Critical Limb Ischemia Induces Remodeling of Skeletal Muscle Motor Unit and Myonuclear- and Mitochondrial-Domains
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Critical limb ischemia, the most severe form of peripheral artery disease, leads to extensive damage and alterations in skeletal muscle homeostasis. Although recent developments towards revascularization therapies have been introduced, there has been limited research into treatments for ischemic myopathy. To elucidate the regenerative mechanism of the muscle stem cell and its niche components in response to ischemic insults, we explored interactions between the vasculature, motor neuron, muscle fiber, and the muscle stem cell. We first investigated changes in the neuromuscular junction and motor neuron innervation following a surgical hindlimb ischemia model of critical limb ischemia in mice. Along with previous findings that support remodeling of the neuromuscular junction, we report that ischemic injury also causes significant alterations to the myofiber through a muscle stem cell-mediated increase of myonuclei number per fiber, a concomitant decrease in myonuclear domain size, and an increase in relative mitochondrial content per myonucleus. These results indicate that as a regenerative response to critical limb ischemia, myofibers exhibit myonuclear expansion to allow enhanced transcriptional support and an increase in mitochondrial content for bioenergetic need of the energy-demanding tissue regeneration.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
References (48)
- Muscle Stem Cell Niche Dysregulation in Volumetric Muscle Loss Injury via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nm.1985 via crossref
- doi:10.1152/physrev.00019.2003 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/1535370213503275 via crossref
- doi:10.1152/physrev.00043.2011 via crossref
- doi:10.1152/physiol.00026.2015 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/cdd.2015.171 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00287-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029082 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/gerona/50a.special_issue.91 via crossref
- doi:10.1101/gad.1305405 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.021 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/mt.2014.76 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.02.006 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/ar.1091900212 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.09221 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00084-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2015.09.027 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/dvg.22050 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/dvg.20794 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2015.07.002 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147198 via crossref
- doi:10.1152/physrev.00033.2014 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/jmor.1052210207 via crossref
- doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006395 via crossref
- doi:10.1096/fj.09-146308 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.01.009 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.04.003 via crossref
- doi:10.1074/jbc.m405958200 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11010-012-1470-0 via crossref
- doi:10.1161/01.atv.0000202677.55012.a0 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.01.032 via crossref
- doi:10.1242/dev.053348 via crossref
- doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01277.2005 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fphys.2017.00052 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s004210050553 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00602-5 via crossref
- doi:10.1006/bbrc.1999.0580 via crossref
- doi:10.1042/bj20111451 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.redox.2014.02.006 via crossref
- doi:10.1074/jbc.m407715200 via crossref
- doi:10.1074/jbc.m702511200 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.08.083 via crossref
- doi:10.1096/fj.201600757r via crossref
- doi:10.1096/fj.14-249813 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199910)22:10<1350::aid-mus3>3.0.co;2-8 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(96)00381-4 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nature03260 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-06-30T06:26:24.461199+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-08-07T06:39:35.550527+00:00