Analysis of movement recursions to detect reproductive events and estimate their fate in central place foragers
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Recursive movement patterns have been used to detect behavioral structure within individual movement trajectories in the context of foraging ecology, home-ranging behavior, and predator avoidance. Some animals exhibit movement recursions to locations that are tied to reproductive functions, including nests and dens; while existing literature recognizes that, no method is currently available to explicitly target different types of revisited locations. Moreover, the temporal persistence of recursive movements to a breeding location can carry information regarding the fate of breeding attempts, but it has never been used as a metric to quantify recursive movement patterns. Here, we introduce a method to locate breeding attempts and estimate their fate from GPS-tracking data of central place foragers. We tested the performance of our method in three bird species differing in breeding ecology (wood stork ( Mycteria americana) , lesser kestrel ( Falco naumanni ), Mediterranean gull ( Ichthyaetus melanocephalus )) and implemented it in the R package ‘nestR’. We identified breeding sites based on the analysis of recursive movements within individual tracks. Using trajectories with known breeding attempts, we estimated a set of species-specific criteria for the identification of nest sites, which we further validated using non-reproductive individuals as controls. We then estimated individual nest survival as a binary measure of reproductive fate (success, corresponding to fledging of at least one chick, or failure) from nest-site revisitation histories during breeding attempts, using a Bayesian hierarchical modeling approach that accounted for temporally variable revisitation patterns, probability of visit detection, and missing data. Across the three species, positive predictive value of the nest-site detection algorithm varied between 87-100% and sensitivity between 88-92%, and we correctly estimated the fate of 86-100% breeding attempts. By providing a method to formally distinguish among revisited locations that serve different ecological functions and introducing a probabilistic framework to quantify temporal persistence of movement recursions, we demonstrated how the analysis of recursive movement patterns can be applied to estimate reproduction in central place foragers. Beyond avian species, the principles of our method can be applied to other central place foraging breeders such as denning mammals. Our method estimates a component of individual fitness from movement data and will help bridge the gap between movement behavior, environmental factors, and their fitness consequences.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
References (58)
- Effect of Foraging and Nest Defense tradeoffs on the Reproductive Success of Wood Storks (<i>Mycteria americana</i>) via crossref
- doi:10.2307/1937718 via crossref
- doi:10.1890/08-1532.1 via crossref
- doi:10.1890/08-0162.1 via crossref
- doi:10.3354/esr00278 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.12.015 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/beheco/8.5.560 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192204 via crossref
- doi:10.1675/1524-4695(2008)31[42:apmows]2.0.co;2 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/ecog.03618 via crossref
- doi:10.1017/cbo9781107415324.004 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00584.x via crossref
- doi:10.1080/00063659609461009 via crossref
- doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0107 via crossref
- doi:10.5735/086.048.0406 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29933-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.1985.tb04841.x via crossref
- doi:10.2173/bna.409 via crossref
- doi:10.2307/177409 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/ece3.785 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/czoolo/60.4.551 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.10.013 via crossref
- doi:10.2307/1521450 via crossref
- doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0084 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/beheco/10.6.714 via crossref
- doi:10.1890/07-0786.1 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12379 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/00063657.2017.1314449 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/s40462-017-0100-6 via crossref
- doi:10.2307/4357 via crossref
- doi:10.2307/2937171 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/beheco/2.4.309 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/00063659709461038 via crossref
- doi:10.1890/03-0269 via crossref
- doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0082 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16291.x via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.0800375105 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/19475683.2014.992366 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.004 via crossref
- doi:10.3955/046.085.0304 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12261 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.10.026 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/beheco/arw154 via crossref
- doi:10.2307/1521253 via crossref
- doi:10.1675/1524-4695(2006)29[308:nfapoa]2.0.co;2 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12134 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01249.x via crossref
- doi:10.1098/rsbl.2014.0379 via crossref
- doi:10.1650/0010-5422(2003)105[0348:uvtmpa]2.0.co;2 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/oso/9780195106084.003.0001 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/0169-5347(96)10030-6 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1600-048x.2010.05006.x via crossref
- doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12394 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s003000000175 via crossref
- doi:10.2307/1942477 via crossref
- doi:10.1890/14-1401.1 via crossref
- doi:10.1163/156853994x00640 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1557-9263.2009.00243.x via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-07-17T06:50:16.227088+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-07-27T06:55:32.580041+00:00