A study of the correlation between phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods and the associated genotypes determined by whole genome sequencing for a collection of Escherichia coli of bovine origin
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
AI-generated summary
Whole genome sequencing of bovine <i>E. coli</i> showed near-perfect agreement with disk diffusion for predicting antimicrobial resistance, but moderate agreement with MIC measurements, suggesting WGS is useful but MIC may be needed for intermediate resistance.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has increased at an alarming pace in the recent years. Molecular-based methods such as whole genome sequencing (WGS) offer a potential alternative to the conventional labour-intensive methods traditionally used to characterise AMR phenotypes. The aim of this study was to investigate whether WGS could be used as a predictor of AMR in Escherichia coli isolates of bovine origin. Genomes of 143 E. coli cultured from cattle presenting with diarrhoea or mastitis were sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform. AMR genes were identified using the ResFinder and AMRFinder databases. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disk diffusion was performed on a panel of 10 antibiotics, covering 7 antimicrobial classes. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) measurements were made using the Sensititre plate with 6 antibiotics, covering 5 antimicrobial classes. Correlation between genotype and phenotype was assessed statistically by means of a two-by-two table analysis and Cohen’s kappa (κ) test. The overall κ correlation between WGS and disk diffusion was 0.81, indicating a near perfect agreement, and the average positive predicted value was 77.4 %. Correlation for individual antimicrobial compounds varied, with five yielding near perfect agreement (κ = 0.81–1.00; amoxicillin, florfenicol, gentamicin, tetracycline and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole), one showing substantial agreement (κ = 0.65; nalidixic acid), and four showing moderate agreement (κ = 0.41– 0.60). The overall κ correlation between WGS and MIC was 0.55 indicating moderate agreement, and the average positive predicted value was 68.6 %. Three antibiotics yielded near perfect agreement (gentamicin, tetracycline and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) and a further three showed fair agreement (κ = 0.21–0.40). WGS is a useful tool that can be used for the prediction of AMR phenotypes, and correlates well with disk diffusion results. MIC measurements may be necessary for antimicrobial compounds with a high proportion of intermediately resistant isolates recorded, such as cephalothin. Highlights Culture based antimicrobial susceptibility testing is used to identify therapeutics in the treatment of clinical veterinary isolates Whole genome sequencing is increasingly adopted for surveillance, epidemiological traceback investigations, and detection of antimicrobial resistance genes Little is known in correlations between antimicrobial resistance genotypes and disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing This study finds that whole genome sequencing is a useful predictor for antimicrobial susceptibility however, minimum inhibitory concentration measurements may still be needed for intermediately resistant isolates
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (45)
- doi:10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 via crossref
- doi:10.1099/mgen.0.000192 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 via crossref
- doi:10.1128/aac.01223-12 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(18)30605-4 via crossref
- doi:10.1128/jcm.01980-19 via crossref
- doi:10.1128/aem.66.10.4555-4558.2000 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/1758-2229.12019 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1198-743x.2004.00887.x via crossref
- doi:10.1089/154545703322860753 via crossref
- doi:10.1128/aac.00137-06 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/zph.12508 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1751-7915.2008.00063.x via crossref
- doi:10.1128/aac.00483-19 via crossref
- doi:10.2165/11315690-000000000-00000 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/bi026352v via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1471-2180-13-113 via crossref
- doi:10.1590/s1413-86702008000100003 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/03009734.2016.1195900 via crossref
- doi:10.1128/aem.00601-11 via crossref
- doi:10.1128/jb.183.8.2646-2653.2001 via crossref
- doi:10.4236/abc.2012.24045 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/s12864-017-3899-8 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0010-4825(00)00006-8 via crossref
- doi:10.1128/aac.00419-13 via crossref
- doi:10.2807/1560-7917.es.2017.22.23.30547 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/jac/dkw511 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.03.022 via crossref
- doi:10.1128/jb.183.20.5803-5812.2001 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/s40246-015-0037-z via crossref
- doi:10.1089/fpd.2019.2634 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/jac/dkg222 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.07.019 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cvfa.2014.11.004 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/jac/dkt180 via crossref
- doi:10.2807/1560-7917.es.2019.24.50.1900136 via crossref
- doi:10.1128/jcm.01405-18 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/jac/dkv186 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190729 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/eva.12202 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/jac/dks261 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/jac/dks496 via crossref
- doi:10.1101/gr.251678.119 via crossref
- doi:10.12688/f1000research.15931.2 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-07-31T06:42:35.626360+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0