Can Smart City Pilot Reduce Urban Haze Pollution? ——Empirical Evidence from Chinese Cities
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
Considering China's smart city pilot policy as a quasi-natural experiment, the panel data of 284 cities from 2003 to 2020 were selected to evaluate the effect of smart city construction on haze pollution by combining the propensity score matching method and the difference-in-difference model (PSM-DID). The research results show that: (1) smart city construction has effectively reduced the concentration of urban haze, which is still valid after a series of robustness tests. (2) the results of heterogeneous test show that the smart city pilot has a stronger inhibitory effect on eastern cities, large and medium-sized cities, and cities with high level of talent agglomeration and intelligence. (3) the mechanism test found that the smart city pilot can indirectly promote the city haze governance by improving the innovation capacity (collaborative innovation and green innovation), improving the efficiency of resource allocation, and increasing the entrepreneurship rate of modern service industries. (4) after further exploration, it was found that the construction of smart cities has a significant spatial spillover effect on haze pollution. While promoting haze control in the local city, it will also suppress the haze concentration of neighboring cities through "demonstration effect".
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (21)
- doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.022 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.07.076 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121037 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2020.04.009 via crossref
- doi:10.1108/jsma-03-2015-0030 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112431 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/07421222.2018.1440766 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.102809 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/17421770802353758 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2022.02.303 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111471 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00191-012-0291-3 via crossref
- doi:10.1257/aer.104.6.1630 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jce.2015.12.003 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2017.07.010 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.apr.2020.02.018 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.117765 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.046 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133877 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.scs.2019.102008 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111354 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-07-28T06:55:08.255528+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0