sample. Invitation to participate was by mail, email and/or
SMS, and recruitment continued until the target sample size was achieved (see Figure 1).
Participant characteristics
Participant characteristics such as age, sex, ethnicity, employment status and smoking history
were collected via questionnaires. Participants were classified as non-smokers (100 cigarettes in their
lifetimes) or current smokers.[16] Height and weight were measured by trained personnel
during the study visit. Education level and occupational exposures (employment in dusty or
polluted environments for at least six months) were obtained from the Adult Survey.[11]
Self-reported asthma status was captured via a modified European Community Respiratory
Health Survey questionnaire.[17] Participants were identified as having spirometry consistent
with COPD if post bronchodilator (BD) FEV
1/FVC < lower limit of normal (5 th percentile)
using Global Lung Initiative spirometry reference values.[18]
Exposure assessment
Retrospective modelling of the spatial and temporal distribution of mine fire-related PM 2.5
concentrations by the Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research
Organisation (CSIRO) Oceans & Atmosphere[19,20] was used due to the absence of ground-
level air pollution monitoring at the beginning of the mine fire. Individual level mean daily
PM
2.5 exposures over the mine fire period (51 days, between 9 February to 31 March, 2014)
were estimated through linking time-location diary data (reported in the Adult Survey) with
the modelled fire-related PM2.5 exposure data as described by Johnson et al.[12]
Clinical outcome measures
Respiratory testing was performed by the same trained respiratory scientists at both sites
using standard operating procedures in line with current respiratory measurement standards
where available. Spirometry was measured using the EasyOne Pro Lab Respiratory Analysis
System (ndd Medical Technologies AG, Zürich, Switzerland) in line with international
standards.[21] Forced Oscillation Technique (FOT) parameters were measured using the
Tremoflo C-100device (Thorasys, Montreal, Canada) in line with standards current at time of
testing.[22] Parameters reported for FOT included respiratory system resistance and
reactance at a frequency of 5Hz (Rrs5 and Xrs5 respectively), the area under the reactance
curve (AX5) and resonant frequency (Fres). Data were imputed[23] where acceptability
criteria were not met or coherence <0.80 for 5Hz or <0.90 at 11 or 19Hz.[22] Tests were
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 20, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.14.20213009doi: medRxiv preprint
6
performed before and 10 minutes after administration of a short acting bronchodilator (300µg
salbutamol). Bronchodilator use in the previous 24 hours was recorded, as bronchodilators
were unable to be withheld prior to assessment due to ethical reasons.
Statistical methods
Statistical weighting was developed and applied to all analyses to correct for over-sampling
of asthmatics as well as possible attrition bias from the Adult Survey to clinical follow-up,
see details in the online supplement. Descriptive statistics were used to compare patient
characteristics and clinical outcomes between non-exposed Sale participants as well as the
tertiles of PM
2.5 exposure level in Morwell (low, medium or high exposure). Crude statistical
significance was assessed using Pearson chi-squared tests for categorical measures and t-tests
for continuous measures.
Multivariate linear regression models were fitted to analyse the association between mean
PM2.5 exposure and outcomes, controlling for key confounders including age, height, weight,
sex, smoking status, self-reported asthma and/or COPD, employment, education level and
occupational exposure. Standardised z-scores and %predicted[24] for FOT outcome variables
were not used in the analysis due to poor regression model fit and high proportions of
participants outside of reference prediction range (mostly due to older age and heavier
weight). Therefore, possible outcome transformation methods and nonlinear associations
were explored using both Box-Cox transformation and fractional polynomial regression
models. The best outcome transformation methods were identified as logarithmic
transformations for Rrs5, AX5 and Fres and exponential transformation for Xrs5. Additional
non-linearity was not observed between transformed outcomes and predicators such as age,
weight and height. Missing data were addressed using multiple imputation using chained
equations. Due to the lack of a low or no exposure sample in Morwell, as well as possible
differences between Morwell and Sale participants, two sets of regression models were
carried out for each outcome variable: one model including a binary variable indicating
township of participant (Morwell or Sale), and the other model excluding this variable.
Sensitivity analyses were performed with unweighted and complete case models. Statistical
analyses were performed using Stata version 15 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas
2015).
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 20, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.14.20213009doi: medRxiv preprint
7
Ethical considerations
The Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (MUHREC) approved the
Hazelwood Health Study: Cardiovascular and Respiratory Streams (approval number 1078).
All participants provided written informed consent.
Results
Participant characteristics and PM2.5 exposure
This cross-sectional analysis included all participants in the first round of Respiratory Stream
data collection, which comprised a total of 519 participants (346 from Morwell, and 173 from
Sale). Refer to Figure 1 for flow of participants.
Table 1 shows the participant characteristics by exposure level to mine fire smoke. The mean
(standard deviation; SD) PM2.5 exposure levels for non-exposed (Sale) and for Morwell (low,
medium and high exposure groups) were 0.1 (0.4), 5.9 (1.8), 11.5 (1.5) and 27.8 (10.3) µg/m3,
respectively. There were differences between exposure groups for gender distribution and
weight, with those in the high exposure group having a higher proportion of males and
heavier weight. Other participant characteristics were comparable between exposure groups.
Table 1: Participant characteristics by exposure group.
Characteristic
Sale
Morwell
low
exposure
Morwell
medium
exposure
Morwell
high
exposure
p-value
N=173 N=109 N=113 N=124
Age group / years, n (weighted %)
18-44 44 (22%) 36 (26%) 36 (30%) 35 (25%) 0.74
45-64 74 (42%) 43 (44%) 43 (37%) 50 (37%)
65+ 55 (36%) 30 (29%) 34 (34%) 39 (38%)
Gender, n (weighted %)
Male 62 (36%) 43 (46%) 46 (43%) 62 (56%) 0.02
Caucasian/White, n (weighted %) 171 (99%) 108 (99%) 112
(100%) 123 (99%) 0.92
Employed, n (weighted %) 89 (47%) 44 (38%) 46 (40%) 50 (35%) 0.34
Higher education*, n (weighted %) 107 (63%) 56 (57%) 54 (54%) 74 (64%) 0.39
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 20, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.14.20213009doi: medRxiv preprint
8
BMI kg/m2, n (weighted %)
Underweight/Normal (BMI<25) 40 (24%) 23 (20%) 21 (18%) 15 (11%) 0.06
Overweight (25≤ BMI<30) 66 (38%) 35 (33%) 31 (29%) 35 (30%)
Obese (BMI≥ 30) 67 (38%) 51 (47%) 61 (53%) 74 (59%)
Smoking status, n (weighted %)
Non-smoker 82 (49%) 58 (52%) 60 (54%) 49 (36%) 0.10
Ex-smoker 66 (39%) 35 (33%) 34 (33%) 51 (47%)
Current smoker 25 (12%) 16 (15%) 19 (13%) 24 (17%)
Asthma and/or COPD †,
n (weighted %) 73 (37%) 58 (41%) 57 (40%) 63 (39%) 0.96
Historical occupational exposure,
n (weighted %) 64 (37%) 43 (44%) 44 (39%) 54 (46%) 0.47
Age / years 57.3 (20.0) 54.7 (14.3) 54.5 (15.3) 56.7 (14.7) 0.50
Height / cm 166.5
(11.2) 166.0 (9.6) 166.4 (8.8) 167.1 (7.9) 0.86
Weight / kg 81.2 (24.4) 86.7 (22.7) 86.8 (20.2) 88.8 (17.0) 0.009
Mean (SD) PM
2.5 exposure / µg/m3 0.1 (0.4) 5.9 (1.8) 11.5 (1.5) 27.8 (10.3)
* Certificate, University or other Tertiary Institute degree
† Spirometric COPD and/or self-reported asthma attack in the last 12 months
PM2.5 exposure and lung function
Forced Oscillation Technique variables are dependent on sex, age, height and weight – hence
unadjusted results lack meaning and were not included in the analysis. As shown in Figures
2A and 2B and Table S1 , all outcome variables were skewed and displayed slightly larger
variation in baseline compared to post bronchodilator outcomes. A clear dose response
pattern was observed between exposure level and FOT outcomes. Results from multivariate
linear regression analysis (Table 2) revealed a negative association between increasing mine
fire related PM
2.5 exposure and post bronchodilator reactance at 5Hz, with Morwell included
or excluded as a predictor. With Morwell excluded as a predictor, a 10 µg/m 3 increase in
mine fire related PM 2.5 was associated with 0.015 reduction in post bronchodilator
exponential transformed Xrs5. This was equivalent to 4.7 years of aging estimated in the
regression model (see Table S2). When Morwell was excluded as a predictor, regression
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 20, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.14.20213009doi: medRxiv preprint
9
analysis suggested that increased exposure to mine fire related PM 2.5 was associated with
increased area under the post bronchodilator reactance curve (AX5). The effect of exposure
was associated with a 0.072 increase in ln(AX5) post-bronchodilator; being equivalent to 3.9
years of aging (see Table S3). More detailed regression results for post bronchodilator Xrs5
and AX5 are shown in supplementary Tables S2 to S3 . Sensitivity analyses (results not
shown) suggest that un-weighted and complete case results were consistent with main
findings.
Table 2. Summary table for multivariate linear regressions of FOT parameters – regression
coefficients (
β ) and 95% confidence intervals.
Mean exposure model (10 µg/m³)
Including Morwell as predictor
Mean exposure model (10 µg/m³)
Excluding Morwell as predictor
β -Coef (95% CI) p-value β -Coef (95% CI) p-value
Baseline*
Baseline ln(Rrs5) -0.003 (-0.035, 0.029) 0.87 -0.001 (-0.028, 0.026) 0.95
Baseline exp(Xrs5) -0.009 (-0.024, 0.006) 0.23 -0.008 (-0.020, 0.005) 0.23
Baseline ln(AX5) 0.030 (-0.056, 0.116) 0.50 0.038 (-0.034, 0.109) 0.31
Baseline ln(Fres) 0.001 (-0.030, 0.032) 0.97 0.006 (-0.019, 0.032) 0.62
Post BD†
Post BD ln(Rrs5) 0.011 (-0.018, 0.041) 0.45 0.012 (-0.013, 0.036) 0.34
Post BD exp(Xrs5) -0.018 (-0.032, -0.003) 0.015 -0.015 (-0.027, -0.004) 0.011
Post BD ln(AX5) 0.063 (-0.017, 0.144) 0.12 0.072 (0.005, 0.138) 0.034
post BD ln(Fres) 0.017 (-0.010, 0.045) 0.22 0.021 (-0.001, 0.044) 0.07
* Regression models adjusted for age, gender, height, weight, employment, education, smoking status, asthma
and COPD status and work exposure and whether participants had bronchodilator prior to the test. Missing data,
including 44 records for baseline Rrs5, baseline Xrs5 and baseline AX5; 48 records for baseline Fres; 6 records
for education level, were imputed using multiple imputation with chained equations.
† Regression models adjusted for age, gender, height, weight, employment, education, smoking status, asthma
and COPD status and work exposure. Missing data, including 41 records for post BD Rrs5, post BD Xrs5 and
post BD AX5; 42 records for post BD Fres; 6 records for education level, were imputed using multiple
imputation with chained equations.
Note: exp- exponential; ln- natural log
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 20, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.14.20213009doi: medRxiv preprint
10
Discussion
Assessment of participants nearly four years after the Hazelwood coal mine fire revealed an
association between medium term mine fire related PM 2.5 exposure and more negative
respiratory system reactance (Xrs5), specifically measured after administration of
bronchodilator. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first study using FOT
analysis in adults to evaluate longer term respiratory function after a medium term PM
2.5
exposure related to coal mine fire smoke.
The mechanism for the more negative reactance (a marker of the compliance of the
respiratory system) is unclear. Previous studies of long-term exposure to air pollution and
PM
2.5 have shown associations with increased respiratory morbidity and airflow
obstruction.[4,6,25-27] Separately, it has been shown that measurements of reactance at 5-
6Hz via FOT are sensitive to airway closure[28-31] and expiratory flow limitation[32-34] in
subjects with obstruction. A possible mechanism for the association seen between medium
term exposure PM
2.5 and Xrs5 in this study may be early peripheral airway changes that
occur with airflow limitation or accelerated lung aging.
Interestingly, the association between PM 2.5 and Xrs5 was only observed in the post-
bronchodilator data. A possible explanation for this finding is that participants were recruited
from a general population with varying states of lung health and by assessing participants
post-bronchodilator, variability of bronchomotor tone was minimised across participants[35-
37] allowing assessment of fixed pulmonary abnormalities. That is, the assessment of the
relationship between PM
2.5 and Xrs5 could be undertaken without the confounding effects of
bronchomotor tone.
Importantly, these findings in adults are similar to the findings in children within the
Hazelwood Health Study Early Life Follow up (ELF) stream. Shao and colleagues[38]
demonstrated that infant or in utero exposures to coal mine fire emissions were associated
with long-term impairment of lung reactance, with increased average PM
2.5 being
significantly associated with worsening area under the reactance curve - a complementary
parameter in the evaluation of reactance.[24]
The study has several strengths. Unlike observational studies that have used only secondary
data (such as hospitalization) to assess respiratory health, this research has built upon
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 20, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.14.20213009doi: medRxiv preprint
11
previously collected hospitalisation[10] and self-reported symptom data[12] with the
inclusion of objective measures of lung mechanics. A further strength of this study was the
inclusion of individual estimates of PM 2.5 exposure utilising a combination of detailed time-
location diaries and spatially and temporally resolved modelling of PM 2.5 concentrations
based upon coal combustion and weather conditions.
However, the study also has some limitations. The study endeavoured to account for all
relevant potential confounding factors in our analysis, such as age, gender, weight, BMI,
education status, tobacco and occupational exposures. However, it is feasible that some of the
observed results occurred by chance or were influenced by unknown confounding factors.
Furthermore, at this stage in the study we only have cross-sectional data on lung mechanics.
Future followup of the Hazelwood Health Study Respiratory Stream participants will better
inform an investigation of the long-term implications of medium-duration coal mine fire-
related smoke exposure on respiratory mechanics and lung health.
In conclusion, a clear dose response association was observed between medium-duration
PM
2.5 exposure levels from ambient coal mine fire smoke and a more negative respiratory
system reactance in this cohort. This study adds new findings to the literature on the lung
health effects of medium term PM
2.5 exposure. These inform public health policy and
planning for future coal mine fires or similar medium duration PM 2.5 generating pollution
events such as the recent megafires in Australia and the United States. Longitudinal data are
required to confirm the findings of this study and to better understand the association of coal
mine fire smoke and altered respiratory system reactance and potential accelerated lung aging
in exposed populations.
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank Susan Denny, Kylie Sawyer, Shantelle Allgood and Kristina Thomas from
the Monash University School of Rural Health, who assisted with the study. Most of all, the
study team would like to acknowledge the contribution of all community members who have
participated in the study to date.
Financial support
The Hazelwood Health Study is funded by the Victorian Department of Health & Human
Services (Australia). However, this paper presents the views of the authors and does not
represent the views of the Department.
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 20, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.14.20213009doi: medRxiv preprint
12
References
1. GB D 2016 Ri s k Fac to r C oll abor ato r s . G loba l, r egion al, a nd na tional compa rativ e ris k a s s e s sme nt o f
84 behav ioural, envi r onm en tal a nd oc cup ation al, and metaboli c r i sk s or clust er s of risk s ,
1990 –2016: a s y s tem atic ana ly si s for the Global Bur d e n of Disea s e S tudy 201 6. La ncet 2017 ;
390: 1345–4 22.
2. Atkin son RW, Kang S , An der s on HR, e t al. Ep i demiolog ica l t i me s e rie s studi e s of PM2.5 a nd daily
mortali ty and ho spital a dmissio ns : a sys t ematic review and me ta -analy s i s. Th or a x 2014
3. L iu C, Che n R, Ser a F , et al . Ambi en t P art i cula t e A i r Po llu tion and Dai ly Mor tali ty in 652 Citie s. Th e
New Engla n d jou rnal o f m e dic ine 2 019;381(8 ):7 05-15 . doi: 10 .1056 /N E J M oa 1817364
[publi she d O nli n e Fir st : 2019 /08/23 ]
4. Guo C, Zhang Z, L au AKH, e t al . E ff e ct of l ong- term e xpo sur e t o fine par ticu l ate mat ter on lung
func t i o n decl ine and ri sk o f c hr o nic ob s t r uc tive p ulmona ry di sea se i n Taiw an : a l on gitudinal ,
co hor t s tudy. L a nce t P l ane t He alth 201 8; 2(3): e114- e2 5. d oi: 10. 1016 /S2542 - 5 196(18)300 28 -
7
5. Li S , W il liams G , Jala ludin B , et a l . Pa nel s tudie s o f air pollu tion on c hildren' s lung function a nd
re spira tor y s y mptoms: a lite rat ure rev iew. J A s t h m a 2012;49(9 ):895 -910. do i :
10.3 109/0277090 3.2012.7 24129
6. Mel ody S , John ston F . C oal mine fir e s and huma n heal th: W ha t do we k now? I n t e r na t io na l J o ur n a l
of Co a l Geol ogy 2015;1 52 doi: 10.1016 /j. c oal.20 15.11.00 1
7. Balme s JR . Whe re T her e's Wild fir e, The r e 's Smoke . N Engl J M ed 20 18;3 78(10 ) :8 81 -83. do i :
10.1 056/N E JMp171 6846
8. Lundbl ad L KA, S iddiqui S, B ossé Y , et a l. Appl ica tion s o f os c illom e t ry in c linic al r e sea r c h a n d
prac t i ce . Cana d ia n Journ al of Re s p ira t o ry, C r itic al Care, and S leep Med icine 2019:1-15. do i :
10.1 080/2474533 2.2019.1 649607
9. Aus tr a li an B urea u of S tati s tics (ABS ). Ca nber a, ACT : Da ta by Reg ion - M orwell (SA2 ). 201 8
[upda ted 2 018 Febr ua r y 05; c ited 2 019 Janua ry 21 ]. A v aila ble f rom :
ww w.sta t.ab s .gov.a u / it t/ r .j sp?d a tabyreg i on#/
.
10. Guo Y, Ga o CX, D enne kamp M , et al. The a ssoc iati on of c o al m ine fi re smo ke with h os pi ta l
emerge ncy pre se nta tion s and admi s sion s : Ti me seri es an al ysi s o f H a z e lwood H e alth Study .
C h em os phe r e 2020 ;253:1266 67 . doi: h t t ps: //doi. org/10 .1 016/j.chem o s p her e.2 02 0.1266 67
11. Ikin J, Ca rroll M, Wal ker J, et al. C ohort P ro file: The Haze lwood H e al th S t u dy Adul t Coh ort .
Inter na tion a l J ourn al o f E pide mi olo gy 2020;dy aa083 doi: 10. 1093 /ije/dya a 083
12. John so n AL, G ao CX, D enneka mp M, e t a l. A s s oc i ation s b etwe en Re s pi ra tor y Health Out c ome s
and Coa l Mine Fir e PM 2.5 S moke E xposur e : A Cro s s-S ec tional Stu dy. I n te r n at i on al J ou r na l of
Env iron men tal R es earch a nd P u blic Healt h 2 019;16 (21): 42 62. do i :
doi:1 0.3390 /ijerph16 214262
13. T aylor S, Borg B, Gao CX, e t a l . The i mpa ct of th e H a zel wood co al mine fire smoke e xpo sure on
as thma. Jour nal o f A s t hma 2020 ;in pr e s s
14. Harr i s PA, T aylor R, T hielk e R, et al. Rese arch elec t ronic d at a c aptur e (RE D Ca p) - - a metad a ta -
drive n me t ho d ology an d w orkflow pr oce ss for pr ovidi ng t ran sl ation a l r e s e a r c h i nfor m a tic s
suppo rt. J B i om e d Inf o r m 2009;4 2 (2) :377-81. d oi : 10.10 16/ j .jbi.200 8 .08.010
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 20, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.14.20213009doi: medRxiv preprint
13
15. Co op er B G . A n upda t e on con traindi cation s f or lung fu nc t i on t e s ting . Thorax 201 1;66(8) :714-23 .
doi: 10.1136/ thx.2 010.13988 1 [ publi she d O nli ne Fir s t : 2010/07 /31]
16. Wor l d He alth Orga niz a t io n. Guidel i nes for c on t roll ing a nd mon i t o r in g th e t o bacc o ep idemic .
Genev a : World Hea lth Organizati on; 1 998. Ava ilable :
http s : / /app s . who .int /iri s/handl e/ 10 665 / 42049 .
17. Europe an C ommunity Re spi rat or y Health Survey II SC . The Euro pean Com munity Re spira tor y
Health S u r v ey I I. Eur Re s pir J 200 2;20(5 ): 1071 - 9 . doi: 1 0 .1183/09031 936.02 .0 004 6802
18. Q uan je r PH, St anoje vic S, Col e TJ, et al. Mul ti -eth nic re fe renc e va lue s for s pir ometry for th e 3 -95 -
yr ag e range : th e g lobal l un g func tion 2 0 12 equati on s. Eur Res pir J 2012 ;40 (6 ):1 324-43. do i :
10.1 183/0903193 6.00080 312
19. L uhar A.K, Emmer son K.M , Rei sen F, Will iamson G . J, Co pe M . E . Modellin g smok e distributi on i n
the v icin it y of a large and prolo nged fi r e f r om an ope n-cu t c oal mi ne. Atm os Envi r on .
2020 ;229:117 471. .
20. Rei se n F, Gill e tt R, Choi J, F i s h e r G, T or re P . Ch arac teri s tics of an op en -cut c o al mi ne fire poll utio n
ev ent. Atmo sph eric E nvi r onm ent . 20 17; 1 5 1:140-151 .
http s : / /doi. org/10 .1016/j.a tmo senv .201 6.12 .015
.
21. Mill e r MR , Hankin son J, Br u s asc o V, e t al . St anda rdi satio n o f s p iro me t ry . Eu r R e s p i r J
2005 ;26(2) :319-38 . doi: 10. 1183 /090319 36.05.00 034805
22. Oo s tve e n E , M ac Leod D , L orino H, et a l . T he forc ed o sci llati on t echniq ue i n c linic al pr a ctic e :
methodol ogy, rec ommenda tion s an d f u ture de vel opme nts . Eur Re spir J 2003 ;22( 6):1026-41 .
doi: 10.1183/090 31936 .03 .0008940 3
23. S te r ne J A , Whi te IR, Ca r l in J B, e t al . Multiple i mputa tion fo r m issing da ta in epide miologic al a nd
cl inica l re sea rch: po te nt i a l and pit fall s . BM J 2009;3 38:b2393. d oi: 10. 1136 /bmj.b 2393
24. O o s tveen E, Bod a K, van der G rin ten CP , e t al . R e spira tory imp e danc e i n heal thy s ub ject s:
bas elin e va lue s and broncho dila tor r esp on s e . Eur Re s p ir J 20 13;42(6) :15 13 -23. doi :
10.1 183/0903193 6.00126 212 [p ubli shed O nli ne Fir st: 2013/04 /20]
25. Sood A. In do or fuel expo sur e a nd the lu ng in bo th d ev eloping and d ev el oped coun tri es : a n
upda t e . Clin Ch e st Med 2012;3 3 (4) :649-6 5. do i: 10.10 16 / j .ccm .2012.08.003
26. Bal can B , Akan S , Ugurlu AO , et a l. Eff ect s o f bioma s s smoke o n pulmon a r y fun ctio ns : a c a se
co nt rol study. I nt J Chr o n Ob struct Pul m on Di s 2016;11:1 61 5-22. doi :
10.2 147/C O P D. S1 09056
27. P op e C A, 3r d, Xu X . Pa s s iv e ci gar ette s mok e, c o al he a t i ng, and r es pira tory symptom s o f
nonsmoki ng w omen i n Ch ina . E nv iron Hea lth Per s p ect 1 993;101(4 ):3 14-6. d oi :
10.1 289/ehp .9310 1314
28. Dell ac a RL , Ande rss on Ole rud M, Za nnin E , et al. Lu ng rec ruitmen t a s s e s sed by total r es pira tor y
sys t e m inpu t reac tan ce . In te n s i v e Care Med 2 009;35(12 ):2 164 -72. doi : 10.1007 /s00134-0 09 -
1673 -3 [publi sh ed Onlin e Fir s t : 2 009/10 /0 1]
2 9 . M i l n e S , J e t m a l a n i K , C h a p m a n D G , e t a l . R e s p i r a t o r y s y s t e m r e a c t a n c e r e f l e c t s c o m m u n i c a t i n g
lung v olume in c hronic obstr u ctive p ul monary dise a se. J our nal o f Applie d P hysiolo gy
2019 ;126(5) :1223 - 3 1. d oi: 1 0.1152 /jappl physiol.005 03 .2018
30. N il sen K , G ov e K, T hien F , et al. Com pa r i s on o f tw o me thod s o f de te rmining lung de - r ec rui tment ,
using the forced o scill a tion techni qu e . Eur J Appl Phys i ol 2018;118 (10) :22 13-24. doi :
10.1 007/ s 004 21-018-3949 -1 [publi sh ed Online Fir st: 2 018 /08/ 0 1 ]
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 20, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.14.20213009doi: medRxiv preprint
14
31. N il sen K , Thien F, Th a mr in C, et al . Ea rly onse t o f ai r w ay de re crui tment as se s se d usi ng the force d
oscill a tion t ec hniqu e i n s u bject s with a sthma. Jo urnal of A pp lie d P hysiol ogy
2019 ;126(5) :1399 - 4 08. d oi: 10.1152 /jap p lphysiol .00 534.2018
3 2 . D e l l a c a R L , D u f f y N , P o m p i l i o P P , e t a l . E x p i r a t o r y f l o w l i m i t a t i o n d e t e c t e d b y f o r c e d o s c i l l a t i o n
and ne ga tive e xpir ato ry pre ssur e. Eur Re spir J 200 7;29 (2):36 3-74. d o i :
10.1 183/0903193 6.00038 006 [p ubli shed O nli ne Fir st: 2006/11 /03]
33. D ellac a RL, Rotge r M, Alive rti A , e t al. N o ninva sive de tec tion o f ex pir a to ry flow li mita tion i n
CO PD p atie nt s dur ing na sal CP AP. Eu r R es p i r J 2006;27(5 ):9 83-91. do i :
10.1 183/0903193 6.06.000 80005 [pub li she d Onlin e F irst: 2006 / 02/01 ]
3 4 . D e l l a c a R L , S a n t u s P , A l i v e r t i A , e t a l . D e t e c t i o n o f e x p i r a t o r y f l o w l i m i t a t i o n i n C O P D u s i n g t h e
force d o scill ati on t e ch nique . Eu r R esp i r J 200 4;23(2 ):232 -40 . [publ i s h e d O nline Fi rst :
2004 / 02/26 ]
35. Kelly VJ, Brown NJ, Ki ng GG, e t a l . The bronchodi la tor re s pon se o f in vi vo spec ific ai rway
co mplianc e i n adul ts w ith ast hma . Ann Bio m ed E ng 20 11;39(3 ):112 5 -35. doi :
10.1 007/ s 104 39-010 -0206 -0
36. Herp el L B, Kanne r RE, Le e SM , e t a l . Var iabili t y of spi rome try in ch roni c ob struc t iv e pulmona r y
dise a se: re sul t s f rom two clin ical t ri a ls. A m J R es p i r C r it C a r e M e d 20 06 ;173(10 ):1 1 06-13. do i :
10.1 164/r c cm.2 00506 -975 OC [publ i s h e d O nl ine Fi rs t: 2006/02 /25 ]
37. N isa r M, Ea r is JE, P e ar son MG, e t a l. Acute b r onc h odila tor trial s in c hronic ob s t ructiv e pulmona r y
dise a se. Am Re v Re spir Di s 1992; 146(3 ):5 55-59. doi : 10. 1164/ajrcc m/ 1 46 .3.555
38. S hao J, Zo s k y GR, H a ll GL, e t a l. Early life ex po sur e t o coal mine fir e smoke e m ission s and a lte r e d
lung function in youn g chi ldre n. Re spir ol ogy 2020; 25(2):198-205 . d oi: 10 .1111 /r e s p.1 3617
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 20, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.14.20213009doi: medRxiv preprint
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 20, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.14.20213009doi: medRxiv preprint
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 20, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.14.20213009doi: medRxiv preprint
. CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 20, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.14.20213009doi: medRxiv preprint
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.