Eligibility rates and representativeness of the General Medical Services scheme population in Ireland 2016-2021: A methodological report
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
BackgroundIn Ireland, the means tested General Medical Services (GMS) scheme provides access to a range of healthcare services at no or low cost to approximately one third of the population. Individuals eligible for the GMS scheme are often a focus of research, as a population that account for a large proportion of healthcare services use. The aim of this study is to describe the eligibility rates and representativeness of the GMS scheme population over time, with respect to age group, sex, and geographical area in Ireland.MethodsPopulation data was obtained from the Central Statistics Office (CSO), using 2016 Census figures and projected population figures for 2017-2021. GMS eligibility figures for 2016-2021 were obtained from the HSE Primary Care Reimbursement Service (PCRS). GMS eligibility rates and relative rates of eligibility were calculated for 2016-2021 by age group and sex. Additionally, 2016 eligibility rates were calculated by geographical area.ResultsThe crude eligibility rate decreased from 36.4% in 2016 to 31.2% in 2020, with a slight increase to 31.6% in 2021. In the 75+ years age group, 78.2% of the total population were eligible for the GMS scheme in 2021. The age group with the lowest rate of eligible individuals was the 25-34 age group, with 19.5% eligible in 2021. The eligibility rate was higher among females compared to males throughout the study period. The highest eligibility rate was seen in Donegal, with a crude rate of 52.8%. Dublin had the lowest rate, with a crude rate of 29.3%.ConclusionsGMS eligibility varies greatly depending on age, sex, and geographical area, and decreased between 2016 and 2021. This study uses the most up-to-date data available to provide age group, sex and area-based figures for GMS eligibility which may inform planning and conduct of research focusing on GMS-eligible individuals.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Funding
- funders
- [{'doi': '10.13039/100010414', 'name': 'Health Research Board', 'awards': ['SDAP-2019-023']}]
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
References (13)
- OpenSAFELY: Representativeness of Electronic Health Record platform OpenSAFELY-TPP data compared to the population of England via crossref
- doi:10.1002/hec.3429 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00228-017-2310-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/bcp.14687 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/aje/kwz243 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/gerona/glw140 via crossref
- doi:10.18637/jss.v084.i06 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.12.001 via crossref
- doi:10.12688/hrbopenres.13372.1 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/aje/kwx246 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.05.006 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19478-2 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-07-31T06:42:37.482829+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0