The alignment of respiration to sensory-motor events is shaped by expected effort
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
Abstract
Humans often align their respiration with external events, a phenomenon thought to optimize neural resources for perception and action. Indeed, in sensory-cognitive experiments participants tend to align their respiration to the upcoming expected trials and their respiratory phase relates to neurophysiological processes reflecting changes in neural excitation, attention or arousal. However, it remains unclear whether this alignment is a passive entrainment to a task’s overall rhythm or an active process selectively aligning respiration based on the demands of individual events. We here tested this by recording respiration during three visual discrimination experiments that manipulated trial importance by either imposing different response deadlines or by manipulating trial value and difficulty. Our results show that participants align their respiration more consistently around stimulus onset for trials with short deadlines or trials presenting high-value and high-difficulty. These findings demonstrate that respiratory alignment is dynamically modulated on a trial-by-trial basis according to the anticipated required effort or task demands. Hence we conclude that respiration serves as an active tool to strategically allocate cognitive resources for sensory-motor challenges.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
References (39)
- doi:10.1037/rev0000391 via crossref
- doi:10.1162/imag.a.26 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3360-17.2018 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-090121-014424 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105262 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41583-018-0003-6 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41593-023-01425-1 via crossref
- doi:10.3758/bf03203952 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1991.tb00413.x via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s42003-024-06642-3 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0592-21.2021 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fphys.2022.813243 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fncir.2016.00115 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/02699931.2018.1445981 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/hbm.22523 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41598-022-06364-8 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001457 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.tics.2024.05.003 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.70907 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41467-023-40250-9 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.83654 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.07.075 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00135-0 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114081 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/psyp.13091 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0204021 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.conb.2007.07.006 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.02.032 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/1088868316628405 via crossref
- doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0208 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0556-z via crossref
- doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0399 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.tins.2008.09.012 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2236-24.2025 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.tins.2018.01.007 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.concog.2017.09.008 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01043.x via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2586-16.2016 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-07-30T08:32:11.524023+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0