Progress and World Happiness Rate: The impact of human rights in the estimation model

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract In the latter half of the last century, the study of national welfare has increasingly become more important for government policy, relying on GDP as a single metric of a country’s development. However, it is now recognized that traditional indicators such as GDP do not capture the entire spectrum of well-being in a population. To address this limitation, the World Happiness Report (WHR), annually released by the United Nations since 2012, aims to offer a multidimensional analysis of happiness in 150 countries, based on six explanatory variables. The purpose of this study is to critically evaluate the limits of the WHR model. Even though statistical models often require the relaxation of theoretical assumptions, here the objective is to test the robustness of the WHR regression and, where possible, explore possible improvements to maximize its accuracy and explanatory power. Initially, the problems of multicollinearity and heteroscedasticity were resolved by excluding two regressors from the initial model. This led to a reduced model with a modest improvement in the explanatory variable of the original model. In response to some of the most urgent challenges facing society today, this analysis aims to assess the influence of additional factors, which are not currently considered in the World Happiness Report (WHR), on overall happiness: ed- ucation, human rights, and the internal gap of happiness. Of these, human rights are identified as the strongest statistical predictors of happiness and enhance the fitness of the model without compromising reliability. These findings support the influence of civil liberties on well-being and suggest that including socio-political variables can provide policymakers with a more reliable tool to monitor and nurture sustainable development.
Full text 11,124 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Progress and World Happiness Rate: The impact of human rights in the estimation model | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Progress and World Happiness Rate: The impact of human rights in the estimation model Ludovica Pietrangelo This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7733858/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract In the latter half of the last century, the study of national welfare has increasingly become more important for government policy, relying on GDP as a single metric of a country’s development. However, it is now recognized that traditional indicators such as GDP do not capture the entire spectrum of well-being in a population. To address this limitation, the World Happiness Report (WHR), annually released by the United Nations since 2012, aims to offer a multidimensional analysis of happiness in 150 countries, based on six explanatory variables. The purpose of this study is to critically evaluate the limits of the WHR model. Even though statistical models often require the relaxation of theoretical assumptions, here the objective is to test the robustness of the WHR regression and, where possible, explore possible improvements to maximize its accuracy and explanatory power. Initially, the problems of multicollinearity and heteroscedasticity were resolved by excluding two regressors from the initial model. This led to a reduced model with a modest improvement in the explanatory variable of the original model. In response to some of the most urgent challenges facing society today, this analysis aims to assess the influence of additional factors, which are not currently considered in the World Happiness Report (WHR), on overall happiness: ed- ucation, human rights, and the internal gap of happiness. Of these, human rights are identified as the strongest statistical predictors of happiness and enhance the fitness of the model without compromising reliability. These findings support the influence of civil liberties on well-being and suggest that including socio-political variables can provide policymakers with a more reliable tool to monitor and nurture sustainable development. Development Economics Full Text Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7733858","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":521735125,"identity":"f0cab8f1-1ae6-45a5-89c3-8b2c1d863471","order_by":0,"name":"Ludovica Pietrangelo","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7796-2453","institution":"Luiss Guido Carli University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ludovica","middleName":"","lastName":"Pietrangelo","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-09-28 10:58:01","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7733858/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7733858/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":92456682,"identity":"97041d1f-95a4-49f6-b4a4-5ceba88b1407","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-30 02:26:52","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":324071,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Article.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7733858/v1_covered_0c72ed32-5f37-4b3c-930c-0139f221a5ae.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eProgress and World Happiness Rate: The impact of human rights in the estimation model\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"Luiss Guido Carli University","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7733858/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7733858/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eIn the latter half of the last century, the study of national welfare has increasingly become more important for government policy, relying on GDP as a single metric of a country’s development. However, it is now recognized that traditional indicators such as GDP do not capture the entire spectrum of well-being in a population. To address this limitation, the World Happiness Report (WHR), annually released by the United Nations since 2012, aims to offer a multidimensional analysis of happiness in 150 countries, based on six explanatory variables. The purpose of this study is to critically evaluate the limits of the WHR model. Even though statistical models often require the relaxation of theoretical assumptions, here the objective is to test the robustness of the WHR regression and, where possible, explore possible improvements to maximize its accuracy and explanatory power. Initially, the problems of multicollinearity and heteroscedasticity were resolved by excluding two regressors from the initial model. This led to a reduced model with a modest improvement in the explanatory variable of the original model. In response to some of the most urgent challenges facing society today, this analysis aims to assess the influence of additional factors, which are not currently considered in the World Happiness Report (WHR), on overall happiness: ed- ucation, human rights, and the internal gap of happiness. Of these, human rights are identified as the strongest statistical predictors of happiness and enhance the fitness of the model without compromising reliability. These findings support the influence of civil liberties on well-being and suggest that including socio-political variables can provide policymakers with a more reliable tool to monitor and nurture sustainable development.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Progress and World Happiness Rate: The impact of human rights in the estimation model","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-09-30 02:18:45","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7733858/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"1b3299cf-e828-44cb-86a6-9faf3a9bb31e","owner":[],"postedDate":"September 30th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":55453732,"name":"Development Economics"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-01-16T14:37:50+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-09-30 02:18:45","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7733858","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7733858","identity":"rs-7733858","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0