Deep learning models of cognitive processes constrained by human brain connectomes
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
Abstract
Decoding cognitive processes from recordings of brain activity has been an active topic in neuroscience research for decades. Traditional decoding studies focused on pattern classification in specific regions of interest and averaging brain activity over many trials. Recently, brain decoding with graph neural networks has been shown to scale at fine temporal resolution and on the full brain, achieving state-of-the-art performance on the human connectome project benchmark. The reason behind this success is likely the strong inductive connectome prior that enables the integration of distributed patterns of brain activity. Yet, the nature of such inductive bias is still poorly understood. In this work, we investigate the impact of the inclusion of multiple path lengths (through high-order graph convolution), the homogeneity of brain parcels (graph nodes), and the type of interactions (graph edges). We evaluate the decoding models on a large population of 1200 participants, under 21 different experimental conditions, acquired from the Human Connectome Project database. Our findings reveal that the optimal choice for large-scale cognitive decoding is to propagate neural dynamics within empirical functional connectomes and integrate brain dynamics using high-order graph convolutions. In this setting, the model exhibits high decoding accuracy and robustness against adversarial attacks on the graph architecture, including randomization in functional connectomes and lesions in targeted brain regions and networks. The trained model relies on biologically meaningful features for the prediction of cognitive states and generates task-specific graph representations resembling task-evoked activation maps. These results demonstrate that a full-brain integrative model is critical for the large-scale brain decoding. Our study establishes principles of how to effectively leverage human connectome constraints in deep graph neural networks, providing new avenues to study the neural substrates of human cognition at scale.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (4)
- BAI-Net: Individualized Anatomical Cerebral Cartography using Graph Neural Network 2021
- A whole-cortex probabilistic diffusion tractography connectome 2020
- Brain-Score: Which Artificial Neural Network for Object Recognition is most Brain-Like? 2018
- Activity flow over resting-state networks shapes cognitive task activations 2016
References (56)
- Activity flow over resting-state networks shapes cognitive task activations via crossref
- A whole-cortex probabilistic diffusion tractography connectome via crossref
- BAI-Net: Individualized Anatomical Cerebral Cartography using Graph Neural Network via crossref
- Brain-Score: Which Artificial Neural Network for Object Recognition is most Brain-Like? via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-040510-143934 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0184-12.2012 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.12.007 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.030 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/hbm.21333 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/sdata.2018.105 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.020 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/cercor/bhw157 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nature18933 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.005 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nature07832 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.016 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062012-170325 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.1063736 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/sciadv.abf2513 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/hbm.20579 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.014 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.005 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116059 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.03.018 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1608282113 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.007 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.1152876 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/brain/aws186 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.031 via crossref
- doi:10.1109/jproc.2018.2820126 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.001 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02460.x via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002707 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41583-021-00473-5 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.016 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1912226117 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx179 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv013 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11263-019-01228-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr099 via crossref
- doi:10.31887/dcns.2018.20.2/osporns via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fncom.2011.00005 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s42256-021-00376-1 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.aad8127 via crossref
- doi:10.12688/mniopenres.12767.2 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15705-9_25 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006565 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/hbm.24891 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.38844 via crossref
- doi:10.1152/jn.00338.2011 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117847 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000408 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1003109107 via crossref
- doi:10.1097/wco.0b013e32832d93dd via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.024 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nrn2575 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-07-09T06:39:24.268718+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0