Distributing Zakatu Kasbil 'Amal as an Alternative to Student Funding, Evidence in Indonesia’s Universities

Distributing Zakatu Kasbil 'Amal as an... | F1000Research "use strict";function _typeof(t){return(_typeof="function"==typeof Symbol&&"symbol"==typeof Symbol.iterator?function(t){return typeof t}:function(t){return t&&"function"==typeof Symbol&&t.constructor===Symbol&&t!==Symbol.prototype?"symbol":typeof t})(t)}!function(){var t=function(){var t,e,o=[],n=window,r=n;for(;r;){try{if(r.frames.__tcfapiLocator){t=r;break}}catch(t){}if(r===n.top)break;r=r.parent}t||(!function t(){var e=n.document,o=!!n.frames.__tcfapiLocator;if(!o)if(e.body){var r=e.createElement("iframe");r.style.cssText="display:none",r.name="__tcfapiLocator",e.body.appendChild(r)}else setTimeout(t,5);return!o}(),n.__tcfapi=function(){for(var t=arguments.length,n=new Array(t),r=0;r 3&&2===parseInt(n[1],10)&&"boolean"==typeof n[3]&&(e=n[3],"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]("set",!0)):"ping"===n[0]?"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]({gdprApplies:e,cmpLoaded:!1,cmpStatus:"stub"}):o.push(n)},n.addEventListener("message",(function(t){var e="string"==typeof t.data,o={};if(e)try{o=JSON.parse(t.data)}catch(t){}else o=t.data;var n="object"===_typeof(o)&&null!==o?o.__tcfapiCall:null;n&&window.__tcfapi(n.command,n.version,(function(o,r){var a={__tcfapiReturn:{returnValue:o,success:r,callId:n.callId}};t&&t.source&&t.source.postMessage&&t.source.postMessage(e?JSON.stringify(a):a,"*")}),n.parameter)}),!1))};"undefined"!=typeof module?module.exports=t:t()}(); dataLayer = dataLayer || []; // Standard GTM initialization - Google Consent Mode handles consent automatically (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start': new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0], j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src= 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl+ '>m_auth=hzk0Vc3qFsQYhCrIoHz68A>m_preview=env-1>m_cookies_win=x';f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f); })(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-MWFK8L5J'); ;window.NREUM||(NREUM={});NREUM.init={distributed_tracing:{enabled:true},privacy:{cookies_enabled:true},ajax:{deny_list:["bam.nr-data.net"]}}; ;NREUM.loader_config={accountID:"438030",trustKey:"438030",agentID:"772317073",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073"} ;NREUM.info={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073",sa:1} ;/*! For license information please see nr-loader-spa-1.236.0.min.js.LICENSE.txt */ (()=>{"use strict";var e,t,r={5763:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P_:()=>l,Mt:()=>g,C5:()=>s,DL:()=>v,OP:()=>T,lF:()=>D,Yu:()=>y,Dg:()=>h,CX:()=>c,GE:()=>b,sU:()=>_});var n=r(8632),i=r(9567);const o={beacon:n.ce.beacon,errorBeacon:n.ce.errorBeacon,licenseKey:void 0,applicationID:void 0,sa:void 0,queueTime:void 0,applicationTime:void 0,ttGuid:void 0,user:void 0,account:void 0,product:void 0,extra:void 0,jsAttributes:{},userAttributes:void 0,atts:void 0,transactionName:void 0,tNamePlain:void 0},a={};function s(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");if(!a[e])throw new Error("Info for ".concat(e," was never set"));return a[e]}function c(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");a[e]=(0,i.D)(t,o),(0,n.Qy)(e,a[e],"info")}var u=r(7056);const d=()=>{const e={blockSelector:"[data-nr-block]",maskInputOptions:{password:!0}};return{allow_bfcache:!0,privacy:{cookies_enabled:!0},ajax:{deny_list:void 0,enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},distributed_tracing:{enabled:void 0,exclude_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_tracecontext_headers:void 0,allowed_origins:void 0},session:{domain:void 0,expiresMs:u.oD,inactiveMs:u.Hb},ssl:void 0,obfuscate:void 0,jserrors:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},metrics:{enabled:!0},page_action:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30},page_view_event:{enabled:!0},page_view_timing:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30,long_task:!1},session_trace:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},harvest:{tooManyRequestsDelay:60},session_replay:{enabled:!1,harvestTimeSeconds:60,sampleRate:.1,errorSampleRate:.1,maskTextSelector:"*",maskAllInputs:!0,get blockClass(){return"nr-block"},get ignoreClass(){return"nr-ignore"},get maskTextClass(){return"nr-mask"},get blockSelector(){return e.blockSelector},set blockSelector(t){e.blockSelector+=",".concat(t)},get maskInputOptions(){return e.maskInputOptions},set maskInputOptions(t){e.maskInputOptions={...t,password:!0}}},spa:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10}}},f={};function l(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");if(!f[e])throw new Error("Configuration for ".concat(e," was never set"));return f[e]}function h(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");f[e]=(0,i.D)(t,d()),(0,n.Qy)(e,f[e],"config")}function g(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");var r=l(e);if(r){for(var n=t.split("."),i=0;i {r.d(t,{D:()=>i});var n=r(50);function i(e,t){try{if(!e||"object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires an object as input");if(!t||"object"!=typeof t)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires a model to set its initial properties");const r=Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(t),Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)),o=0===Object.keys(r).length?e:r;for(let a in o)if(void 0!==e[a])try{"object"==typeof e[a]&&"object"==typeof t[a]?r[a]=i(e[a],t[a]):r[a]=e[a]}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occurred while setting a property of a Configurable",e)}return r}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting a Configurable",e)}}},6818:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Re:()=>i,gF:()=>o,q4:()=>n});const n="1.236.0",i="PROD",o="CDN"},385:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{FN:()=>a,IF:()=>u,Nk:()=>f,Tt:()=>s,_A:()=>o,il:()=>n,pL:()=>c,v6:()=>i,w1:()=>d});const n="undefined"!=typeof window&&!!window.document,i="undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator),o=n?window:"undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis),a=""+o?.location,s=/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(navigator.userAgent),c=s&&"undefined"==typeof SharedWorker,u=(()=>{const e=navigator.userAgent.match(/Firefox[/\s](\d+\.\d+)/);return Array.isArray(e)&&e.length>=2?+e[1]:0})(),d=Boolean(n&&window.document.documentMode),f=!!navigator.sendBeacon},1117:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{w:()=>o});var n=r(50);const i={agentIdentifier:"",ee:void 0};class o{constructor(e){try{if("object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("shared context requires an object as input");this.sharedContext={},Object.assign(this.sharedContext,i),Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,r]=e;Object.keys(i).includes(t)&&(this.sharedContext[t]=r)}))}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting SharedContext",e)}}}},8e3:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{L:()=>d,R:()=>c});var n=r(2177),i=r(1284),o=r(4322),a=r(3325);const s={};function c(e,t){const r={staged:!1,priority:a.p[t]||0};u(e),s[e].get(t)||s[e].set(t,r)}function u(e){e&&(s[e]||(s[e]=new Map))}function d(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:"",t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:"feature";if(u(e),!e||!s[e].get(t))return a(t);s[e].get(t).staged=!0;const r=[...s[e]];function a(t){const r=e?n.ee.get(e):n.ee,a=o.X.handlers;if(r.backlog&&a){var s=r.backlog[t],c=a[t];if(c){for(var u=0;s&&u {let[t,r]=e;return r.staged}))&&(r.sort(((e,t)=>e[1].priority-t[1].priority)),r.forEach((e=>{let[t]=e;a(t)})))}function f(e,t){var r=e[1];(0,i.D)(t[r],(function(t,r){var n=e[0];if(r[0]===n){var i=r[1],o=e[3],a=e[2];i.apply(o,a)}}))}},2177:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{c:()=>f,ee:()=>u});var n=r(8632),i=r(2210),o=r(1284),a=r(5763),s="nr@context";let c=(0,n.fP)();var u;function d(){}function f(e){return(0,i.X)(e,s,l)}function l(){return new d}function h(){u.aborted=!0,u.backlog={}}c.ee?u=c.ee:(u=function e(t,r){var n={},c={},f={},g=!1;try{g=16===r.length&&(0,a.OP)(r).isolatedBacklog}catch(e){}var p={on:b,addEventListener:b,removeEventListener:y,emit:v,get:x,listeners:w,context:m,buffer:A,abort:h,aborted:!1,isBuffering:E,debugId:r,backlog:g?{}:t&&"object"==typeof t.backlog?t.backlog:{}};return p;function m(e){return e&&e instanceof d?e:e?(0,i.X)(e,s,l):l()}function v(e,r,n,i,o){if(!1!==o&&(o=!0),!u.aborted||i){t&&o&&t.emit(e,r,n);for(var a=m(n),s=w(e),d=s.length,f=0;fn,p:()=>i});var n=r(2177).ee.get("handle");function i(e,t,r,i,o){o?(o.buffer([e],i),o.emit(e,t,r)):(n.buffer([e],i),n.emit(e,t,r))}},4322:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>o});var n=r(5546);o.on=a;var i=o.handlers={};function o(e,t,r,o){a(o||n.E,i,e,t,r)}function a(e,t,r,i,o){o||(o="feature"),e||(e=n.E);var a=t[o]=t[o]||{};(a[r]=a[r]||[]).push([e,i])}},3239:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{bP:()=>s,iz:()=>c,m$:()=>a});var n=r(385);let i=!1,o=!1;try{const e={get passive(){return i=!0,!1},get signal(){return o=!0,!1}};n._A.addEventListener("test",null,e),n._A.removeEventListener("test",null,e)}catch(e){}function a(e,t){return i||o?{capture:!!e,passive:i,signal:t}:!!e}function s(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;window.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}function c(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;document.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}},4402:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Ht:()=>u,M:()=>c,Rl:()=>a,ky:()=>s});var n=r(385);const i="xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx";function o(e,t){return e?15&e[t]:16*Math.random()|0}function a(){const e=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let t,r=0;return e&&e.getRandomValues&&(t=e.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31))),i.split("").map((e=>"x"===e?o(t,++r).toString(16):"y"===e?(3&o()|8).toString(16):e)).join("")}function s(e){const t=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let r,i=0;t&&t.getRandomValues&&(r=t.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31)));const a=[];for(var s=0;s {r.d(t,{Bq:()=>n,Hb:()=>o,oD:()=>i});const n="NRBA",i=144e5,o=18e5},7894:(e,t,r)=>{function n(){return Math.round(performance.now())}r.d(t,{z:()=>n})},7243:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{e:()=>o});var n=r(385),i={};function o(e){if(e in i)return i[e];if(0===(e||"").indexOf("data:"))return{protocol:"data"};let t;var r=n._A?.location,o={};if(n.il)t=document.createElement("a"),t.href=e;else try{t=new URL(e,r.href)}catch(e){return o}o.port=t.port;var a=t.href.split("://");!o.port&&a[1]&&(o.port=a[1].split("/")[0].split("@").pop().split(":")[1]),o.port&&"0"!==o.port||(o.port="https"===a[0]?"443":"80"),o.hostname=t.hostname||r.hostname,o.pathname=t.pathname,o.protocol=a[0],"/"!==o.pathname.charAt(0)&&(o.pathname="/"+o.pathname);var s=!t.protocol||":"===t.protocol||t.protocol===r.protocol,c=t.hostname===r.hostname&&t.port===r.port;return o.sameOrigin=s&&(!t.hostname||c),"/"===o.pathname&&(i[e]=o),o}},50:(e,t,r)=>{function n(e,t){"function"==typeof console.warn&&(console.warn("New Relic: ".concat(e)),t&&console.warn(t))}r.d(t,{Z:()=>n})},2587:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>c,T:()=>u});var n=r(2177),i=r(5546),o=r(8e3),a=r(3325);const s={stn:[a.D.sessionTrace],err:[a.D.jserrors,a.D.metrics],ins:[a.D.pageAction],spa:[a.D.spa],sr:[a.D.sessionReplay,a.D.sessionTrace]};function c(e,t){const r=n.ee.get(t);e&&"object"==typeof e&&(Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,n]=e;void 0===u[t]&&(s[t]?s[t].forEach((e=>{n?(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,e,r):(0,i.p)("block-"+t,[],void 0,e,r),(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+t,[Boolean(n)],void 0,e,r)})):n&&(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,void 0,r),u[t]=Boolean(n))})),Object.keys(s).forEach((e=>{void 0===u[e]&&(s[e]?.forEach((t=>(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+e,[!1],void 0,t,r))),u[e]=!1)})),(0,o.L)(t,a.D.pageViewEvent))}const u={}},2210:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>i});var n=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty;function i(e,t,r){if(n.call(e,t))return e[t];var i=r();if(Object.defineProperty&&Object.keys)try{return Object.defineProperty(e,t,{value:i,writable:!0,enumerable:!1}),i}catch(e){}return e[t]=i,i}},1284:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n});const n=(e,t)=>Object.entries(e||{}).map((e=>{let[r,n]=e;return t(r,n)}))},4351:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P:()=>o});var n=r(2177);const i=()=>{const e=new WeakSet;return(t,r)=>{if("object"==typeof r&&null!==r){if(e.has(r))return;e.add(r)}return r}};function o(e){try{return JSON.stringify(e,i())}catch(e){try{n.ee.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}}},3960:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{K:()=>a,b:()=>o});var n=r(3239);function i(){return"undefined"==typeof document||"complete"===document.readyState}function o(e,t){if(i())return e();(0,n.bP)("load",e,t)}function a(e){if(i())return e();(0,n.iz)("DOMContentLoaded",e)}},8632:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{EZ:()=>u,Qy:()=>c,ce:()=>o,fP:()=>a,gG:()=>d,mF:()=>s});var n=r(7894),i=r(385);const o={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net"};function a(){return i._A.NREUM||(i._A.NREUM={}),void 0===i._A.newrelic&&(i._A.newrelic=i._A.NREUM),i._A.NREUM}function s(){let e=a();return e.o||(e.o={ST:i._A.setTimeout,SI:i._A.setImmediate,CT:i._A.clearTimeout,XHR:i._A.XMLHttpRequest,REQ:i._A.Request,EV:i._A.Event,PR:i._A.Promise,MO:i._A.MutationObserver,FETCH:i._A.fetch}),e}function c(e,t,r){let i=a();const o=i.initializedAgents||{},s=o[e]||{};return Object.keys(s).length||(s.initializedAt={ms:(0,n.z)(),date:new Date}),i.initializedAgents={...o,[e]:{...s,[r]:t}},i}function u(e,t){a()[e]=t}function d(){return function(){let e=a();const t=e.info||{};e.info={beacon:o.beacon,errorBeacon:o.errorBeacon,...t}}(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.init||{};e.init={...t}}(),s(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.loader_config||{};e.loader_config={...t}}(),a()}},7956:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>i});var n=r(3239);function i(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1],r=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,i=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;return void(0,n.iz)("visibilitychange",(function(){if(t)return void("hidden"==document.visibilityState&&e());e(document.visibilityState)}),r,i)}},1214:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{em:()=>v,u5:()=>N,QU:()=>S,_L:()=>I,Gm:()=>L,Lg:()=>M,gy:()=>U,BV:()=>Q,Kf:()=>ee});var n=r(2177);const i="nr@original";var o=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,a=!1;function s(e,t){return e||(e=n.ee),r.inPlace=function(e,t,n,i,o){n||(n="");var a,s,c,u="-"===n.charAt(0);for(c=0;c 2?n-2:0),o=2;o {r(A[T],e,w),r(E[T],e,w)})),r(l._A,"fetch",y),t.on(y+"end",(function(e,r){var n=this;if(r){var i=r.headers.get("content-length");null!==i&&(n.rxSize=i),t.emit(y+"done",[null,r],n)}else t.emit(y+"done",[e],n)})),t}const O={},j=["pushState","replaceState"];function S(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("history")}(e);return!l.il||O[t.debugId]++||(O[t.debugId]=1,s(t).inPlace(window.history,j,"-")),t}var P=r(3239);const C={},R=["appendChild","insertBefore","replaceChild"];function I(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("jsonp")}(e);if(!l.il||C[t.debugId])return t;C[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=/[?&](?:callback|cb)=([^&#]+)/,o=/(.*)\.([^.]+)/,a=/^(\w+)(\.|$)(.*)$/;function c(e,t){var r=e.match(a),n=r[1],i=r[3];return i?c(i,t[n]):t[n]}return r.inPlace(Node.prototype,R,"dom-"),t.on("dom-start",(function(e){!function(e){if(!e||"string"!=typeof e.nodeName||"script"!==e.nodeName.toLowerCase())return;if("function"!=typeof e.addEventListener)return;var n=(a=e.src,s=a.match(i),s?s[1]:null);var a,s;if(!n)return;var u=function(e){var t=e.match(o);if(t&&t.length>=3)return{key:t[2],parent:c(t[1],window)};return{key:e,parent:window}}(n);if("function"!=typeof u.parent[u.key])return;var d={};function f(){t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}function l(){t.emit("jsonp-error",[],d),t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}r.inPlace(u.parent,[u.key],"cb-",d),e.addEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.addEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1)),t.emit("new-jsonp",[e.src],d)}(e[0])})),t}var k=r(5763);const H={};function L(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("mutation")}(e);if(!l.il||H[t.debugId])return t;H[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=k.Yu.MO;return i&&(window.MutationObserver=function(e){return this instanceof i?new i(r(e,"fn-")):i.apply(this,arguments)},MutationObserver.prototype=i.prototype),t}const z={};function M(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("promise")}(e);if(z[t.debugId])return t;z[t.debugId]=!0;var r=n.c,o=s(t),a=k.Yu.PR;return a&&function(){function e(r){var n=t.context(),i=o(r,"executor-",n,null,!1);const s=Reflect.construct(a,[i],e);return t.context(s).getCtx=function(){return n},s}l._A.Promise=e,Object.defineProperty(e,"name",{value:"Promise"}),e.toString=function(){return a.toString()},Object.setPrototypeOf(e,a),["all","race"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){let i=!1;[...e||[]].forEach((e=>{this.resolve(e).then(a("all"===r),a(!1))}));const o=n.apply(this,arguments);return o;function a(e){return function(){t.emit("propagate",[null,!i],o,!1,!1),i=i||!e}}}})),["resolve","reject"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){const r=n.apply(this,arguments);return e!==r&&t.emit("propagate",[e,!0],r,!1,!1),r}})),e.prototype=a.prototype;const n=a.prototype.then;a.prototype.then=function(){var e=this,i=r(e);i.promise=e;for(var a=arguments.length,s=new Array(a),c=0;c e())),t};function m(e,t){i.inPlace(t,["onreadystatechange"],"fn-",E)}function b(){var e=this,t=r.context(e);e.readyState>3&&!t.resolved&&(t.resolved=!0,r.emit("xhr-resolved",[],e)),i.inPlace(e,f,"fn-",E)}if(function(e,t){for(var r in e)t[r]=e[r]}(o,p),p.prototype=o.prototype,i.inPlace(p.prototype,J,"-xhr-",E),r.on("send-xhr-start",(function(e,t){m(e,t),function(e){h.push(e),a&&(y?y.then(A):u?u(A):(w=-w,x.data=w))}(t)})),r.on("open-xhr-start",m),a){var y=c&&c.resolve();if(!u&&!c){var w=1,x=document.createTextNode(w);new a(A).observe(x,{characterData:!0})}}else t.on("fn-end",(function(e){e[0]&&e[0].type===d||A()}));function A(){for(var e=0;e {r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.ajax},6660:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{A:()=>i,t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.jserrors,i="nr@seenError"},3081:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{gF:()=>o,mY:()=>i,t9:()=>n,vz:()=>s,xS:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.metrics,i="sm",o="cm",a="storeSupportabilityMetrics",s="storeEventMetrics"},4649:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageAction},7633:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Dz:()=>i,OJ:()=>a,qw:()=>o,t9:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewEvent,i="firstbyte",o="domcontent",a="windowload"},9251:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewTiming},3614:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BST_RESOURCE:()=>i,END:()=>s,FEATURE_NAME:()=>n,FN_END:()=>u,FN_START:()=>c,PUSH_STATE:()=>d,RESOURCE:()=>o,START:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.sessionTrace,i="bstResource",o="resource",a="-start",s="-end",c="fn"+a,u="fn"+s,d="pushState"},7836:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BODY:()=>A,CB_END:()=>E,CB_START:()=>u,END:()=>x,FEATURE_NAME:()=>i,FETCH:()=>_,FETCH_BODY:()=>v,FETCH_DONE:()=>m,FETCH_START:()=>p,FN_END:()=>c,FN_START:()=>s,INTERACTION:()=>l,INTERACTION_API:()=>d,INTERACTION_EVENTS:()=>o,JSONP_END:()=>b,JSONP_NODE:()=>g,JS_TIME:()=>T,MAX_TIMER_BUDGET:()=>a,REMAINING:()=>f,SPA_NODE:()=>h,START:()=>w,originalSetTimeout:()=>y});var n=r(5763);const i=r(3325).D.spa,o=["click","submit","keypress","keydown","keyup","change"],a=999,s="fn-start",c="fn-end",u="cb-start",d="api-ixn-",f="remaining",l="interaction",h="spaNode",g="jsonpNode",p="fetch-start",m="fetch-done",v="fetch-body-",b="jsonp-end",y=n.Yu.ST,w="-start",x="-end",A="-body",E="cb"+x,T="jsTime",_="fetch"},5938:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{W:()=>o});var n=r(5763),i=r(2177);class o{constructor(e,t,r){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.aggregator=t,this.ee=i.ee.get(e,(0,n.OP)(this.agentIdentifier).isolatedBacklog),this.featureName=r,this.blocked=!1}}},9144:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{j:()=>m});var n=r(3325),i=r(5763),o=r(5546),a=r(2177),s=r(7894),c=r(8e3),u=r(3960),d=r(385),f=r(50),l=r(3081),h=r(8632);function g(){const e=(0,h.gG)();["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease","addPageAction","setCurrentRouteName","setPageViewName","setCustomAttribute","interaction","noticeError","setUserId"].forEach((t=>{e[t]=function(){for(var r=arguments.length,n=new Array(r),i=0;i 1?r-1:0),i=1;i {e.exposed&&e.api[t]&&o.push(e.api[t](...n))})),o.length>1?o:o[0]}(t,...n)}}))}var p=r(2587);function m(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:{},m=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,v=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0,{init:b,info:y,loader_config:w,runtime:x={loaderType:m},exposed:A=!0}=t;const E=(0,h.gG)();y||(b=E.init,y=E.info,w=E.loader_config),(0,i.Dg)(e,b||{}),(0,i.GE)(e,w||{}),(0,i.sU)(e,x),y.jsAttributes??={},d.v6&&(y.jsAttributes.isWorker=!0),(0,i.CX)(e,y),g();const T=function(e,t){t||(0,c.R)(e,"api");const h={};var g=a.ee.get(e),p=g.get("tracer"),m="api-",v=m+"ixn-";function b(t,r,n,o){const a=(0,i.C5)(e);return null===r?delete a.jsAttributes[t]:(0,i.CX)(e,{...a,jsAttributes:{...a.jsAttributes,[t]:r}}),x(m,n,!0,o||null===r?"session":void 0)(t,r)}function y(){}["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease"].forEach((e=>h[e]=x(m,e,!0,"api"))),h.addPageAction=x(m,"addPageAction",!0,n.D.pageAction),h.setCurrentRouteName=x(m,"routeName",!0,n.D.spa),h.setPageViewName=function(t,r){if("string"==typeof t)return"/"!==t.charAt(0)&&(t="/"+t),(0,i.OP)(e).customTransaction=(r||"http://custom.transaction")+t,x(m,"setPageViewName",!0)()},h.setCustomAttribute=function(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2];if("string"==typeof e){if(["string","number"].includes(typeof t)||null===t)return b(e,t,"setCustomAttribute",r);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nNon-null value must be a string or number type, but a type of was provided."))}else(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nName must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.setUserId=function(e){if("string"==typeof e||null===e)return b("enduser.id",e,"setUserId",!0);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setUserId.\nNon-null value must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.interaction=function(){return(new y).get()};var w=y.prototype={createTracer:function(e,t){var r={},i=this,a="function"==typeof t;return(0,o.p)(v+"tracer",[(0,s.z)(),e,r],i,n.D.spa,g),function(){if(p.emit((a?"":"no-")+"fn-start",[(0,s.z)(),i,a],r),a)try{return t.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw p.emit("fn-err",[arguments,this,"string"==typeof e?new Error(e):e],r),e}finally{p.emit("fn-end",[(0,s.z)()],r)}}}};function x(e,t,r,i){return function(){return(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/"+t+"/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),i&&(0,o.p)(e+t,[(0,s.z)(),...arguments],r?null:this,i,g),r?void 0:this}}function A(){r.e(439).then(r.bind(r,7438)).then((t=>{let{setAPI:r}=t;r(e),(0,c.L)(e,"api")})).catch((()=>(0,f.Z)("Downloading runtime APIs failed...")))}return["actionText","setName","setAttribute","save","ignore","onEnd","getContext","end","get"].forEach((e=>{w[e]=x(v,e,void 0,n.D.spa)})),h.noticeError=function(e,t){"string"==typeof e&&(e=new Error(e)),(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/noticeError/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),(0,o.p)("err",[e,(0,s.z)(),!1,t],void 0,n.D.jserrors,g)},d.il?(0,u.b)((()=>A()),!0):A(),h}(e,v);return(0,h.Qy)(e,T,"api"),(0,h.Qy)(e,A,"exposed"),(0,h.EZ)("activatedFeatures",p.T),T}},3325:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n,p:()=>i});const n={ajax:"ajax",jserrors:"jserrors",metrics:"metrics",pageAction:"page_action",pageViewEvent:"page_view_event",pageViewTiming:"page_view_timing",sessionReplay:"session_replay",sessionTrace:"session_trace",spa:"spa"},i={[n.pageViewEvent]:1,[n.pageViewTiming]:2,[n.metrics]:3,[n.jserrors]:4,[n.ajax]:5,[n.sessionTrace]:6,[n.pageAction]:7,[n.spa]:8,[n.sessionReplay]:9}}},n={};function i(e){var t=n[e];if(void 0!==t)return t.exports;var o=n[e]={exports:{}};return r[e](o,o.exports,i),o.exports}i.m=r,i.d=(e,t)=>{for(var r in t)i.o(t,r)&&!i.o(e,r)&&Object.defineProperty(e,r,{enumerable:!0,get:t[r]})},i.f={},i.e=e=>Promise.all(Object.keys(i.f).reduce(((t,r)=>(i.f[r](e,t),t)),[])),i.u=e=>(({78:"page_action-aggregate",147:"metrics-aggregate",242:"session-manager",317:"jserrors-aggregate",348:"page_view_timing-aggregate",412:"lazy-feature-loader",439:"async-api",538:"recorder",590:"session_replay-aggregate",675:"compressor",733:"session_trace-aggregate",786:"page_view_event-aggregate",873:"spa-aggregate",898:"ajax-aggregate"}[e]||e)+"."+{78:"ac76d497",147:"3dc53903",148:"1a20d5fe",242:"2a64278a",317:"49e41428",348:"bd6de33a",412:"2f55ce66",439:"30bd804e",538:"1b18459f",590:"cf0efb30",675:"ae9f91a8",733:"83105561",786:"06482edd",860:"03a8b7a5",873:"e6b09d52",898:"998ef92b"}[e]+"-1.236.0.min.js"),i.o=(e,t)=>Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,t),e={},t="NRBA:",i.l=(r,n,o,a)=>{if(e[r])e[r].push(n);else{var s,c;if(void 0!==o)for(var u=document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=0;d {s.onerror=s.onload=null,clearTimeout(h);var i=e[r];if(delete e[r],s.parentNode&&s.parentNode.removeChild(s),i&&i.forEach((e=>e(n))),t)return t(n)},h=setTimeout(l.bind(null,void 0,{type:"timeout",target:s}),12e4);s.onerror=l.bind(null,s.onerror),s.onload=l.bind(null,s.onload),c&&document.head.appendChild(s)}},i.r=e=>{"undefined"!=typeof Symbol&&Symbol.toStringTag&&Object.defineProperty(e,Symbol.toStringTag,{value:"Module"}),Object.defineProperty(e,"__esModule",{value:!0})},i.j=364,i.p="https://js-agent.newrelic.com/",(()=>{var e={364:0,953:0};i.f.j=(t,r)=>{var n=i.o(e,t)?e[t]:void 0;if(0!==n)if(n)r.push(n[2]);else{var o=new Promise(((r,i)=>n=e[t]=[r,i]));r.push(n[2]=o);var a=i.p+i.u(t),s=new Error;i.l(a,(r=>{if(i.o(e,t)&&(0!==(n=e[t])&&(e[t]=void 0),n)){var o=r&&("load"===r.type?"missing":r.type),a=r&&r.target&&r.target.src;s.message="Loading chunk "+t+" failed.\n("+o+": "+a+")",s.name="ChunkLoadError",s.type=o,s.request=a,n[1](s)}}),"chunk-"+t,t)}};var t=(t,r)=>{var n,o,[a,s,c]=r,u=0;if(a.some((t=>0!==e[t]))){for(n in s)i.o(s,n)&&(i.m[n]=s[n]);if(c)c(i)}for(t&&t(r);u {i.r(o);var e=i(3325),t=i(5763);const r=Object.values(e.D);function n(e){const n={};return r.forEach((r=>{n[r]=function(e,r){return!1!==(0,t.Mt)(r,"".concat(e,".enabled"))}(r,e)})),n}var a=i(9144);var s=i(5546),c=i(385),u=i(8e3),d=i(5938),f=i(3960),l=i(50);class h extends d.W{constructor(e,t,r){let n=!(arguments.length>3&&void 0!==arguments[3])||arguments[3];super(e,t,r),this.auto=n,this.abortHandler,this.featAggregate,this.onAggregateImported,n&&(0,u.R)(e,r)}importAggregator(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:{};if(this.featAggregate||!this.auto)return;const r=c.il&&!0===(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"privacy.cookies_enabled");let n;this.onAggregateImported=new Promise((e=>{n=e}));const o=async()=>{let t;try{if(r){const{setupAgentSession:e}=await Promise.all([i.e(860),i.e(242)]).then(i.bind(i,3228));t=e(this.agentIdentifier)}}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("A problem occurred when starting up session manager. This page will not start or extend any session.",e)}try{if(!this.shouldImportAgg(this.featureName,t))return void(0,u.L)(this.agentIdentifier,this.featureName);const{lazyFeatureLoader:r}=await i.e(412).then(i.bind(i,8582)),{Aggregate:o}=await r(this.featureName,"aggregate");this.featAggregate=new o(this.agentIdentifier,this.aggregator,e),n(!0)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Downloading and initializing ".concat(this.featureName," failed..."),e),this.abortHandler?.(),n(!1)}};c.il?(0,f.b)((()=>o()),!0):o()}shouldImportAgg(r,n){return r!==e.D.sessionReplay||!1!==(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"session_trace.enabled")&&(!!n?.isNew||!!n?.state.sessionReplay)}}var g=i(7633),p=i(7894);class m extends h{static featureName=g.t9;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];if(super(r,n,g.t9,i),("undefined"==typeof PerformanceNavigationTiming||c.Tt)&&"undefined"!=typeof PerformanceTiming){const n=(0,t.OP)(r);n[g.Dz]=Math.max(Date.now()-n.offset,0),(0,f.K)((()=>n[g.qw]=Math.max((0,p.z)()-n[g.Dz],0))),(0,f.b)((()=>{const t=(0,p.z)();n[g.OJ]=Math.max(t-n[g.Dz],0),(0,s.p)("timing",["load",t],void 0,e.D.pageViewTiming,this.ee)}))}this.importAggregator()}}var v=i(1117),b=i(1284);class y extends v.w{constructor(e){super(e),this.aggregatedData={}}store(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,r,i);return o.metrics=function(e,t){t||(t={count:0});return t.count+=1,(0,b.D)(e,(function(e,r){t[e]=w(r,t[e])})),t}(n,o.metrics),o}merge(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,n,i);if(o.metrics){var a=o.metrics;a.count+=r.count,(0,b.D)(r,(function(e,t){if("count"!==e){var n=a[e],i=r[e];i&&!i.c?a[e]=w(i.t,n):a[e]=function(e,t){if(!t)return e;t.c||(t=x(t.t));return t.min=Math.min(e.min,t.min),t.max=Math.max(e.max,t.max),t.t+=e.t,t.sos+=e.sos,t.c+=e.c,t}(i,a[e])}}))}else o.metrics=r}storeMetric(e,t,r,n){var i=this.getBucket(e,t,r);return i.stats=w(n,i.stats),i}getBucket(e,t,r,n){this.aggregatedData[e]||(this.aggregatedData[e]={});var i=this.aggregatedData[e][t];return i||(i=this.aggregatedData[e][t]={params:r||{}},n&&(i.custom=n)),i}get(e,t){return t?this.aggregatedData[e]&&this.aggregatedData[e][t]:this.aggregatedData[e]}take(e){for(var t={},r="",n=!1,i=0;i t.max&&(t.max=e),e 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,r,j.t,n),c.il&&((0,t.OP)(e).initHidden=Boolean("hidden"===document.visibilityState),(0,N.N)((()=>(0,s.p)("docHidden",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee)),!0),(0,O.bP)("pagehide",(()=>(0,s.p)("winPagehide",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee))),this.importAggregator())}}var P=i(3081);class C extends h{static featureName=P.t9;constructor(e,t){let r=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,P.t9,r),this.importAggregator()}}var R,I=i(2210),k=i(1214),H=i(2177),L={};try{R=localStorage.getItem("__nr_flags").split(","),console&&"function"==typeof console.log&&(L.console=!0,-1!==R.indexOf("dev")&&(L.dev=!0),-1!==R.indexOf("nr_dev")&&(L.nrDev=!0))}catch(e){}function z(e){try{L.console&&z(e)}catch(e){}}L.nrDev&&H.ee.on("internal-error",(function(e){z(e.stack)})),L.dev&&H.ee.on("fn-err",(function(e,t,r){z(r.stack)})),L.dev&&(z("NR AGENT IN DEVELOPMENT MODE"),z("flags: "+(0,b.D)(L,(function(e,t){return e})).join(", ")));var M=i(6660);class B extends h{static featureName=M.t;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,M.t,i),this.skipNext=0;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}const o=this;o.ee.on("fn-start",(function(e,t,r){o.abortHandler&&(o.skipNext+=1)})),o.ee.on("fn-err",(function(t,r,n){o.abortHandler&&!n[M.A]&&((0,I.X)(n,M.A,(function(){return!0})),this.thrown=!0,(0,s.p)("err",[n,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee))})),o.ee.on("fn-end",(function(){o.abortHandler&&!this.thrown&&o.skipNext>0&&(o.skipNext-=1)})),o.ee.on("internal-error",(function(t){(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee)})),this.origOnerror=c._A.onerror,c._A.onerror=this.onerrorHandler.bind(this),c._A.addEventListener("unhandledrejection",(t=>{const r=function(e){let t="Unhandled Promise Rejection: ";if(e instanceof Error)try{return e.message=t+e.message,e}catch(t){return e}if(void 0===e)return new Error(t);try{return new Error(t+(0,D.P)(e))}catch(e){return new Error(t)}}(t.reason);(0,s.p)("err",[r,(0,p.z)(),!1,{unhandledPromiseRejection:1}],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}),(0,O.m$)(!1,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),(0,k.gy)(this.ee),(0,k.BV)(this.ee),(0,k.em)(this.ee),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}onerrorHandler(t,r,n,i,o){"function"==typeof this.origOnerror&&this.origOnerror(...arguments);try{this.skipNext?this.skipNext-=1:(0,s.p)("err",[o||new F(t,r,n),(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(t){try{(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(e){}}return!1}}function F(e,t,r){this.message=e||"Uncaught error with no additional information",this.sourceURL=t,this.line=r}let U=1;const q="nr@id";function G(e){const t=typeof e;return!e||"object"!==t&&"function"!==t?-1:e===c._A?0:(0,I.X)(e,q,(function(){return U++}))}function V(e){if("string"==typeof e&&e.length)return e.length;if("object"==typeof e){if("undefined"!=typeof ArrayBuffer&&e instanceof ArrayBuffer&&e.byteLength)return e.byteLength;if("undefined"!=typeof Blob&&e instanceof Blob&&e.size)return e.size;if(!("undefined"!=typeof FormData&&e instanceof FormData))try{return(0,D.P)(e).length}catch(e){return}}}var X=i(7243);class W{constructor(e){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.generateTracePayload=this.generateTracePayload.bind(this),this.shouldGenerateTrace=this.shouldGenerateTrace.bind(this)}generateTracePayload(e){if(!this.shouldGenerateTrace(e))return null;var r=(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier);if(!r)return null;var n=(r.accountID||"").toString()||null,i=(r.agentID||"").toString()||null,o=(r.trustKey||"").toString()||null;if(!n||!i)return null;var a=(0,_.M)(),s=(0,_.Ht)(),c=Date.now(),u={spanId:a,traceId:s,timestamp:c};return(e.sameOrigin||this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useTraceContextHeadersForCors())&&(u.traceContextParentHeader=this.generateTraceContextParentHeader(a,s),u.traceContextStateHeader=this.generateTraceContextStateHeader(a,c,n,i,o)),(e.sameOrigin&&!this.excludeNewrelicHeader()||!e.sameOrigin&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useNewrelicHeaderForCors())&&(u.newrelicHeader=this.generateTraceHeader(a,s,c,n,i,o)),u}generateTraceContextParentHeader(e,t){return"00-"+t+"-"+e+"-01"}generateTraceContextStateHeader(e,t,r,n,i){return i+"@nr=0-1-"+r+"-"+n+"-"+e+"----"+t}generateTraceHeader(e,t,r,n,i,o){if(!("function"==typeof c._A?.btoa))return null;var a={v:[0,1],d:{ty:"Browser",ac:n,ap:i,id:e,tr:t,ti:r}};return o&&n!==o&&(a.d.tk=o),btoa((0,D.P)(a))}shouldGenerateTrace(e){return this.isDtEnabled()&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)}isAllowedOrigin(e){var r=!1,n={};if((0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"distributed_tracing")&&(n=(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier).distributed_tracing),e.sameOrigin)r=!0;else if(n.allowed_origins instanceof Array)for(var i=0;i 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,Z.t,i),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(this.dt=new W(r),this.handler=(e,t,r,n)=>(0,s.p)(e,t,r,n,this.ee),(0,k.u5)(this.ee),(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),function(r,n,i,o){function a(e){var t=this;t.totalCbs=0,t.called=0,t.cbTime=0,t.end=E,t.ended=!1,t.xhrGuids={},t.lastSize=null,t.loadCaptureCalled=!1,t.params=this.params||{},t.metrics=this.metrics||{},e.addEventListener("load",(function(r){_(t,e)}),(0,O.m$)(!1)),c.IF||e.addEventListener("progress",(function(e){t.lastSize=e.loaded}),(0,O.m$)(!1))}function s(e){this.params={method:e[0]},T(this,e[1]),this.metrics={}}function u(e,n){var i=(0,t.DL)(r);i.xpid&&this.sameOrigin&&n.setRequestHeader("X-NewRelic-ID",i.xpid);var a=o.generateTracePayload(this.parsedOrigin);if(a){var s=!1;a.newrelicHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("newrelic",a.newrelicHeader),s=!0),a.traceContextParentHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("traceparent",a.traceContextParentHeader),a.traceContextStateHeader&&n.setRequestHeader("tracestate",a.traceContextStateHeader),s=!0),s&&(this.dt=a)}}function d(e,t){var r=this.metrics,i=e[0],o=this;if(r&&i){var a=V(i);a&&(r.txSize=a)}this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.listener=function(e){try{"abort"!==e.type||o.loadCaptureCalled||(o.params.aborted=!0),("load"!==e.type||o.called===o.totalCbs&&(o.onloadCalled||"function"!=typeof t.onload)&&"function"==typeof o.end)&&o.end(t)}catch(e){try{n.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}};for(var s=0;s 1?e[1]=i:e.push(i)}else e[0]&&e[0].headers&&s(e[0].headers,n)&&(this.dt=n);function s(e,t){var r=!1;return t.newrelicHeader&&(e.set("newrelic",t.newrelicHeader),r=!0),t.traceContextParentHeader&&(e.set("traceparent",t.traceContextParentHeader),t.traceContextStateHeader&&e.set("tracestate",t.traceContextStateHeader),r=!0),r}}function x(e,t){this.params={},this.metrics={},this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.dt=t,e.length>=1&&(this.target=e[0]),e.length>=2&&(this.opts=e[1]);var r,n=this.opts||{},i=this.target;"string"==typeof i?r=i:"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof Y?r=i.url:c._A?.URL&&"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof URL&&(r=i.href),T(this,r);var o=(""+(i&&i instanceof Y&&i.method||n.method||"GET")).toUpperCase();this.params.method=o,this.txSize=V(n.body)||0}function A(t,r){var n;this.endTime=(0,p.z)(),this.params||(this.params={}),this.params.status=r?r.status:0,"string"==typeof this.rxSize&&this.rxSize.length>0&&(n=+this.rxSize);var o={txSize:this.txSize,rxSize:n,duration:(0,p.z)()-this.startTime};i("xhr",[this.params,o,this.startTime,this.endTime,"fetch"],this,e.D.ajax)}function E(t){var r=this.params,n=this.metrics;if(!this.ended){this.ended=!0;for(var o=0;o 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,we.t,r),this.importAggregator()}}new class{constructor(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:(0,_.ky)(16);c._A?(this.agentIdentifier=t,this.sharedAggregator=new y({agentIdentifier:this.agentIdentifier}),this.features={},this.desiredFeatures=new Set(e.features||[]),this.desiredFeatures.add(m),Object.assign(this,(0,a.j)(this.agentIdentifier,e,e.loaderType||"agent")),this.start()):(0,l.Z)("Failed to initial the agent. Could not determine the runtime environment.")}get config(){return{info:(0,t.C5)(this.agentIdentifier),init:(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier),loader_config:(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier),runtime:(0,t.OP)(this.agentIdentifier)}}start(){const t="features";try{const r=n(this.agentIdentifier),i=[...this.desiredFeatures];i.sort(((t,r)=>e.p[t.featureName]-e.p[r.featureName])),i.forEach((t=>{if(r[t.featureName]||t.featureName===e.D.pageViewEvent){const n=function(t){switch(t){case e.D.ajax:return[e.D.jserrors];case e.D.sessionTrace:return[e.D.ajax,e.D.pageViewEvent];case e.D.sessionReplay:return[e.D.sessionTrace];case e.D.pageViewTiming:return[e.D.pageViewEvent];default:return[]}}(t.featureName);n.every((e=>r[e]))||(0,l.Z)("".concat(t.featureName," is enabled but one or more dependent features has been disabled (").concat((0,D.P)(n),"). This may cause unintended consequences or missing data...")),this.features[t.featureName]=new t(this.agentIdentifier,this.sharedAggregator)}})),(0,T.Qy)(this.agentIdentifier,this.features,t)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Failed to initialize all enabled instrument classes (agent aborted) -",e);for(const e in this.features)this.features[e].abortHandler?.();const r=(0,T.fP)();return delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.api,delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.[t],delete this.sharedAggregator,r.ee?.abort(),delete r.ee?.get(this.agentIdentifier),!1}}}({features:[J,m,S,class extends h{static featureName=oe;constructor(t,r){if(super(t,r,oe,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;const n=this.ee;let i;(0,k.QU)(n),this.eventsEE=(0,k.em)(n),this.eventsEE.on(se,(function(e,t){this.bstStart=(0,p.z)()})),this.eventsEE.on(ae,(function(t,r){(0,s.p)("bst",[t[0],r,this.bstStart,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),n.on(ce+ne,(function(e){this.time=(0,p.z)(),this.startPath=location.pathname+location.hash})),n.on(ce+ie,(function(t){(0,s.p)("bstHist",[location.pathname+location.hash,this.startPath,this.time],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)}));try{i=new PerformanceObserver((t=>{const r=t.getEntries();(0,s.p)(te,[r],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),i.observe({type:re,buffered:!0})}catch(e){}this.importAggregator({resourceObserver:i})}},C,xe,B,class extends h{static featureName=de;constructor(e,r){if(super(e,r,de,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;if(!(0,t.OP)(e).xhrWrappable)return;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}let n,i=0;const o=this.ee.get("tracer"),a=(0,k._L)(this.ee),s=(0,k.Lg)(this.ee),u=(0,k.BV)(this.ee),d=(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),f=this.ee.get("events"),l=(0,k.u5)(this.ee),h=(0,k.QU)(this.ee),g=(0,k.Gm)(this.ee);function m(e,t){h.emit("newURL",[""+window.location,t])}function v(){i++,n=window.location.hash,this[ve]=(0,p.z)()}function b(){i--,window.location.hash!==n&&m(0,!0);var e=(0,p.z)();this[pe]=~~this[pe]+e-this[ve],this[ye]=e}function y(e,t){e.on(t,(function(){this[t]=(0,p.z)()}))}this.ee.on(ve,v),s.on(be,v),a.on(be,v),this.ee.on(ye,b),s.on(ge,b),a.on(ge,b),this.ee.buffer([ve,ye,"xhr-resolved"],this.featureName),f.buffer([ve],this.featureName),u.buffer(["setTimeout"+le,"clearTimeout"+fe,ve],this.featureName),d.buffer([ve,"new-xhr","send-xhr"+fe],this.featureName),l.buffer([me+fe,me+"-done",me+he+fe,me+he+le],this.featureName),h.buffer(["newURL"],this.featureName),g.buffer([ve],this.featureName),s.buffer(["propagate",be,ge,"executor-err","resolve"+fe],this.featureName),o.buffer([ve,"no-"+ve],this.featureName),a.buffer(["new-jsonp","cb-start","jsonp-error","jsonp-end"],this.featureName),y(l,me+fe),y(l,me+"-done"),y(a,"new-jsonp"),y(a,"jsonp-end"),y(a,"cb-start"),h.on("pushState-end",m),h.on("replaceState-end",m),window.addEventListener("hashchange",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("load",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("popstate",(function(){m(0,i>1)}),(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}}],loaderType:"spa"})})(),window.NRBA=o})(); window.jQuery || document.write(' ') CKEDITOR_BASEPATH='https://f1000research.com/js/vendor/ckeditor/' window.reactTheme = 'research'; window.MathJax = { CommonHTML: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, 'HTML-CSS': { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, SVG: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, AuthorInit: function() { MathJax.Hub.Register.MessageHook('End Process', function () { let timeout = false; // holder for timeout id const delay = 250; // delay after event is "complete" to run callback const reflowMath = function() { const dispFormulas = document.querySelectorAll('.disp-formula.panel'); if (!dispFormulas) { return; } for (const dispFormula of dispFormulas) { const child = dispFormula.querySelector('.MathJax_Preview').nextSibling.firstChild; const isMultiline = MathJax.Hub.getAllJax(dispFormula)[0].root.isMultiline; if (dispFormula.offsetWidth < child.offsetWidth || isMultiline) { MathJax.Hub.Queue(['Rerender', MathJax.Hub, dispFormula]); } } }; window.addEventListener('resize', function() { clearTimeout(timeout); // clear the timeout timeout = setTimeout(reflowMath, delay); // start timing for event "completion" }); }); }, }; if (window.location.hash == '#_=_'){ window.location = window.location.href.split('#')[0] } !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function() {n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)} ;if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n; n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script','https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '1641728616063202'); fbq('track', "PixelInitialized", {}); (function(h,o,t,j,a,r){ h.hj=h.hj||function(){(h.hj.q=h.hj.q||[]).push(arguments)}; h._hjSettings={hjid:2318163,hjsv:6}; a=o.getElementsByTagName('head')[0]; r=o.createElement('script');r.async=1; r.src=t+h._hjSettings.hjid+j+h._hjSettings.hjsv; a.appendChild(r); })(window,document,'https://static.hotjar.com/c/hotjar-','.js?sv='); search file_upload Submit your research search menu close search Browse Gateways & Collections How to Publish Submit your Research My Submissions Article Guidelines Article Guidelines (New Versions) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines Open Data and Accessible Source Materials Guidelines (HSS) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines (PSE) Prepublication Checks Production Process Posters and Slides Guidelines Document Guidelines Article Processing Charges Peer Review Finding Article Reviewers About How it Works For Reviewers Our Advisors Policies Glossary FAQs For Developers Newsroom Contact My Research Submissions Content and Tracking Alerts My Details Sign In file_upload Submit your research { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/13-185" }, "headline": "Distributing Zakatu Kasbil 'Amal as an Alternative to Student Funding, Evidence in Indonesia’s...", "datePublished": "2024-03-11T11:49:31", "dateModified": "2025-09-22T16:43:04", "author": [ { "@type": "Person", "name": "Marliyah Marliyah" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Budi Dharma" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Ahmad Muhaisin B. Syarbaini" } ], "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "F1000Research", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 480, "width": 60 } }, "image": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 1200, "width": 150 }, "description": " Background The purpose of this paper is to clarify the use of zakat as an alternative funding for students to pay their tuition fees. Apart from that, this paper also explains how zakat collected from muzakki fixed income known as zakatu kasbil 'amal, which is known as income zakat and is still controversial in Indonesia. Method The study uses a systematic literature review with an inductive approach to find out the theoretical basis of the research questions. The analysis uses a qualitative method that explores significant findings from various literature sources. The findings will combine with the exploration results of several universities in Indonesia that use social funds as a tool for helping students. Result The income zakat controversy mediates using the precautionary principle, which ensures that the projected income indeed exceeds the nisab (1 year) of the income. Some Islamic universities in Indonesia carry out this zakat withdrawal and even use an auto debit system. On the other hand, the distribution of zakat to students is also controversial because zakat is part of worship whose distribution is regulated into nine asnaf. Nevertheless, students may be equated with one of the asnaf so that it becomes permissible to be the subject of zakat distribution. Observation findings at Indonesian Islamic universities even show that the results of zakat distribution strongly influence the success of students’ studies, even if only in aid of tuition fees. " } { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "1", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/", "name": "Home" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "2", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/browse/articles", "name": "Browse" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "3", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/13-185/v1", "name": "Distributing Zakatu Kasbil 'Amal as an Alternative to Student Funding,..." } } ] } Home Browse Distributing Zakatu Kasbil 'Amal as an Alternative to Student Funding,... ALL Metrics - Views Downloads Get PDF Get XML Cite How to cite this article Marliyah M, Dharma B and Syarbaini AMB. Distributing Zakatu Kasbil 'Amal as an Alternative to Student Funding, Evidence in Indonesia’s Universities [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :185 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.144610.1 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. Close Copy Citation Details Export Export Citation Sciwheel EndNote Ref. Manager Bibtex ProCite Sente EXPORT Select a format first Track Share ▬ ✚ Systematic Review Distributing Zakatu Kasbil 'Amal as an Alternative to Student Funding, Evidence in Indonesia’s Universities [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] Marliyah Marliyah https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9466-1963 1 , Budi Dharma https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1592-5386 2 , Ahmad Muhaisin B. Syarbaini 1 Marliyah Marliyah https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9466-1963 1 , Budi Dharma https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1592-5386 2 , Ahmad Muhaisin B. Syarbaini 1 PUBLISHED 11 Mar 2024 Author details Author details 1 Islamic Economic, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, North Sumatra, Indonesia 2 Management, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, North Sumatra, Indonesia Marliyah Marliyah Roles: Conceptualization, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Resources, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing Budi Dharma Roles: Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Ahmad Muhaisin B. Syarbaini Roles: Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation OPEN PEER REVIEW DETAILS REVIEWER STATUS This article is included in the Research on Research, Policy & Culture gateway. Abstract Background The purpose of this paper is to clarify the use of zakat as an alternative funding for students to pay their tuition fees. Apart from that, this paper also explains how zakat collected from muzakki fixed income known as zakatu kasbil 'amal , which is known as income zakat and is still controversial in Indonesia. Method The study uses a systematic literature review with an inductive approach to find out the theoretical basis of the research questions. The analysis uses a qualitative method that explores significant findings from various literature sources. The findings will combine with the exploration results of several universities in Indonesia that use social funds as a tool for helping students. Result The income zakat controversy mediates using the precautionary principle, which ensures that the projected income indeed exceeds the nisab (1 year) of the income. Some Islamic universities in Indonesia carry out this zakat withdrawal and even use an auto debit system. On the other hand, the distribution of zakat to students is also controversial because zakat is part of worship whose distribution is regulated into nine asnaf. Nevertheless, students may be equated with one of the asnaf so that it becomes permissible to be the subject of zakat distribution. Observation findings at Indonesian Islamic universities even show that the results of zakat distribution strongly influence the success of students’ studies, even if only in aid of tuition fees. READ ALL READ LESS Keywords Improving University Quality, Income Zakat, Indonesian Universities, Student Funding. Corresponding Author(s) Marliyah Marliyah ( [email protected] ) Close Corresponding author: Marliyah Marliyah Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information: Ministry of Religion (Research Grant under BOPTN) The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Copyright: © 2024 Marliyah M et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. How to cite: Marliyah M, Dharma B and Syarbaini AMB. Distributing Zakatu Kasbil 'Amal as an Alternative to Student Funding, Evidence in Indonesia’s Universities [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :185 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.144610.1 ) First published: 11 Mar 2024, 13 :185 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.144610.1 ) Latest published: 22 Sep 2025, 13 :185 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.144610.2 )  There is a newer version of this article available. Suppress this message for one day. 1. Introduction One of the root problems in Indonesian higher education is student funding. Providing alternative student funding will significantly contribute to higher education improvement in Indonesia. The basis for the emergence of student funding problems is the increasing costs of higher education, which stem from the university’s expectation to grow in an era of technological disruption and high competition. 1 Even though universities can obtain operational funding assistance from various parties, 2 more is needed to ease the burden transferred to students. The educational costs charged to students tend to increase yearly. 3 Even though Indonesian people’s participation in higher education tends to increase yearly, 4 , 5 it is dominated by communities with the highest per capita income in Indonesia. 6 , 7 BPS-Statistics Indonesia reports (2022b) show that the average cost of pursuing higher education has increased by 85.51% from the costs incurred during high school (almost two times high school cost). So, it is natural that higher education tends to be expensive. Why is Indonesian higher education increasing its tuition fees? The research results of Marliyah & Dharma (2022) inform that the most critical risk for Indonesian Islamic universities is the risk of standardizing the higher education system, 8 , 9 which must be “ Unggul ” (DIKTI version) and have an international ranking. Therefore, various improvements need to be made, such as improving college facilities and infrastructure and improving the quality of students. 10 This impact increasing university operational costs, and with the current university business model, 11 – 13 the most straightforward choice to take is to pass it on to students. BPS-Statistics Indonesia (2022b) reports an increase in participation of the lowest economic community by 1.34 times from 2016. The main factor causing that phenomenon is funding assistance schemes, including scholarships for poor people, paving the way for students to study in universities. Popular schemes in various countries are Scholarships and endowment Funds. 14 In Indonesia, the Government provides higher education subsidies known as KIP ( Kartu Indonesia Pintar ). Apart from these schemes, popular funding at various universities in Indonesia comes from social financial assistance, including zakat. Kompas (2022), in an investigation, stated that people with middle to lower economic levels in Indonesia need assistance to obtain higher education, 3 and the distribution of zakat is one alternative assistance. Zakat is one of the Islamic pillars aiming to fulfil the primary needs of Muslims, one of which is gaining access to higher education. It is because Islam realizes that although all humans have the same opportunity to work and earn an income, not everyone can earn a decent and sufficient income to fulfil their life’s needs. On the other hand, zakat is an Islamic mechanism for withdrawing part of the rich’s wealth to distribute to people in need so that everyone has the same right to access and enjoy the results of the country’s development. The findings of BAZNAS Center Of Strategic Studies & Zaenal (2019) that for two consecutive years (2018-2019), 15 the distribution of zakat had a good impact on mustahik and confirmed by Abdullah et al. (2012) and Beik et al. (2017) concluded that one of the solutions to improving human quality in Indonesia is the distribution of zakat. 16 , 17 Apart from that, there is a complicated problem that requires logical and accurate research, namely whether zakat can be distributed to students. It is said to be complicated because, in Islam, the criteria or groups of people who are entitled to receive zakat have been determined in the Al Quran. In Surah At-Taubah verse 60, Allah SWT said: "Indeed, zakat is only for the needy, the poor, the amils, those whose hearts are softened and then convert to Islam, to free those who are enslaved, to free those who are in debt, for (jihad) in the way of Allah and for those who are in a journey that requires help as an obligation from Allah. Allah is knowing and wise." The verse above explains that those who are entitled to receive zakat distribution are only eight groups “ asnaf ,” namely the needy, the poor, the amil , Muslim converts, for freeing enslaved people, people who are in debt for mujahid ( jihad ) defending Islam and travellers who need accommodation assistance. If we look carefully, there is no explicit information from this verse, which shows that students have the right to receive zakat distribution. It is a significant discussion that requires sufficient attention, considering that education is an essential instrument in human development, especially in Indonesia. The researcher seeks to explore the origin of assistance from income zakat and its distribution to students for higher education purposes, both in the form of previous research findings and actual exploration in several universities in Indonesia. These findings will help universities to use zakat as alternative funding for students and provide recommendations on how to integrate them into strategic policies for the development of universities. 2. Theoretical framework and literature review 2.1 Zakat The terminology of zakat begins with a review of its etymology, defined as an-nama' , which means blessing, cleanliness, and growth, or a process that will provide incredible wealth and protect it from danger. This reference is based on Ibn Taymiyah's translation, which states that zakat payers will have their hearts guarded to become pure. The zakat terminology is defined as an obligation from Allah to a certain amount of wealth with a specific size ( nisab ) which must be given to those who need it/ mustahik , or it is called a certain level of certain wealth which must distributed to entitled people who have determined (in the Alquran) when they meet the conditions. According to Dieb et al. (2012), "This wealth is called zakat because the original wealth (which has been given as zakat) grows because of the blessings of zakat wealth and the prayers from the people who receive it." Likewise, zakat is a cleanser of all wealth from syubhat (doubts) and a cleanser from the rights of other people attached to them. As Allah commanded, zakat is a form of worship that Muslims must carry out. It has a transcendental ( unseen ) side and a real side, following the Islamic view of wealth that contains the rights of people experiencing poverty attached to it, then must be paid out as a form of zakat. 2.2 Distribution of Zakat Zakat is one of the Islamic laws obligatory for its well-off adherents, where the goal is the same as other goals of Islamic philanthropy so that wealth does not only circulate in certain circles, as stated in the seventh verse of Surah Al-Hasyr. Zakat is an effort so that people have sufficient financial capacity to meet basic needs such as food, clothing, and shelter, not to mention the need for a decent education. Therefore, it includes the distribution of zakat in Islamic law, which covers an extensive group, as explained in Qs. At-Taubah: 60. However, apart from the aim of meeting people’s basic needs, if we look closely at how Allah determines who is entitled to receive zakat in the Al Quran, it turns out that zakat is not only intended to meet basic needs alone. Furthermore, zakat will be distributed to those who have contributed to developing the country broadly. For example, among the asnaf of zakat who are not necessarily included in the poor category are fisabilillah and mualaf. For example, Fisabilillah are those in the army fighting for Islam who are assigned to guard the borders and protect the Muslim territory from enemy attacks. Fisabilillah still gets zakat even if they are rich. 18 The inclusion of the fisabilillah group in the asnaf category (those who are entitled to receive zakat) is a strong indication that those who contribute to religion are entitled to receive zakat as a form of appreciation for those who are willing to serve their religion. So, among contemporary Fiqh (Islamic law) scholars, the asnaf category of zakat receives a fairly extensive portion of discourse and discussion in order to maximize the potential and influence of zakat in building an advanced and sustainable Islamic civilization. 3. Methods The research seeks to explore contextual views in finding solutions to the complexity of background phenomena. On this basis, the recommended research approach is qualitative. 19 – 21 Because researchers seek to present theoretical fundamentals that can provide a comprehensive understanding of zakat in a specific context, this requires finding historical data from time to time, 22 which according to Fowler & Christakis (2010) must be able to be linked to broader needs, 23 and in line with Fisher et al. (2017) recommend a systematic literature review approach. 24 A systematic literature review is carried out by analysing literature related to zakat, both in the context of its collection and in the context of its distribution. The research uses the concept of inductive analysis in exploring specific evidence so that findings emerge naturally from published literature. 25 For this reason, the appraisal/ 'Amid concept was developed Marliyah et al. (2023) 26 to reduce the data into essential findings. 27 The research begins with data collection from relevant literature. 28 Moseley et al. (2009) imply the need for a quality and structure selection process (framework) that explores the constructs of the theme variable builders. 29 The premise underlying the unit of analysis is a thesaurus database set formed from the results of literature searches. 28 , 30 , 31 Relevant literature is divided into a thesaurus database of recent findings 32 sourced from reputable journals (Scopus, WOS, and Sinta), applicable regulation, 33 and a thesaurus database originating from classical and contemporary Islamic reference books as a record of events from the previous Islamic era. Researchers build an analytical framework as follows: 1) Developing a search string 31 with subsequent filtering, which focuses on a “search question” to identify the database. 28 Collecting data as search string: collecting zakat from income or zakatu kasbil 'amal (زكاة كسب العمل) and distributing zakat as student funds. 2) The database is screening to potentially relevant articles by title and abstract 32 , 33 The potential paper will be carried out by selecting books or articles that focus on and contrast with the search string. 3) Eligibility and sensitivity analysis. Sensitivity analysis performs by configuring inclusion and exclusion criteria, 25 then the potentially relevant articles screening by inclusion and exclusion criteria. 34 The following criteria ( Table 1 ): Notes for Eligible articles to be screened for data abstraction. 25 4) Qualitative synthesis analysis was done by data abstraction and reduction using triangulation tables. Table 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria. 25 Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria At least published in 2010 for article and current regulations. Articles whose research locus is in Islamic countries. Zakat and its impact on society. Full text not obtained. Collecting zakat in addition to income. Distributing zakat in addition to education. To obtain empirical findings on how universities in Indonesia use zakat, researchers conducted a deep interview and FGD (Focus Group Discussion) with philanthropic organizations formed by universities with the same aim as the research theme “using social funds as an alternative to student funding.” Sources of informants came from UPZ UIN Sumatera Utara, UPZ UIN Walisongo Semarang, Puspas Unair, and Ziswaf UNIDA. The selection (as informants) was based on the fact that they have the best image in Indonesia in collecting social funds. For example, Puspas is an organization that has long been active and plays a crucial role for Universitas Airlangga students 35 and managing finances very well, as reflected in the unqualified opinion acquisition for the last three years. UPZ UIN Walisongo Semarang is the best UPZ in Indonesia, according to the Ministry of Religion. 36 The data and information obtained will be analyzed using qualitative analysis tools such as coding analysis for data reduction and content analysis for systematically identify the meaning. 4. Research findings 4.1 Income zakat and its controversies Income zakat is a controversial type of zakat. Until now, the legal status or position of income zakat is still being debated, which covers comprehensive aspects. If simplified, the debate can be concluded in two aspects. First, is it permissible to determine the type of zakat whose determination does not come directly from the Al Quran or Hadith? Second, if it is permitted, then what are the provisions for determining the requirements for income zakat obligations both in terms of nisab (minimum level) and haul (period)? As previously explained, the zakat required in Islam, whether it comes from the Al Quran or the Hadith, is limited to six types, namely zakat on gold and silver (including) money, zakat on livestock, zakat on staple foods, zakat on trade, zakat on mining products, and the last is zakat fitrah. All types of zakat mentioned above have transparent sources and arguments in the Al Quran and Hadith. Based on the explicit provisions related to the types of zakat mentioned above, not a single ulama since the time of the Prophet Muhammad until many later generations carried out ijtihad or reform to determine other types of zakat outside of what is stated in the Al Quran or the Hadith. It is because zakat is a mahdhah (ritual/form of worship) where a Muslim must obey and follow the rules without adding or subtracting from the rules. This attitude is based on the rules agreed upon by the ulama, namely: الاصل في العباده التوقيف “ The original law in determining worship is to follow standard rules. ” So based on this rule, since the zakat law was introduced by Islam, not a single Muslim researcher has modified the law, both from the type of zakat to the determination of the minimum level ( nisab ) and the mandatory period for paying zakat ( haul ). The zakat law is implemented following the provisions of the Al Quran and Hadith. Discourse regarding income zakat was first raised in the 60s. The researcher who published the first work related to income zakat (professional zakat) was Yusuf Al Qardhawi. Through his work entitled Fiqh Az - Zakah (Fiqh Zakat) in 1969. 37 Al Qadhawy was the person who first made issues related to income zakat. It became widespread with challenging discussions throughout the Islamic world, both in meetings, scientific writings, and research, both pros and cons. Even though discussions about income zakat have emerged since the late 60s, according to Riyadi (2016), the study and practice of it began to spread in Indonesia around the late 90s and early 2000s. 38 After Al Qardhawi’s book was translated into Indonesian by Didin Hafidhuddin with the title “Fikih Zakat” in 1999, income zakat began to be widely implemented by zakat management institutions in Indonesia, both BAZ ( Badan Amil Zakat ) owned by the government (either BAZDA or BASNAZ), or privately owned LAZ ( Lembaga Amil Zakat ), such as PKPU, Dompet Dhuafa. The emergence of the idea of income zakat gave rise to widespread controversy. There are quite a few scholars who support Al Qardhawi’s ideas and even wrote many works to strengthen what he had initiated. However, there are also quite a few who oppose it and refute it with various scientific arguments for the ideas put forward by Qardhawy. In the Indonesian context, the same thing also happens. Not all fatwa institutions agree with the idea of income zakat. Nahdatul Ulama (NU) in Bahtsul Masail Maudlu'iyyah activities at the East Java PWNU Regional Conference at Lirboyo (15-28-29 July 2018) confirmed NU’s official opinion that there is no income zakat obligation in the four mahzab. However, every person in any profession with money that reaches the nisab and haul must pay zakat, considering that this money has the same exchange rate as gold and silver ( nuqud ). It differs from the Fatwa of the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI/ Majelis Ulama Indonesia ). MUI (2003) stated that all forms of halal income must be paid zakat on condition that they have reached the nisab in one year, namely 85 grams of gold. In this fatwa, what is meant by “income” is any income such as salary, honorarium, service fees, and other things that are obtained in a halal way, whether routine, such as state officials, employees, or non-routine, such as doctors, lawyers, consultants, and the like, as well as income earned from other freelance work. However, it should be noted that even though the MUI agrees with Al Qardhawi’s ideas regarding income zakat obligations, if we look more carefully, the MUI fatwa takes a different legal perspective from several points that Al Qardhawi initiated. Among these differences is that the MUI fatwa states that all forms of halal income must paid zakat if they have reached the nisab , namely 85 grams of gold. It means that the minimum level of assets that requires income zakat is analogous ( qiyas ) to zakat on gold and silver. It is different from Al Qardhawi’s initial idea, where the nisab of income zakat is debiased/analogous ( qiyas ) to the nisab of agricultural zakat, namely 653 kg of dry grain or 520 kg of rice. The MUI goes further than Al Qardhawi’s original idea, where the MUI believes that even if a person’s income has not reached the nisab , he can already pay zakat if, in his calculations, the amount of salary or income he receives in one year (even if it is still in the calculation above paper) and has not been received, can reach the nisab value without taking into account daily or monthly expenses that must be excluded from the income or salary received. However, regardless of the debate regarding the law or the status of professional zakat itself, according to Baidowi (2018), even though the law regarding professional zakat is still controversial and not yet well known by the Muslim community in general and Muslim professional circles in the country in particular, awareness and enthusiasm to set aside a portion of income as zakat which he believes is a religious obligation that must be paid relatively high. 39 Moreover, the Indonesian government has issued various regulations related to zakat. However, according to Cahyani (2020), the legal position of professional zakat has not been strengthened by adequate regulations, at least in Law No. 38 of 1999 concerning Zakat Management, in Chapter IV Article 11 Paragraph 2, states the types of assets subject to zakat, and one of the types is income and services. So, indirectly, the issue of professional zakat already has rules to adhere to as a legal reference. 40 4.2 Student as Asnaf (zakat recipient) Students are one of the groups that are still being debated whether they are one of the eight groups entitled to receive zakat. This is because, in Surah At-Taubah verse 60, no sentence explicitly indicates that students or those seeking knowledge have the right to receive zakat. This causes not all Muslim scientists to agree that students have the right to receive zakat. However, this debate came to light when the MUI issued a fatwa in 1996 regarding providing zakat for scholarships. The fatwa states that “ Giving zakat money for educational purposes, especially in the form of scholarships, is legal because it is included in asnaf fi sabilillah ”. 41 Looking at the fatwa, the main opinion is that students or people who are studying are included in the fisabilillah group or people who are fighting in the way of Allah. MUI issued this fatwa regarding the general rules in the method of interpreting the Al Quran, namely: يبقى العموم على عمومه “ The general text is applied as is its generality. ” The meaning of the rules of interpretation above is that if the text of the Al Quran and Hadith is universal without any particular meaning that limits its universality, then the text is applied universally without certain limits. In the context of Surah At-Taubah verse 60, one of the groups entitled to receive zakat mentioned by Allah SWT in that verse is fisabilillah , namely people who are fighting jihad in the way of Allah. However, the verse above does not clearly or explicitly explain what jihad means in the way of Allah. The rules of interpretation above are: As long as the text of the Koran and Hadith is universal without any particular meaning that limits its universality, then the text is applied universally without certain limits. In the context of Surah At-Taubah verse 60, one of the groups entitled to receive zakat mentioned by Allah SWT in that verse is fisabilillah , namely people who are fighting jihad in the way of Allah. However, the verse above needs to clearly or explicitly explain what jihad means in the way of Allah. It is true that during the time of Rasulullah SAW, the groups included in this category were war volunteers who did not have a fixed salary. 42 However, if viewed in general terms, jihad does not limit the scope of its meaning to troops or soldiers fighting to defend and defend the country. However, in general terms, without specifying the person in those who are fighting in the way of Allah. 43 So, in the logic of this fatwa, MUI sees that students or students of knowledge are people who are also fighting jihad in the way of Allah, and with their knowledge, they can defend religion and advance the nation and state so that they can include as the fisabilillah category. It is just that the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI), in its fatwa, provides strict limits or categories regarding what kind of students are entitled to receive scholarships through zakat distribution. The fatwa provides three categories that must be fulfilled by pupils or university students in order to be entitled to receive a scholarship from zakat, namely: 1) academic achievement, 2) priority for those who are less fortunate, and 3) studying knowledge that is useful for the Indonesian nation. The Indonesian Ulema Council is not the only fatwa institution that has stated that zakat funds can distribute scholarships for students. One of the international fatwa institutions that is a reference for Muslims around the world, namely Darul Ifta' Egypt, 2007 issued a similar fatwa in fatwa sheet number 175, which contained: يجوزُ شرعًا صرفُ الزكاة في الإنفاقِ على تدريبِ طلبة العلم، خاصَّةً إذا كانوا محتاجين، حتى إن الحنفية أجازوا نقل الزكاة من بلد إلى آخر لطالب العلم. والإنفاق على طلبة العلم يشمل تدريبهم على المهارات الضرورية؛ لأنهم يحتاجون إليها “ It is legally permissible to distribute zakat for scholarships for science passports, especially if they are in need. Even the Hanafi Madhab allows the transfer of zakat from one country to another for distribution to seekers of knowledge. Scholarships for students include (among other things) to train them in necessary skills because they are very shaky” ( dar-alifta.org/ar/fatawa ). Likewise, the official fatwa institution of the Islamic State of Jordan, namely Dairah Al-Ifta, issued a similar fatwa in 2013 in fatwa sheet number 2847. However, in this case, the fatwa from Dairah Al Ifta' provides strict limits regarding students entitled to receive zakat. The contents of the fatwa state that: 1) He must be a student who is proven to be serious about studying so that his activities in studying cause him to be unable to work and make money. 2) The knowledge the studies are fardhu kifayah , whose orientation is the good of the people, both Shar'i knowledge, such as fiqh and interpretation, and general knowledge, such as medicine, economics, chemistry, and others. 3) Zakat does not come from relatives or family obliged to provide for their needs. From the description above, contemporary ulama is more inclined to the opinion that allows zakat to be distributed through scholarships to students. Of course, this fatwa is a breath of fresh air both for the government of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia and for the students themselves. For the government, this will help accelerate the human development index (HDI) 44 and improve the quality of human resources for the nation’s children, considering that access to higher education among young people is still very low. Alawiyah (2016) concluded that one of the leading causes is the high cost of higher education, which causes many young people of productive learning age to be unable to access it due to limited costs. 45 , 46 Quoting from official data on the Central Statistics Agency (BPS) website, it shows that the percentage of poor people in March 2022 is 9.54 percent. The number of poor people in our country in March 2022 is 26.16 million. The number of urban poor people in March 2022 was 11.82 million people, while the number of rural poor people in March 2022 was 14.34 million people. Education is the right of all groups, from the lower middle class to the upper middle class, with supportive socio-economic conditions; of course, there will be no difficulty in reaching education up to the upper level, but this is not the case with the lower middle class, which is why there is a need for equal distribution of opportunities to obtain education. Many weak people do not continue their education to a higher level because the cost of education is expensive. 47 The facts of the exchange show that the ulama’s fatwa regarding the legality of distributing zakat in the form of scholarships to students was welcomed by the National Zakat Amil Agency (Baznas). Baznas distribute part of the zakat from muzakki (people obliged to pay zakat) through educational scholarships. Baznas even formed a particular unit to handle the distribution of zakat through student scholarships. The institution is called LBB or Baznas Scholarship Institute. LBB is a program from the Distribution and Utilization Division tasked with providing educational funds to ensure the continuity of educational programs for underprivileged/poor students as an intergenerational responsibility. 48 Even some of the Amil Zakat Institutions affiliated with mass organizations have also started taking steps or taking part in distributing zakat to students. Prakoso, in his research in 2022, discovered the fact that the Amil Zakat Infaq Sadaqoh Muhammadiyah Institute (LAZISMU) has distributed scholarships to students since 2016. In the 2017/2018 academic year, LAZISMU provided scholarships of IDR 818,448,000 to 508 students, while in 2021, it will provide scholarships for 6,600 students. 49 So, for students or prospective students who come from lower middle-class economic backgrounds, this fatwa is undoubtedly a bright hope for being able to continue higher education, provided that this fatwa can open people’s minds to distribute their zakat assets in the education sector. 4.3 Limitations, future research avenues, and implications The findings might be in the light of some of its limitations, where the main limitation of this research is universities in Indonesia as a locus for seeing the impact of using zakat as a mechanism to help universities, in this case, helping students in need. The combination of Indonesian culture of helping each other with the dominance of Islamic thought has resulted in the growth of the model of using zakat in universities in Indonesia. Future research may focus on models of collecting social funds in Islamic corridors such as alms / infaq and even waqf. The researchers’ initial findings on the waqf model led to the emergence of a well-known university in Indonesia, namely UNIDA Gontor. It is quite an initial treatise for researching the waqf model in higher education, especially in Indonesia. Currently, both alms/infaq and waqf are still predominantly used in religious activities, although specifically for waqf, various higher education foundations have emerged that source their funds from waqf. The research results can provide essential implications for managing Islamic-based social funds (especially zakat). The research results can be used as a reference and alternative for zakat collection in universities to build zakat collection units that focus on helping improve the quality of students, then the combination of higher education interests solely for achieving benefits, namely education for all levels of society. This finding also encourages universities to carry out zakat collection activities, which are then synchronized with the needs of universities to help students unable to complete their studies. Data availability All data underlying the results is available as part of the article and no additional source data are required. References 1. Nasution L, Rapono M: Strategi Dalam Menghadapi Persaingan Perguruan Tinggi Di Propinsi Sumatera Utara Melalui Analisis SWOT (Studi Kasus UMN Al Washliyah Medan). JKBM (Jurnal Konsep Bisnis dan Manajemen). Nov. 2018; 5 (1): 9. Publisher Full Text 2. Hanim Z, Anggal N, Sanda Y: Strategi Pembiayaan Pendidikan Pada Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Katolik Swasta Untuk Pemenuhan Capaian Kinerja. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia. Jun. 2023; 9 (2): 604–614. Publisher Full Text 3. Rosalina MP, Krisna A, Wisanggeni SP: Orangtua Indonesia Makin Sulit Biayai Kuliah Anak. Kompas. 4. BPS-Statistics Indonesia: Data Survei Sosial Ekonomi Nasional 2020. Jakarta: 2021. 5. BPS-Statistics Indonesia: Data Survei Sosial Ekonomi Nasional 2021. Jakarta: 2022. 6. BPS-Statistics Indonesia: Indonesian Economic Report, 2020. Jakarta: 2021. 7. BPS-Statistics Indonesia: Indonesian Economic Report, 2021. Jakarta: 2022. 8. Marliyah, Dharma B: Desain Manajemen Risiko Dengan Pendekatan Transdisipliner di Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan. Medan: 2022. 9. Marliyah, Dharma B, Syarbaini AMB: The Maturity Of Risk Management In Indonesian Islamic Universities. Jurnal Riset Bisnis dan Manajemen. Aug. 2023; 16 (2): 117–125. Publisher Full Text 10. Marliyah B, Dharma MY, Syarbaini AMB: Analisis Kebutuhan Industri Keuangan Syariah Terhadap Kompetensi Luaran Pendidikan Tinggi Islam. HUMAN FALAH: Jurnal Studi Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam. Dec. 2022; 9 (2): 10. Publisher Full Text 11. Ibrohim B: Pembiyaan Pendidikan Tinggi. Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan. 2017; 3 (1): 15–23. 12. Irawan DE, et al. : Kajian Pendidikan Tinggi IDRI untuk DPR RI dan Ristek Dikti 2018. Bandung: ITB Press; 2018. 13. Zuhairi A, Riana KE, Maria M, et al. : Model Ekonomi dan Manajemen Pembiayaan Pendidikan Tinggi pada PTBHMN, PTN, PTS, dan PTJJ di Indonesia.2008. 14. Munadi M: Pengelolaan Endowment Fund di Perguruan Tinggi Malaysia: Studi Kasus di Universitas Teknologi Malaysia. Al-Ulum. Dec. 2017; 17 (2). Publisher Full Text 15. BAZNAS Center Of Strategic StudiesZaenal MH: Dampak Zakat Terhadap Kesejahteraan Mustahik Evaluasi Program Zakat Produktif 2018. Jakarta: Puskas Baznas; 2019. 16. Abdullah N, Yusop MM, Awang COH: A Technical Note on The Derivation of Zakat Effectiveness Index (Zein). International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting. 2012; 20 (1). 17. Beik IS, et al. : National Zakat Index: Framework and Methodology. Puskas Working Paper Series. 2017; 1–22. 18. Dieb M, Al-Khin M, Asy-Syarbaji A: Al-Fiqh al-Manhaji ‘ala Mazhab al-Imam asy-Syafi’I. 13th ed.Damaskus: Darul Qolam; 2012. 19. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS: Handbook of Qualitative Research. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar; 2009. 20. Bungin B: Penelitian kualitatif: Komunikasi, ekonomi, kebijakan publik, dan ilmu sosial lainnya. Ketiga ed.Jakarta: Kencana; 2021. 21. Bungin B: Post-Qualitative Social Research Methods. Ketiga ed.Jakarta: Kencana; 2022. 22. Esendorfer J, Lehner OM: Islamic Banking And Finance As An Ethical Alternative: A Systematic Literature Review. ACRN Oxford Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives. 2016; 5 (2): 42–64. 23. Fowler JH, Christakis NA: Cooperative Behavior Cascades in Human Social Networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Mar. 2010; 107 (12): 5334–5338. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 24. Fisher M, Qureshi H, Hardyman W, et al. : Using Qualitative Research in Systematic Reviews: Older People’s Views of Hospital Discharge. London (England): Social Care Institute foe Exellence; 2017. 25. Yob FSC, et al. : Children’s emotion regulation strategies in facing the Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, and Ambiguous (VUCA) World: A systematic narrative review. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik. 2023; 36 (2): 185–200. Publisher Full Text 26. Marliyah M, Yafiz BD, Syarbaini AMB: ’Amid: Islamic Integrative Approach as Survey Model. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Literature and Muslim Society. Mar. 2023; 7 (1): 17–32. Publisher Full Text 27. Murphy CM: Writing an Effective Review Article. Journal of Medical Toxicology. Jun. 2012; 8 (2): 89–90. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 28. McFadden P, Taylor BJ, Campbell A, et al. : Systematically Identifying Relevant Research. Research on Social Work Practice. Nov. 2012; 22 (6): 626–636. Publisher Full Text 29. Moseley AM, Sherrington C, Elkins MR, et al. : Indexing of randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions: a comparison of AMED, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, Hooked on Evidence, PEDro, PsycINFO and PubMed. Physiotherapy. Sep. 2009; 95 (3): 151–156. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 30. Flatley RK, Lilla R, Widner J: Choosing a Database for Social Work: A Comparison of Social Work Abstracts and Social Service Abstracts. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. Jan. 2007; 33 (1): 47–55. Publisher Full Text 31. Lee E, Dobbins M, DeCorby K, et al. : An optimal search filter for retrieving systematic reviews and meta-analyses. BMC Medical Research Methodology. Dec. 2012; 12 (1): 51. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 32. Holden G, Barker K, Covert-Vail L, et al. : Sosial Abstracts fails again: A Replication and Extension. Research on Social Practice. 2009; 19 : 715–721. Publisher Full Text 33. Holden G, Barker K, Covert-Vail L, et al. : Does Sosial Abstract works? Research on Social Practice. 2008; 18 : 487–499. Publisher Full Text 34. McFadden P, Taylor BJ, Campbel A, et al. : Systematically Identifying Relevant Research: Case Study on Child Protection Social Workers’ Resilience. Research on Social Practice. 2012; 22 (6): 626–636. Publisher Full Text 35. Bagus: Wisudawan Beprestasi: Ini Berkat PUSPAS. PUSPAS UNAIR; 36. pendis.kemenag: Berhasil Kelola Zakat untuk Sejahterakan Ummat, Prof. Imam Taufiq terima Baznas Award 2023. Kementrian Agama RI; 37. al-Qaradawi Y: Fiqh Az-Zakat: A Comparative Study. UK: Dar Al Taqwa; 1991. 38. Riyadi F: Kontroversi zakat profesi pesrpektif ulama kontemporer. ZISWAF: Jurnal Zakat dan Wakaf. 2016; 2 (1): 109–132. 39. Baidowi I: Zakat Profesi (Zakat Penghasilan). Tazkiya. 2018; 19 (01): 40–54. 40. Cahyani AI: Zakat Profesi Dalam Era Kontemporer. El-Iqthisadi: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum. Dec. 2020; 2 (2). Publisher Full Text 41. Majelis Ulama Indonesia: Pemberian Zakat Untuk Beasiswa Nomor Kep.-120/MU/II/1996. Jakarta: Feb. 1996. 42. Zabir M: Manajemen Pendistribusian Zakat Melalui Program Unggulan Beasiswa Oleh Baitul Mal Aceh. Al-Idarah: Jurnal Manajemen dan Administrasi Islam. Jul. 2017; 1 (1): 131–151. Publisher Full Text 43. Ahmed BO: Identifying the poor and the needy among the beneficiaries of zakat Need for a zakat-based poverty threshold in Nigeria. International Journal of Social Economics. 2017; 44 (4): 446–458. Publisher Full Text 44. Herianingrum S: The impact of zakat, education expenditure, and health expenditure towards poverty reduction. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy. 2020; 11 (12): 235–239. Publisher Full Text 45. Alawiyah F: Akses Pendidikan Tinggi dan Penyebabnya. Kajian. 2016; 17 (3): 301–328. Publisher Full Text 46. Piliyanti I: Transformasi Tradisi Filantropi Islam: Studi Model Pendayagunaan Zakat, Infaq, Sadaqah Wakaf Di Indonesia. Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Ekonomi Islam. 2010; 11 (2). 47. Aminah S: Pendistribusian Dana Zakat Untuk Beasiswa Pendidikan Mahasiswa Di Badan Amil Zakat Nasional (Baznas) Kota Cirebon. AKSIOMA AL-MUSAQOH: Journal of Islamic Economics and Business Studies. 2021; 4 (2). 48. Baznas: Lembaga Beasiswa Baznas. 49. Prakoso YA, Masruchin: Zakat Profesi dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Lanjut Studi Mahasiswa UMSIDA (Studi Kasus LAZISMU Cabang UMSIDA). Syarikat: Jurnal Rumpun Ekonomi Syariah. Jun. 2022; 5 (1): 128–139. Publisher Full Text Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 2 VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 11 Mar 2024 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment Author details Author details 1 Islamic Economic, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, North Sumatra, Indonesia 2 Management, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, North Sumatra, Indonesia Marliyah Marliyah Roles: Conceptualization, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Resources, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing Budi Dharma Roles: Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Ahmad Muhaisin B. Syarbaini Roles: Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation Competing interests No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information Ministry of Religion (Research Grant under BOPTN) The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Article Versions (2) version 2 Revised Published: 22 Sep 2025, 13:185 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.144610.2 version 1 Published: 11 Mar 2024, 13:185 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.144610.1 Copyright © 2024 Marliyah M et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Download Export To Sciwheel Bibtex EndNote ProCite Ref. Manager (RIS) Sente metrics Views Downloads F1000Research - - PubMed Central info_outline Data from PMC are received and updated monthly. - - Citations open_in_new 0 open_in_new 0 open_in_new SEE MORE DETAILS CITE how to cite this article Marliyah M, Dharma B and Syarbaini AMB. Distributing Zakatu Kasbil 'Amal as an Alternative to Student Funding, Evidence in Indonesia’s Universities [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :185 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.144610.1 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS track receive updates on this article Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article. TRACK THIS ARTICLE Share Open Peer Review Current Reviewer Status: ? Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 11 Mar 2024 Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Ariffin MI. Reviewer Report For: Distributing Zakatu Kasbil 'Amal as an Alternative to Student Funding, Evidence in Indonesia’s Universities [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :185 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.158428.r400985 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-185/v1#referee-response-400985 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 25 Aug 2025 Muhammad Irwan Ariffin , International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Not Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.158428.r400985 1. The title does not truly reflect the content of the article - while there are discussions on the origin of zakat on income and students as fi sabilillah asnaf in INDONESIA, there is a serious lacking of link with ... Continue reading READ ALL 1. The title does not truly reflect the content of the article - while there are discussions on the origin of zakat on income and students as fi sabilillah asnaf in INDONESIA, there is a serious lacking of link with Indonesia's universities. Some of the keywords are also not properly discussed - improving university quality, indonesian universities, and student funding. 2. If the title is to be maintained - then they must be a stronger link with Indonesian universities - for example, how many indonesian university students received or benefited from zakat under fi sabilillah, did the quality of indonesian universities improved after their students received zakat under fi sabilillah (but this is difficult to prove since the students are the one that receive zakat, not the university management), etc. 3. The use of social funds by universities' philanthropic organizations is different than zakat - since social funds can be channeled directly to university management for development and operational expenses - but zakat must be given to students. So the empirical data collected for this study seems not really aligned with the objective/title. 4. Suggest to provide data on income zakat and zakat for students in Indonesia to motivate the research. Did zakat for students increases after zakat on income has become popular due to the translation of Qaradhawi's Fiqh Zakat in Indonesia? Or, is the research actually focusing on income zakat collection from university's staff which are then channeled to their students under fi sabilillah? Is this the model that the research is trying to analyze/develop? 5. Suggest for the article to be sent for professional proofreading service to improve the language style and enforce consistency in spelling - MUI or Indonesian Ulema Council, Al Quran or Koran, Fisabilillah (capital F) or fisabilillah? Madhab or Madhhab/Mazhab? Is it correct to call Islamic State of Jordan? Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? No Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review? No If this is a Living Systematic Review, is the ‘living’ method appropriate and is the search schedule clearly defined and justified? (‘Living Systematic Review’ or a variation of this term should be included in the title.) Partly Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Applied Macroeconomics, Theoretical Microeconomics, Islamic Economics, Social Finance, Public Finance. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Ariffin MI. Reviewer Report For: Distributing Zakatu Kasbil 'Amal as an Alternative to Student Funding, Evidence in Indonesia’s Universities [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :185 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.158428.r400985 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-185/v1#referee-response-400985 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 27 Sep 2025 Budi Dharma , Management, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, North Sumatra, Indonesia 27 Sep 2025 Author Response Dear Muhammad Irwan Ariffin. with respect. We sincerely thank the reviewer for the constructive feedback. We have carefully revised the manuscript to address all comments point by point: 1. Title ... Continue reading Dear Muhammad Irwan Ariffin. with respect. We sincerely thank the reviewer for the constructive feedback. We have carefully revised the manuscript to address all comments point by point: 1. Title and Content Alignment. We decided to maintain the current title but have strengthened the manuscript to better support it. Specifically, we: Expanded discussions on how Indonesian universities integrate Zakat into student funding strategies. Added contextual data showing how Zakat on income (zakatu kasbil ‘amal) is institutionalized through UPZs, private Zakat institution, or university partnerships with BAZNAS and LAZISMU. Included examples of structured scholarship programs that operationalize the Fisabilillah category within universities. 2. Stronger Link with Indonesian Universities We have improved the connection between Zakat and higher education by: Adding national data on zakat-based scholarships. For example, BAZNAS Scholarship Institute supported 1,670 students in 2023, while LAZISMU allocated IDR 6.6 billion to fund 6,600 students in 2021. Including institutional case studies such as UNAIR’s PUSPAS, UIN Sumatera Utara to demonstrate the operational models. Clarifying universities role as proactive facilitators, by Institutionalized Zakat bodies in Universities, facilitated the Zakat collection and distribution. Clarifying that Zakat’s role is reducing financial exclusion for students. 3. Clarification of Zakat vs. Social Funds We have clarified in the discussion that zakat distribution must comply with Islamic legal principles, particularly tamalluk (direct ownership), meaning that zakat funds are allocated directly to eligible students under the Fisabilillah category rather than being used for university operational expenses. Universities act as facilitators that support zakat collection and scholarship programs, rather than as recipients of zakat themselves. here are the example of quote: “Table 4 summarizes how universities and Zakat institutions operationalize Zakat income to support student scholarships under the fisabilillah category”. 4. Data on Income Zakat and Student Funding Models To strengthen the empirical foundation, we: Added historical context on the increasing acceptance of zakat on income following Qaradawi’s Fiqh al-Zakat . Highlighted how income zakat collected from university staff is redistributed to students under the Fisabilillah category. Summarized these practices in Table 4 , showing zakat collections, distribution mechanisms, and the number of students funded. 5. Language and Terminology We have conducted thorough proofreading and ensured consistent terminology across the manuscript: “MUI” standardized into "Indonesian Ulema Council" “Al-Qur’an” used consistently “Fisabilillah” consistently capitalized and Italic We believe these revisions make the manuscript clearer, more focused, and better aligned with the title and research objectives. We are grateful for the reviewer’s comments, which have significantly strengthened the work. Warms Regards. Dear Muhammad Irwan Ariffin. with respect. We sincerely thank the reviewer for the constructive feedback. We have carefully revised the manuscript to address all comments point by point: 1. Title and Content Alignment. We decided to maintain the current title but have strengthened the manuscript to better support it. Specifically, we: Expanded discussions on how Indonesian universities integrate Zakat into student funding strategies. Added contextual data showing how Zakat on income (zakatu kasbil ‘amal) is institutionalized through UPZs, private Zakat institution, or university partnerships with BAZNAS and LAZISMU. Included examples of structured scholarship programs that operationalize the Fisabilillah category within universities. 2. Stronger Link with Indonesian Universities We have improved the connection between Zakat and higher education by: Adding national data on zakat-based scholarships. For example, BAZNAS Scholarship Institute supported 1,670 students in 2023, while LAZISMU allocated IDR 6.6 billion to fund 6,600 students in 2021. Including institutional case studies such as UNAIR’s PUSPAS, UIN Sumatera Utara to demonstrate the operational models. Clarifying universities role as proactive facilitators, by Institutionalized Zakat bodies in Universities, facilitated the Zakat collection and distribution. Clarifying that Zakat’s role is reducing financial exclusion for students. 3. Clarification of Zakat vs. Social Funds We have clarified in the discussion that zakat distribution must comply with Islamic legal principles, particularly tamalluk (direct ownership), meaning that zakat funds are allocated directly to eligible students under the Fisabilillah category rather than being used for university operational expenses. Universities act as facilitators that support zakat collection and scholarship programs, rather than as recipients of zakat themselves. here are the example of quote: “Table 4 summarizes how universities and Zakat institutions operationalize Zakat income to support student scholarships under the fisabilillah category”. 4. Data on Income Zakat and Student Funding Models To strengthen the empirical foundation, we: Added historical context on the increasing acceptance of zakat on income following Qaradawi’s Fiqh al-Zakat . Highlighted how income zakat collected from university staff is redistributed to students under the Fisabilillah category. Summarized these practices in Table 4 , showing zakat collections, distribution mechanisms, and the number of students funded. 5. Language and Terminology We have conducted thorough proofreading and ensured consistent terminology across the manuscript: “MUI” standardized into "Indonesian Ulema Council" “Al-Qur’an” used consistently “Fisabilillah” consistently capitalized and Italic We believe these revisions make the manuscript clearer, more focused, and better aligned with the title and research objectives. We are grateful for the reviewer’s comments, which have significantly strengthened the work. Warms Regards. Competing Interests: The authors declare that there are no financial or non-financial competing interests related to this article. Although this research was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia (BOPTN), the funder had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 27 Sep 2025 Budi Dharma , Management, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, North Sumatra, Indonesia 27 Sep 2025 Author Response Dear Muhammad Irwan Ariffin. with respect. We sincerely thank the reviewer for the constructive feedback. We have carefully revised the manuscript to address all comments point by point: 1. Title ... Continue reading Dear Muhammad Irwan Ariffin. with respect. We sincerely thank the reviewer for the constructive feedback. We have carefully revised the manuscript to address all comments point by point: 1. Title and Content Alignment. We decided to maintain the current title but have strengthened the manuscript to better support it. Specifically, we: Expanded discussions on how Indonesian universities integrate Zakat into student funding strategies. Added contextual data showing how Zakat on income (zakatu kasbil ‘amal) is institutionalized through UPZs, private Zakat institution, or university partnerships with BAZNAS and LAZISMU. Included examples of structured scholarship programs that operationalize the Fisabilillah category within universities. 2. Stronger Link with Indonesian Universities We have improved the connection between Zakat and higher education by: Adding national data on zakat-based scholarships. For example, BAZNAS Scholarship Institute supported 1,670 students in 2023, while LAZISMU allocated IDR 6.6 billion to fund 6,600 students in 2021. Including institutional case studies such as UNAIR’s PUSPAS, UIN Sumatera Utara to demonstrate the operational models. Clarifying universities role as proactive facilitators, by Institutionalized Zakat bodies in Universities, facilitated the Zakat collection and distribution. Clarifying that Zakat’s role is reducing financial exclusion for students. 3. Clarification of Zakat vs. Social Funds We have clarified in the discussion that zakat distribution must comply with Islamic legal principles, particularly tamalluk (direct ownership), meaning that zakat funds are allocated directly to eligible students under the Fisabilillah category rather than being used for university operational expenses. Universities act as facilitators that support zakat collection and scholarship programs, rather than as recipients of zakat themselves. here are the example of quote: “Table 4 summarizes how universities and Zakat institutions operationalize Zakat income to support student scholarships under the fisabilillah category”. 4. Data on Income Zakat and Student Funding Models To strengthen the empirical foundation, we: Added historical context on the increasing acceptance of zakat on income following Qaradawi’s Fiqh al-Zakat . Highlighted how income zakat collected from university staff is redistributed to students under the Fisabilillah category. Summarized these practices in Table 4 , showing zakat collections, distribution mechanisms, and the number of students funded. 5. Language and Terminology We have conducted thorough proofreading and ensured consistent terminology across the manuscript: “MUI” standardized into "Indonesian Ulema Council" “Al-Qur’an” used consistently “Fisabilillah” consistently capitalized and Italic We believe these revisions make the manuscript clearer, more focused, and better aligned with the title and research objectives. We are grateful for the reviewer’s comments, which have significantly strengthened the work. Warms Regards. Dear Muhammad Irwan Ariffin. with respect. We sincerely thank the reviewer for the constructive feedback. We have carefully revised the manuscript to address all comments point by point: 1. Title and Content Alignment. We decided to maintain the current title but have strengthened the manuscript to better support it. Specifically, we: Expanded discussions on how Indonesian universities integrate Zakat into student funding strategies. Added contextual data showing how Zakat on income (zakatu kasbil ‘amal) is institutionalized through UPZs, private Zakat institution, or university partnerships with BAZNAS and LAZISMU. Included examples of structured scholarship programs that operationalize the Fisabilillah category within universities. 2. Stronger Link with Indonesian Universities We have improved the connection between Zakat and higher education by: Adding national data on zakat-based scholarships. For example, BAZNAS Scholarship Institute supported 1,670 students in 2023, while LAZISMU allocated IDR 6.6 billion to fund 6,600 students in 2021. Including institutional case studies such as UNAIR’s PUSPAS, UIN Sumatera Utara to demonstrate the operational models. Clarifying universities role as proactive facilitators, by Institutionalized Zakat bodies in Universities, facilitated the Zakat collection and distribution. Clarifying that Zakat’s role is reducing financial exclusion for students. 3. Clarification of Zakat vs. Social Funds We have clarified in the discussion that zakat distribution must comply with Islamic legal principles, particularly tamalluk (direct ownership), meaning that zakat funds are allocated directly to eligible students under the Fisabilillah category rather than being used for university operational expenses. Universities act as facilitators that support zakat collection and scholarship programs, rather than as recipients of zakat themselves. here are the example of quote: “Table 4 summarizes how universities and Zakat institutions operationalize Zakat income to support student scholarships under the fisabilillah category”. 4. Data on Income Zakat and Student Funding Models To strengthen the empirical foundation, we: Added historical context on the increasing acceptance of zakat on income following Qaradawi’s Fiqh al-Zakat . Highlighted how income zakat collected from university staff is redistributed to students under the Fisabilillah category. Summarized these practices in Table 4 , showing zakat collections, distribution mechanisms, and the number of students funded. 5. Language and Terminology We have conducted thorough proofreading and ensured consistent terminology across the manuscript: “MUI” standardized into "Indonesian Ulema Council" “Al-Qur’an” used consistently “Fisabilillah” consistently capitalized and Italic We believe these revisions make the manuscript clearer, more focused, and better aligned with the title and research objectives. We are grateful for the reviewer’s comments, which have significantly strengthened the work. Warms Regards. Competing Interests: The authors declare that there are no financial or non-financial competing interests related to this article. Although this research was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia (BOPTN), the funder had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Rohim AN. Reviewer Report For: Distributing Zakatu Kasbil 'Amal as an Alternative to Student Funding, Evidence in Indonesia’s Universities [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :185 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.158428.r355629 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-185/v1#referee-response-355629 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 17 Jan 2025 Ade Nur Rohim , Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.158428.r355629 This research is quite relevant to the current phenomenon of zakat distribution which has been widely implemented in various zakat institutions. However, some notes for the author to consider include: 1. The abstract does not ... Continue reading READ ALL This research is quite relevant to the current phenomenon of zakat distribution which has been widely implemented in various zakat institutions. However, some notes for the author to consider include: 1. The abstract does not contain a sufficient statement of the research problem, especially related to the distribution of zakat to the scholarship scheme. This has implications for the bias of the approach used, whether using a fatwa approach, or regulation, or an interpretation (tafseer) approach or indeed only limited to a review of several of these provisions. 2. There are terms in the abstract that trigger fundamental errors, such as nisab which is interpreted as "1 year", and also the number of asnaf mentioned as 9 asnaf. The use of the term "Baznas" also needs to comply with the provisions of the Zakat Law which no longer uses the term "BAZ". 3. The research results presented in the abstract are not relevant enough to the discussion. The author states the practice in "several universities" related to zakat distribution, but this is not specifically reviewed in the discussion, including its impact on the success of student studies which has not been described in depth. 4. Reviews of several previous studies related to the research topic have not been clearly stated in the introduction. The author needs to describe them to strengthen the justification of the novelty of this research, including by describing academic debates related to this research topic. 5. There needs to be a comprehensive explanation regarding the terms used, whether zakat kasbil 'amal or income zakat, by reviewing the similarities or differences, or the relationship between the two terms. 6. The author needs to review several practices of implementing zakat distribution at several universities in Indonesia in a separate subsection in the discussion section, so that it can be relevant to the title of this research which captures a portrait of zakat distribution at various universities in Indonesia. 7. There is no final conclusion to answer the research questions. Based on these notes, this study is expected to reconstruct the systematic discussion in this study to make it in line between the research title, methods and approaches used, and the findings and results of the study that answer the research questions. Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated? Partly Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? No Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Not applicable Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review? No If this is a Living Systematic Review, is the ‘living’ method appropriate and is the search schedule clearly defined and justified? (‘Living Systematic Review’ or a variation of this term should be included in the title.) Not applicable Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Islamic Economics; Zakat; Waqf I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Rohim AN. Reviewer Report For: Distributing Zakatu Kasbil 'Amal as an Alternative to Student Funding, Evidence in Indonesia’s Universities [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :185 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.158428.r355629 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-185/v1#referee-response-355629 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 27 Sep 2025 Budi Dharma , Management, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, North Sumatra, Indonesia 27 Sep 2025 Author Response Dear Ade Nur Rohim, with respect, We thank the reviewer for the constructive and detailed feedback. We have carefully revised the manuscript to address each point and improve the overall ... Continue reading Dear Ade Nur Rohim, with respect, We thank the reviewer for the constructive and detailed feedback. We have carefully revised the manuscript to address each point and improve the overall clarity, consistency, and alignment between the title, methodology, and findings. Our responses are as follows: 1. Abstract and Research Problem Clarification We have revised the abstract to explicitly state the research problem and clarify the scope of our inquiry. The abstract now explains the funding gap in Indonesian higher education, highlights the growing use of zakat on income ( zakatu kasbil ‘amal ) for scholarships, and describes how this study investigates institutional practices and theological frameworks that enable zakat distribution for students under the Fisabilillah category. 2. Terminology Accuracy and Consistency Comment: Some terms in the abstract were inaccurate, such as interpreting nisab as “1 year,” miscounting asnaf as “9,” and inconsistent use of “Baznas.” Response: We have corrected all terminology to ensure consistency and compliance with zakat regulations: Clarified that nisab refers to the minimum wealth threshold , not duration. Confirmed there are eight asnaf categories , in line with QS. At-Taubah: 60. Standardized the use of BAZNAS (Badan Amil Zakat Nasional), aligning with the Zakat Law terminology. 3. Linking Abstract Results to the Discussion We have strengthened the discussion by explicitly integrating case-based examples from several Indonesian universities: PUSPAS UNAIR — integrates zakat and sadaqah into structured tuition support. UPZ UIN Sumatera Utara — mobilizes payroll-based zakat and distributes scholarships. We also highlight the role of the BAZNAS Scholarship Institute and LAZISMU , ensuring consistency between the abstract and the discussion. 4. Review of Related Studies and Theoretical Debates We have expanded the introduction to include key prior studies and scholarly debates on: The theological controversies around using zakat for education ( fisabilillah interpretation). Institutional innovations enabling university-based zakat management. Empirical trends showing the increasing use of zakat for student funding. This positions our research within ongoing debates and clarifies its novel contribution . 5. Clarification of Zakat Kasbil ‘Amal vs. Income Zakat We have added a clarification in the literature review, noting that zakat kasbil ‘amal is the Arabic term for zakat on income derived from professional work or salaries, while “income zakat” is its direct English equivalent. Both terms are now used interchangeably but consistently, and this clarification resolves potential ambiguity. 6. Institutional Practices of Zakat Distribution We created a distinct subsection within the discussion presenting institutional practices of zakat-based scholarships , including: UPZ mechanisms at UIN Sumatera Utara. Integrated models like PUSPAS UNAIR combining zakat, infaq, and sadaqah. National and private initiatives like the BAZNAS Scholarship Institute and LAZISMU’s Beasiswa Sang Surya . This makes the discussion directly aligned with the research title. 7. Strengthened Conclusion We have rewritten the conclusion to directly answer the research questions by: Summarizing how zakat on income has been institutionalized within Indonesian universities. Highlighting how fatwa-driven legitimacy enables broader use of the Fisabilillah category. Emphasizing universities’ evolving roles as proactive facilitators of zakat-based student funding. 8. Alignment Between Title, Methods, and Findings We have restructured the manuscript to improve the flow and alignment between the title, methodology, and findings: The methods now clearly explain how the systematic review integrates theological, regulatory, and institutional perspectives. The discussion explicitly links findings to institutional case studies. The conclusion ties back to the research objectives and answers the central questions. We believe these revisions have substantially improved the manuscript’s clarity, depth, and alignment. We thank the reviewer for the valuable insights, which have significantly strengthened our work. Warm Regards. Dear Ade Nur Rohim, with respect, We thank the reviewer for the constructive and detailed feedback. We have carefully revised the manuscript to address each point and improve the overall clarity, consistency, and alignment between the title, methodology, and findings. Our responses are as follows: 1. Abstract and Research Problem Clarification We have revised the abstract to explicitly state the research problem and clarify the scope of our inquiry. The abstract now explains the funding gap in Indonesian higher education, highlights the growing use of zakat on income ( zakatu kasbil ‘amal ) for scholarships, and describes how this study investigates institutional practices and theological frameworks that enable zakat distribution for students under the Fisabilillah category. 2. Terminology Accuracy and Consistency Comment: Some terms in the abstract were inaccurate, such as interpreting nisab as “1 year,” miscounting asnaf as “9,” and inconsistent use of “Baznas.” Response: We have corrected all terminology to ensure consistency and compliance with zakat regulations: Clarified that nisab refers to the minimum wealth threshold , not duration. Confirmed there are eight asnaf categories , in line with QS. At-Taubah: 60. Standardized the use of BAZNAS (Badan Amil Zakat Nasional), aligning with the Zakat Law terminology. 3. Linking Abstract Results to the Discussion We have strengthened the discussion by explicitly integrating case-based examples from several Indonesian universities: PUSPAS UNAIR — integrates zakat and sadaqah into structured tuition support. UPZ UIN Sumatera Utara — mobilizes payroll-based zakat and distributes scholarships. We also highlight the role of the BAZNAS Scholarship Institute and LAZISMU , ensuring consistency between the abstract and the discussion. 4. Review of Related Studies and Theoretical Debates We have expanded the introduction to include key prior studies and scholarly debates on: The theological controversies around using zakat for education ( fisabilillah interpretation). Institutional innovations enabling university-based zakat management. Empirical trends showing the increasing use of zakat for student funding. This positions our research within ongoing debates and clarifies its novel contribution . 5. Clarification of Zakat Kasbil ‘Amal vs. Income Zakat We have added a clarification in the literature review, noting that zakat kasbil ‘amal is the Arabic term for zakat on income derived from professional work or salaries, while “income zakat” is its direct English equivalent. Both terms are now used interchangeably but consistently, and this clarification resolves potential ambiguity. 6. Institutional Practices of Zakat Distribution We created a distinct subsection within the discussion presenting institutional practices of zakat-based scholarships , including: UPZ mechanisms at UIN Sumatera Utara. Integrated models like PUSPAS UNAIR combining zakat, infaq, and sadaqah. National and private initiatives like the BAZNAS Scholarship Institute and LAZISMU’s Beasiswa Sang Surya . This makes the discussion directly aligned with the research title. 7. Strengthened Conclusion We have rewritten the conclusion to directly answer the research questions by: Summarizing how zakat on income has been institutionalized within Indonesian universities. Highlighting how fatwa-driven legitimacy enables broader use of the Fisabilillah category. Emphasizing universities’ evolving roles as proactive facilitators of zakat-based student funding. 8. Alignment Between Title, Methods, and Findings We have restructured the manuscript to improve the flow and alignment between the title, methodology, and findings: The methods now clearly explain how the systematic review integrates theological, regulatory, and institutional perspectives. The discussion explicitly links findings to institutional case studies. The conclusion ties back to the research objectives and answers the central questions. We believe these revisions have substantially improved the manuscript’s clarity, depth, and alignment. We thank the reviewer for the valuable insights, which have significantly strengthened our work. Warm Regards. Competing Interests: The authors declare that there are no financial or non-financial competing interests related to this article. Although this research was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia (BOPTN), the funder had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 27 Sep 2025 Budi Dharma , Management, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, North Sumatra, Indonesia 27 Sep 2025 Author Response Dear Ade Nur Rohim, with respect, We thank the reviewer for the constructive and detailed feedback. We have carefully revised the manuscript to address each point and improve the overall ... Continue reading Dear Ade Nur Rohim, with respect, We thank the reviewer for the constructive and detailed feedback. We have carefully revised the manuscript to address each point and improve the overall clarity, consistency, and alignment between the title, methodology, and findings. Our responses are as follows: 1. Abstract and Research Problem Clarification We have revised the abstract to explicitly state the research problem and clarify the scope of our inquiry. The abstract now explains the funding gap in Indonesian higher education, highlights the growing use of zakat on income ( zakatu kasbil ‘amal ) for scholarships, and describes how this study investigates institutional practices and theological frameworks that enable zakat distribution for students under the Fisabilillah category. 2. Terminology Accuracy and Consistency Comment: Some terms in the abstract were inaccurate, such as interpreting nisab as “1 year,” miscounting asnaf as “9,” and inconsistent use of “Baznas.” Response: We have corrected all terminology to ensure consistency and compliance with zakat regulations: Clarified that nisab refers to the minimum wealth threshold , not duration. Confirmed there are eight asnaf categories , in line with QS. At-Taubah: 60. Standardized the use of BAZNAS (Badan Amil Zakat Nasional), aligning with the Zakat Law terminology. 3. Linking Abstract Results to the Discussion We have strengthened the discussion by explicitly integrating case-based examples from several Indonesian universities: PUSPAS UNAIR — integrates zakat and sadaqah into structured tuition support. UPZ UIN Sumatera Utara — mobilizes payroll-based zakat and distributes scholarships. We also highlight the role of the BAZNAS Scholarship Institute and LAZISMU , ensuring consistency between the abstract and the discussion. 4. Review of Related Studies and Theoretical Debates We have expanded the introduction to include key prior studies and scholarly debates on: The theological controversies around using zakat for education ( fisabilillah interpretation). Institutional innovations enabling university-based zakat management. Empirical trends showing the increasing use of zakat for student funding. This positions our research within ongoing debates and clarifies its novel contribution . 5. Clarification of Zakat Kasbil ‘Amal vs. Income Zakat We have added a clarification in the literature review, noting that zakat kasbil ‘amal is the Arabic term for zakat on income derived from professional work or salaries, while “income zakat” is its direct English equivalent. Both terms are now used interchangeably but consistently, and this clarification resolves potential ambiguity. 6. Institutional Practices of Zakat Distribution We created a distinct subsection within the discussion presenting institutional practices of zakat-based scholarships , including: UPZ mechanisms at UIN Sumatera Utara. Integrated models like PUSPAS UNAIR combining zakat, infaq, and sadaqah. National and private initiatives like the BAZNAS Scholarship Institute and LAZISMU’s Beasiswa Sang Surya . This makes the discussion directly aligned with the research title. 7. Strengthened Conclusion We have rewritten the conclusion to directly answer the research questions by: Summarizing how zakat on income has been institutionalized within Indonesian universities. Highlighting how fatwa-driven legitimacy enables broader use of the Fisabilillah category. Emphasizing universities’ evolving roles as proactive facilitators of zakat-based student funding. 8. Alignment Between Title, Methods, and Findings We have restructured the manuscript to improve the flow and alignment between the title, methodology, and findings: The methods now clearly explain how the systematic review integrates theological, regulatory, and institutional perspectives. The discussion explicitly links findings to institutional case studies. The conclusion ties back to the research objectives and answers the central questions. We believe these revisions have substantially improved the manuscript’s clarity, depth, and alignment. We thank the reviewer for the valuable insights, which have significantly strengthened our work. Warm Regards. Dear Ade Nur Rohim, with respect, We thank the reviewer for the constructive and detailed feedback. We have carefully revised the manuscript to address each point and improve the overall clarity, consistency, and alignment between the title, methodology, and findings. Our responses are as follows: 1. Abstract and Research Problem Clarification We have revised the abstract to explicitly state the research problem and clarify the scope of our inquiry. The abstract now explains the funding gap in Indonesian higher education, highlights the growing use of zakat on income ( zakatu kasbil ‘amal ) for scholarships, and describes how this study investigates institutional practices and theological frameworks that enable zakat distribution for students under the Fisabilillah category. 2. Terminology Accuracy and Consistency Comment: Some terms in the abstract were inaccurate, such as interpreting nisab as “1 year,” miscounting asnaf as “9,” and inconsistent use of “Baznas.” Response: We have corrected all terminology to ensure consistency and compliance with zakat regulations: Clarified that nisab refers to the minimum wealth threshold , not duration. Confirmed there are eight asnaf categories , in line with QS. At-Taubah: 60. Standardized the use of BAZNAS (Badan Amil Zakat Nasional), aligning with the Zakat Law terminology. 3. Linking Abstract Results to the Discussion We have strengthened the discussion by explicitly integrating case-based examples from several Indonesian universities: PUSPAS UNAIR — integrates zakat and sadaqah into structured tuition support. UPZ UIN Sumatera Utara — mobilizes payroll-based zakat and distributes scholarships. We also highlight the role of the BAZNAS Scholarship Institute and LAZISMU , ensuring consistency between the abstract and the discussion. 4. Review of Related Studies and Theoretical Debates We have expanded the introduction to include key prior studies and scholarly debates on: The theological controversies around using zakat for education ( fisabilillah interpretation). Institutional innovations enabling university-based zakat management. Empirical trends showing the increasing use of zakat for student funding. This positions our research within ongoing debates and clarifies its novel contribution . 5. Clarification of Zakat Kasbil ‘Amal vs. Income Zakat We have added a clarification in the literature review, noting that zakat kasbil ‘amal is the Arabic term for zakat on income derived from professional work or salaries, while “income zakat” is its direct English equivalent. Both terms are now used interchangeably but consistently, and this clarification resolves potential ambiguity. 6. Institutional Practices of Zakat Distribution We created a distinct subsection within the discussion presenting institutional practices of zakat-based scholarships , including: UPZ mechanisms at UIN Sumatera Utara. Integrated models like PUSPAS UNAIR combining zakat, infaq, and sadaqah. National and private initiatives like the BAZNAS Scholarship Institute and LAZISMU’s Beasiswa Sang Surya . This makes the discussion directly aligned with the research title. 7. Strengthened Conclusion We have rewritten the conclusion to directly answer the research questions by: Summarizing how zakat on income has been institutionalized within Indonesian universities. Highlighting how fatwa-driven legitimacy enables broader use of the Fisabilillah category. Emphasizing universities’ evolving roles as proactive facilitators of zakat-based student funding. 8. Alignment Between Title, Methods, and Findings We have restructured the manuscript to improve the flow and alignment between the title, methodology, and findings: The methods now clearly explain how the systematic review integrates theological, regulatory, and institutional perspectives. The discussion explicitly links findings to institutional case studies. The conclusion ties back to the research objectives and answers the central questions. We believe these revisions have substantially improved the manuscript’s clarity, depth, and alignment. We thank the reviewer for the valuable insights, which have significantly strengthened our work. Warm Regards. Competing Interests: The authors declare that there are no financial or non-financial competing interests related to this article. Although this research was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia (BOPTN), the funder had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 2 VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 11 Mar 2024 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment keyboard_arrow_left keyboard_arrow_right Open Peer Review Reviewer Status info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Reviewer Reports Invited Reviewers 1 2 3 Version 2 (revision) 22 Sep 25 read read read Version 1 11 Mar 24 read read Ade Nur Rohim , Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia Muhammad Irwan Ariffin , International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Jonathan O'Donnell , Deakin University, Burwood, Australia Comments on this article All Comments (0) Add a comment Sign up for content alerts Sign Up You are now signed up to receive this alert Browse by related subjects keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 O'Donnell J. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 03 Nov 2025 | for Version 2 Jonathan O'Donnell , Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia 0 Views copyright © 2025 O'Donnell J. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Where I stand Before I begin, I should say that I am not an expert in Muslim funding mechanisms, nor am I an expert in student funding in Indonesian universities. My expertise sits with alternative funding sources for universities. I have particular expertise in crowdfunding for research at Australian universities. My review should be read in this light - as an outsider to the topic, who sits within the broader field of alternative funding mechanisms. Article strengths This article is a useful review of the current state of Zakat funding for student scholarships at Indonesian universities. It's value comes from it's focus on this type of funding, which is not well understood outside of the Muslim world, and its focus on Indonesian universities. I complement the authors on the conceptual focus of the article. The issue of funding higher education is a worldwide debate, with many different funding models in different jurisdictions. By restricting this article to focus on Zakat as a funding mechanism, within universities in the Indonesian jurisdiction, they are able to focus clearly on this particular model. The article gains its strength from combining academic literature, institutional documentation and legal rulings. The narrative thread through the document is clear and lead the reader to the conclusions. Improvements I think that the work done on the literature could be clarified by clearly stating how many documents were reviewed in each category. The text mentions "28 studies reviewed (2003 - 2024)", but it isn't clear whether that is 28 documents including all academic articles, institutional documentation and fatwas, or whether it is 28 academic articles. The authors have clearly done a lot of work, and that work should be reflected in a table or text that clarifies how many documents in each category were considered. The dates also should be aligned: * In Table 2, the inclusion criteria states: "Published after 2010." * In the text it says "...28 studies reviewed (2003–2024)...". Are the articles only from 2010 onwards, or are they from 2003 onwards? Are these two statements about different types of documents, with the articles from 2010 and the institutional documentation and fatwas from 2003? As I said before, a table or text that clarifies how many documents of each type. If it included the date ranges for earliest and latest document considered for each of the three types, that would be useful for the reader to understand the scope of the review. In overall terms, it isn't clear to me whether Zakat for scholarships is a common practice across all Indonesian universities (and therefore this paper is trying to regularise that practice) or Zakat for scholarships is an emerging practice across all Indonesian universities (and therefore this paper is trying to understand and perhaps encourage that practice). It is beyond the scope of the article to say how many universities are doing this, and how many students benefit, but it would be good to provide a general sense of whether the four examples listed in Table 4 are good examples drawn from all universities, or are some of the few examples that exist today. This would give readers from outside of Indonesia a sense of the scale of the practice at the time of writing. Minor issues Section 4.2 and 4.3 have the same heading text. There are some words capitalised that are not proper nouns. Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Not applicable Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review? Yes If this is a Living Systematic Review, is the ‘living’ method appropriate and is the search schedule clearly defined and justified? (‘Living Systematic Review’ or a variation of this term should be included in the title.) Not applicable Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise My expertise connects with this paper in the broad area of alternative methods of funding in universities. My expertise differs from the authors in that I focus on research funding in Australian universities. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) O'Donnell J. Peer Review Report For: Distributing Zakatu Kasbil 'Amal as an Alternative to Student Funding, Evidence in Indonesia’s Universities [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :185 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.188022.r418974) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-185/v2#referee-response-418974 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Rohim A. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 30 Sep 2025 | for Version 2 Ade Nur Rohim , Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia 0 Views copyright © 2025 Rohim A. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions The article has undergone substantial improvements and now provides a comprehensive overview of the zakat management model aimed at enhancing the education sector. Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Islamic Economics; Zakat; Waqf I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Rohim AN. Peer Review Report For: Distributing Zakatu Kasbil 'Amal as an Alternative to Student Funding, Evidence in Indonesia’s Universities [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :185 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.188022.r416421) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-185/v2#referee-response-416421 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Ariffin M. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 26 Sep 2025 | for Version 2 Muhammad Irwan Ariffin , International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 0 Views copyright © 2025 Ariffin M. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions 1. Introduction: Paragraph 4 - the authors started by highlighting the controversy on zakat on income (zakat kasb amal) but went on discussing the zakat of scholarship under fi sabilillah asnaf - these two are totally different issues. If Indonesia follows Mazhab Shafie, then there must be an explanation why and how zakat on income is accepted since it is rejected in Mazhab Shafie. 2. Section 2.1 Explain how zakat on income (zakat kasb amal) was established and practiced in Indonesia. 3. Section 2.4 - The structure of institutionalised zakat bodies in universities is not clear - are they part of the university management structure, who do they report to, how to maintain good governance? 4. There were some repetitions on the issue of zakat fi sabilillah extended to scholarship in different places throughout the article. 5. From the first round of review, I asked for some data on zakat kasb amal collection, zakat fi sabilillah disbursed in Indonesia, etc. No data available? 6. Please send the article to a proofreader. The writing style, spelling and grammar need to be improved. Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Applied Macroeconomics, Theoretical Microeconomics, Islamic Economics, Social Finance, Public Finance. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Ariffin MI. Peer Review Report For: Distributing Zakatu Kasbil 'Amal as an Alternative to Student Funding, Evidence in Indonesia’s Universities [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :185 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.188022.r416422) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-185/v2#referee-response-416422 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Ariffin M. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 25 Aug 2025 | for Version 1 Muhammad Irwan Ariffin , International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 0 Views copyright © 2025 Ariffin M. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Not Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions 1. The title does not truly reflect the content of the article - while there are discussions on the origin of zakat on income and students as fi sabilillah asnaf in INDONESIA, there is a serious lacking of link with Indonesia's universities. Some of the keywords are also not properly discussed - improving university quality, indonesian universities, and student funding. 2. If the title is to be maintained - then they must be a stronger link with Indonesian universities - for example, how many indonesian university students received or benefited from zakat under fi sabilillah, did the quality of indonesian universities improved after their students received zakat under fi sabilillah (but this is difficult to prove since the students are the one that receive zakat, not the university management), etc. 3. The use of social funds by universities' philanthropic organizations is different than zakat - since social funds can be channeled directly to university management for development and operational expenses - but zakat must be given to students. So the empirical data collected for this study seems not really aligned with the objective/title. 4. Suggest to provide data on income zakat and zakat for students in Indonesia to motivate the research. Did zakat for students increases after zakat on income has become popular due to the translation of Qaradhawi's Fiqh Zakat in Indonesia? Or, is the research actually focusing on income zakat collection from university's staff which are then channeled to their students under fi sabilillah? Is this the model that the research is trying to analyze/develop? 5. Suggest for the article to be sent for professional proofreading service to improve the language style and enforce consistency in spelling - MUI or Indonesian Ulema Council, Al Quran or Koran, Fisabilillah (capital F) or fisabilillah? Madhab or Madhhab/Mazhab? Is it correct to call Islamic State of Jordan? Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? No Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review? No If this is a Living Systematic Review, is the ‘living’ method appropriate and is the search schedule clearly defined and justified? (‘Living Systematic Review’ or a variation of this term should be included in the title.) Partly Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Applied Macroeconomics, Theoretical Microeconomics, Islamic Economics, Social Finance, Public Finance. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 27 Sep 2025 Budi Dharma, Management, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, North Sumatra, Indonesia Dear Muhammad Irwan Ariffin. with respect. We sincerely thank the reviewer for the constructive feedback. We have carefully revised the manuscript to address all comments point by point: 1. Title and Content Alignment. We decided to maintain the current title but have strengthened the manuscript to better support it. Specifically, we: Expanded discussions on how Indonesian universities integrate Zakat into student funding strategies. Added contextual data showing how Zakat on income (zakatu kasbil ‘amal) is institutionalized through UPZs, private Zakat institution, or university partnerships with BAZNAS and LAZISMU. Included examples of structured scholarship programs that operationalize the Fisabilillah category within universities. 2. Stronger Link with Indonesian Universities We have improved the connection between Zakat and higher education by: Adding national data on zakat-based scholarships. For example, BAZNAS Scholarship Institute supported 1,670 students in 2023, while LAZISMU allocated IDR 6.6 billion to fund 6,600 students in 2021. Including institutional case studies such as UNAIR’s PUSPAS, UIN Sumatera Utara to demonstrate the operational models. Clarifying universities role as proactive facilitators, by Institutionalized Zakat bodies in Universities, facilitated the Zakat collection and distribution. Clarifying that Zakat’s role is reducing financial exclusion for students. 3. Clarification of Zakat vs. Social Funds We have clarified in the discussion that zakat distribution must comply with Islamic legal principles, particularly tamalluk (direct ownership), meaning that zakat funds are allocated directly to eligible students under the Fisabilillah category rather than being used for university operational expenses. Universities act as facilitators that support zakat collection and scholarship programs, rather than as recipients of zakat themselves. here are the example of quote: “Table 4 summarizes how universities and Zakat institutions operationalize Zakat income to support student scholarships under the fisabilillah category”. 4. Data on Income Zakat and Student Funding Models To strengthen the empirical foundation, we: Added historical context on the increasing acceptance of zakat on income following Qaradawi’s Fiqh al-Zakat . Highlighted how income zakat collected from university staff is redistributed to students under the Fisabilillah category. Summarized these practices in Table 4 , showing zakat collections, distribution mechanisms, and the number of students funded. 5. Language and Terminology We have conducted thorough proofreading and ensured consistent terminology across the manuscript: “MUI” standardized into "Indonesian Ulema Council" “Al-Qur’an” used consistently “Fisabilillah” consistently capitalized and Italic We believe these revisions make the manuscript clearer, more focused, and better aligned with the title and research objectives. We are grateful for the reviewer’s comments, which have significantly strengthened the work. Warms Regards. View more View less Competing Interests The authors declare that there are no financial or non-financial competing interests related to this article. Although this research was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia (BOPTN), the funder had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. reply Respond Report a concern Ariffin MI. Peer Review Report For: Distributing Zakatu Kasbil 'Amal as an Alternative to Student Funding, Evidence in Indonesia’s Universities [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :185 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.158428.r400985) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-185/v1#referee-response-400985 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Rohim A. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 17 Jan 2025 | for Version 1 Ade Nur Rohim , Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia 0 Views copyright © 2025 Rohim A. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions This research is quite relevant to the current phenomenon of zakat distribution which has been widely implemented in various zakat institutions. However, some notes for the author to consider include: 1. The abstract does not contain a sufficient statement of the research problem, especially related to the distribution of zakat to the scholarship scheme. This has implications for the bias of the approach used, whether using a fatwa approach, or regulation, or an interpretation (tafseer) approach or indeed only limited to a review of several of these provisions. 2. There are terms in the abstract that trigger fundamental errors, such as nisab which is interpreted as "1 year", and also the number of asnaf mentioned as 9 asnaf. The use of the term "Baznas" also needs to comply with the provisions of the Zakat Law which no longer uses the term "BAZ". 3. The research results presented in the abstract are not relevant enough to the discussion. The author states the practice in "several universities" related to zakat distribution, but this is not specifically reviewed in the discussion, including its impact on the success of student studies which has not been described in depth. 4. Reviews of several previous studies related to the research topic have not been clearly stated in the introduction. The author needs to describe them to strengthen the justification of the novelty of this research, including by describing academic debates related to this research topic. 5. There needs to be a comprehensive explanation regarding the terms used, whether zakat kasbil 'amal or income zakat, by reviewing the similarities or differences, or the relationship between the two terms. 6. The author needs to review several practices of implementing zakat distribution at several universities in Indonesia in a separate subsection in the discussion section, so that it can be relevant to the title of this research which captures a portrait of zakat distribution at various universities in Indonesia. 7. There is no final conclusion to answer the research questions. Based on these notes, this study is expected to reconstruct the systematic discussion in this study to make it in line between the research title, methods and approaches used, and the findings and results of the study that answer the research questions. Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated? Partly Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? No Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Not applicable Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review? No If this is a Living Systematic Review, is the ‘living’ method appropriate and is the search schedule clearly defined and justified? (‘Living Systematic Review’ or a variation of this term should be included in the title.) Not applicable Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Islamic Economics; Zakat; Waqf I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 27 Sep 2025 Budi Dharma, Management, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, North Sumatra, Indonesia Dear Ade Nur Rohim, with respect, We thank the reviewer for the constructive and detailed feedback. We have carefully revised the manuscript to address each point and improve the overall clarity, consistency, and alignment between the title, methodology, and findings. Our responses are as follows: 1. Abstract and Research Problem Clarification We have revised the abstract to explicitly state the research problem and clarify the scope of our inquiry. The abstract now explains the funding gap in Indonesian higher education, highlights the growing use of zakat on income ( zakatu kasbil ‘amal ) for scholarships, and describes how this study investigates institutional practices and theological frameworks that enable zakat distribution for students under the Fisabilillah category. 2. Terminology Accuracy and Consistency Comment: Some terms in the abstract were inaccurate, such as interpreting nisab as “1 year,” miscounting asnaf as “9,” and inconsistent use of “Baznas.” Response: We have corrected all terminology to ensure consistency and compliance with zakat regulations: Clarified that nisab refers to the minimum wealth threshold , not duration. Confirmed there are eight asnaf categories , in line with QS. At-Taubah: 60. Standardized the use of BAZNAS (Badan Amil Zakat Nasional), aligning with the Zakat Law terminology. 3. Linking Abstract Results to the Discussion We have strengthened the discussion by explicitly integrating case-based examples from several Indonesian universities: PUSPAS UNAIR — integrates zakat and sadaqah into structured tuition support. UPZ UIN Sumatera Utara — mobilizes payroll-based zakat and distributes scholarships. We also highlight the role of the BAZNAS Scholarship Institute and LAZISMU , ensuring consistency between the abstract and the discussion. 4. Review of Related Studies and Theoretical Debates We have expanded the introduction to include key prior studies and scholarly debates on: The theological controversies around using zakat for education ( fisabilillah interpretation). Institutional innovations enabling university-based zakat management. Empirical trends showing the increasing use of zakat for student funding. This positions our research within ongoing debates and clarifies its novel contribution . 5. Clarification of Zakat Kasbil ‘Amal vs. Income Zakat We have added a clarification in the literature review, noting that zakat kasbil ‘amal is the Arabic term for zakat on income derived from professional work or salaries, while “income zakat” is its direct English equivalent. Both terms are now used interchangeably but consistently, and this clarification resolves potential ambiguity. 6. Institutional Practices of Zakat Distribution We created a distinct subsection within the discussion presenting institutional practices of zakat-based scholarships , including: UPZ mechanisms at UIN Sumatera Utara. Integrated models like PUSPAS UNAIR combining zakat, infaq, and sadaqah. National and private initiatives like the BAZNAS Scholarship Institute and LAZISMU’s Beasiswa Sang Surya . This makes the discussion directly aligned with the research title. 7. Strengthened Conclusion We have rewritten the conclusion to directly answer the research questions by: Summarizing how zakat on income has been institutionalized within Indonesian universities. Highlighting how fatwa-driven legitimacy enables broader use of the Fisabilillah category. Emphasizing universities’ evolving roles as proactive facilitators of zakat-based student funding. 8. Alignment Between Title, Methods, and Findings We have restructured the manuscript to improve the flow and alignment between the title, methodology, and findings: The methods now clearly explain how the systematic review integrates theological, regulatory, and institutional perspectives. The discussion explicitly links findings to institutional case studies. The conclusion ties back to the research objectives and answers the central questions. We believe these revisions have substantially improved the manuscript’s clarity, depth, and alignment. We thank the reviewer for the valuable insights, which have significantly strengthened our work. Warm Regards. View more View less Competing Interests The authors declare that there are no financial or non-financial competing interests related to this article. Although this research was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia (BOPTN), the funder had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. reply Respond Report a concern Rohim AN. Peer Review Report For: Distributing Zakatu Kasbil 'Amal as an Alternative to Student Funding, Evidence in Indonesia’s Universities [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2024, 13 :185 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.158428.r355629) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-185/v1#referee-response-355629 Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Adjust parameters to alter display View on desktop for interactive features Includes Interactive Elements View on desktop for interactive features Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Stay Updated Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles Register with F1000Research Already registered? Sign in Not now, thanks close PLEASE NOTE If you are an AUTHOR of this article, please check that you signed in with the account associated with this article otherwise we cannot automatically identify your role as an author and your comment will be labelled as a “User Comment”. If you are a REVIEWER of this article, please check that you have signed in with the account associated with this article and then go to your account to submit your report, please do not post your review here. If you do not have access to your original account, please contact us . All commenters must hold a formal affiliation as per our Policies . The information that you give us will be displayed next to your comment. User comments must be in English, comprehensible and relevant to the article under discussion. We reserve the right to remove any comments that we consider to be inappropriate, offensive or otherwise in breach of the User Comment Terms and Conditions . Commenters must not use a comment for personal attacks. When criticisms of the article are based on unpublished data, the data should be made available. I accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions Please confirm that you accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions. Affiliation ✕ refresh Please enter your institution. Note: To add your institution or organisation, start typing the name and then select the correct name from the list. Where applicable, the name will appear in both the original language and in English. Do not paste in the name. If the name does not appear in the drop-down list, we will display the information you have entered. ✕ refresh Country/Region * USA UK Canada China France Germany Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Federated States of Micronesia Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo (Serbia and Montenegro) Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Minor Outlying Islands of the United States Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island North Korea North Macedonia Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Is South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The Gambia The Netherlands Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu UK USA Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Wallis and Futuna West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Please select your country/region. You must enter a comment. Competing Interests Please disclose any competing interests that might be construed to influence your judgment of the article's or peer review report's validity or importance. Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Please state your competing interests The comment has been saved. An error has occurred. Please try again. Cancel Post var lTitle = "Distributing Zakatu Kasbil \'Amal as an Alternative...".replace("'", ''); var linkedInUrl = "http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/13-185/v1" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle) + "&summary=" + encodeURIComponent('Read the article by '); var deliciousUrl = "https://del.icio.us/post?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/13-185/v1&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); var redditUrl = "http://reddit.com/submit?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/13-185/v1" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); linkedInUrl += encodeURIComponent('Marliyah M et al.'); var offsetTop = /chrome/i.test( navigator.userAgent ) ? 4 : -10; var addthis_config = { ui_offset_top: offsetTop, services_compact : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_expanded : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_custom : [ { name: "LinkedIn", url: linkedInUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_linkedin.svg" }, { name: "Mendeley", url: "http://www.mendeley.com/import/?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/13-185/v1/mendeley", icon:"/img/icon/at_mendeley.svg" }, { name: "Reddit", url: redditUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_reddit.svg" }, ] }; var addthis_share = { url: "https://f1000research.com/articles/13-185", templates : { twitter : "Distributing Zakatu Kasbil \'Amal as an Alternative to Student.... Marliyah M et al., published by " + "@F1000Research" + ", https://f1000research.com/articles/13-185/v1" } }; if (typeof(addthis) != "undefined"){ addthis.addEventListener('addthis.ready', checkCount); addthis.addEventListener('addthis.menu.share', checkCount); } $(".f1r-shares-twitter").attr("href", "https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=" + addthis_share.templates.twitter); $(".f1r-shares-facebook").attr("href", "https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=" + addthis_share.url); $(".f1r-shares-linkedin").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[0].url); $(".f1r-shares-reddit").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[2].url); $(".f1r-shares-mendelay").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[1].url); function checkCount(){ setTimeout(function(){ $(".addthis_button_expanded").each(function(){ var count = $(this).text(); if (count !== "" && count != "0") $(this).removeClass("is-hidden"); else $(this).addClass("is-hidden"); }); }, 1000); } close How to cite this report {{reportCitation}} Cancel Copy Citation Details $(function(){R.ui.buttonDropdowns('.dropdown-for-downloads');}); $(function(){R.ui.toolbarDropdowns('.toolbar-dropdown-for-downloads');}); $.get("/articles/acj/144610/158428") new F1000.Clipboard(); new F1000.ThesaurusTermsDisplay("articles", "article", "158428"); $(document).ready(function() { $( "#frame1" ).on('load', function() { var mydiv = $(this).contents().find("div"); var h = mydiv.height(); console.log(h) }); var tooltipLivingFigure = jQuery(".interactive-living-figure-label .icon-more-info"), titleLivingFigure = tooltipLivingFigure.attr("title"); tooltipLivingFigure.simpletip({ fixed: true, position: ["-115", "30"], baseClass: 'small-tooltip', content:titleLivingFigure + " " }); tooltipLivingFigure.removeAttr("title"); $("body").on("click", ".cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); var ref = $(this).attr("data-ref"); $(this).closest(".living-figure-list-container").find("#" + ref).fadeIn(200); }); $("body").on("click", ".close-cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).closest(".popup-window-wrapper").fadeOut(200); }); $(document).on("mouseup", function(e) { var metricsContainer = $(".article-metrics-popover-wrapper"); if (!metricsContainer.is(e.target) && metricsContainer.has(e.target).length === 0) { $(".article-metrics-close-button").click(); } }); var articleId = $('#articleId').val(); if($("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics) { $("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics(articleId, { articleMetricsView: true }); } }); var figshareWidget = $(".new_figshare_widget"); if (figshareWidget.length > 0) { window.figshare.load("f1000", function(Widget) { // Select a tag/tags defined in your page. In this tag we will place the widget. _.map(figshareWidget, function(el){ var widget = new Widget({ articleId: $(el).attr("figshare_articleId") //height:300 // this is the height of the viewer part. [Default: 550] }); widget.initialize(); // initialize the widget widget.mount(el); // mount it in a tag that's on your page // this will save the widget on the global scope for later use from // your JS scripts. This line is optional. //window.widget = widget; }); }); } close Error Close Add Reset F1000.MICROSERVICES.AFFILIATION = ''; $(document).ready(function () { $('.js-affiliations-form').each((index, form) => { new AffiliationForm({ formId: form.id, institutionErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-institution', departmentErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-department', placeSelector: '.js-add-comment-place', stateSelector: '.js-add-comment-state', zipCodeSelector: '.js-add-comment-zipcode', countrySelector: '.js-add-comment-country', countryErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-country', }); }); }); $(document).ready(function () { var reportIds = { "270596": 0, "270597": 0, "270598": 0, "270599": 0, "287232": 0, "270593": 0, "287233": 0, "270594": 0, "287234": 0, "270595": 0, "287235": 0, "270600": 0, "270601": 0, "270602": 0, "256027": 0, "256026": 0, "308255": 0, "256031": 0, "256030": 0, "256029": 0, "256028": 0, "256035": 0, "355621": 0, "256034": 0, "256033": 0, "266278": 0, "355623": 0, "256032": 0, "266279": 0, "355622": 0, "355629": 22, "355628": 0, "355630": 0, "266280": 0, "355625": 0, "266281": 0, "355624": 0, "266282": 0, "355627": 0, "266283": 0, "355626": 0, "400982": 0, "400983": 0, "400981": 0, "400990": 0, "400988": 0, "400989": 0, "400986": 0, "400987": 0, "400984": 0, "400985": 28, "424806": 0, "424807": 0, "424804": 0, "424805": 0, "422254": 0, "422255": 0, "424812": 0, "422252": 0, "424813": 0, "422253": 0, "424810": 0, "422250": 0, "424811": 0, "422251": 0, "424808": 0, "424809": 0, "422258": 0, "422259": 0, "422256": 0, "422257": 0, "418974": 4, "418975": 0, "418972": 0, "418973": 0, "416422": 5, "418980": 0, "418981": 0, "416421": 7, "418978": 0, "418979": 0, "418976": 0, "418977": 0, "266934": 0, "301028": 0, "301029": 0, "301030": 0, "301031": 0, "301026": 0, "301027": 0, "301032": 0, "301033": 0, "301034": 0, "301035": 0, "287228": 0, "287229": 0, "287230": 0, "287231": 0, "287226": 0, "287227": 0, }; $(".referee-response-container,.js-referee-report").each(function(index, el) { var reportId = $(el).attr("data-reportid"), reportCount = reportIds[reportId] || 0; $(el).find(".comments-count-container,.js-referee-report-views").html(reportCount); }); var uuidInput = $("#article_uuid"), oldUUId = uuidInput.val(), newUUId = "820c782d-9541-4eae-b90a-aa11c2f1eedf"; uuidInput.val(newUUId); $("a[href*='article_uuid=']").each(function(index, el) { var newHref = $(el).attr("href").replace(oldUUId, newUUId); $(el).attr("href", newHref); }); }); An innovative open access publishing platform offering rapid publication and open peer review, whilst supporting data deposition and sharing. Browse Gateways Collections How it Works Contact For Developers Cookie Notice Privacy Notice RSS Submit Your Research Follow us © 2012-2026 F1000 Research Ltd. ISSN 2046-1402 | Legal | Partner of Research4Life • CrossRef • ORCID • FAIRSharing R.templateTests.simpleTemplate = R.template(' $text $text $text $text $text '); R.templateTests.runTests(); var F1000platform = new F1000.Platform({ name: "f1000research", displayName: "F1000Research", hostName: "f1000research.com", id: "1", editorialEmail: "[email protected]", infoEmail: "[email protected]", usePmcStats: true }); $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-authors, .dropdown-for-about, .dropdown-for-myresearch');}); // $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-referees');}); $(document).ready(function () { if ($(".cookie-warning").is(":visible")) { $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "35px"); $(".devices").addClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); } $(".cookie-warning .close-button").click(function (e) { $(".devices").removeClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "0"); }); $("#tweeter-feed .tweet-message").each(function (i, message) { var self = $(message); self.html(linkify(self.html())); }); $(".partner").on("mouseenter mouseleave", function() { $(this).find(".gray-scale, .colour").toggleClass("is-hidden"); }); }); Sign In Remember me Forgotten your password? Sign In Cancel Email or password not correct. Please try again Please wait... $(function(){ // Note: All the setup needs to run against a name attribute and *not* the id due the clonish // nature of facebox... $("a[id=googleSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("GOOGLE"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=facebookSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("FACEBOOK"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=orcidSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("ORCID"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); }); If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password. The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000. Email address not valid, please try again You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here . You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here . Code not correct, please try again Reset password Cancel Email us for further assistance. Server error, please try again. If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password. If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance. Please wait... Register $(document).ready(function () { signIn.createSignInAsRow($("#sign-in-form-gfb-popup")); $(".target-field").each(function () { var uris = $(this).val().split("/"); if (uris.pop() === "login") { $(this).val(uris.toString().replace(",","/")); } }); });