Transcriptional responses and secondary metabolites variation of tomato plant in response to tobacco mosaic virus infestation
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
Abstract The present study focused on the impact of infection with the tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) Specifically, changes in phytochemicals and gene activity related to pathogenesis-related and the phenylpropanoid pathway genes in tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.) during a period of 2-to-14-day post inoculation (dpi). According to TEM investigation and coat protein sequence analysis, the purified TMV Egyptian AM isolate (PP133743) has a rod-shaped structure with a diameter of around 110 nm. The RT-qPCR analysis revealed that PR-1 showed an initial increase after TMV infection, as seen in the time-course analysis. In contrast, PR-2 was consistently elevated throughout the infection, suggesting a stronger reaction to the virus and suppressing PAL expression at 6 to 14 dpi. The expression levels of HQT and CHS transcripts exhibited alternating patterns of upregulation and downregulation at different time intervals. The HPLC and GC-MS analysis of control and TMV-infected tomato extracts revealed that different phenolic, flavonoid, and fatty acid compounds could be increased (such as naringenin, rutin, flavone, ferulic acid, and pyrogallol) or decreased (such as salicylic acid and chlorogenic acid) after TMV infection. The ability of TMV to inhibit most polyphenolic compounds could potentially accelerate the viral life cycle. Consequently, working to increase such suppressed compounds in tomato plants could be important for developing the management of plant viral infections.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
References (42)
- doi:10.1038/35081178 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/35081161 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2022.04.003 via crossref
- doi:10.5504/bbeq.2013.0068 via crossref
- doi:10.3390/v14081830 via crossref
- doi:10.2307/4450516 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0271-5317(03)00105-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2007.04.008 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/13102818.2019.1673207 via crossref
- doi:10.22271/phyto.2024.v13.i1a.14811 via crossref
- doi:10.1046/j.1364-3703.2002.00131.x via crossref
- doi:10.3390/antiox13020164 via crossref
- doi:10.3390/jof9020167 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143425 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.050908.135202 via crossref
- doi:10.3390/ijpb14020035 via crossref
- doi:10.1094/mpmi-19-1207 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/ps.5193 via crossref
- doi:10.1046/j.1364-3703.2002.00126.x via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.micron.2010.11.001 via crossref
- doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00658.x via crossref
- doi:10.3390/ijms19030862 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11816-013-0300-5 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1365-3059.2008.01866.x via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41598-020-72676-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.07.008 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nbt966 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/plb.12947 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.btre.2014.09.002 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.0c07579 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/0042-6822(60)90163-x via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01189.x via crossref
- doi:10.4238/2013.april.26.3 via crossref
- doi:10.32604/phyton.2020.010597 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103828 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1471-2229-10-187 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.gene.2020.144451 via crossref
- doi:10.1099/0022-1317-34-3-475 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0166-0934(02)00135-0 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/molbev/msab120 via crossref
- doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262 via crossref
- doi:10.3390/app11094239 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-07-07T06:37:27.215773+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0