Posttraumatic reexperiencing and alcohol use: mediofrontal theta as a neural mechanism for negative reinforcement
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
Objective Over half of US military veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) use alcohol heavily, potentially to cope with their symptoms. This study investigated the neural underpinnings of PTSD symptoms and heavy drinking in veterans. We focused on brain responses to salient outcomes within predictive coding theory. This framework suggests the brain generates prediction errors (PEs) when outcomes deviate from expectations. Alcohol use might provide negative reinforcement by reducing the salience of negatively-valenced PEs and dampening experiences like loss. Methods We analyzed electroencephalography (EEG) responses to unpredictable gain/loss feedback in veterans of Operations Enduring and Iraqi Freedom. We used time-frequency principal components analysis of event-related potentials to isolate neural responses indicative of PEs, identifying mediofrontal theta linked to losses (feedback-related negativity, FRN) and central delta associated with gains (reward positivity, RewP). Results Intrusive reexperiencing symptoms of PTSD were associated with intensified mediofrontal theta signaling during losses, suggesting heightened negative PE sensitivity. Conversely, increased hazardous alcohol use was associated with reduced theta responses, implying a dampening of these negative PEs. The separate delta-RewP component showed associations with alcohol use but not PTSD symptoms. Conclusions Findingss: uggest a common neural component of PTSD and hazardous alcohol use involving altered PE processing. We suggest that reexperiencing enhances the intensity of salient negative PEs, while chronic alcohol use may reduce their intensity, thereby providing negative reinforcement by muting emotional disruption from reexperienced trauma. Modifying the mediofrontal theta response could address the intertwined nature of PTSD symptoms and alcohol use, providing new avenues for treatment.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (74)
- doi:10.1111/tops.12307 via crossref
- doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0306-x via crossref
- doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01 via crossref
- doi:10.1097/00041444-199524000-00001 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/acer.14641 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/a0022124 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2005.01.019 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/bf02105408 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00347.x via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101114 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.280.5364.747 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.007 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2014.04.003 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2022.08.015 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102142 via crossref
- doi:10.7551/mitpress/9609.001.0001 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/hbm.22685 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/da.22353 via crossref
- doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0300 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.02.003 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.1066893 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00876.x via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nrn3119 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/psyp.13953 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/psyp.12976 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nn.3204 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0167-8760(03)00052-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.03.023 via crossref
- doi:10.1109/78.124950 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41398-023-02388-4 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.11.019 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/psyp.14052 via crossref
- doi:10.18637/jss.v075.i06 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.conb.2013.03.011 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/0021-843x.114.4.537 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.04.014 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.04.002 via crossref
- doi:10.21105/joss.03139 via crossref
- doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3084 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00164 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/21677026211025018 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/abn0000552 via crossref
- doi:10.3109/02699052.2011.558040 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00169-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/0021-843x.116.2.329 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.02.061 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00376.x via crossref
- doi:10.1111/jopy.12119 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0741-8329(98)00047-0 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/jts.22199 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/15427609.2021.1964898 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/psyp.12370 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104704 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nrn2357 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00452 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/bul0000006 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.032 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.10.001 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.11.027 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5587-06.2007 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nrn2994 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.007 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/0021-843x.111.4.637 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00213-021-05935-3 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5695-12.2013 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/da.1029 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106777 via crossref
- doi:10.4088/jcp.14m09328 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2018.08.039 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/a0020981 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.048 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.014 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-07-04T06:30:21.850019+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0