Comprehensive Codon Usage Analysis Across Diverse Plant Lineages
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-ND-4.0
Abstract
The variation of codon usage patterns in response to the evolution of organisms is an intriguing question to answer. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relevance of the evolutionary events of vascularization and seed production with the codon usage patterns in different plant lineages. We found that the optimal codons of non-vascular lineages generally end with GC, whereas those of the vascular lineages end with AU. Correspondence analysis and model-based clustering showed that the evolution of the codon usage pattern follows the evolutionary event of the vascularization more precisely than that of the seed production. The dinucleotides CpG and TpA were under-represented in all the lineages, whereas the dinucleotide TpG was found over-represented in all the lineages, except algae. Evolutionary-related lineages showed similar codon pair bias (CPB). The dinucleotide CpA showed a similar representation as those of its parent codon pairs. Although natural selection predominates over mutational pressure in determining the codon usage bias (CUB), the relative influence of mutational pressure is higher in the non-vascular lineages than in the vascular lineages.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (73)
- doi:10.1093/dnares/dss039 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00400-9 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/genetics/139.2.1067 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/genetics/146.1.295 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.1203810 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2012.00242.x via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1365-583.2009.00933.x via crossref
- doi:10.1007/bf02101150 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/genetics/129.3.897 via crossref
- doi:10.1104/pp.92.1.1 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/dnares/dsv027 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fgene.2012.00055 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.gene.2016.11.023 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.gene.2017.08.003 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nrg2526 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0378-1119(00)00521-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/s12862-021-01792-y via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.1155761 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/24701394.2018.1472772 via crossref
- doi:10.1128/jvi.02381-16 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2015.08.033 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1471-2148-14-82 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1471-2164-14-732 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/nar/21.23.5294 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040153 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nbt.1883 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/s12864-018-4937-x via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41598-018-35760-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/srep35927 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091442 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/bf00178247 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1596-z via crossref
- doi:10.1128/jvi.00601-10 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(00)89076-9 via crossref
- doi:10.1128/jvi.68.5.2889-2897.1994 via crossref
- doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0528 via crossref
- doi:10.1266/ggs.78.343 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/ece3.1249 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.gene.2005.04.001 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.011 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/bf02715890 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/bf02715890 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.1118884 via crossref
- doi:10.1139/gen-2019-0165 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/genetics/157.1.245 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057122 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/dnares/7.3.223 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.0404957101 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022855 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.94.15.7784 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00239-003-0030-3 via crossref
- doi:10.4137/ebo.s22566 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1471-2164-14-56 via crossref
- doi:10.1101/gr.2896904 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1471-2148-14-23 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0097497 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1502864112 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040525 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1756-0500-5-50 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s12042-016-9165-4 via crossref
- doi:10.1534/genetics.107.086405 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.85.8.2653 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/gbe/evx098 via crossref
- doi:10.4172/jpb.1000e32 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-12-r134 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1744-7909.2011.01033.x via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194372 via crossref
- doi:10.3390/genes6041125 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131508 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/s12864-016-3021-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.2106555118 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11262-007-0159-z via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-07-07T06:37:25.573703+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-ND-4.0