Association Between Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition and In-Hospital Outcomes in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated with Coronary Thrombus Aspiration: Findings from the CCC-ACS Project
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
Abstract Purpose: Thrombus aspiration in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with high thrombus burden did not improve clinical outcomes. The clinical efficacy of bailout use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs) in this clinical scenario remains unknown. Methods: We assessed associations between GPI use and in-hospital major bleeds, ischemic events, and mortality among STEMI patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and thrombus aspiration in a nationwide acute coronary syndrome registry (the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome project). Results: A total of 5,896 STEMI patients who received thrombus aspiration were identified, among which 56.3% received GPI therapy. In a 1-to-1 propensity-score-matched cohort, compared with STEMI patients not treated with GPI, GPI use was associated with a 69% increase in major in-hospital bleeds, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.69, a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.08 to 2.65, and a nonsignificant reduction in ischemic events (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.36 to 1.06), as well as a neutral effect on mortality (OR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.55 to 1.58). However, among patients aged < 65 years, GPI use was associated with a reduction in ischemic events (OR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.77), and no significant increase in major bleeds (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 0.67 to 2.25) was observed. Conclusion: In a nationwide registry, routine use of GPI following thrombus aspiration was not associated with reduced in-hospital ischemic events and mortality, but at the cost of increased major bleeding. However, for patients aged < 65 years, there may be a potential net benefit.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (27)
- doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs411 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.005 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.07.040 via crossref
- doi:10.1161/circulationaha.116.025371 via crossref
- doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2019.10.003 via crossref
- doi:10.4070/kcj.2021.0043 via crossref
- doi:10.6515/acs.202007_36(4).20200619a via crossref
- doi:10.1253/circj.cj-19-0133 via crossref
- doi:10.1055/s-0040-1718729 via crossref
- doi:10.1155/2018/5174714 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.02.022 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2016.06.005 via crossref
- doi:10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.022 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.047 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht513 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2013.02.010 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fcvm.2021.710994 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2016.38 via crossref
- doi:10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2015.02.003 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.11.114 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/0003319718808911 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30770-5 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.076 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.12.009 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv304 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-07-15T06:44:42.063605+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0