How to Become An Excellent Cardiovascular Scholar & Researcher?
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
This article briefly discusses what should be encouraged for the scientific ability of scholars and researchers (S&R) and what should be focused in scientific evaluation. It is believed that several core competencies that should be encouraged include learning, research, scientific writing, innovation and translational application. Scientific evaluation should focus on several “hard indicators”: academic leadership, independence, guidance, diversity, cooperation and innovation. As to how to become an excellent cardiovascular S&R, one should improve scientific abilities, which include innovation and publishing academic papers in one of “345” (Cell, Nature or Nature Medicine, and Science; BMJ, JAMA, NEJM, and The Lancet; Circulation, Circulation Research, European Heart Journal, JACC, and Nature Review Cardiology) international top journals as the first, single, or independent author. And it is time to develop a new scoring system based on these indicators for better and more reasonably evaluating one’s scientific performance.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-07-09T06:39:28.105016+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-07-20T07:01:09.845843+00:00